Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / January 2006
New natural cancer remedy backed by us patent goes mlm
|
|
Thread rating:  |
DAVID YOUNG - 22 Jan 2006 14:30 GMT Our Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!
Waiora is a world-class company dedicated to helping people maintain their health as they age. Our healthy living and aging philosophy is simple - eat well-balanced meals that include multiple servings of foods high in fiber, like fruits, vegetables, and bran, exercise regularly and incorporate a nutritional regimen that addresses aging at the root of the problem, from a cellular and biological level. One of Waiora's Newest Products "Natural Cellular Defense", acts like a sponge to remove toxins and chemicals from the body. It works so well, the company has a US PATENT# 6288045 documenting it's amazing Cancer cell killing ability in the human body. It not only kills cancer but balances the bodies blood ph to slightly alkaline to prevent viral and bacterial growth! It has been extreemly effective on shingles and even chrones disease. because it is a natural product, it is even safe for pregnant mothers to be. The company has experienced a 433% growth rate in gross sales in only 150 days after NCD was introduced. The Compensation plan is the BEST I've seen! Check it out at http://uspto.gov -search for PATENT# 6288045 You may find the product here: http://www.linkbrander.com/go/4658
Be sure to watch the ten minute video and listen to the 3 minite recorded call (212)461-9061 Stay Healthy and Happy, David Young
Gordy - 22 Jan 2006 15:02 GMT > Our > Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% > within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045! UH OH! There are going to be a lot of unemployed medical oncologists.
-Gordy
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 17:06 GMT >> Our >> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% >> within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045! > > UH OH! There are going to be a lot of unemployed medical oncologists. They could become sales wo/men.
I'll miss mine.
Mary
> -Gordy I.P. Freely - 22 Jan 2006 19:03 GMT Lessee, do I buy onea them there cancer sponges, or do I spend the money on tickets to see "Bareback Mountain"? Do I choose ADT or bone mets?
If it ain't one damn decision, it's another.
I.P.
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 20:33 GMT > Lessee, do I buy onea them there cancer sponges, or do I spend the money > on tickets to see "Bareback Mountain"? > Do I choose ADT or bone mets? > > If it ain't one damn decision, it's another. <sigh> it's a tough life ...
Mary
> I.P. baldycotton - 22 Jan 2006 18:15 GMT >Our Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% >within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045! And you've been keeping this a secret for 4 1/2 years?
Ernest Gudath - 22 Jan 2006 18:22 GMT > Our > Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% > within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045! My infallible shockproof BS detector is detecting. The needle is pegged.
Brian - 22 Jan 2006 23:08 GMT >> Our >> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% within 72 hours according >> to US PATENT 6288045! >> > My infallible shockproof BS detector is detecting. The needle is pegged. Mine vomited and took the rest of the day "sick leave". I've been warned not to do this to it again.
Stavros - 22 Jan 2006 19:04 GMT > Our > Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% > within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045! Does it come in an oil formulation?
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 20:33 GMT >> Our >> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% >> within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045! >> > Does it come in an oil formulation? Does it come in blue?
Mary
baldycotton - 22 Jan 2006 20:10 GMT >Our healthy living and aging philosophy is simple <snip-snip> > and incorporate a nutritional regimen that addresses aging at the >root of the problem, from a cellular and biological level. In other words, do what you always knew was right, AND BUY YOUR PRODUCT?
>it is even safe for pregnant mothers to be. Yeah sure, but what about "not-pregnant" mothers to be?
>The company has experienced a 433% growth rate in >gross sales in only 150 days after NCD was introduced. So if the day BEFORE it was introduced there were no sales, and on intro day there was one sale, like to your proud Mom or someone. And in the 150 days following there were four sales and one with a 2/3 off discount, maybe for your Aunt Mary...
WoW! That's like 433% growth! Let me call my broker!
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 20:34 GMT >>Our healthy living and aging philosophy is simple <snip-snip> >> and incorporate a nutritional regimen that addresses aging at the [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > in the 150 days following there were four sales and one with a 2/3 off > discount, maybe for your Aunt Mary... HEY!
I'm not even pregnant!!!
Mary
baldycotton - 22 Jan 2006 22:14 GMT >HEY! >I'm not even pregnant!!! Hmmm... maybe you bought the wrong pills!
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 22:46 GMT >>HEY! >>I'm not even pregnant!!! > > Hmmm... maybe you bought the wrong pills! At my age I get mine free. You gotta take what you're given!
Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 22:58 GMT > >> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > At my age I get mine free. You gotta take what you're given! > Um, I thunk that an aspirin tablet was an effective contraceptive. The lady simply holds it betwixt her knees.....
Regards,
Steve J
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 23:10 GMT >>>> HEY! >>>> I'm not even pregnant!!! [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > Um, I thunk that an aspirin tablet was an effective contraceptive. The > lady simply holds it betwixt her knees..... Doesn't necessarily work.Think about it.
Mary
> Regards, > > Steve J Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 23:30 GMT > (su-nip)
Quoting me:
>> Um, I thunk that an aspirin tablet was an effective contraceptive. The >> lady simply holds it betwixt her knees..... >> Mary replied:
> Doesn't necessarily work.Think about it. > I've been on ADT for over a year. As all know, one SE is that it may tend to degrade memory. I was relying upon memory (though I have not encountered a lady with an aspirin between her knees -- I think) when I wrote what I hoped were Words of Wisdom.
As Mary suggested, I have thunk about it. Wellll, maybe..... ;-)
But I will say this: I like the way Mary thinks...... :-)
Regards,
Steve J
Mary Fisher - 23 Jan 2006 11:31 GMT > (su-nip) > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> > I've been on ADT ?
> for over a year. As all know, one SE Side effect?
> is that it may > tend to degrade memory. You don't need artificial aids for that, advancing years do it for you.
> I was relying upon memory (though I have not > encountered a lady with an aspirin between her knees -- I think) That raises all sorts of thoughts ...
> when I > wrote what I hoped were Words of Wisdom.
> As Mary suggested, I have thunk about it. Wellll, maybe..... ;-) > > But I will say this: I like the way Mary thinks...... :-) I don't just think, I do :-)
Mary
Brian - 22 Jan 2006 23:12 GMT >> "baldycotton" wrote >>> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > Um, I thunk that an aspirin tablet was an effective contraceptive. The > lady simply holds it betwixt her knees..... That method has been defeated by sufficient contortion.
However, inserting the aspirin 3" up the urethra (either party's) does seem to be a sure cure.
Mary Fisher - 23 Jan 2006 11:28 GMT >>>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:34:39 -0000, "Mary Fisher" wrote: >>>> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > > That method has been defeated by sufficient contortion. Oh it doesn't need to be contortive (is there such a word?). Think spoons.
> However, inserting the aspirin 3" up the urethra (either party's) does > seem to be a sure cure. It wouldn't be pleasant but wouldn't prevent impregnation if it were inserted in the female urethra.
Mary
Brian - 25 Jan 2006 02:13 GMT >> However, inserting the aspirin 3" up the urethra (either party's) does >> seem to be a sure cure. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > Mary I should think her pain level would prevent any further progress in the direction...
Brian - 22 Jan 2006 23:09 GMT >>it is even safe for pregnant mothers to be. > > Yeah sure, but what about "not-pregnant" mothers to be? More important, is it safe for pregnant fathers?
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 23:13 GMT >>>it is even safe for pregnant mothers to be. >> >> Yeah sure, but what about "not-pregnant" mothers to be? > > More important, is it safe for pregnant fathers? Only if they're 'to be'.
Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 20:21 GMT Over on sci.med.prostate.cancer, where this spammer has also posted his pitch, jhhtexas posted the following response:
"I went to the patent office website and looked at your cited patent. One sentence in the patent states "The drug must be administered directly into the cancer tumor by injection or a 24-hour intravenous slow drip. The patent substance must be in close proximity to or infused into the cancer cells and/or in the blood stream supplying the tumor."
This does not sound anything like the natural nutrional (sic) product you are peddling."
Good detective work.
Regards,
Steve J
"A man's most valuable trait is a judicious sense of what not to believe." -- Euripides
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 20:37 GMT > Over on sci.med.prostate.cancer, where this spammer has also posted his > pitch, jhhtexas posted the following response: [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > This does not sound anything like the natural nutrional (sic) You missed the solecisms in "*it's* amazing Cancer cell killing ability in the human body. ... It has been *extreemly* effective on shingles and even *chrones* disease."
Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 20:57 GMT On January 22, Mary Fisher responded to me:
> You missed the solecisms in "*it's* amazing Cancer cell killing ability in > the human body. ... It has been *extreemly* effective on shingles and even > *chrones* disease." > Au contraire. I just ignored them in order to quote jhh.
;-)
Regards,
Steve J
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 21:01 GMT > ... I just ignored them in order to quote jhh. jhh?
OK, you've got me there.
What's jhh?
Mary
> ;-) > > Regards, > > Steve J Gordy - 22 Jan 2006 21:30 GMT "Over on sci.med.prostate.cancer, where this spammer has also posted his pitch, jhhtexas posted the following response:"
On the (most likely) assumption that the poster is from Texas and bears the initials "jhh".
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 21:41 GMT > "Over on sci.med.prostate.cancer, where this spammer has also posted > his > pitch, jhhtexas posted the following response:" > > On the (most likely) assumption that the poster is from Texas and bears > the initials "jhh". Oh. I thought it was DAVID YOUNG ...
I'm so green ...
Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 21:43 GMT On January 22, Mary Fisher enquired:
Quoting me:
>> ... I just ignored them in order to quote jhh. >> She wrote:
> jhh? > > OK, you've got me there. > > What's jhh? > I abbreviated.
His/her entire e-mail address, per the referenced post, is: jhhtexas@ieee.org
Beyond that, I dunno who 'tis....
My point is that (s)he pretty much destroyed the spammer's pretensions.
Regards,
Steve J
A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk I have a work station. -- Hecate
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 21:44 GMT > On January 22, Mary Fisher enquired: > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > > My point is that (s)he pretty much destroyed the spammer's pretensions. Indeed.
I wish I were clever.
Can I mail you, please?
Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 22:13 GMT On January 22, Mary Fisher wrote, in pertinent part:
(ka-snip)
> Indeed. > I wish I were clever. > > Can I mail you, please? > Please do :-)
Regards,
Steve J
"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." -- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slitheen - 23 Jan 2006 15:35 GMT > Our > Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% > within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045! This SPAM is in the poorest taste I have ever come across. Well done.
jhhtexas@ieee.org - 26 Jan 2006 23:15 GMT I went to the patent office website and looked at your cited patent. One sentence in the patent states "The drug must be administered directly into the cancer tumor by injection or a 24-hour intravenous slow drip. The patent substance must be in close proximity to or infused into the cancer cells and/or in the blood stream supplying the tumor."
This does not sound anything like the natural nutrional product you are
peddling.
|
|
|