Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Hello and God Bless you all

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
dave481 - 17 Feb 2006 19:08 GMT
I finally got a  biopsy and ultrasound yesterday. The Dr, took 14
samples. He's sending them to San Antonio, Tx. My psa was down to a
32.6. The prostate didn't appear as tender as it was two weeks ago. Psa
then was 39.8. He also ran an ultra sound over my bladder. I can barely
pee and it had gotten worse inspite of 14 days of Levaquin and Flomax.
I get a bladder biopsy in 10 days. After that comes back they are gonna
take out tumor in colon, and take necessary action with prostate and
bladder at same time, if there is evidence of malignacy in biopsies.
Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it
probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption?

I wanted to thank, again, everyones time and info here. I am much more
informed, and not as scared.
God Bless You
David
c palmer - 17 Feb 2006 19:45 GMT
From: daave481@yahoo.com (dave481)

My psa was down to a 32.6. The prostate didn't appear as tender as it
was two weeks ago. Psa then was 39.8.

Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it
probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption?

David
============

hi david - it's a good sign that your psa took a big drop.  

but in response to your question about it being infection instead of
cancer, i would have to say, wait and see what the biopsy says.

the explanation that i will offer is that there is no doubt account for
some of the high psa rise and tenderness of the prostate is due to the
infection.

but i will add to this that while my psa was only 6.35, by comparison, i
had reduced urine flow, the prostate had pushed into the floor of my
bladder and i had BPH, so when i had the biopsy done, i was fairly sure
that the rise in psa above the 4.0 cutoff was due to the BPH condition.
plus my prostate was full of prostate stones.  i had explained it all
away logically.  

then, when i got told that both lobes had prostate cancer, it was a
surprise.  my logic didn't work...... i had prostate cancer and i was
going to have to deal with it.

i really want to say that the biopsy won't reveal anything, but instead,
i'll say, hope for the best, prepare for the worst.  this way, it will
keep you on level ground in case the results aren't what you were
expecting.

all the best,

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Steve Jordan - 17 Feb 2006 20:25 GMT
On February 17, David wrote:
> I finally got a  biopsy and ultrasound yesterday. The Dr, took 14
> samples. He's sending them to San Antonio, Tx.
Every PCa specialist medic I've read or heard of strongly recommends
having the specimens sent to a specialist laboratory for a second
opinion on the Gleason grades and score (x+y=z).

I believe that this is absolutely vital, since everything that is done
from here on will be controlled by the  Gleason score. Its accuracy
cannot be guaranteed unless a specialist has examined and reported on
the specimens. This second opinion is, I understand, covered by
insurance and Medicare. Even if it were not, the ~$350 cost is well
worth the peace of mind of knowing the facts.

There are various labs: Bostwick, Oppenheimer, Uro-Cor. Google prostate
pathology laboratories.

My second opinion on my second biopsy (don't ask) was done by Bostwick
and reported important facts not even mentioned in the local lab's report.

(snip)
> Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it
> probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption?
>  
I must confess that due to the relatively high PSA I doubt that the
assumption is correct. Wasn't a Cipro regimen used before the biopsy? If
so, it should have killed off any infection.

But wait for the path reports....

Regards,

Steve J

"The thing is to expect nothing in particular, but be aware of the lack
of enforceable guarantees or enforceable contracts with
nature/god/entropy as to the condition or durability of our bodies."
-- Brian Brunner, PCa survivor, December 12, 2005 on The Prostate
Problems Mailing List
Thank you, Brian.
dave481 - 17 Feb 2006 22:15 GMT
Once again I pick up valid and important information here. Gained
through hard experience and generously and promptly shared. I will keep
vigil and arrange for the second tests.
Thanks again guys. I truly believe God keeps special stars for your
crowns. Awarded for caring efforts.
God Bless
David
juniper - 18 Feb 2006 00:25 GMT
> 32.6. The prostate didn't appear as tender as it was two weeks ago.

nice.

> Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it
> probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption?

Well, my experience w/PCa has been a roller coaster of emotion.
There's no way to not hope for good news.  So true, you won't know what
the biopsy shows until you get it back.  Still, I found this and it was
the only thing that showed what amount of effect on PSA.  Apparently it
is technically possible that your PSA is due to prostatitis.  It's just
that you would be in the minority (3%) with a PSA > 20 that wasn't
cancer.  I hope you are.  You have enough to deal with anyway.  Seems
like you're getting lots of good medical help quickly.  Good job on
that.

http://www.cancer.prostate-help.org/capsaif.htm

Condition                  Manipulation Increase    Effect on PSA Level
Persists Up To

Acute bacterial prostatitis           5-7 fold        6 weeks
Acute urinary retention               5-7 fold        6 weeks
Digital Rectal Exam (DRE)         Variable       3 days
Exercise - bicycle                     0-3 fold        1 week
Prostate biopsy                   Very Variable     6 weeks
Prostate massage                    Variable        6 weeks
Ejaculation                              Variable        3 days
TURP Very                              Variable        6 weeks

Best wishes!
Steve Kramer - 18 Feb 2006 11:55 GMT
> Since my psa had fallen 7 points I took it as a good sign that it
> probably is an infection instead of cancer. Is this a fair assumption?

It is certainly something to hang your hat on, as they say.  But, with all
that is, or possibly is, going on in your colon, bladder and prostate
region, I suspect wild variations of PSA are possible regardless of your
diagnosis.

However, cancer without Cipro or something, usually does not produce
significant drops in PSA.  And 7 points is significant.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .05 .08
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

juniper - 25 Feb 2006 16:08 GMT
David,
What did you learn?
laurel

> I finally got a  biopsy and ultrasound yesterday. The Dr, took 14
> samples. He's sending them to San Antonio, Tx. My psa was down to a
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> God Bless You
> David
dave481 - 25 Feb 2006 16:28 GMT
Laurel, the biopsies still aren't back. He took 14 samples, with
ultrasound and said there is something in my bladder. He's going to
biopsy the bladder monday (2/27). The prostate had shrunk with two
weeks of Levaquin, But he said now he can feel a hard ridge and lump on
it. He took biopsies out of these. It's just hurry up and wait. I
realize they need to get all the ducks in a row before the colon
surgery and I don't think it's a "runaway" cancer, if in fact any of it
is malignant. It's just very frustrating, but .....thanks for asking:)
What have you guys found out?
David
juniper - 25 Feb 2006 16:58 GMT
Well, not much.  The endorectal MRI w/spectroscopy is back.  It wasn't
bad; I don't know that it was good.  Well, in this business no bad news
IS good. The CT scan and the MRI both talk about an unidentified
shading at the side near the rectum.  The spectroscopy didn't identify
it as cancer, though.  And he had surgery there once.  We see the onc
and the surgeon again on the 1st.  Of course the surgeon is all for it
(and he's right, we're thinking) so unless the oncologist has a
completely different take, then surgery is in 9 days.  I looked at the
list of post-RP supplies someone puts on here every so often, and I've
got a couple of things.  But I haven't printed it yet, the whole
process makes it seem too real I think.  For me, this business is a
process of getting swamped by waves of reality, then a breather while I
incorporate that, then another wave.  But I better print it this
morning, and get serious.  Next weekend is our last weekend prior, and
the way I handle things I can see myself getting all busy-body when I
should be all soft and romantic.  So, guess I'll go deal with that now
so next weekend might be calmed down (I think we can schedule the next
wave, it will be the fact of surgery.)

> What have you guys found out?
> David
dave481 - 25 Feb 2006 20:35 GMT
Well Laurel, my prayers will be with ya'll.  They (med. profession)
seem to be getting better at saving lives all the time. I just haven't
been able to get answers I'd like to know. I suppose are impossible to
tell at this point. Like, will I ever have sex again, will I have to
wear a pee bag, and since mine all started in the colon, but colostomy
bags. Please forgive me for going on like this, but these a greatly
life changing issues. I'm not married and met a beautiful lady last
week. Some of these factors could sure influence that outcome. Whew!!!!
Nuff for now:))
God Bless All and Livestrong:))
David
Steve Kramer - 26 Feb 2006 00:15 GMT
3/6?

> Well, not much.  The endorectal MRI w/spectroscopy is back.  It wasn't
> bad; I don't know that it was good.  Well, in this business no bad news
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>> What have you guys found out?
>> David
juniper - 26 Feb 2006 02:31 GMT
> 3/6?
Monday, March 6, 2006 at 7:30 am, check in at 5:30.
dave481 - 26 Feb 2006 03:28 GMT
Prayers will be with you.
Steve Kramer - 26 Feb 2006 10:48 GMT
Okay.  I'll be putting in a good word with St. Peregrine that day.  I hope
you don't mind a little Catholic intervention into the health of your
husband and skill of the surgeon.

>> 3/6?
> Monday, March 6, 2006 at 7:30 am, check in at 5:30.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.