Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / February 2006
Hello and God Bless you all
|
|
Thread rating:  |
dave481 - 17 Feb 2006 19:08 GMT I finally got a biopsy and ultrasound yesterday. The Dr, took 14 samples. He's sending them to San Antonio, Tx. My psa was down to a 32.6. The prostate didn't appear as tender as it was two weeks ago. Psa then was 39.8. He also ran an ultra sound over my bladder. I can barely pee and it had gotten worse inspite of 14 days of Levaquin and Flomax. I get a bladder biopsy in 10 days. After that comes back they are gonna take out tumor in colon, and take necessary action with prostate and bladder at same time, if there is evidence of malignacy in biopsies. Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption?
I wanted to thank, again, everyones time and info here. I am much more informed, and not as scared. God Bless You David
c palmer - 17 Feb 2006 19:45 GMT From: daave481@yahoo.com (dave481)
My psa was down to a 32.6. The prostate didn't appear as tender as it was two weeks ago. Psa then was 39.8.
Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption?
David ============
hi david - it's a good sign that your psa took a big drop.
but in response to your question about it being infection instead of cancer, i would have to say, wait and see what the biopsy says.
the explanation that i will offer is that there is no doubt account for some of the high psa rise and tenderness of the prostate is due to the infection.
but i will add to this that while my psa was only 6.35, by comparison, i had reduced urine flow, the prostate had pushed into the floor of my bladder and i had BPH, so when i had the biopsy done, i was fairly sure that the rise in psa above the 4.0 cutoff was due to the BPH condition. plus my prostate was full of prostate stones. i had explained it all away logically.
then, when i got told that both lobes had prostate cancer, it was a surprise. my logic didn't work...... i had prostate cancer and i was going to have to deal with it.
i really want to say that the biopsy won't reveal anything, but instead, i'll say, hope for the best, prepare for the worst. this way, it will keep you on level ground in case the results aren't what you were expecting.
all the best,
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Steve Jordan - 17 Feb 2006 20:25 GMT On February 17, David wrote:
> I finally got a biopsy and ultrasound yesterday. The Dr, took 14 > samples. He's sending them to San Antonio, Tx. Every PCa specialist medic I've read or heard of strongly recommends having the specimens sent to a specialist laboratory for a second opinion on the Gleason grades and score (x+y=z).
I believe that this is absolutely vital, since everything that is done from here on will be controlled by the Gleason score. Its accuracy cannot be guaranteed unless a specialist has examined and reported on the specimens. This second opinion is, I understand, covered by insurance and Medicare. Even if it were not, the ~$350 cost is well worth the peace of mind of knowing the facts.
There are various labs: Bostwick, Oppenheimer, Uro-Cor. Google prostate pathology laboratories.
My second opinion on my second biopsy (don't ask) was done by Bostwick and reported important facts not even mentioned in the local lab's report.
(snip)
> Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it > probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption? > I must confess that due to the relatively high PSA I doubt that the assumption is correct. Wasn't a Cipro regimen used before the biopsy? If so, it should have killed off any infection.
But wait for the path reports....
Regards,
Steve J
"The thing is to expect nothing in particular, but be aware of the lack of enforceable guarantees or enforceable contracts with nature/god/entropy as to the condition or durability of our bodies." -- Brian Brunner, PCa survivor, December 12, 2005 on The Prostate Problems Mailing List Thank you, Brian.
dave481 - 17 Feb 2006 22:15 GMT Once again I pick up valid and important information here. Gained through hard experience and generously and promptly shared. I will keep vigil and arrange for the second tests. Thanks again guys. I truly believe God keeps special stars for your crowns. Awarded for caring efforts. God Bless David
juniper - 18 Feb 2006 00:25 GMT > 32.6. The prostate didn't appear as tender as it was two weeks ago. nice.
> Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it > probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption? Well, my experience w/PCa has been a roller coaster of emotion. There's no way to not hope for good news. So true, you won't know what the biopsy shows until you get it back. Still, I found this and it was the only thing that showed what amount of effect on PSA. Apparently it is technically possible that your PSA is due to prostatitis. It's just that you would be in the minority (3%) with a PSA > 20 that wasn't cancer. I hope you are. You have enough to deal with anyway. Seems like you're getting lots of good medical help quickly. Good job on that.
http://www.cancer.prostate-help.org/capsaif.htm
Condition Manipulation Increase Effect on PSA Level Persists Up To
Acute bacterial prostatitis 5-7 fold 6 weeks Acute urinary retention 5-7 fold 6 weeks Digital Rectal Exam (DRE) Variable 3 days Exercise - bicycle 0-3 fold 1 week Prostate biopsy Very Variable 6 weeks Prostate massage Variable 6 weeks Ejaculation Variable 3 days TURP Very Variable 6 weeks
Best wishes!
Steve Kramer - 18 Feb 2006 11:55 GMT > Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it > probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption? It is certainly something to hang your hat on, as they say. But, with all that is, or possibly is, going on in your colon, bladder and prostate region, I suspect wild variations of PSA are possible regardless of your diagnosis.
However, cancer without Cipro or something, usually does not produce significant drops in PSA. And 7 points is significant.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05 PSA .07 .05 .06 .05 .08 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
juniper - 25 Feb 2006 16:08 GMT David, What did you learn? laurel
> I finally got a biopsy and ultrasound yesterday. The Dr, took 14 > samples. He's sending them to San Antonio, Tx. My psa was down to a [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > God Bless You > David dave481 - 25 Feb 2006 16:28 GMT Laurel, the biopsies still aren't back. He took 14 samples, with ultrasound and said there is something in my bladder. He's going to biopsy the bladder monday (2/27). The prostate had shrunk with two weeks of Levaquin, But he said now he can feel a hard ridge and lump on it. He took biopsies out of these. It's just hurry up and wait. I realize they need to get all the ducks in a row before the colon surgery and I don't think it's a "runaway" cancer, if in fact any of it is malignant. It's just very frustrating, but .....thanks for asking:) What have you guys found out? David
juniper - 25 Feb 2006 16:58 GMT Well, not much. The endorectal MRI w/spectroscopy is back. It wasn't bad; I don't know that it was good. Well, in this business no bad news IS good. The CT scan and the MRI both talk about an unidentified shading at the side near the rectum. The spectroscopy didn't identify it as cancer, though. And he had surgery there once. We see the onc and the surgeon again on the 1st. Of course the surgeon is all for it (and he's right, we're thinking) so unless the oncologist has a completely different take, then surgery is in 9 days. I looked at the list of post-RP supplies someone puts on here every so often, and I've got a couple of things. But I haven't printed it yet, the whole process makes it seem too real I think. For me, this business is a process of getting swamped by waves of reality, then a breather while I incorporate that, then another wave. But I better print it this morning, and get serious. Next weekend is our last weekend prior, and the way I handle things I can see myself getting all busy-body when I should be all soft and romantic. So, guess I'll go deal with that now so next weekend might be calmed down (I think we can schedule the next wave, it will be the fact of surgery.)
> What have you guys found out? > David dave481 - 25 Feb 2006 20:35 GMT Well Laurel, my prayers will be with ya'll. They (med. profession) seem to be getting better at saving lives all the time. I just haven't been able to get answers I'd like to know. I suppose are impossible to tell at this point. Like, will I ever have sex again, will I have to wear a pee bag, and since mine all started in the colon, but colostomy bags. Please forgive me for going on like this, but these a greatly life changing issues. I'm not married and met a beautiful lady last week. Some of these factors could sure influence that outcome. Whew!!!! Nuff for now:)) God Bless All and Livestrong:)) David
Steve Kramer - 26 Feb 2006 00:15 GMT 3/6?
> Well, not much. The endorectal MRI w/spectroscopy is back. It wasn't > bad; I don't know that it was good. Well, in this business no bad news [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >> What have you guys found out? >> David juniper - 26 Feb 2006 02:31 GMT > 3/6? Monday, March 6, 2006 at 7:30 am, check in at 5:30.
dave481 - 26 Feb 2006 03:28 GMT Prayers will be with you.
Steve Kramer - 26 Feb 2006 10:48 GMT Okay. I'll be putting in a good word with St. Peregrine that day. I hope you don't mind a little Catholic intervention into the health of your husband and skill of the surgeon.
>> 3/6? > Monday, March 6, 2006 at 7:30 am, check in at 5:30.
|
|
|