<http://www.boston.com/news/local/new_hampshire/articles/2005/08/20/cancer_doctor
_becomes_cancer_patient/>
By Holly Ramer, Associated Press Writer | August 20, 2005
CONCORD, N.H. --When Jack Evjy was diagnosed with prostate cancer last
year, the disease spread quickly -- from his professional life to his
personal life.
"What I have is right smack in the middle of what I do," said Evjy, an
oncologist for 30 years who has treated thousands of patients, many with
the same diagnosis. Becoming a patient himself gave him deeper insight
into the choices he once presented to others, and made him realize how
much his patients had taught him.
"Running away doesn't help," he said. "It's far better to try to do
whatever you can do -- not put your face in the sand -- and face it."
Evjy, 70, stopped seeing patients three years ago but still helps run
Commonwealth Hematology-Oncology Group, a network of specialists
stretching from Quincy, Mass., into southern New Hampshire. In April 2004,
he was enjoying semi-retirement -- traveling, building a new house in
Bedford and preparing for his daughter's wedding -- when he squeezed in a
visit to his family doctor.
"Life was pretty darn good," he said. "Everything was going all fine."
Then his doctor did a routine examination of Evjy's prostate gland.
"Jack," the doctor said. "This gland does not feel the same way it did a
year ago.'"
"That was the bursting of the bubble of equanimity," Evjy said.
A blood test for a protein called PSA, indicating an inflamed prostate,
came back normal. But tissue from one of 10 biopsy sites came back
positive for cancer and the pathology report showed the tumor was growing
at a moderately aggressive pace.
Doctors often recommend "watchful waiting" for men over 70, because in
many cases, the tumor grows so slowly the patient dies of something else.
Two types of radiation therapy to kill the tumor were options, but Evjy
decided surgical removal of the gland was the best approach, if only to
find out what he was up against.
"The thinking has been that if the PSA isn't sky-high and you're a
youngster like me who at that time was approaching 70 and was otherwise
healthy, do you want to just watch and wait?" he said. "My feeling was
that what can really hurt you is what you don't know, so I made a decision
to pursue it rather than just sit and wait."
That opened up a new array of choices. Instead of conventional surgery,
his involved a three-armed robot fitted with a tiny camera, magnifying
lens and surgical tools. Sitting at a console, a surgeon used handgrips
and footpedals to manipulate the robotic arms, which entered his body
through quarter-sized incisions.
Evjy had read about the technique a few years ago when the military began
exploring equipment that would allow a surgeon in the United States to
operate on a soldier in a war zone using video imaging and robotic hands.
"I wasn't thinking I might be at war with cancer myself," he said.
The flexibility of the robotic hands and the enhanced view provided by the
camera allow the surgeon to be more precise in removing a tumor while
sparing nerve bundles, said Dr. John Munoz, who performed Evjy's surgery
using the $1.2 million da Vinci surgical system. Preliminary data suggests
the procedure is less likely to result in impotence and has shortened the
duration of post-surgical incontinence, he said.
Smaller incisions also mean less bleeding during surgery and less pain
afterward, shorter hospital stays and quicker recoveries. Patients are
told to limit their activity for about two weeks instead of four to six.
Within days, Evjy was going up and down the stairs of his new home,
unpacking and moving things around. But the final pathology report showed
that the tumor, though confined to the prostate, had been more aggressive
than originally believed. That meant he was at high risk for a recurrence
and had another decision to make.
Evjy, a former president of the Massachusetts Medical Society, consulted
experts at the Dana Farber Cancer Center in Boston and his colleagues
before choosing to undergo further treatment in New Hampshire.
"I felt that I should be cared for by oncologists who were not part of my
own group because if things didn't go right, it would just be such a
struggle on them," he said.
He endured six months of chemotherapy and a course of radiation and is now
taking hormone therapy to suppress testosterone, which feeds the growth of
prostate tumors. Aside some from hot flashes, Evjy says he feels 100
percent.
He urges men not to rely exclusively on PSA tests, have biopsies if
there's any doubt and consider new techniques like the robot-assisted
surgery so they know what they're facing.
"You may find that there's a whole boatload of people whose lives can be
saved," he said. "Maybe I'll be one of them, maybe not. But I'd much
rather sit here today or five years from now or 10 years from now feeling
as though I hadn't just watched, that I'd done everything I can."
--------
On the Net:
National Cancer Institute general information about prostate cancer:
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/prostate/patient/
Da Vinci Surgical System: http://www.davinciprostatectomy.com/
Bill - 21 Aug 2005 15:01 GMT
RP, 6 mos. of chemo, RT, and HT! That is a most aggressive treatmeant
plan even for a 50 year old - this guy is 70! IMO that's just plain
wrong.
Bill Denton
RP 2/12/02
PSA .6
Memphis
DonC - 21 Aug 2005 16:09 GMT
Hi Bill,
Not disagreeing on the over aggressiveness of the treatment but.... don't
assume all 70 year olds are in more vulnerable condition than most 50 year
olds.
My father-in-law at 70 put most 50 year olds to shame. He easily survived
colon cancer surgery at 75 and lived to 87 years in good health.
Wide-spread cancer finally got him. Even then he underwent chemo which he
handled as well as expected.
Another example is my SIL's father who at 75 still competes in the Senior
Olympics, runs marathons and climbs mountains. He puts many (most?) 50 year
olds to shame. I'm certain he'd handle RP as well as most 50 year olds.
My barber at 70+ underwent surgery for colon cancer followed by RT. At 76
he's still cutting hair and running a concrete yard ornament business on the
side.
For sure, ON AVERAGE a 70 year old is at greater risk but don't assume this
is always the case.
My two cents,
Don
RP at 62 March 2004
> RP, 6 mos. of chemo, RT, and HT! That is a most aggressive treatmeant
> plan even for a 50 year old - this guy is 70! IMO that's just plain
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> PSA .6
> Memphis
J - 21 Aug 2005 19:33 GMT
> RP, 6 mos. of chemo, RT, and HT! That is a most aggressive treatmeant
> plan even for a 50 year old - this guy is 70! IMO that's just plain
> wrong.
I was surprised about the chemo but it was given along with the radiation
therapy. I hear that chemo may potentiate radiation therapy, so it sounds
like he gave it a big zapparoo at the beginning, while he's (in theory)
fitter. I'm inclined to think that if he does have a recurrence/spread,
he may not go with chemo again, but I could be wrong. (Or I suppose it
depends where the reoccurence is). It'll be interesting if anyone (from
this newsgroup) gets treated there and can keep us posted (about the
doctor).
I'm not suggestig this to anyone else; just thought you'd all find it
interesting.
J
Ron B - 21 Aug 2005 15:29 GMT
This article sparked many thoughts...
One is technical.
it said:
"But the final pathology report showed that the tumor, though confined
to the prostate, had been more aggressive than originally believed. That
meant he was at high risk for a recurrence"
What might that mean?
Positive margins?
Usually 'confined' would lead one to think of lower risk of recurrence.
Maybe some of you guys or gals could weigh in?
In the recent past, it's been discussed here about the lower key
response that men have toward prostate cancer awareness compared to
women and breast cancer.
Women march and are moe vocal.
Guys clam up and maybe, due to macho concerns, don't want to say too
much.
I bet that the above article, in the Boston Globe, is how many guys get
introduced to this situation.
Meant to inform (and it DOES)...
I bet it scares the hell out of them in the
"Oh God, this could happen to me" way.
We, here, discuss the robot and the techniques but it struck me that an
average guy...sipping (or gulping) coffee and reading this in the
paper...will be more than happy to flip the paper over to read about the
Red Sox.
Ron B.
Chicago
Robert - 21 Aug 2005 20:20 GMT
It could mean that the tumor had been upstaged to a higher gleason. Even
though the tumor was "confined," an 8 or 9 would strongly suggest risk for
recurrence is high.
> This article sparked many thoughts...
>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
>
> Chicago
Dick Smith - 22 Aug 2005 06:08 GMT
Ron, good point. I have no clue what that meant either. This article
was not well written, IMO.