Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Don't sunbathe to avoid prostate cancer, take a pill instead

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
c palmer - 28 Jun 2005 18:18 GMT
my notes - didn't we just have a discussion on this where they said that
natural sunlight was better because of the way the body processes
vitamin D?

~ curtis

================
Men's Health NewsPublished: Tuesday, 28-Jun-2005  

 According to a recent study spending long periods in the sun may
significantly reduce a man's risk of prostate cancer.
Apparently exposure to the sun encourages the body to produce vitamin D,
which is known to inhibit the growth of prostate cells.
Researchers measured the skin tones of 426 men with advanced prostate
cancer and 455 cancer-free men using an instrument called a
reflectometer, they then compared unexposed underarm skin to sun-exposed
skin on the forehead.
They found that the darker a man's skin pigmentation, a measure of his
sun exposure, the less likely he was to have prostate cancer.
They also discovered that certain genetic variations in the body's
vitamin D receptors played roles in the development of prostate cancer.
However Dr. Esther John, the lead author on the study, does not
recommend sitting in the sun, which is just as well as most
dermatologists believe that no amount of sun exposure is safe because of
the risk of skin cancer.
She says that as the effects from supplements and sun exposure on
vitamin D levels in the blood are equal, supplements would be a safer.
Despite the fact that it is known that vitamin D is an essential
nutrient for other reasons, especially for bone health, as yet no one
knows what level of the vitamin is effective in avoiding prostate
cancer.
Dr. John, an epidemiologist at the Northern California Cancer Center
says the findings need to be confirmed by other studies before specific
recommendations can be given to the public regarding prostate cancer
prevention.
The study is published in the June 15 issue of Cancer Research.
 

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Stephen Jordan - 28 Jun 2005 18:32 GMT
> my notes - didn't we just have a discussion on this where they said that
> natural sunlight was better because of the way the body processes
> vitamin D?

ISTR that only a few minutes of sun exposure are necessary to manufacture
one's daily vitamin D requirement.

Regards,

Steve J

(snip article)
Ed Friedman - 28 Jun 2005 18:55 GMT
>> my notes - didn't we just have a discussion on this where they said that
>> natural sunlight was better because of the way the body processes
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> (snip article)

If you are close enough to the equator and in the summertime, then a few
minutes of sun exposure is sufficient to produce the vitamin D you need.
 However, last year the Chicago Tribune did an article about this, and
in this article they claimed that during February in Chicago, if you
were to go outside naked on a sunny day from sunup to sundown, you would
end up deficient in your daily requirement of vitamin D.

Also, do not be confused by vitamin D2 and vitamin D3.  Vitamin D3 is
the natural form of vitamin D that is produced by sunlight.  Vitamin D2
is a synthetic form of vitamin D that is used to supplement milk, some
orange juice, etc.  Vitamin D2 will keep people from dying from rickets,
but it is not clear that it has the health benefits for prostate cancer
which vitamin D3 does (which may explain why a study showed that dairy
products were not good for prostate cancer - if the vitamin D2 in the
dairy interferes with the binding of vitamin D3).

Ed Friedman
Stephen Jordan - 29 Jun 2005 00:30 GMT
Quoting me:

>> ISTR that only a few minutes of sun exposure are necessary to
>> manufacture one's daily vitamin D requirement.

He replied

> If you are close enough to the equator and in the summertime, then a few
> minutes of sun exposure is sufficient to produce the vitamin D you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>  sundown, you would end up deficient in your daily requirement of
> vitamin D.

Having been in Chicago during February, I can well believe it. Lotsa luck
finding any sunshine at all   ;-)

And if one is foolish enough to step outside while naked, one will lose
certain irreplaceable parts very quickly.

Ron might not admit it, but he knows it's true.

Regards,

Steve J
Ed Friedman - 29 Jun 2005 18:35 GMT
Somebody e-mailed and asked me to post the following info.  I make no
claims for its accuracy, but since it deals with vitamin D slowing down
the growth rate of prostate cancer it is appropriate for this newsgroup.
 It does make sense to me, since the drug given, cholecalciferol, is
the chemical name for vitamin D3.  The link is:

http://www.ndmnutrition.com/vit_d_&_pros._ca.htm

Ed Friedman
Netmask - 01 Jul 2005 07:38 GMT
If you went naked in Sydney (no one would take any notice btw) in February
from sun up to sun set you would have nice dose of skin cancer and be a
pleasant lobster colour depending on your background genes!!! Seriously if
this research on Vitamin D is correct then the incidence of Prostate cancer
should be lower in Australia - but somehow I don't think it is?

>>> my notes - didn't we just have a discussion on this where they said that
>>> natural sunlight was better because of the way the body processes
[quoted text clipped - 26 lines]
>
> Ed Friedman
I. P. Freely - 28 Jun 2005 21:20 GMT
Anecdotal, but I've spent my whole life in the sun with no sunblock. I'm
talking about well over a thousand hours a year on Florida beaches and New
Mexico and Utah deserts and mountaintops and lakes, often early AM 'til
dark, with zero regard to exposure. Someone once said I was the darkest
white boy they'd ever seen. What do I have to show for it? A red neck and
PC.

I.P.
Clarence Crow - 28 Jun 2005 22:44 GMT
>Anecdotal, but I've spent my whole life in the sun with no sunblock. I'm
>talking about well over a thousand hours a year on Florida beaches and New
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
>I.P.

You always struck me as a redneck p;

-- Reader to complete...
-- Please reply to this ng as my email adress is fake:

-- Regards

-- CC
I. P. Freely - 28 Jun 2005 23:55 GMT
>>Anecdotal, but I've spent my whole life in the sun with no sunblock. I'm
>>talking about well over a thousand hours a year on Florida beaches and New
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>>
> You always struck me as a redneck p;

No joke.
The pale sun shadow beneath my ears and chin are obvious even in mid-winter.

I.P.
Stephen Jordan - 29 Jun 2005 00:37 GMT
On June 28, I. P. Freely and CC had the following exchange:

>>> Anecdotal, but I've spent my whole life in the sun with no
>>> sunblock. I'm talking about well over a thousand hours a year on
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>
> I.P.

Stop! Stop! You're making me queasy!

;-)

Steve J
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.