Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / January 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

New natural cancer remedy backed by us patent goes mlm

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DAVID YOUNG - 22 Jan 2006 14:30 GMT
Our
Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100%
within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!

Waiora is a world-class company dedicated to
helping people maintain their health as they age.
Our healthy living and aging
philosophy is simple - eat well-balanced meals
that include
multiple servings of foods high in fiber, like
fruits, vegetables,
and bran, exercise regularly and incorporate a
nutritional regimen that addresses aging at the
root of the problem,  from a cellular and
biological level. One of Waiora's Newest Products
"Natural Cellular Defense", acts like a sponge to
remove toxins and chemicals from the body.  It
works so well, the company has a US PATENT#
6288045 documenting
it's amazing Cancer cell killing ability in the
human body. It not only kills cancer but balances
the bodies blood ph to slightly alkaline to
prevent viral and bacterial growth!  It has been
extreemly effective on shingles and even chrones
disease.
because it is a natural product, it is even safe
for pregnant mothers to be.
The company has experienced a 433% growth rate in
gross sales in only 150 days after NCD was
introduced.  The Compensation plan is the BEST
I've seen!
Check it out at http://uspto.gov  -search for
PATENT# 6288045
You may find the product here:
http://www.linkbrander.com/go/4658

Be sure to watch the ten minute video
and listen to the 3 minite recorded call
(212)461-9061
Stay Healthy and Happy,
David Young
Gordy - 22 Jan 2006 15:02 GMT
> Our
> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100%
> within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!

UH OH!  There are going to be a lot of unemployed medical oncologists.

-Gordy
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 17:06 GMT
>> Our
>> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100%
>> within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!
>
> UH OH!  There are going to be a lot of unemployed medical oncologists.

They could become sales wo/men.

I'll miss mine.

Mary

> -Gordy
I.P. Freely - 22 Jan 2006 19:03 GMT
Lessee, do I buy onea them there cancer sponges, or do I spend the money on
tickets to see "Bareback Mountain"?
Do I choose ADT or bone mets?

If it ain't one damn decision, it's another.

I.P.
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 20:33 GMT
> Lessee, do I buy onea them there cancer sponges, or do I spend the money
> on tickets to see "Bareback Mountain"?
> Do I choose ADT or bone mets?
>
> If it ain't one damn decision, it's another.

<sigh> it's a tough life ...

Mary

> I.P.
baldycotton - 22 Jan 2006 18:15 GMT
>Our Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100%
>within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!

And you've been keeping this a secret for 4 1/2 years?
Ernest Gudath - 22 Jan 2006 18:22 GMT
> Our
> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100%
> within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!

My infallible shockproof BS detector is detecting. The needle is pegged.
Brian - 22 Jan 2006 23:08 GMT
>> Our
>> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100% within 72 hours according
>> to US PATENT 6288045!
>>
> My infallible shockproof BS detector is detecting. The needle is pegged.

Mine vomited and took the rest of the day "sick leave".  I've been warned
not to do this to it again.
Stavros - 22 Jan 2006 19:04 GMT
> Our
> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100%
> within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!

Does it come in an oil formulation?
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 20:33 GMT
>> Our
>> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100%
>> within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!
>>
> Does it come in an oil formulation?

Does it come in blue?

Mary
baldycotton - 22 Jan 2006 20:10 GMT
>Our healthy living and aging philosophy is simple  <snip-snip>
> and incorporate a nutritional regimen that addresses aging at the
>root of the problem,  from a cellular and biological level.

In other words, do what you always knew was right, AND BUY YOUR
PRODUCT?

>it is even safe for pregnant mothers to be.

Yeah sure, but what about "not-pregnant" mothers to be?

>The company has experienced a 433% growth rate in
>gross sales in only 150 days after NCD was introduced.

So if the day BEFORE it was introduced there were no sales, and on
intro day there was one sale, like to your proud Mom or someone.  And
in the 150 days following there were four sales and one with a 2/3 off
discount, maybe for your Aunt Mary...

WoW!  That's like 433% growth!  Let me call my broker!
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 20:34 GMT
>>Our healthy living and aging philosophy is simple  <snip-snip>
>> and incorporate a nutritional regimen that addresses aging at the
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> in the 150 days following there were four sales and one with a 2/3 off
> discount, maybe for your Aunt Mary...

HEY!

I'm not even pregnant!!!

Mary
baldycotton - 22 Jan 2006 22:14 GMT
>HEY!
>I'm not even pregnant!!!

Hmmm... maybe you bought the wrong pills!
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 22:46 GMT
>>HEY!
>>I'm not even pregnant!!!
>
> Hmmm... maybe you bought the wrong pills!

At my age I get mine free. You gotta take what you're given!

Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 22:58 GMT
>  
>>    
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> At my age I get mine free. You gotta take what you're given!
>  
Um, I thunk that an aspirin tablet was an effective contraceptive. The
lady simply holds it betwixt her knees.....

Regards,

Steve J
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 23:10 GMT
>>>> HEY!
>>>> I'm not even pregnant!!!
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Um, I thunk that an aspirin tablet was an effective contraceptive. The
> lady simply holds it betwixt her knees.....

Doesn't necessarily work.Think about it.

Mary

> Regards,
>
> Steve J
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 23:30 GMT
>  
(su-nip)

Quoting me:
>> Um, I thunk that an aspirin tablet was an effective contraceptive. The
>> lady simply holds it betwixt her knees.....
>>    
Mary replied:

> Doesn't necessarily work.Think about it.
>  
I've been on ADT for over a year. As all know, one SE is that it may
tend to degrade memory. I was relying upon memory (though I have not
encountered a lady with an aspirin between her knees -- I think) when I
wrote what I hoped were Words of Wisdom.

As Mary suggested, I have thunk about it. Wellll, maybe.....  ;-)

But I will say this: I like the way Mary thinks...... :-)

Regards,

Steve J
Mary Fisher - 23 Jan 2006 11:31 GMT
> (su-nip)
>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>>
> I've been on ADT

?

> for over a year. As all know, one SE

Side effect?

> is that it may
> tend to degrade memory.

You don't need artificial aids for that, advancing years do it for you.

> I was relying upon memory (though I have not
> encountered a lady with an aspirin between her knees -- I think)

That raises all sorts of thoughts ...

> when I
> wrote what I hoped were Words of Wisdom.

> As Mary suggested, I have thunk about it. Wellll, maybe.....  ;-)
>
> But I will say this: I like the way Mary thinks...... :-)

I don't just think, I do :-)

Mary
Brian - 22 Jan 2006 23:12 GMT
>> "baldycotton"  wrote
>>>    
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Um, I thunk that an aspirin tablet was an effective contraceptive. The
> lady simply holds it betwixt her knees.....

That method has been defeated by sufficient contortion.

However, inserting the aspirin 3" up the urethra (either party's) does
seem to be a sure cure.
Mary Fisher - 23 Jan 2006 11:28 GMT
>>>> On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:34:39 -0000, "Mary Fisher" wrote:
>>>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> That method has been defeated by sufficient contortion.

Oh it doesn't need to be contortive (is there such a word?). Think spoons.

> However, inserting the aspirin 3" up the urethra (either party's) does
> seem to be a sure cure.

It wouldn't be pleasant but wouldn't prevent impregnation if it were
inserted in the female urethra.

Mary
Brian - 25 Jan 2006 02:13 GMT
>> However, inserting the aspirin 3" up the urethra (either party's) does
>> seem to be a sure cure.
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mary

I should think her pain level would prevent any further progress in the
direction...
Brian - 22 Jan 2006 23:09 GMT
>>it is even safe for pregnant mothers to be.
>
> Yeah sure, but what about "not-pregnant" mothers to be?

More important, is it safe for pregnant fathers?
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 23:13 GMT
>>>it is even safe for pregnant mothers to be.
>>
>> Yeah sure, but what about "not-pregnant" mothers to be?
>
> More important, is it safe for pregnant fathers?

Only if they're 'to be'.

Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 20:21 GMT
Over on sci.med.prostate.cancer, where this spammer has also posted his
pitch, jhhtexas posted the following response:

"I went to the patent office website and looked at your cited patent.
One sentence in the patent states "The drug must be administered
directly into the cancer tumor by injection or a 24-hour intravenous
slow drip. The patent substance must be in close proximity to or
infused into the cancer cells and/or in the blood stream supplying the
tumor."

This does not sound anything like the natural nutrional (sic) product
you are
peddling."

Good detective work.

Regards,

Steve J

"A man's most valuable trait is a judicious sense of what not to believe."
-- Euripides
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 20:37 GMT
> Over on sci.med.prostate.cancer, where this spammer has also posted his
> pitch, jhhtexas posted the following response:
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> This does not sound anything like the natural nutrional (sic)

You missed the solecisms in  "*it's* amazing Cancer cell killing ability in
the human body. ...  It has been *extreemly* effective on shingles and even
*chrones* disease."

Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 20:57 GMT
On January 22, Mary Fisher responded to me:
> You missed the solecisms in  "*it's* amazing Cancer cell killing ability in
> the human body. ...  It has been *extreemly* effective on shingles and even
> *chrones* disease."
>  
Au contraire. I just ignored them in order to quote jhh.

;-)

Regards,

Steve J
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 21:01 GMT
> ... I just ignored them in order to quote jhh.

jhh?

OK, you've got me there.

What's jhh?

Mary

> ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve J
Gordy - 22 Jan 2006 21:30 GMT
"Over on sci.med.prostate.cancer, where this spammer has also posted
his
pitch, jhhtexas posted the following response:"

On the (most likely) assumption that the poster is from Texas and bears
the initials "jhh".
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 21:41 GMT
> "Over on sci.med.prostate.cancer, where this spammer has also posted
> his
> pitch, jhhtexas posted the following response:"
>
> On the (most likely) assumption that the poster is from Texas and bears
> the initials "jhh".

Oh. I thought it was DAVID YOUNG ...

I'm so green ...

Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 21:43 GMT
On January 22, Mary Fisher enquired:

Quoting me:
>> ... I just ignored them in order to quote jhh.
>>    
She wrote:
> jhh?
>
> OK, you've got me there.
>
> What's jhh?
>  
I abbreviated.

His/her entire e-mail address, per the referenced post, is:
jhhtexas@ieee.org

Beyond that, I dunno who 'tis....

My point is that (s)he pretty much destroyed the spammer's pretensions.

Regards,

Steve J

A bus station is where a bus stops.  A train station is where a train
stops.  On my desk I have a work station.
-- Hecate
Mary Fisher - 22 Jan 2006 21:44 GMT
> On January 22, Mary Fisher enquired:
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> My point is that (s)he pretty much destroyed the spammer's pretensions.

Indeed.

I wish I were clever.

Can I mail you, please?

Mary
Steve Jordan - 22 Jan 2006 22:13 GMT
On January 22, Mary Fisher wrote, in pertinent part:

(ka-snip)
> Indeed.
> I wish I were clever.
>
> Can I mail you, please?
>  
Please do :-)

Regards,

Steve J

"Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path
and leave a trail."
-- Ralph Waldo Emerson
Slitheen - 23 Jan 2006 15:35 GMT
> Our
> Natural Product Kills Human Cancer cells 100%
> within 72 hours according to US PATENT 6288045!

This SPAM is in the poorest taste I have ever come across. Well done.
jhhtexas@ieee.org - 26 Jan 2006 23:15 GMT
I went to the patent office website and looked at your cited patent.
One sentence in the patent states "The drug must be administered
directly into the cancer tumor by injection or a 24-hour intravenous
slow drip. The patent substance must be in close proximity to or
infused into the cancer cells and/or in the blood stream supplying the
tumor."

This does not sound anything like the natural nutrional product you are

peddling.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.