Journal of Urology. 174(6):2204-2208, December 2005.
BROOKS, JOSEPH P.; ALBERT, PAUL S.; WILDER, RICHARD B.; GANT, DEAN A.;
McLEOD, DAVID G. *; POGGI, MATTHEW M. +
Abstract:
Purpose: We assessed the efficacy of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) and
analyzed predictors of biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) and
distant metastasis-free survival in patients with clinically localized
disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Materials and Methods: The records of 114 patients treated with SRT at
2 institutions between 1991 and 2001 were retrospectively reviewed.
Time to biochemical recurrence and to distant metastases was analyzed
using the Kaplan-Meier estimation. Candidate predictors of bPFS and
distant metastasis-free survival were analyzed using the log rank test
and Cox regression. Acute and late complications were scored using
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and
Treatment of Cancer criteria.
Results: At a median followup of 6.3 years (range 1.9 to 13.3) for SRT
4 and 6-year bPFS was 50% (95% CI 42% to 61%) and 33% (95% CI 24% to
43%), respectively. The 6-year actuarial probability of distant
metastases after SRT was 14%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated an
independent association of increasing Gleason score, lymphovascular
invasion and lack of a complete response to SRT with decreased 5-year
bDFS. These factors were associated with significantly less 5-year
distant metastasis-free survival. Pre-RT prostate specific antigen
greater than 2.0 ng/ml was associated with significantly decreased
5-year bDFS and distant metastasis-free survival, although it was not
maintained on multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: SRT results in durable prostate specific antigen control
in select patients. It is well tolerated with few severe late effects.
Increasing Gleason score, lymphovascular invasion and lack of a
complete response to SRT are significant risks for disease progression
requiring additional management.
Copyright (C) 2005 by American Urological Association, Inc.
Alan Meyer - 23 Nov 2005 16:16 GMT
> ... Pre-RT prostate specific antigen
> greater than 2.0 ng/ml was associated with significantly decreased
> 5-year bDFS and distant metastasis-free survival, although it was not
> maintained on multivariate analysis.
> ...
Does anyone know how to interpret the above sentence?
The first clause appears to indicate that people who get salvage
radiation before their PSA reaches 2.0 ng/ml have a "significantly"
better shot at metastasis-free survival. The second clause
appears to say, No, it ain't so.
You smiled, you spoke, and I believed - 23 Nov 2005 22:05 GMT
>>... Pre-RT prostate specific antigen
>>greater than 2.0 ng/ml was associated with significantly decreased
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> better shot at metastasis-free survival. The second clause
> appears to say, No, it ain't so.
I think what they are saying is that using two different statistical
techniques, they had two different results.
PSA was significant in one technique, but in the other, "Multivariate
analysis demonstrated an independent association of increasing Gleason
score, lymphovascular invasion and lack of a complete response to SRT
with decreased 5-year bDFS. "
j.