On December 17, Mike wrote:
>Medicare Part D is a sham unless you are paying many thousands a year
>for medications. I would be better off paying for my Fosamax than by
>getting it through Medicare D.
>
Well, it certainly is complex. but my simple arithmetic tells me that,
of the $200+ that I'm now spending per month for meds. I'll save ~$70,
net after premium, deductible and copays. *That* is simple enough even
for me.
Regards,
Steve J
Epitaph for a wasted life:
"He lived beneath the moon
And slept beneath the sun.
He lived a life of going to do
And died with nothing done."
-- Anonymous
olfart - 17 Dec 2005 23:14 GMT
On December 17, Mike wrote:
Medicare Part D is a sham unless you are paying many thousands a year
for medications. I would be better off paying for my Fosamax than by
getting it through Medicare D.
Well, it certainly is complex. but my simple arithmetic tells me that, of the $200+ that I'm now spending per month for meds. I'll save ~$70, net after premium, deductible and copays. That is simple enough even for me.
Regards,
Steve J
Epitaph for a wasted life:
"He lived beneath the moon
And slept beneath the sun.
He lived a life of going to do
And died with nothing done."
-- Anonymous
That's $70 on the meds you are taking now. What will you need 6 months from now?? Insurance is a bit of a crap shoot - so you "pays your money and you takes your chances". My meds are around $300/month and I really don't expect the cost ever go down.
Steve Jordan - 17 Dec 2005 23:37 GMT
Quoting me regarding my anticipated net saving on rxs with Part D:
> That's $70 on the meds you are taking now. What will you need 6
> months from now?? Insurance is a bit of a crap shoot - so you
> "pays your money and you takes your chances". My meds are around
> $300/month and I really don't expect the cost ever go down.
I dunno what I'll need six months in the future. I just hope that the
benefit is proportionate.
And re: insurance, I've been in the claims business (not med claims,
thank Bog) for most of what passes for my adult life. Insurers dislike
the simile, but I think it's a fact that they bet that the insured will
not sustain a loss and the insured bets that he will. An insurance
policy is a useless piece of paper *until *a loss occurs. Then, the
insured must hope that his insurer is ethical -- and solvent.
OT aside: my car was stolen last July. GEICO will not pay the true
market value and five months later we're still arguing.
Regards,
Steve J
"Men occasionally stumble on the truth, but most of them pick themselves
up and hurry off as if nothing had happened."
-- Sir Winston L. S. Churchill