Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / April 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

post RP radiation

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DominicM - 03 Feb 2006 03:39 GMT
Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except
maybe extracapsular extension into margin)  some of those Gleason 8's
(3+5) must have have gotten loose as my 7 week post-RP PSA is 0.55 PSA.
I was tested twice by two labs with same result.

My uro is now recommending I see the Radiological Oncologist to get
zapped.

Has anyone been thru a similiar process? How often and frequency? Side
effects? Can work same day after etc?

Thanks guys....
c palmer - 03 Feb 2006 08:34 GMT
From: dmarrese@gmail.com (DominicM)
Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except
maybe extracapsular extension into margin) some of those Gleason 8's
(3+5) must have have gotten loose as my 7 week post-RP PSA is 0.55 PSA.
I was tested twice by two labs with same result.
My uro is now recommending I see the Radiological Oncologist to get
zapped.
Has anyone been thru a similiar process? How often and frequency? Side
effects? Can work same day after etc?
Thanks guys....
===========
hi Dominic - the psa shows that there are some prostate cells producing
psa.  where, they don't know.    is it cancer?  is it BPH?  or is it
prostate tissue?

the only thing the surgeon knows is that they prostate cells are in the
prostate bed and that is why he wants to radiate you.  to kill those
cells before they get a chance to get into the lymph nodes.

usually, you will be given a series of radiation treatments.   i believe
it takes about 5 minutes for the actual treatment.  but you have to come
in 5 days a week for about a month or so.  

they will go over the side effects to watch out for at the onc's office.  

others at the ng,  will add to what S.E.'s to watch out for.

given the fact that the gleason was an 8 and that your secondary number
was a 5, and you already have a .55 psa number, i would push for a quick
radiation treatment too.  

if you want.  wait 30 days, take the psa test again.  if that number has
gone up any, then your decision for radiation treatment has been made
for you.

hope this info helps,

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
DominicM - 03 Feb 2006 13:42 GMT
Thanks Curtis....I really appreciate your insight. I go see the
oncologist on the 22nd . I think I'll try to get on a cancellation list
in case something opens up sooner.
I.P. Freely - 03 Feb 2006 23:48 GMT
> they will go over the side effects to watch out for at the onc's office.

But do not hang your hat on what your onc tells you. We and the literature
are full of tales and statistics of patients who got only part of the SE
story. DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK in at least several PC books plus some trials.

But that's for planning and scheduling purposes. RT is probably a no-brainer
at this point IF a repeat PSA test verifies your number AND extensive
testing finds no mets outside the radiation field.

I.P.
Steve Kramer - 03 Feb 2006 11:35 GMT
I'm your Huckleberry....

First, however, was it 5+3 or 3+5?  You first reported the latter, which is
not good, but better.

As to RT, mine was EBRT (External Beam Radiation Treatment) where they use
an particle accelerator and zap your prostate bed from six direction each
treatment.  I had 35 treatments; once every weekday for seven weeks.

There really is nothing to it.  They set you up by doing a lot of scanning,
looking at your innards (technical term), mark your sides and belly with
aiming points, and the next day or next week you start the treatments.
Treatments consist of dropping trow, telling the nurse to quit oggling your
manhood, and watching this machine work around you.

Most likely side effects are diarrhea, burning while urination and general
fatigue.  You can combat all three by daily or every-other-daily
cardiopulmonary exercise (I walked 3-5 miles a day, 3-5 times a week),
drinking gallons of water (I drank 2-4 liters daily), and getting plenty of
rest (I went to bed an hour early every night).  The side effects still got
me to a minor degree, but I didn't miss a day of work.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .05 .08
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

> Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except
> maybe extracapsular extension into margin)  some of those Gleason 8's
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks guys....
DominicM - 03 Feb 2006 13:40 GMT
Thanks Steve....I really appreciate your insight.  I was biopsied as
3+5 with a tertiary of 4. Sounds like this isn't a trivial treatment. I
see the oncologist on the 22nd.
Alan Meyer - 03 Feb 2006 14:57 GMT
> Thanks Steve....I really appreciate your insight.  I was biopsied as
> 3+5 with a tertiary of 4. Sounds like this isn't a trivial treatment. I
> see the oncologist on the 22nd.

My experience of external beam radiation sounds a lot like Steve's.
The first time I went they took a couple of hours to image everything
and figure out all the aiming points.  After that the procedures
mostly took 10 minutes a day - about 8 minutes to set things up
and position me on the table, and about two minutes for the
actual beams.  The greatest amount of time was spent finding
a parking spot and then waiting in the waiting room for my turn
at the machine.  I never felt a thing and went to work each day
after treatment.

Towards the end of my treatment, I began to experience some
radiation burns.  There was irritation of the skin, irritation of the
rectum, and some pubic hair was burned off.  But I used lots
of skin creams and within a couple of weeks after treatment
ended the burns, like sunburns, had cleared up and the hair
started to grow back.

I also had difficulty urinating and had some blood in the semen.
The urination problem took longer to go away, but it did go
away and, in the meantime, was treated with Flowmax.

In my case, I had radiation as a primary treatment with HDR
brachytherapy as a boost to the external beam.  So my
experience was probably somewhat different from what
you'll have.

Good luck with the treatment.  It is often the case that the
cancer first spreads to the area right around the prostate
that is still accessible to radiation.  If that is what happened
to you, then radiation gives you a second chance at a cure.

It's a crapshoot as to whether it will work.  Here's hoping
you roll a seven.

    Alan
Sandy K. - 03 Feb 2006 20:05 GMT
> > Thanks Steve....I really appreciate your insight.  I was biopsied as
> > 3+5 with a tertiary of 4. Sounds like this isn't a trivial treatment. I
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> It's a crapshoot as to whether it will work.  Here's hoping
> you roll a seven.

Alan - FYI - you generally do not a want a 7 to show when playing craps.
The only time you want it to show is on the come out roll when the are no
other bets up.  After that, the seven is the last number you would want to
see rolled - unless youpaly the dark side....

Sandy k.
Alan Meyer - 03 Feb 2006 22:40 GMT
>> ...
>> It's a crapshoot as to whether it will work.  Here's hoping
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> other bets up.  After that, the seven is the last number you would want to
> see rolled - unless youpaly the dark side....

Oops.  I stand corrected.

I confess I'm not a gambler and have never shot craps.

Well, here's hoping that Dominic wins - whatever it takes.

   Alan
DominicM - 04 Feb 2006 01:08 GMT
Thanks Alan. I hope I roll 7's.Thought I caught it damn cells escaped.
Nonetheless "it is what it is" . This is just but a bump in the road of
life. Hopefully by mid year I'm in a better position.
Steve Kramer - 03 Feb 2006 23:05 GMT
No, Dominic.  'Taint trivial.  I'm afraid you're in it for the long haul.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .05 .08
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

> Thanks Steve....I really appreciate your insight.  I was biopsied as
> 3+5 with a tertiary of 4. Sounds like this isn't a trivial treatment. I
> see the oncologist on the 22nd.
I.P. Freely - 04 Feb 2006 02:43 GMT
> Treatments consist of dropping trow, telling the nurse to quit oggling
> your manhood

Or was she just trying to FIND it?  ;-)

> Most likely side effects are diarrhea, burning while urination and general
> fatigue.  You can combat all three by daily or every-other-daily
> cardiopulmonary exercise (I walked 3-5 miles a day, 3-5 times a week),
> drinking gallons of water (I drank 2-4 liters daily), and getting plenty
> of rest (I went to bed an hour early every night).  The side effects still
> got me to a minor degree, but I didn't miss a day of work.

How long did those hassles last after you were finished with the RT, and was
your experience in line with the literature's expectations? And what
convinced you and your docs that your PSA source was in the radiation field?
That last question seems like a salvage RT  deal-maker/breaker to me.

I.P.
Steve Kramer - 04 Feb 2006 12:02 GMT
>> The side effects still got me to a minor degree, but I didn't miss a day
>> of work.
>
> How long did those hassles last after you were finished with the RT, and
> was your experience in line with the literature's expectations?

The burning urination started during the last week of treatment and stopped
the day the treatments ended.

The mild diarrhea started mid-way or 2/3rds into the treatment and lasted to
about two weeks after.

I went into the treatments with hemorrhoids caused by constipation.  They
just would not heal until I ended the treatments.  I think they lasted about
two months after treatment.  The good news is, I never again suffered from
constipation.

The fatigue is something that I cannot quantify.  I never felt it, but my
wife said it was obvious to her.  I don't know when it started or ended.

> And what convinced you and your docs that your PSA source was in the
> radiation field?

Pre-treatments?  My doc convinced me that A) my rising PSA was indicative of
the surgery not having gotten it all and B) if there was any chance of a
cure now it was zapping it while it was still hopefully contained on or near
the prostate bed.  There were no promises.

Post-treatment?  My PSA went from 0.75 to 0.15.  So, the source is apparent.
My PSA then went up, so escape of PCa cells is also apparent.

> That last question seems like a salvage RT  deal-maker/breaker to me.

I'll wager you don't spend a lot of time in Vegas either.  Honestly, I don't
know what the percentages were either.  If the doc had told me there is only
a 25% chance of a cure, I think I would have tried it.  Maybe even 10%.
Almost three years later, my only side effect is cured constipation.  I know
that if it had been successful, 20 years out, I might have had significant
side effects.  But, I lucked out.  It wasn't successful.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .05 .08
Non Illegitimi Carborundum

Steve Jordan - 03 Feb 2006 17:17 GMT
On February 2, DominicM inquired:

(snip another sad tale of recurrence)
> My uro is now recommending I see the Radiological Oncologist to get
> zapped.
>
> Has anyone been thru a similiar process? How often and frequency? Side
> effects? Can work same day after etc?
>  
As for working the same day, yes, it can be done. Some fatigue may be
noted late in the tx course.

This same question was asked 1/30 on another help group. Here is my
detailed answer. I have been informed that the experience of others is
essentially the same:

*********

Ending in October, 2004, I underwent IMRT, and will try to outline my
experience.

Caveat! Each of us is different, and each tumor has its own individual
characteristics. My experience may or may not bear much resemblance to
anyone else's experience. In short, what I report is anecdotal and a tx
decision should not be based solely upon it.

Background: I had a low-PSA/high Gleason case. PSA was only 5.7; Gleason
was 4+5=9 in five of six specimens on one lobe. Very high-risk. There
was also a small occult 4+4=8 in the opposite lobe. Clinical stage: T2a.
Had cryosurgery 11/03, which utterly failed.

A year later, underwent IMRT, 76 Gy with 40-some to lymph nodes and
seminal vesicles. Also began adjuvant ADT (androgen deprivation
therapy), which continues with excellent results to this day.

First, there was a session in which a CAT scan located the relevant
organs so that a computer program could be written to control the tx.
This involved injection of a dye into my bladder via a Foley catheter,
my first and I hope last experience with it. Also, a mold of my hips and
legs was made (very high-tech: plastic foam in a garbage bag) so they
would be motionless during tx sessions. Being motionless is vital.

There were 35 sessions, five per week for seven weeks.

There is no sensation, but you'd better do all your scratching before
the start. I did watch a computer screen that told me what the shape and
strength of the particular "beam" was at each of the five stops of the
"gantry" around my body.

Before starting each day's session, the techs located my prostate using
BAT (B-mode Acquisition and Targeting) ultrasound. I was positioned on
the table using laser beams that were focused on three dots that had
been tattooed on my lower abdomen and hips.

Between each exposure, the gantry moves to the next position and one can
hear the metal leaves in the gantry move around to the programmed
positions. This is the intensity modulated feature.

After about a week, I began to notice some side effects (SEs). These
continued for several weeks after the end of the tx. Note that the
radiation continues to affect the tissues for some time after the
exposures are completed. Those SEs were urinary urgency and a degree of
fecal urgency that, fortunately, did not continue for long. I was also
fatigued, but how much was due to the ADT and how much to the radiation
I do not know. There was a very slight reddening and itch directly over
my prostate, which was quickly alleviated with a salve.

I also occasionally noted minor amounts of blood in the stool. This can
happen because the prostate is very close to, may even touch, the rectum
and the latter can be affected by the radiation. In my case, I don't
know whether the blood resulted from the radiation or my pre-existent
internal hemorrhoids or a little of both. Didn't amount to much, anyhow.

The urgency was not to the extent of incontinence (barring a couple of
accidents that were my fault), but when I had to go, I had to go *right
now* and had better act without delay. It could be addressed by watching
the clock and keeping track of what's going on internally.

After a couple of months of improvement, the SEs pretty much cleared up.

Objective info can be found on the authoritative website of the Prostate
Cancer Research Institute at:
http://www.prostate-cancer.org/education/localdis/Chaiken_IMRT.html
among other papers at PCRI. Search on IMRT.

*******

Hope this helps.

Regards,

Steve J

"The thing is to expect nothing in particular, but be aware of the lack
of enforceable guarantees or enforceable contracts with
nature/god/entropy as to the condition or durability of our bodies."
-- Brian Brunner, PCa survivor, December 12, 2005 on The Prostate
Problems Mailing List
Thank you, Brian.
DominicM - 04 Feb 2006 01:18 GMT
Guys I can't tell you how much this helps dealing with the unknowns
while you're waiting in limbo wondering about treatments, side effects
etc. There is a ton of info on the web but getting 1st hand  insight
from folks that have been through it is invaluable.

Thanks to all!
Dominic
I.P. Freely - 04 Feb 2006 03:37 GMT
> There is a ton of info on the web but getting 1st hand  insight
> from folks that have been through it is invaluable.

Realize that the most accurate depiction of what you can expect -- by
definition -- comes from the literature, not from a few folks that have been
through it. The lit builds statistics on thousands of RT patients, then
presents odds of  a patient experiencing this or that or the other effect.
Personal experiences are most useful for tips on how to handle the problems
that crop up, and for greater insight into the effects they happened to
have. How your experience -- or mine when the time comes -- remains to be
seen. Some rather nasty effects can show up even 2-3 years later, for
example, but for SALVAGE RT, those effect are not likely to compare to the
effects of NOT getting necessary salvage RT ... as far as I know. I haven't
researched the benefits of salvage RT yet, but am starting to. There are
many factors affecting the potential benefits and SEs of salvage RT, and I
plan to condense dozens of documents into several pages of data on them
before making up my mind. I'm not too motivated yet because my PSA is still
out in the second decimal place, but when it hits the first digit , or
especially if it hits 0.2, my motivation will change. Why so  much research?
'Cause only about 1/4 of pts benefit from salvage RT, I don't know yet what
percentage live any longer, it can exacerbate problems some of already have
(such as bowel behavior), etc. Salvage RT beats the hell out of "salvage"
ADT *FOR ME*, but then I have no PSA or mets yet, either.

My research will start by following the work of C.L. Amling of the Mayo
Clinic. He's done and/or overseen a lot of research into salvage RT after
RP, and comes highly recommended by my uro onc. Googling various
combinations of the words Amling Mayo salvage radiation quickly brings up
many useful-sounding titles such as "Parameters for Treatment Decisions for
Salvage Radiation Therapy".

I.P.
Alan Meyer - 04 Feb 2006 19:36 GMT
There's a recent research report from Sloan Kettering on salvage
radiotherapy.  See:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstra
ct&list_uids=12560439&query_hl=5&itool=pubmed_docsum


They are citing 46% four year PSA relapse free results, with
up to 77% good results for patients with positive pre-treatment
indicators (and presumably lower than 46% for patients with
negative indicators.)

   Alan
Steve Jordan - 04 Feb 2006 19:54 GMT
> There's a recent research report from Sloan Kettering on salvage
> radiotherapy.  See:
>
> (snip thundering-long url)
>  
Or, better yet, http://tinyurl.com/cxmkh

Regards,

Steve J
DominicM - 05 Feb 2006 00:30 GMT
I sure hope I'm in the 46% . Thanks for article. My oncologist and uro
is from Sloan.
Thomas Traub - 07 Feb 2006 17:37 GMT
Dominic,

I had RRP in August and tested fos PSA 3 weeks later.  It showed a small
detectable amount--I don't recall how much.  The doctor had me come back
three months later (December) and the PSA was <0.1.  I get checked again in
June.

> Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except
> maybe extracapsular extension into margin)  some of those Gleason 8's
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks guys....
kh - 14 Mar 2006 13:45 GMT
> Well despite smooth RP and recovery and a "clean" path report ( except
> maybe extracapsular extension into margin)  some of those Gleason 8's
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Thanks guys....

really, really sorry to hear that.  

I don't know how much rad they give guys for these scrub-up
treatments.  

I had 25 days of IMRT followed by 97 palladium-103 seeds.  

For 25 days of IMRT, I barely noticed  the side effects. The
rad doc said that most guys start to notice something about the 4th
or 5th week.   Something being, maybe getting up once or twice a
night to pee, that sort of thing.

Supposedly, there's a chance of fatigue, uretha irritation, or maybe
bowel activity, like you went to an all you can eat chili and beer
party.

I can't say that I had any of that and most guys don't seem to, at
least doing the 25 day regime.  

If they schedule you for 35 days, then the side effects are more
noticeable but frankly, nothing like what you're already gone
through.

Seeds, which they probably won't give you, are more intense and I
did notice the side effects.  Notice.  I wasn't debilitated and did
not change my schedule, even during the worse of it.

I took Flomax for 6 months and was getting up 2 and 3 times a night
to "go".   I also had to make frequent pit-stops during the day.
Like about every hour to 90 minutes.  

I had a bunch of other things going wrong so, in the grand scheme of
things, the radiation was a nit, the side effects were barely on the
radar.  

During the worst of it, I was working an 11 hour day for idiots.
That's 2 and 3 hours of unpaid overtime each day while recovering
from the treatment.  

Then, after I bailed them out and cut back my hours to just what I
was being paid, they copped an attitude and fired me.  That was
harsh, it took me a whole 2 hours to find another job.  I even got a
nice raise, should-a bailed long ago.

Here's another funny.  I might have a case for a
discrimination suit, what with the cancer, being 59, and
blatant racist remarks at my firing meeting.

Won't bother though, I got too much to do to fool around with scum
like that.  The company is on the ropes again.  
I.P. Freely - 14 Mar 2006 18:20 GMT
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 03:39:55 UTC, "DominicM" wrote
>>
>> Has anyone been thru a similiar process? How often and frequency? Side
>> effects? Can work same day after etc?

While you're asking our opinions, I hope you're also reading the RT
chapters in the PC books. We couldn't BEGIN to cover the many short- and
long-term considerations here.

> During the worst of it, I was working an 11 hour day for idiots.
> That's 2 and 3 hours of unpaid overtime each day while recovering
> from the treatment.  

My boss tried that once, whining because the parking lot was empty
before dark -- in midsummer -- and told me to start putting in 18-hour
days permanently. I told him, "If you need that much work done, you
should hire more people rather than abusing the ones you have ...
Colonel." That ... plus the fact that I knew the regs wouldn't back him
up in our peacetime, stateside environment, shut him up. Funny thing was
 that it was ultimately he who got fired (not over that, but I'll take
good karma wherever I can find it.)

I.P.
Alan Meyer - 06 Apr 2006 18:50 GMT
> Here's another funny.  I might have a case for a
> discrimination suit, what with the cancer, being 59, and
> blatant racist remarks at my firing meeting.

Sometimes I wish there were a hell, with a special room for
people who exploit their sick employees, and a special corner
in that room, right next to the fire, for the racists among them.

I'm glad you got a better job right away.  At our ages, it
isn't always easy.

    Alan
Peter Headland - 07 Apr 2006 01:26 GMT
> I might have a case for a discrimination suit ... Won't bother though

Oh please do:

1. It helps all of us to "reeducate" people they can't get away with
that kind of abuse.

2. Most companies take advice and settle instantly for a few $K - if
you don't want it you can always donate it to a worthy cause.

Signature

Peter Headland

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.