Younger Men Do Well with Prostate Cancer Surgery
By Anthony J. Brown, MD
NEW YORK Aug 22 2005 (Reuters Health) - As a treatment for prostate
cancer in men younger than 50 years of age, surgery to remove the
prostate can provide good results with low complication rates,
according to a recent report.
Moreover, the findings, which appear in the journal Urology, may have a
broader message as well: that men should be screened earlier for
prostate cancer, perhaps.
The study involved 790 men who underwent surgical prostate removal --
prostatectomy -- performed by a single surgeon over a four-year period.
The patients included 66 who were younger than 50 years of age and 724
who were 50 years of age or older.
The rate of complications during the operation and after was very low,
just 1.3 percent overall, and no significant differences were seen
between the groups, report Dr. Herbert Lepor and colleagues from New
York University School of Medicine.
The rates of urinary continence for younger and older men were 93
percent and 97 percent, respectively, the report indicates.
Among men who did not have erectile difficulties before the operation,
the percentage who afterwards had erections that were adequate for
intercourse (with or without the use of medical therapy) was 100
percent in the younger group compared with 81 percent in the older
group.
"Current guidelines suggest that screening should begin at 50 years of
age, unless you have a family history of the disease or are African
American, in which case it should begin at a younger age," Lepor told
Reuters Health.
"However, when I reviewed the patients who were referred to me for
surgery, I found that the percentage with a family history of prostate
cancer or African American ethnicity was comparable in patients over
and under 50 years of age," Lepor noted. "This suggests that many
younger men were being screened who didn't have indications for early
screening" and yet they had disease that was comparable to that seen in
older patients."
Taken together, these observations led Lepor to conclude that prostate
cancer screening should begin at 40 years of age in all men. "You
can't prove that PSA screening in general (saves lives), so certainly I
can't prove that screening all men starting at 40 will be beneficial.
Still, I believe that finding cancers earlier will lead to better
outcomes."
SOURCE:
Urology, July 2005.
Steve U
Buttercup's Dad - 23 Aug 2005 15:53 GMT
I wonder how they define "continence"? When I was first diagnosed I found a
very wide range of claims, 97% Hopkins, 63% American Cancer Society, and 52%
Harvard. What I have been told is that the big difference has to do with
pad use. If you need a pad at all Harvard classified men as incontinent,
whereas Hopkins considered the one pad a day man as continent.
> Younger Men Do Well with Prostate Cancer Surgery
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> The rates of urinary continence for younger and older men were 93
> percent and 97 percent, respectively, the report indicates.
Beverley - 23 Aug 2005 19:45 GMT
I know I shouldn't stick my nose in here but I think if you dribble even a
little you're not continent. Yes, there is a big difference between no
control and leakage. Who thinks up these definitions anyway? The dictionary
defines continence as: "the ability to retain a bodily discharge
voluntarily" hmmmm!
Bev
> I wonder how they define "continence"? When I was first diagnosed I found a
> very wide range of claims, 97% Hopkins, 63% American Cancer Society, and 52%
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> > The rates of urinary continence for younger and older men were 93
> > percent and 97 percent, respectively, the report indicates.
Tom Cular - 23 Aug 2005 23:54 GMT
David,
Consider the source when weighing their claims, i.e. Dr. Walsh, JHMC's most
published prostate cancer writer is a surgeon and "might just be a little
biased" in his published opinions; as are other proponents of their
treatment modalities. I have family members who are staff at JHMC that
questioned my decision to pursue treatment protocols other than those
suggested by Dr. Walsh.
I performed "due diligence" research prior to making my decision, as we all
should. I think I made the right choice, ( I sure hope so, so far pretty
good). We are all so different that there is no "right treatment", our
commonality lies in the fact that we all have the same disease, albeit in
different stages and with different complications. I guess the bottom line
is: You're still here to bark, and that's good!!!!!!
Tom
> I know I shouldn't stick my nose in here but I think if you dribble even a
> little you're not continent. Yes, there is a big difference between no
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > > The rates of urinary continence for younger and older men were 93
> > > percent and 97 percent, respectively, the report indicates.