Several peopl;e here have spoken of the good results they get with
Levitra and Viagra but I have not seen Cialis mentioned.
To me, Cialis, or the generic equivalent tadalafil, is the best solution.
It permits spontaneity. Also, the generic tadalafil is far, far cheaper
and makes it possible to use the medication as a continuing therapy
rather than as an occasional recreational. There was a study published
some time ago that indicated that men who took a dose of Viagra every
day, need or not, were more likely to regain full potency not dependent
on medications. I assume Cialis would have the same effect. Any thoughts?
james_wv@hotmail.com - 17 Aug 2005 21:12 GMT
I'd be very interested in any and all experiences (good and bad) that
anyone has had with any of the 'big 3' medications. I'm one-day
post-catheter and will be looking to choose a 'return to potency'
therapy soon.
Steve Kramer - 17 Aug 2005 21:28 GMT
Vitamin V gave me a headache and not much else.
Shots (if included) would definitely have filled the bill, but personal
issues intervened.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05
PSA .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum
> I'd be very interested in any and all experiences (good and bad) that
> anyone has had with any of the 'big 3' medications. I'm one-day
> post-catheter and will be looking to choose a 'return to potency'
> therapy soon.
Steve U - 18 Aug 2005 01:09 GMT
I find the three pills are similar. Cialis costs the most per pill but
lasts the longest and erection is slightly less durable. Levitra has
the midddle for cost, fewest side effects, and best erections. Viagra
is cheapest, and is in the middle for erections, and has the most side
effects. The shots blow them all away.
Steve U
Realtor1 - 03 Jan 2006 01:15 GMT
>I find the three pills are similar. Cialis costs the most per pill but
>lasts the longest and erection is slightly less durable. Levitra has
>the midddle for cost, fewest side effects, and best erections. Viagra
>is cheapest, and is in the middle for erections, and has the most side
>effects. The shots blow them all away.
>Steve U
What shots are you refering to?

Signature
Realtor1
Ron B - 17 Aug 2005 22:32 GMT
Gogarty asked about Cialis.
I'm about 5 months out from my open RP and I take Cialis 20mg almost
every other day.
I have no erections yet but have orgasms with manual stimulation.
My doc, Dr. Catalona suggests this starting 4 weeks after surgery.
I've included a blurb from him which describes the concept.
It's the same as described to help increase the blood flow. Makes sense
to me.
I hope folks find it helpful.
Ron B.
Chicago
::Recovery of Erections After Radical Prostatectomy
By Dr. William J. Catalona
Normally, men have erections every day. Thus, the normal physiology of
the penis is to get an infusion of well oxygenated blood every day to
keep the tissues healthy. After a radical prostatectomy, men usually
have no erections for 3 to 6 months because of surgical trauma
(manipulation and stretching of the nerves, sutures to control bleeders,
etc.).
Then erections begin to return as partial erections that gradually
improve for up to 36 months. However, in the interim it is important to
get blood into the penis at least 3 days per week to keep the tissues
healthy. Blood flow is improved by several methods:
Regular taking of Viagra-like medicines (I usually recommend Cialis 20
mg/day because it lasts longer, but this drug causes some men to have
muscle cramps and they have to switch to another);
Vacuum erection device;
Injections into the penis of prostaglandin-like drugs that increase
blood flow;
Any sexual stimulation that causes erections normally. All patients
should be encouraged to use one or all of these methods for sexual
rehabilitation beginning about 1 month after surgery.
John Loomis - 18 Aug 2005 02:40 GMT
I agree.....That helped me........
Pump, Prostaglandin, Viagra.......then nothing....
Good wishes...
John Loomis
> Gogarty asked about Cialis.
>
[quoted text clipped - 42 lines]
> should be encouraged to use one or all of these methods for sexual
> rehabilitation beginning about 1 month after surgery.
Ron B - 17 Aug 2005 22:56 GMT
Also, at this time, there are unfortunately no generic equivalents for
the E.D. drugs in the U.S.
(Internet junk doesn't count. :-)
Ron B.
Chicago
Buttercup's Dad - 17 Aug 2005 23:05 GMT
The Cialis did nothing for me, for which I was grateful (in some men they
get leg pain that lasts 36 hours). I am interested in the generic product
though. How is it that there is already a generic equivalent? Isn't there
a patent that would prevent that from being marketed yet? Is it generally
available?
Thank you for the information.
David S.
> Several peopl;e here have spoken of the good results they get with
> Levitra and Viagra but I have not seen Cialis mentioned.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> day, need or not, were more likely to regain full potency not dependent
> on medications. I assume Cialis would have the same effect. Any thoughts?
Gogarty - 18 Aug 2005 00:57 GMT
>The Cialis did nothing for me, for which I was grateful (in some men they
>get leg pain that lasts 36 hours). I am interested in the generic product
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
>Thank you for the information.
I had all these questions too. How can you have a generic when the branded
drug is tied up with patents for years to come?
Simple. Some countries just do not recognize patents on medications. In
addition, the actual medication differs somewhat from the branded one though
the active ingredient is the same and in the same dosage.
India seems to be the source of a lot of these generics. Don't knock Indian
manufacturing technology and capabilities. But they are marketed through
Canada and Europe. The generic Tadalafil I have tried is branded as Tadacip.
The tablet is 20mg and the same color as the Cialis tablet but a different
shape. Seems it's easier to protect the shape of your product than the
content. The inert ingredients in the tablet are also different but the
active ingredient is the same.
A daily regimen of any of these branded medications is quite simply way too
expensive. But the generics are affordable, especially when you split the tab
to 10mg, which is the recommended starting dosage. We will see how it goes.
I take one a day at noon. After six years of just about nothing, Willy seems
to be waking from his long sleep. I am 74, by the way, and the libido ain't
what it used to be, nor is that of my dear wife of 33 years. Which makes it
all the more important that on those rare occasions when things get going
that I don't have to wait two hours while I take a pill and the moment flees.
Leonard Evens - 18 Aug 2005 04:23 GMT
> Several peopl;e here have spoken of the good results they get with
> Levitra and Viagra but I have not seen Cialis mentioned.
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> day, need or not, were more likely to regain full potency not dependent
> on medications. I assume Cialis would have the same effect. Any thoughts?
I tried Cialis after my doctor gave me some samples. It did seem to
work as promised, lasting about 36 hours. On one occasion I did end up
with some leg pain. For us, the 36 hour window doesn't seem to be
important, so I went back to using Viagra. I have noticed though that
Viagra may also last into the next day for me. It is a bit hard to be
sure since I sometimes can attain an erection without any aids.
As has already been pointed out, Cialis is still under patent protection
in the US, so it is not available in generic form.
Ron B - 18 Aug 2005 14:34 GMT
In discussing Viagra...Len wrote:
"It is a bit hard to be sure since I sometimes can attain an erection
without any aids."
"a bit hard"...Len's such a card.
:-)
Ron B.
Chicago
Buttercup's Dad - 18 Aug 2005 15:19 GMT
I would settle for a "bit hard" at this point....
> In discussing Viagra...Len wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Chicago