Aha! I've had 2 ruptured discs for many years, been on Zoladex and
Casodex for almost a year and had 25 sessions of EBRT during July and
August of this year and then 3 sessions of HDR brachytherapy on August
29 and 30. BTW - even Astra-Zeneca's website refers to back pain and
bone pain for each of the 2 drugs.
I had bone density and bone scans (for mets) in February when I first
started on the meds and had another bone scan in July - fortunately
negative.
Steve Kramer - 09 Jan 2006 11:53 GMT
My experience is essentially the same. L4/L5 rupture in 1982. It's been
sore to painful for 23 years, but no difference after Lupron. Had dexoscan
six months ago and no problems there, though I am taking Fozomax and
calcium.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05, 5/05, 10/05
PSA .07 .05 .06 .05 .08
Non Illegitimi Carborundum
> Aha! I've had 2 ruptured discs for many years, been on Zoladex and
> Casodex for almost a year and had 25 sessions of EBRT during July and
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> started on the meds and had another bone scan in July - fortunately
> negative.
> Nobody will admit to a cause or connection to my PCa treatment. 18 mths
> ADT (Lucrin) plus EBRT x 23 and HDRB x 3.
> (I was never given a Bone Mineral Density test at the beginning
> because there was "no evidence of weak bones or recent fractures,
> consistent with Osteo-Porosis.")
I, also, did not get a BMD Baseline (I did my own Dexa but no qCT was
ordered) before injecting Lupron, I consider it a serious oversight on
the uro's part.
> My take on all this is, that the ADT has caused general weakening of the
> bones and connective tissue, plus previous DJD problems to become worse,
> plus my spine and L knee cartilage were disturbed by rough handling
> during the HDRB treatment period of 48hrs immobilisation by the Epidural.
Clarence, please state what was the volume/weight of your prostate at
start of HDRB? Mine was 23g at biopsy 4 months ago (start of Lupron) and
was told by the RadOnc that 23 was too small for HDRB. He's the only
source of this assertion (that a prostate can be too small for HDRB) that
I can find.
Alan Meyer - 09 Jan 2006 05:17 GMT
> ...
> Clarence, please state what was the volume/weight of your prostate at
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I can find.
> ...
Brian,
I was in a clinical trial of magnetic resonance imaging guided
HDRB. I had Lupron before the radiation. I was told before
any treatment that my prostate was 40 grams. When it came
time for the HDRB, the rad onc told me my prostate was tiny
(Lupron causes it to shrink.) But they apparently had no problem
doing the HDRB - though they were using MRI instead of
ultrasound to guide the placement of the catheters - which
might have been a factor.
Does the rad onc say no brachytherapy at all, or just no High
Dose Rate Brachytherapy?
Is he a guy that specializes in prostates, or does he mainly
do other types of cancer? It's possible that he feels that the
23 gram size is not within his limits of skill - in which case you
sure don't want him to do it. But it's possible someone else
can. You might want to check - hopefully with someone who
won't just say, "Yes I can do it" because he wants your
business and doesn't care if he hurts you in the process.
However external beam radiation is also an excellent option.
it is my understanding that EBRT and brachytherapy get very
similar results.
Good luck.
Alan
Brian - 11 Jan 2006 23:40 GMT
>> ...
>> Clarence, please state what was the volume/weight of your prostate at
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> prostate was 40 grams. When it came time for the HDRB, the rad onc told
> me my prostate was tiny (Lupron causes it to shrink.)
No number on the size?
I don't know my size either, was 23 grams (and yes the lupron has made the
prostate tiny and soft, too.)
> But they apparently had no problem doing the HDRB - though they were
> using MRI instead of ultrasound to guide the placement of the catheters
> - which might have been a factor.
>
> Does the rad onc say no brachytherapy at all, or just no High Dose Rate
> Brachytherapy?
HDR: DSQ because prostate was too small
LDR: DSQ because of Gleason 3+4->7
I think he was disingenuating me towards IMRT.
> Is he a guy that specializes in prostates, or does he mainly do other
> types of cancer? It's possible that he feels that the 23 gram size is
> not within his limits of skill - in which case you sure don't want him
> to do it. But it's possible someone else can. You might want to check
> - hopefully with someone who won't just say, "Yes I can do it" because
> he wants your business and doesn't care if he hurts you in the process.
So who is the best pro closest to Philadelphia? Yes, we're minimizing two
variable in a function.
> However external beam radiation is also an excellent option. it is my
> understanding that EBRT and brachytherapy get very similar results.
and that SI/HDR/EBRT get the best, which has to do with why I prefer that
sequence.
Clarence Crow - 09 Jan 2006 06:07 GMT
<snip>
>Clarence, please state what was the volume/weight of your prostate at
>start of HDRB? Mine was 23g at biopsy 4 months ago (start of Lupron) and
>was told by the RadOnc that 23 was too small for HDRB. He's the only
>source of this assertion (that a prostate can be too small for HDRB) that
>I can find.
72 cc at entry, shrunk to 65 cc after 3 mths ADT. But I also went into
PCa treatment with BPH.
ergo I cannot advise you on how "small" a gland should be. The median
for HDRB is around 36 cc.
Incidentally, 1cc = 1 gram, dependent on the Labs take on it.
-- Reader to complete...
-- Please reply to this ng as my email adress is fake:
-- Regards
-- CC