Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / April 2006
post RP radiation
|
|
Thread rating:  |
DominicM - 03 Feb 2006 03:39 GMT Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except maybe extracapsular extension into margin) some of those Gleason 8's (3+5) must have have gotten loose as my 7 week post-RP PSA is 0.55 PSA. I was tested twice by two labs with same result.
My uro is now recommending I see the Radiological Oncologist to get zapped.
Has anyone been thru a similiar process? How often and frequency? Side effects? Can work same day after etc?
Thanks guys....
c palmer - 03 Feb 2006 08:34 GMT From: dmarrese@gmail.com (DominicM) Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except maybe extracapsular extension into margin) some of those Gleason 8's (3+5) must have have gotten loose as my 7 week post-RP PSA is 0.55 PSA. I was tested twice by two labs with same result. My uro is now recommending I see the Radiological Oncologist to get zapped. Has anyone been thru a similiar process? How often and frequency? Side effects? Can work same day after etc? Thanks guys.... =========== hi Dominic - the psa shows that there are some prostate cells producing psa. where, they don't know. is it cancer? is it BPH? or is it prostate tissue?
the only thing the surgeon knows is that they prostate cells are in the prostate bed and that is why he wants to radiate you. to kill those cells before they get a chance to get into the lymph nodes.
usually, you will be given a series of radiation treatments. i believe it takes about 5 minutes for the actual treatment. but you have to come in 5 days a week for about a month or so.
they will go over the side effects to watch out for at the onc's office.
others at the ng, will add to what S.E.'s to watch out for.
given the fact that the gleason was an 8 and that your secondary number was a 5, and you already have a .55 psa number, i would push for a quick radiation treatment too.
if you want. wait 30 days, take the psa test again. if that number has gone up any, then your decision for radiation treatment has been made for you.
hope this info helps,
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so." http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
DominicM - 03 Feb 2006 13:42 GMT Thanks Curtis....I really appreciate your insight. I go see the oncologist on the 22nd . I think I'll try to get on a cancellation list in case something opens up sooner.
I.P. Freely - 03 Feb 2006 23:48 GMT > they will go over the side effects to watch out for at the onc's office. But do not hang your hat on what your onc tells you. We and the literature are full of tales and statistics of patients who got only part of the SE story. DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK in at least several PC books plus some trials.
But that's for planning and scheduling purposes. RT is probably a no-brainer at this point IF a repeat PSA test verifies your number AND extensive testing finds no mets outside the radiation field.
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 03 Feb 2006 11:35 GMT I'm your Huckleberry....
First, however, was it 5+3 or 3+5? You first reported the latter, which is not good, but better.
As to RT, mine was EBRT (External Beam Radiation Treatment) where they use an particle accelerator and zap your prostate bed from six direction each treatment. I had 35 treatments; once every weekday for seven weeks.
There really is nothing to it. They set you up by doing a lot of scanning, looking at your innards (technical term), mark your sides and belly with aiming points, and the next day or next week you start the treatments. Treatments consist of dropping trow, telling the nurse to quit oggling your manhood, and watching this machine work around you.
Most likely side effects are diarrhea, burning while urination and general fatigue. You can combat all three by daily or every-other-daily cardiopulmonary exercise (I walked 3-5 miles a day, 3-5 times a week), drinking gallons of water (I drank 2-4 liters daily), and getting plenty of rest (I went to bed an hour early every night). The side effects still got me to a minor degree, but I didn't miss a day of work.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05 PSA .07 .05 .06 .05 .08 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
> Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except > maybe extracapsular extension into margin) some of those Gleason 8's [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Thanks guys.... DominicM - 03 Feb 2006 13:40 GMT Thanks Steve....I really appreciate your insight. I was biopsied as 3+5 with a tertiary of 4. Sounds like this isn't a trivial treatment. I see the oncologist on the 22nd.
Alan Meyer - 03 Feb 2006 14:57 GMT > Thanks Steve....I really appreciate your insight. I was biopsied as > 3+5 with a tertiary of 4. Sounds like this isn't a trivial treatment. I > see the oncologist on the 22nd. My experience of external beam radiation sounds a lot like Steve's. The first time I went they took a couple of hours to image everything and figure out all the aiming points. After that the procedures mostly took 10 minutes a day - about 8 minutes to set things up and position me on the table, and about two minutes for the actual beams. The greatest amount of time was spent finding a parking spot and then waiting in the waiting room for my turn at the machine. I never felt a thing and went to work each day after treatment.
Towards the end of my treatment, I began to experience some radiation burns. There was irritation of the skin, irritation of the rectum, and some pubic hair was burned off. But I used lots of skin creams and within a couple of weeks after treatment ended the burns, like sunburns, had cleared up and the hair started to grow back.
I also had difficulty urinating and had some blood in the semen. The urination problem took longer to go away, but it did go away and, in the meantime, was treated with Flowmax.
In my case, I had radiation as a primary treatment with HDR brachytherapy as a boost to the external beam. So my experience was probably somewhat different from what you'll have.
Good luck with the treatment. It is often the case that the cancer first spreads to the area right around the prostate that is still accessible to radiation. If that is what happened to you, then radiation gives you a second chance at a cure.
It's a crapshoot as to whether it will work. Here's hoping you roll a seven.
Alan
Sandy K. - 03 Feb 2006 20:05 GMT > > Thanks Steve....I really appreciate your insight. I was biopsied as > > 3+5 with a tertiary of 4. Sounds like this isn't a trivial treatment. I [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > It's a crapshoot as to whether it will work. Here's hoping > you roll a seven. Alan - FYI - you generally do not a want a 7 to show when playing craps. The only time you want it to show is on the come out roll when the are no other bets up. After that, the seven is the last number you would want to see rolled - unless youpaly the dark side....
Sandy k.
Alan Meyer - 03 Feb 2006 22:40 GMT >> ... >> It's a crapshoot as to whether it will work. Here's hoping [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > other bets up. After that, the seven is the last number you would want to > see rolled - unless youpaly the dark side.... Oops. I stand corrected.
I confess I'm not a gambler and have never shot craps.
Well, here's hoping that Dominic wins - whatever it takes.
Alan
DominicM - 04 Feb 2006 01:08 GMT Thanks Alan. I hope I roll 7's.Thought I caught it damn cells escaped. Nonetheless "it is what it is" . This is just but a bump in the road of life. Hopefully by mid year I'm in a better position.
Steve Kramer - 03 Feb 2006 23:05 GMT No, Dominic. 'Taint trivial. I'm afraid you're in it for the long haul.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05 PSA .07 .05 .06 .05 .08 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
> Thanks Steve....I really appreciate your insight. I was biopsied as > 3+5 with a tertiary of 4. Sounds like this isn't a trivial treatment. I > see the oncologist on the 22nd. I.P. Freely - 04 Feb 2006 02:43 GMT > Treatments consist of dropping trow, telling the nurse to quit oggling > your manhood Or was she just trying to FIND it? ;-)
> Most likely side effects are diarrhea, burning while urination and general > fatigue. You can combat all three by daily or every-other-daily > cardiopulmonary exercise (I walked 3-5 miles a day, 3-5 times a week), > drinking gallons of water (I drank 2-4 liters daily), and getting plenty > of rest (I went to bed an hour early every night). The side effects still > got me to a minor degree, but I didn't miss a day of work. How long did those hassles last after you were finished with the RT, and was your experience in line with the literature's expectations? And what convinced you and your docs that your PSA source was in the radiation field? That last question seems like a salvage RT deal-maker/breaker to me.
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 04 Feb 2006 12:02 GMT >> The side effects still got me to a minor degree, but I didn't miss a day >> of work. > > How long did those hassles last after you were finished with the RT, and > was your experience in line with the literature's expectations? The burning urination started during the last week of treatment and stopped the day the treatments ended.
The mild diarrhea started mid-way or 2/3rds into the treatment and lasted to about two weeks after.
I went into the treatments with hemorrhoids caused by constipation. They just would not heal until I ended the treatments. I think they lasted about two months after treatment. The good news is, I never again suffered from constipation.
The fatigue is something that I cannot quantify. I never felt it, but my wife said it was obvious to her. I don't know when it started or ended.
> And what convinced you and your docs that your PSA source was in the > radiation field? Pre-treatments? My doc convinced me that A) my rising PSA was indicative of the surgery not having gotten it all and B) if there was any chance of a cure now it was zapping it while it was still hopefully contained on or near the prostate bed. There were no promises.
Post-treatment? My PSA went from 0.75 to 0.15. So, the source is apparent. My PSA then went up, so escape of PCa cells is also apparent.
> That last question seems like a salvage RT deal-maker/breaker to me. I'll wager you don't spend a lot of time in Vegas either. Honestly, I don't know what the percentages were either. If the doc had told me there is only a 25% chance of a cure, I think I would have tried it. Maybe even 10%. Almost three years later, my only side effect is cured constipation. I know that if it had been successful, 20 years out, I might have had significant side effects. But, I lucked out. It wasn't successful.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05 PSA .07 .05 .06 .05 .08 Non Illegitimi Carborundum
Steve Jordan - 03 Feb 2006 17:17 GMT On February 2, DominicM inquired:
(snip another sad tale of recurrence)
> My uro is now recommending I see the Radiological Oncologist to get > zapped. > > Has anyone been thru a similiar process? How often and frequency? Side > effects? Can work same day after etc? > As for working the same day, yes, it can be done. Some fatigue may be noted late in the tx course.
This same question was asked 1/30 on another help group. Here is my detailed answer. I have been informed that the experience of others is essentially the same:
*********
Ending in October, 2004, I underwent IMRT, and will try to outline my experience.
Caveat! Each of us is different, and each tumor has its own individual characteristics. My experience may or may not bear much resemblance to anyone else's experience. In short, what I report is anecdotal and a tx decision should not be based solely upon it.
Background: I had a low-PSA/high Gleason case. PSA was only 5.7; Gleason was 4+5=9 in five of six specimens on one lobe. Very high-risk. There was also a small occult 4+4=8 in the opposite lobe. Clinical stage: T2a. Had cryosurgery 11/03, which utterly failed.
A year later, underwent IMRT, 76 Gy with 40-some to lymph nodes and seminal vesicles. Also began adjuvant ADT (androgen deprivation therapy), which continues with excellent results to this day.
First, there was a session in which a CAT scan located the relevant organs so that a computer program could be written to control the tx. This involved injection of a dye into my bladder via a Foley catheter, my first and I hope last experience with it. Also, a mold of my hips and legs was made (very high-tech: plastic foam in a garbage bag) so they would be motionless during tx sessions. Being motionless is vital.
There were 35 sessions, five per week for seven weeks.
There is no sensation, but you'd better do all your scratching before the start. I did watch a computer screen that told me what the shape and strength of the particular "beam" was at each of the five stops of the "gantry" around my body.
Before starting each day's session, the techs located my prostate using BAT (B-mode Acquisition and Targeting) ultrasound. I was positioned on the table using laser beams that were focused on three dots that had been tattooed on my lower abdomen and hips.
Between each exposure, the gantry moves to the next position and one can hear the metal leaves in the gantry move around to the programmed positions. This is the intensity modulated feature.
After about a week, I began to notice some side effects (SEs). These continued for several weeks after the end of the tx. Note that the radiation continues to affect the tissues for some time after the exposures are completed. Those SEs were urinary urgency and a degree of fecal urgency that, fortunately, did not continue for long. I was also fatigued, but how much was due to the ADT and how much to the radiation I do not know. There was a very slight reddening and itch directly over my prostate, which was quickly alleviated with a salve.
I also occasionally noted minor amounts of blood in the stool. This can happen because the prostate is very close to, may even touch, the rectum and the latter can be affected by the radiation. In my case, I don't know whether the blood resulted from the radiation or my pre-existent internal hemorrhoids or a little of both. Didn't amount to much, anyhow.
The urgency was not to the extent of incontinence (barring a couple of accidents that were my fault), but when I had to go, I had to go *right now* and had better act without delay. It could be addressed by watching the clock and keeping track of what's going on internally.
After a couple of months of improvement, the SEs pretty much cleared up.
Objective info can be found on the authoritative website of the Prostate Cancer Research Institute at: http://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/localdis/Chaiken_IMRT.html among other papers at PCRI. Search on IMRT.
*******
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Steve J
"The thing is to expect nothing in particular, but be aware of the lack of enforceable guarantees or enforceable contracts with nature/god/entropy as to the condition or durability of our bodies." -- Brian Brunner, PCa survivor, December 12, 2005 on The Prostate Problems Mailing List Thank you, Brian.
DominicM - 04 Feb 2006 01:18 GMT Guys I can't tell you how much this helps dealing with the unknowns while you're waiting in limbo wondering about treatments, side effects etc. There is a ton of info on the web but getting 1st hand insight from folks that have been through it is invaluable.
Thanks to all! Dominic
I.P. Freely - 04 Feb 2006 03:37 GMT > There is a ton of info on the web but getting 1st hand insight > from folks that have been through it is invaluable. Realize that the most accurate depiction of what you can expect -- by definition -- comes from the literature, not from a few folks that have been through it. The lit builds statistics on thousands of RT patients, then presents odds of a patient experiencing this or that or the other effect. Personal experiences are most useful for tips on how to handle the problems that crop up, and for greater insight into the effects they happened to have. How your experience -- or mine when the time comes -- remains to be seen. Some rather nasty effects can show up even 2-3 years later, for example, but for SALVAGE RT, those effect are not likely to compare to the effects of NOT getting necessary salvage RT ... as far as I know. I haven't researched the benefits of salvage RT yet, but am starting to. There are many factors affecting the potential benefits and SEs of salvage RT, and I plan to condense dozens of documents into several pages of data on them before making up my mind. I'm not too motivated yet because my PSA is still out in the second decimal place, but when it hits the first digit , or especially if it hits 0.2, my motivation will change. Why so much research? 'Cause only about 1/4 of pts benefit from salvage RT, I don't know yet what percentage live any longer, it can exacerbate problems some of already have (such as bowel behavior), etc. Salvage RT beats the hell out of "salvage" ADT *FOR ME*, but then I have no PSA or mets yet, either.
My research will start by following the work of C.L. Amling of the Mayo Clinic. He's done and/or overseen a lot of research into salvage RT after RP, and comes highly recommended by my uro onc. Googling various combinations of the words Amling Mayo salvage radiation quickly brings up many useful-sounding titles such as "Parameters for Treatment Decisions for Salvage Radiation Therapy".
I.P.
Alan Meyer - 04 Feb 2006 19:36 GMT There's a recent research report from Sloan Kettering on salvage radiotherapy. See:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra ct&list_uids=12560439&query_hl=5&itool=pubmed_docsum
They are citing 46% four year PSA relapse free results, with up to 77% good results for patients with positive pre-treatment indicators (and presumably lower than 46% for patients with negative indicators.)
Alan
Steve Jordan - 04 Feb 2006 19:54 GMT > There's a recent research report from Sloan Kettering on salvage > radiotherapy. See: > > (snip thundering-long url) > Or, better yet, http://tinyurl.com/cxmkh
Regards,
Steve J
DominicM - 05 Feb 2006 00:30 GMT I sure hope I'm in the 46% . Thanks for article. My oncologist and uro is from Sloan.
Thomas Traub - 07 Feb 2006 17:37 GMT Dominic,
I had RRP in August and tested fos PSA 3 weeks later. It showed a small detectable amount--I don't recall how much. The doctor had me come back three months later (December) and the PSA was <0.1. I get checked again in June.
> Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except > maybe extracapsular extension into margin) some of those Gleason 8's [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Thanks guys.... kh - 14 Mar 2006 13:45 GMT > Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except > maybe extracapsular extension into margin) some of those Gleason 8's [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Thanks guys.... really, really sorry to hear that.
I don't know how much rad they give guys for these scrub-up treatments.
I had 25 days of IMRT followed by 97 palladium-103 seeds.
For 25 days of IMRT, I barely noticed the side effects. The rad doc said that most guys start to notice something about the 4th or 5th week. Something being, maybe getting up once or twice a night to pee, that sort of thing.
Supposedly, there's a chance of fatigue, uretha irritation, or maybe bowel activity, like you went to an all you can eat chili and beer party.
I can't say that I had any of that and most guys don't seem to, at least doing the 25 day regime.
If they schedule you for 35 days, then the side effects are more noticeable but frankly, nothing like what you're already gone through.
Seeds, which they probably won't give you, are more intense and I did notice the side effects. Notice. I wasn't debilitated and did not change my schedule, even during the worse of it.
I took Flomax for 6 months and was getting up 2 and 3 times a night to "go". I also had to make frequent pit-stops during the day. Like about every hour to 90 minutes.
I had a bunch of other things going wrong so, in the grand scheme of things, the radiation was a nit, the side effects were barely on the radar.
During the worst of it, I was working an 11 hour day for idiots. That's 2 and 3 hours of unpaid overtime each day while recovering from the treatment.
Then, after I bailed them out and cut back my hours to just what I was being paid, they copped an attitude and fired me. That was harsh, it took me a whole 2 hours to find another job. I even got a nice raise, should-a bailed long ago.
Here's another funny. I might have a case for a discrimination suit, what with the cancer, being 59, and blatant racist remarks at my firing meeting.
Won't bother though, I got too much to do to fool around with scum like that. The company is on the ropes again.
I.P. Freely - 14 Mar 2006 18:20 GMT > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 03:39:55 UTC, "DominicM" wrote >> >> Has anyone been thru a similiar process? How often and frequency? Side >> effects? Can work same day after etc? While you're asking our opinions, I hope you're also reading the RT chapters in the PC books. We couldn't BEGIN to cover the many short- and long-term considerations here.
> During the worst of it, I was working an 11 hour day for idiots. > That's 2 and 3 hours of unpaid overtime each day while recovering > from the treatment. My boss tried that once, whining because the parking lot was empty before dark -- in midsummer -- and told me to start putting in 18-hour days permanently. I told him, "If you need that much work done, you should hire more people rather than abusing the ones you have ... Colonel." That ... plus the fact that I knew the regs wouldn't back him up in our peacetime, stateside environment, shut him up. Funny thing was that it was ultimately he who got fired (not over that, but I'll take good karma wherever I can find it.)
I.P.
Alan Meyer - 06 Apr 2006 18:50 GMT > Here's another funny. I might have a case for a > discrimination suit, what with the cancer, being 59, and > blatant racist remarks at my firing meeting. Sometimes I wish there were a hell, with a special room for people who exploit their sick employees, and a special corner in that room, right next to the fire, for the racists among them.
I'm glad you got a better job right away. At our ages, it isn't always easy.
Alan
Peter Headland - 07 Apr 2006 01:26 GMT > I might have a case for a discrimination suit ... Won't bother though Oh please do:
1. It helps all of us to "reeducate" people they can't get away with that kind of abuse.
2. Most companies take advice and settle instantly for a few $K - if you don't want it you can always donate it to a worthy cause.
 Signature Peter Headland
|
|
|