Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / February 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Choosing a doctor

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
juniper - 01 Feb 2006 16:03 GMT
I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
recommend going to only the best doctors, like 6, in the country.
Well, its impossible for those few experts to treat every prostate
cancer patient.  If we try to go to Sloan Ketterling or wherever, it
will bankrupt us.  We can probably get $50K if we sold our house, maybe
that much if we cleared out our retirements, maybe that much more could
be put on VISAs.  I doubt that $150K would pay for treatment at one of
those places, much less the travel and motels and whatever.  I'd have
to quit my job or else send Steve off alone, which I wouldn't do.  So
this means bankruptcy and no income (he does have disability insurance
which would give us roughly 40% of our current income).

BUT, if we don't go to one of these experts or masters or whatever
they're called, it puts me in the position of giving the impression
that Steve's life is less important.  Well, what a load of crap. I
believe it should be possible to find good doctors in Arizona, but the
pressure (and it is pressure) from newsgroups, books, the internet is
to go only to those few doctors, or you are making a big mistake that
will permanently screw up whatever is left of your pathetic little
life.

This is bullshit.  To be responsible, you have to do what 99% of PCa
patients cannot possibly achieve. Obviously, one or two dozen doctors
cannot treat the 200,000 cases of PCa a year.  Still, the message is
loud and clear throughout every communication with everyone.  So here I
am, trying to find an Arizona surgeon, and feeling all the while that I
am actively harming my husbands health and not caring about what he
needs to get well.  Worse, this is a subtle communication BETWEEN US
that I don't think he is valuable.

I don't think this is fair or right.  I think that most people would
intuitively understand that if they could see the people that write the
books and do the videos, it would be great.  But PCa survivors, doctors
and authors hammer it in so loudly, longly and consistently that in
this case, you're left with the feeling that you are committing suicide
or murder or lifelong disability if you don't go to one of them.

Try it.  Ask someone:  who would you go to locally?  ANYWHERE you are,
they will tell you "oh, Scardino's the best."  Well, hello, I KNEW
that.  Why doesn't someone say, "this doctor has a good bedside manner,
but that doctor is a good surgeon, and this other doctor does a lot of
surgeries but..."  Hell, no.  Its Johns Hopkins or just go commit
suicde and save yourself the hassel.  No one even says "I went to
so-and-so and it was good (or bad)."

I am hoping for some supportive responses, I know I'm really upset and
please forgive me.  This is my reality: that unless I somehow get my
husband treatment from a nationally-known doctor who is famous for his
skills, I am basically telling him he doesn't matter.  It is a nasty,
nasty situation to be in.

laurel
Sandy K. - 01 Feb 2006 16:45 GMT
> I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
> know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> laurel

First off - do you have medical insurance?  If so, then your actual out of
pocket should be reasonable.  If not, then it's going to cost a lot no
matter where you have the surgery done.  Second - FYI - I was fortunate
enough to have Dr. Scardino perform my surgery.  My brother, 5 years older
than me, was diagnosed with PCa right after I was diagnosed.  We both live
in NJ, Sloane is only a 45 minute ride from my home - so it seemed to be a
reasonable option for me.  My brother chose NOT to go to Sloane for
treatment - he went to Morristown Memorial.  Guess what?  His surgery &
hospital stay was charged out at exactly the rate same as mine.  The
insurance companies have made arrangements with the various medical centers
around the country and seem to have set consistent rates across the board.
Don't want to travel?  Fine - I'm am sure that there are many good doctors
near where you live - just find one that has had a lot of experience with
the procedure your husband is going for.  You may want to check with the
Prostate Cancer Foundation to get recommendations for docs local to you.  Do
what is best for you & your husband.  BTW - although my brother & I had
different surgeons and different post-operative treatment -we're both doing
fine.  I just felt more comfortable going to Sloane - it was the right
choice for me.

Best of luck to the both you,
Sandy K.
Leonard Evens - 01 Feb 2006 16:57 GMT
> I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
> know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
[quoted text clipped - 47 lines]
> skills, I am basically telling him he doesn't matter.  It is a nasty,
> nasty situation to be in.

You don't have to bankrupt yourself by travelling to New York or
Baltimore to be treated.   Perhaps if you would tell us what kind of
insurance or resources you have available, and what doctors are
available to you,  we could give you more explicit advice.  You can also
check out local doctors' qualifications.  Look them up on the web and
see where they did their training.  Also ask them about their experience
in the relevant procedure and what sorts of results they have, including
side effect, for a case like your husband's.    There are lots of
retirees in Arizona, so there certainly is a market for doctors treating
prostate cancer.   I would be very surprised if there weren't several
urologists trained at major medical centers under the stars you can't
afford.  At one point, it was possible to call Dr. Walsh's office and
ask for a referral to a local doctor they know.  Sloan Kettering may
also provide a similar service.

When I was diagnosed with prostate cancer, I was covered by a Humana
HMO, and unless I wanted to pay for it myself, I was restricted to local
physicians.  Fortunately,  I was in an area well supplied with good
doctors, and at the time Humana included some of them in its network.  I
just went to the doctor recommended by my primary care physician.  I
checked where he was trained and questioned him about his experience.
I was satisfied that he would do about as good a job curing my cancer as
anyone else.  I was convinced that with him doing the surgery, the
chances of permanent incontinence were too small to be concerned about.
  Impotence was another matter.  He told me that, given my age, the
chances of not being permenently impotent were about 50 percent.   Had I
arranged to have Patrick Walsh of some other star doi the surgery (at my
own expense), I estimated that I might increase the likelihood to
perhaps 60 percent.   Given all the undertainties, it didn't seem worth
the effort.  I understood that I might be impotent, but that it also
could be treated.  So I stuck with him.  As things turned out, I was
impotent for 18 months, during which time I used a pump with
satisfactory results, and I regained erections, albeit not up to what I
had before surgery, after that.

At the same time, a friend who lived in California, was diagnosed with a
case similar to mine is several ways and different in others.  the
surgeons avilable to him through Kaiser, his health plan,  wern't at all
optimistic about doing nerve sparing surgery.   At our age aat the time,
67, the choice between radiation and surgery is close.  It turned out
that he has access through his inurance plan to a very good radiation
oncologist, so he chose radiation.  He seems to be doing pretty well also.

> laurel
John Loomis - 01 Feb 2006 17:32 GMT
Hello Juniper,
   I am sorry for your problems with financing RP.  Does your work, or
husbands work provide insurance?
   I have Blue Cross Insurance and I am self employed.  It is very
expensive.  I just figured it cost about 11,800 per year, with part pay,
etc.......and is going up.
   So, I imagine you do not have insurance and that is why you have a
problem financing RP.
   I was diagnosed in 1999.  I was 49 then.  Scared yes, seeing a local Dr.
yes.  He was a Urologist.  That Dr. frightened the heck out of me and was
already set to have external beam radiation at a local hospital.  I started
reading and found this news group.  I decided to go to "The Big City"  San
Francisco..I went to see 2 prostate cancer specialists.....I ended up @
Stanford Hospital with Dr. James D. Brooks.  He is a wonderful Dr. and said
he would help me out.  They did take my insurance and see that may be where
you are having problems.  So, I can ask my Dr. James D. Brooks if he knows
of a goo RP surgeon in Arizona.  He may know one close by or within driving
time.  Did you look up prostate cancer specialist....Arizona? on the
internet?  The hospital stay is 2 days, the surgery is for 3 or so hours.
You drive home in 2 days.  You may be able to work out a payment schedule
with a Dr. you choose also.  I hope I have helped a bit.
If you want to ask any questions feel free.
Wish You the Best John Loomis
>I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
> know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> laurel
hepburn2006@gmail.com - 02 Feb 2006 18:45 GMT
> Hello Juniper,
>     I am sorry for your problems with financing RP.  Does your work, or
> husbands work provide insurance?
>     So, I imagine you do not have insurance and that is why you have a
> problem financing RP.

We do have insurance, for Arizona only.  My frustration was that I had
the message that there were only a few acceptable doctors, and none in
Arizona.  These replys have helped.

>     I was diagnosed in 1999.  I was 49 then.  Scared yes, seeing a local Dr.
> yes.  He was a Urologist.  That Dr. frightened the heck out of me and was
> already set to have external beam radiation at a local hospital.  I started

Yes, we were in a cattle chute headed towards automatic surgery.  It
may end up being surgery, but this "frighten them into your plan" idea
is not my idea of a reasoned decision.

> you are having problems.  So, I can ask my Dr. James D. Brooks if he knows
> of a goo RP surgeon in Arizona.  He may know one close by or within driving

I would REALLY appreciate that.  Of course I have looked many times on
the Internet.  And can find sites for Arizona prostate surgeons.  But
they don't publish any real data on their websites (I wouldn't expect
that, but it would be nice.)  And of course they won't say, "we're not
as good as so-and-so".  No comparasions, a website is a marketing tool.

SO please do ask your doctor if he can recommend any.  If I had a
limited number of names, I could try to get more info.  Of course we
could just go see every doctor in the plan.  I think it is around 170.
(joke)  Hopefully we can get a few names then get more info about them.
Or maybe one name from several sources....
Sandy K. - 02 Feb 2006 21:34 GMT
> > Hello Juniper,
> >     I am sorry for your problems with financing RP.  Does your work, or
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
> (joke)  Hopefully we can get a few names then get more info about them.
>  Or maybe one name from several sources....

Contact the Prostate Cancer Foundation for Dr. recomendations.
www.prostatecancerfoundation.org

Good luck,
Sandy K.
NickySantoro - 03 Feb 2006 16:09 GMT
>> Hello Juniper,
>>     I am sorry for your problems with financing RP.  Does your work, or
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>(joke)  Hopefully we can get a few names then get more info about them.
> Or maybe one name from several sources....

FWIW, this site lists places that use the Da Vinci robotic technique.
It might provide some leads to major facilities with considerable
experience with PCa surgery even if you don't choose to consider
robotic.
http://www.davinciprostatectomy.com/hospitals.html

FWIW
YMMV
Claude - 01 Feb 2006 17:37 GMT
>I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
> know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
> laurel

Laurel,

I had my RP done by Dr. Lipson in Canandaigua, NY.  Never heard of him?
That's the point.  He is an excellent urological surgeon, half of a two doc
practise, who has done a large number of RP's with excellent results.  I was
continent within 48 hours and, despite losing one of my nerves, have
erectile function.  I personally spoke with a number of his RP patients and
all but one were continent and functioning (some with the help of Viagra) in
the other way.  The point of this is that there are *lots* of excellent
urological surgeons all over the country, not associated with Johns Hopkins.
Experience in the procedure is the key.  And if you have one of the locals
do it, rather than one of the big names, he (or she) will likely be the one
wielding the knife, not a resident.  I also liked having the surgery done in
our local hospital, a 10 minute drive from my home.  Though my margins were
not clear, I am presently almost 4 years past the surgery and still with
undetectable PSA's.  Your right--This you *gotta* have a big name is
bullshit.   Claude
jhhtexas@ieee.org - 01 Feb 2006 18:01 GMT
> >I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
> > know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
[quoted text clipped - 67 lines]
> undetectable PSA's.  Your right--This you *gotta* have a big name is
> bullshit.   Claude

I chose an experienced urologic surgeon at a major teaching hospital --
UCLA, as they accepted Medicare just as my local hospital would have.
If you don't have health insurance, a major medical center (like UCLA)
usually has financial assistance programs that could allow you can get
an RRP done much cheaper than at a community hospital. Don't assume
that a well-known medical center will be more expensive.
I.P. Freely - 01 Feb 2006 21:24 GMT
"juniper" accurately lamented

> Well, its impossible for those few experts to treat every prostate
> cancer patient.  If we try to go to Sloan Ketterling or wherever, it
> will bankrupt us.

> BUT, if we don't go to one of these experts or masters or whatever
> they're called, it puts me in the position of giving the impression
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> this case, you're left with the feeling that you are committing suicide
> or murder or lifelong disability if you don't go to one of them.

I've got health coverage coming out my wazoo. Surgeries cost me less out of
pocket than shoes or milk on an annual basis, no matter where I get it. On
top of that, I don't think my wife and I will be ABLE to outspend our
pensions and savings before we die. But did I even CONSIDER Scardino or
Walsh Lange or S-K or Mayo Clinic? No. I did what I'll bet is 1)98.648% as
good and 2) FAR simpler overall: I 3) picked a nearby teaching and research
hospital, 4) checked out its emphasis on prostate cancer, 5) found a
surgeon/ onc/ researcher/ medical professor I liked and who said all the
right things, 6) rejected his offer of my choice of any physician on the
staff, and said, 7) "Let's do it."

Why?

1. I doubt a surgeon who's done thousands of RPs is inherently better than
one who has done merely a thousand or two. Innate skill counts, too, and if
you can't get it right after one thousand, the next thousand ain't gonna
overcome your ineptitude.

2. We considered all the visits before and after surgery in choosing a
hospital. We have a high-end cancer RT center 10 minutes from home and three
very good hospitals within 20 minutes, but we're also just three hours from
Seattle with its huge selection of medical centers for more depth and
breadth. We've driven to Seattle (220 miles each way) 6-8 times now, for all
sorts of consultations. We're down to occasional long phone calls now to
discuss my case, relevant trials, new adjuvant tx options, etc., with more
face-to-face visits lined up the minute my PSA resurfaces or just any time I
want to talk face to face. It's also very reassuring to know that a whole
team of oncologists is STILL discussing ME every time my situation or
adjuvant treatment technology changes, thanks to my doc who's on that team
and still calling me at home 15 months post-op. Is Walsh or Scardino gonna
do that?

3. Teaching hospitals are the cream of the crop. One of mine's specialties
is PC, there are several other related highly rated medical centers in
Seattle, and they often work together. If I want a CT/PET scan to rule out
mets before accepting adjuvant RT, a state-of-the-art CT/PET scanner is
right down the road. Last time my doc phoned me, Caller ID said he was at
that center. Big-name new cancer meds? They're made and tested "down the
block". I'd have no reservations about walking in their door and asking
whether my case warrants trying out their latest promising med. I presume
most big cities have that depth and breadth of facilities available.

4. You local doc or some website clicks should indicate how active and
reputable a particular hospital is in PC treatment, and what collateral
facilities may be available if necessary. Similar checking into my
particular candidate surgeon's background also told me a lot, such as
experience (several RPs a week and teaches the procedure), reputation in the
uro community, education (S-K internship and post-doc for , and attends
national medical seminars), etc.

5. The "right things" for me included number of RPs he's performed as well
as details on that last paragraph.

6. He said I could choose any physician I wanted, including the university
surgery dept head, Lange, who had an RP, and who authored "PC for Dummies"
along with the whole UW & VA oncology staff. I didn't need him; by now I was
duly impressed with my guy.

7. They were ready to operate quite soon, having compacted many
consultations with several specialists into a very short time span. Their
cooperative, eager spirit, from nurses to surgeons, had impressed me from
the very first time I phoned the uro phone number cold and said, "I've got
Gleason 8 PC. What does your hospital have to offer me?" That call got me
the OR nurse who coordinates all PC surgery and lasted over half an hour,
and when the oncologist called back the next afternoon, we talked for
another 45 minutes, checking each other out.

By that time I didn't need no steenkin'  Walsh to feel confident I was in
good hands.

And my entire expense so far? Great Seattle dining and a Super 8 motel for
the wife while I was in recovery. (I could sleep and eat free in the
hospital if I didn't take the wife along, but I ain't eatin' hospital food
in a city like Seattle.)

Which brings up medical insurance. I gather you guys have none? I can't
imagine entering our age brackets without it. My medical jacket runs into
two very thick packages not even counting half a dozen surgeries (my RP was
a low-risk pajama party compared to one of them). Sure, I had military care
for 20 years and remnants of that now, so the cost is low (under a grand a
year), but without that I'd have bought my own insurance at "list price" for
exactly the concerns you've expressed. My medical bills would have probably
hit seven figures by now without medical coverage, and I'm just STARTING to
fall apart.

I.P.
juniper - 02 Feb 2006 05:15 GMT
> "juniper" accurately lamented
>
> Which brings up medical insurance. I gather you guys have none? I can't

This is great--all your answers.  I am only half through.  We do have
health insurance, but it only covers doctors in Arizona.  Not all, but
a good selection.  But if we tried to go to UCLA or New York, we would
have to pay all of it ourselves.

I have been reading about PCa since the first PSA result on 12/18, and
I must have missed the posts like this.  I really appreciate the
message that it is possible and responsible to get good medical care
elsewhere.  I may have been reading things wrong, but if I was, you
guys have set me straighter.  Thank you.  laurel
I.P. Freely - 02 Feb 2006 16:34 GMT
"juniper" wrote >  you guys have set me straighter.  Thank you.  laurel

Now if you ladies could just return the favor, we'd be even.    ;-(

I.P.
judamd@aol.com - 01 Feb 2006 23:07 GMT
I think you are unnecessarily flogging yourself.  There are plenty of
good urologists all over the country including Arizona, every one of
whom can provide excellent care.  We see an occasional horror story
about some quack mutilating a patient, but many of these are "doctors"
who also do nose jobs, hair transplants, boob lifts, and will cut your
toenails too while waiting for the anesthesia to kick in with their
cousin acting as assistant surgeon.  They often work out of a
storefront "clinica" in a poor part of town.  Any surgeon operating in
a real hospital has the same many years of training as any other
surgeon, has passed the same exams, is board certified, etc., etc..
Sure, some are better than others and a few have to take the exams a
second time to pass but any doctor can (and does) have screwups, even
the gurus.  Usually the best physicians are the ones who truly care
about their patients and who will make the extra effort to do the best
they can do no matter where they ranked in their graduating class or
where they hang their shingle.  What you need to do is get referrals
from other physicians such as your family doctor (who would they go to
if it were their prostate?) and interview at least half a dozen.
People end up going with the one who seems to be the most caring, has
the best "bedside manner", the one who has a busy office, the one who
does many of these surgeries each month, and the one who claims to have
good statistics.  You do the best you can do given your resources -
both financial and emotional.  Our local county hospital (Oakland, CA)
has some of the best doctors around.  They often look a little
hippy-dippy, coming to work in sandals with their hair tied back into a
ponytail (the men that is) but they do damn good work inspite of their
often limited financial resources - just about as good as anybody - so
don't feel you're shortchanging your husband just because your doctor's
name isn't Walsh.

If you have no insurance, you may want to investigate a new phenomenon,
some of the large, brand spanking new hospitals in India and Thailand
that cater to folks just like you from all over the world.  The
facilities are absolute top of the line, all the doctors are American
or European trained, they all speak English (unlike some in this
country), you are given a registered nurse as your private attendant
(you're lucky to see a registered nurse for more than a few minutes
each day around here), and after your hospital stay you spend another
week or so recovering at a nearby resort.  The total cost for two
including airfare and resort is about 20% of what it would cost in the
good old US of A just for the surgery.  Many of our x-rays and MRI's
are already outsourced to someone in Asia and we don't even know it -
with results every bit as good as those from the inhouse radiologists.
I'm not recommending this option, it's a mighty big step to take and
you will really flog yourself if it doesn't turn out well, but you
might look into it and tuck it away in the back of your mind just in
case.

No matter what road you take, it will be a crap shoot with regard to
side effects and possible recurrence.  Most doctors and hospitals hover
around the same statistics, all else being equal (no cherry picking,
for instance).  I saw some figures a few years ago with respect to
major heart surgery where something like 5% of the patients died in the
best hospitals and 10% died in the worst hospitals.  Does that mean the
best is twice as good as the worst?  I don't know, they don't seem much
different to me.  Is 80% erectile function with Viagra as reported by
Walsh better than 50% without Viagra as reported by some other doctors?
Probably not.

When it is all over and your husband is fully recovered, you will have
picked the best doctor.

All the luck to you and your husband.  
Dave Perry
Alan Meyer - 02 Feb 2006 23:00 GMT
> ... Usually the best physicians are the ones who truly care
> about their patients and who will make the extra effort to do
> the best they can do ...

I can't help but agree with this.  I can't always tell when one
doctor knows more science or more technique than another, but all
of us have learned to tell the difference between a person who
cares and is committed to what he or she is doing, and one who
isn't.

One doctor I went to did a digital rectal exam in 2 seconds,
found nothing, hurt me going in and out, told me I would be a
fool to get radiation instead of surgery, and worked me through
his office at high speed.

Another one did a careful exam, found problems that the first
didn't, and spent over an hour answering questions.  She's the
one who I got treatment from (radiation) and I'm very happy with
the results.

> ... get referrals from other physicians such as your family
> doctor (who would they go to if it were their prostate?)...

That sounds like a good way to start looking.

I.P.'s idea of checking out a teaching hospital is also a good
way.

> ... People end up going with the one who seems to be the most
> caring, has the best "bedside manner", the one who has a busy
> office, the one who does many of these surgeries each month,
> and the one who claims to have good statistics. ...

In effect, "bedside manner" was a key criterion for me.

I'll tell what is really horrible - to go to a famous cancer
center a thousand miles away and then have problems afterwards.
That's the worst of both worlds.  You spend the money for the
"best" treatment and find out that it didn't work out for you and
you can't easily get any followup.

I presume that happens less often at the great cancer centers
than at other ones, but it definitely does happen.  A friend of
mine got out of surgery at Johns Hopkins and, a month afterwards,
he still can't sit down without pain and one of his legs is numb.
S**t happens, and it can happen at Hopkins or Sloan-Kettering or
M.D. Anderson as well as anywhere else.

Good luck.

   Alan
juniper - 04 Feb 2006 03:06 GMT
> > ... Usually the best physicians are the ones who truly care
> > about their patients and who will make the extra effort to do
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> cares and is committed to what he or she is doing, and one who
> isn't.

This is for sure.  We saw Dr Ondreyco this week, and it was like being
on another planet compared to our 'cattle chute' experience at Mayo.
Maybe I'll post about it some day.

IP? SAID
> > ... get referrals from other physicians such as your family
> > doctor (who would they go to if it were their prostate?)...
>
> That sounds like a good way to start looking.

We could ask the family doctor for more referrals.  He did refer us to
the one urologist in town who (from what I could find) has an
'interest' in prostate cancer.  That doctor is, however, a general
urologist.  I am pretty sure we would want treatment from someone who
does PCa day in and day out.

Its a drag to go to Phoenix, but even if we found one good doctor here,
what about the rest of the team?  I didn't even try.  It might be bad
enough to go out of town for treatment, but if we saw a doctor in town
then did not choose to get treatment from him, we would get a
reputation and that would be bad. Its bigger than it used to be, but
its still a small town.  And anyway, stuff like the endorectal MRI
cannot even be done up here. Do they send people with PSAs over 20 to
Scottsdale?  Or do they just 'make do' with what they have up here?  I
don't know, it just didn't seem like a good idea to start down that
local path.

Dr Ondreyco is an exception (to the 'PCa-day-in-and-day-out'
statement), but she has knowledge/experience with PCa, and also she has
excellent experience with chemo and breast cancer (in some ways similar
to PCa).  Since it's looking like chemo has been the unappreciated
stepchild in PCa treatment, for no good reason, I wanted a physician
who had real knowledge there to put into the treatment-decision mix.
Also, she is strongly dedicated to a team approach. She has many other
qualities, such as a relationship with Scholz' clinic, willingness to
say "I don't know" (when she does, she gets the answer in minutes,
literally), and extreme caring very well done.  (Some humor, lots of
information-gathering, lots of information-giving.)  Plus a nice
surprise was the quality of her staff.  They are pros also.

So she is our hematologist/oncologist.  Grado has been recommended
several times, for expertise and caring, plus he has the best equipment
(no pun intended y'all), plus his office helped us get tests ordered
and such even though we had not yet been to see him.   So we have some
personal experience.  We are looking forward to meeting him.

We have so many more resources (2 good doctors instead of none; staging
tests on order) than we had 2 weeks ago, it almost feels like we have
no problems at all.  The MRI is scheduled for exactly 6 weeks after the
biopsy and we don't see any reason to rush down there to see doctors
when we won't even be able to stage before then.  So, although Ondreyco
wants us to have seen the other 2 doctors already, we're waiting till
the MRI and putting it all into one 2-day trip.  I hope she doesn't
fire us over this.  She's pretty cool.

> I'll tell what is really horrible - to go to a famous cancer
> center a thousand miles away and then have problems afterwards.
> That's the worst of both worlds.  You spend the money for the
> "best" treatment and find out that it didn't work out for you and
> you can't easily get any followup.

Excellent point.
Glassman - 01 Feb 2006 23:53 GMT
> I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
> know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> will bankrupt us.  We can probably get $50K if we sold our house, maybe
> that much if we cleared out our retirements, maybe that much more could

Looks like you have no health insurance. Start contacting human resources
at all your area hospitals. Tell them your situation, and let them help you.
Almost every doc in the world does SOME pro bono work. It's tax deductable
for them. Even broke guys get surgery. As to the doc... relax there are
thousands of good qualified Urologists all over the country that can get
this done. It's not like you're going to a blind butcher. Start doing the
legwork, and stop feeling sorry for yourselves. If he was diagnosed early
there's a good chance he'll be just fine.

Signature

"Don't get me wrong...  I'm SNARKY"
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories

Tom - 02 Feb 2006 04:38 GMT
I'll just second what others have said. You don't need a big name.
There are uros all over who do great work. I live in Georgia and had
surgery 4 months ago locally. I am VERY pleased with the outcome. I
married a RN 3 years ago and have learned a lot about how the medical
community. Primary care docs see patients for years after surgery. They
know who's good and who isn't. If you know anyone in the AZ medical
community have them ask around. If you know someone who knows someone
have them ask around. If you know someone who knows etc. I'll bet AZ is
a great place to find a PCa surgeon. All the best.

Tom
Justin Case - 02 Feb 2006 17:56 GMT
: I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
: know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
: recommend going to only the best doctors, like 6, in the country.

<Remainder snipped>

Laurel, I live in New Mexico, probably in a smaller town than you, and my
surgeon was recommended (on the basis of a 28.4 PSA) by my personal
physician who knew to whom he was sending me.  The PSA was scary enough and
the biopsy was certainly no fun (and confirmed all our suspicions) and
surgery, RRP, performed within the week.  Prior to the urologist's
examination I didn't know this man, but trusted my doctor's recommendation
because I trusted him.

Turns out, this urologist was formerly an army officer who treated many men
at Fort Bliss, Texas, before retirement from the army and he was the most
considerate, compassionate, and knowledgeable surgeon I could have hoped to
find.  He followed up consistently, made further recommendations (radiation
was eventually required), and is still following my case after about four
years.

Maybe it's an advantage for me that I'm a Christian and depend on the kind
of guidance that I receive from God.  It's a discussion I prefer not to go
into right now, but I never even thought twice about accepting what was
being offered.  I hadn't read anything about prostate cancer before this,
never looked at this newsgroup, never even talked with anyone on a personal
basis, and I certainly didn't travel out of town (Las Cruces) to New York or
Los Angeles, or Boston, or any of those other places where the "experts"
live and perform their surgeries.

In short, do you trust your family doctor or personal physician?  What does
he or she tell you?  Is there more than one urologist in your vicinity?  Do
you have an US TOO chapter in your town?  (You can hear valuable stories and
helps in this group.)

There are many posts preceding mine here and I haven't read most of them.
Some may offer similar counsel -- I hope they do.

Don't despair, help is available.  You and your husband are not experiencing
anything that a number of others here are not also experiencing.

Ken Bland
judamd@aol.com - 02 Feb 2006 22:08 GMT
Did you really mean "surgery within a week"?  I have always been led to
believe the colon needed to heal up a bit after the biopsy and before
any surgery was performed in that area since there's some risk peeling
the prostate off the other side of the damaged colon wall.  The usual
wait is around six weeks or more.  Maybe your higher PSA was more of an
"emergency" but the one week delay is a surprise, to me at least.  It
seems to have worked out OK for you though.
Dave Perry
Justin Case - 02 Feb 2006 22:29 GMT
: Did you really mean "surgery within a week"?  I have always been led to
: believe the colon needed to heal up a bit after the biopsy and before
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
: seems to have worked out OK for you though.
: Dave Perry

It might've been a little longer than a week, Dave; it happened quite a
while ago.  I suppose it took several days for the needle biopsy results to
come back and a little longer for the surgeon to schedule to operating room,
but, on recollection, I don't think it was more than about two weeks.
Things moved pretty fast when the biopsy report was returned.  I recall that
there was concern that the prostate capsule had begun to rupture.

The prostatectomy didn't reduce the PSA to zero, either.  I had two shots of
Lupron-L which dropped the PSA a bit, but then started back up again.  At
this point the urologist said, in his laconic style, "Well, 't'were me, I'd
be going for radiation."  That was sufficient for me.  The subsequent
radiation dropped the PSA to zero where it's been for four years, but the
coincidental effects were not pleasant and after four trips for colonoscopy
and sigmoidoscopy with argon laser cauterization, I'm greatly encouraged at
this moment.

Ken Bland
doubleowseven@theplacecalledyahoo.com - 03 Feb 2006 03:31 GMT
>I am at work and don't have much time, but I am so frustrated and don't
>know what to think.  It is all very well and good for everyone to
[quoted text clipped - 49 lines]
>
>laurel

Sorry for what you are going thru.  It's something I'm sure crosses
many peoples minds.  I know I gave it some thought.  I'm in Arizona
(Phoenix metro) but went to Detroit, MI for my robotic lap RP.  I
found that the doctor there (one of the pioneers in RLRP) as well as
the hospital was "in-network" for my health insurance.   Having said
that, there's no way to know that the outcome would have been any
different had I used a local doctor.  I have talked to people who used
local doctors here who had completely great outcomes so its not a
given that a local doc won't be as good.  I did have to find a local
Uro to do my follow up.  I can't vouch for his surgical skills but I
found a local Uro-surgeon who seems very nice who has done 150 of the
same type of robotic LRP here in phx and he may be just as good as
anyone else.  He was agreeable to doing my follow up even though he
knew I was going out of town for the surgery before I went.  I'm not
making any recommendation that he's right for you but if you want to
see if he's on your insurance his name is Dr. Dale Russell.  One of
his partners, whose name I believe is Mitchell Kane, also does the
same surgery but I've never met him.  I believe Kane has done perhaps
200 of the procedures.  From my research at the time (last Dec) they
appeared to be the most experienced at that particular procedure here
in Phx.  

My best wishes to you in this trying time.  Ask if you have any
questions.
juniper - 04 Feb 2006 03:22 GMT
> Uro to do my follow up.  I can't vouch for his surgical skills but I
> found a local Uro-surgeon who seems very nice who has done 150 of the
> same type of robotic LRP here in phx and he may be just as good as
> anyone else.  He was agreeable to doing my follow up even though he

Thanks, I have been trying to come up with a list of specific questions
for doctors and all I found on the Web (bad search probably) is generic
things to ask a doctor.  Guess I know what I'll be doing this weekend.
But I know that the resources I have (books, websites, groups) have
between them all the questions I need to know.  I just need to start
collating and culling.  But up until Monday night we were still doing
the questions for the 1st visit to the oncologist, this weekend it is
surgery and rad I guess.

Is it okay to just call doctors offices and ask them these questions
without actually going in?  How do you do that?

> making any recommendation that he's right for you but if you want to
> see if he's on your insurance his name is Dr. Dale Russell.  One of
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> appeared to be the most experienced at that particular procedure here
> in Phx.

Thank you for sharing the fruits of your time and research, and thank
you also for being willing to actually name names.  We will be
responsible for the doctors we choose, but it is very helpful to have
starting places.  

best regards,
laurel
Glassman - 04 Feb 2006 05:24 GMT
 Laurel/Juniper, I may get some upset but this is my opinion. I would not
mortgage my family's future with a lifetime of debt for the top 10 guy, when
I can get an OK experienced guy to do this surgery that's covered by my
insurance. It's not like it's brain surgery, or a 1960's Debaky heart
transplant that no one else could do. Sure it's a serious surgery and
desease, but there are thousands of really good experienced Uro's that can
do it with a high probability of the same success.
 I had the surgery almost 4 years ago. I went with a younger and local guy,
with lots of experience and top credentials, that no one ever heard of. I
wouldn't change a thing if I could go back and get Walsh to do it.

Signature

"Don't get me wrong...  I'm SNARKY"
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories

Tom Cular - 05 Feb 2006 14:32 GMT
>  Laurel/Juniper, I may get some upset but this is my opinion. I would not
> mortgage my family's future with a lifetime of debt for the top 10 guy,
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> with lots of experience and top credentials, that no one ever heard of. I
> wouldn't change a thing if I could go back and get Walsh to do it.

I agree with JK, if the "Top Ten", whether it's surgery or radiation were
the only competent Drs. to seek out, they would be darn busy with the
230,000 +/- cases diagnosed every year in the US, not to mention that most
of us would go untreated.

Tom
doubleowseven@theplacecalledyahoo.com - 04 Feb 2006 07:40 GMT
>> Uro to do my follow up.  I can't vouch for his surgical skills but I
>> found a local Uro-surgeon who seems very nice who has done 150 of the
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>the questions for the 1st visit to the oncologist, this weekend it is
>surgery and rad I guess.

I never found a good set of questions.  Mostly I read Walsh's book and
as I read it things that seemed important would jump out and I'm jot
them down as things to ask.  For example, Walsh says "if your doctor
says 'the cancer is more on the right side then the left so I'll
remove the right side nerves", that you should know that statistically
that's a poor decision and he goes into the statistics. And that was
one of the things my first Uro/surgeon said, that he was going to
remove the right side nerves for that reason.  The Doctor I finally
choose left all the nerves in and still got negative margins.  So if
you have time, you might try that approach.  

>Is it okay to just call doctors offices and ask them these questions
>without actually going in?  How do you do that?

I'll be surprised if you get much info that way from the local
doctors.  I hoped to do that with a guy recommended at the Mayo but
when I called I found it would cost me around $400 for a consultation
visit and my insurance didn't include the Mayo in it's network.  I
later found out that the Mayo here in Scottsdale is not much of a
player in the newest forms of prostate surgery anyway.  But I did find
that the Major out of town places that looked like strong candidates
based on their web pages would often have a doctor call you back and
talk to you.  One place was Kongrad in Florida, I talked to him a
couple times and almost went there but my insurance would not cover
his $18000 fee.  Another place very high on my list was the Henry Ford
Hospital in Detroit and they were covered under my insurance along
with the Doctors.  They sent a package of forms to fill out which I
faxed back and a couple days later one of the Doctors on their team
called and talked to me and did not seem to be trying to rush me off
the phone.  Of course there is only so much they can tell you and it's
not going to be vastly different from doctor to doctor but you can get
a feel for how up they are on the newest stuff and just an overall
feel for whether you think they sound competent.  I think ultimately
you wind up going with part gut feeling and part rational choice. Even
though you are restricted to AZ hospitals and doctors you might want
to talk to some of the out of town people to see what they say. One
question I always ask is "Is there some question I didn't ask that
most people ask you?"  Sometimes they have something I should have
asked.

>> making any recommendation that he's right for you but if you want to
>> see if he's on your insurance his name is Dr. Dale Russell.  One of
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>best regards,
>laurel

Please let us know how things are going.  Everyone here cares about
you folks and hopes you will get thru this in the best possible way.

Peace
Jim
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.