An American Cancer Society survey finds up to half of Americans
mistakenly believe surgery can spread cancer, and more than one in four
thinks a cure for cancer already exists but is being held back by a
profit-driven industry.
Results of the survey are published in the August 1, 2005 issue of
CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society. The
authors say it shows the American public is significantly ill-informed
about cancer, and that most overestimate how much they know.
The medical management of cancer and cancer-related complications, such
as pain, has significantly improved over the last three decades, as have
survival rates for leading cancers. Still, studies indicate that a
patient's own cultural beliefs and understanding of cancer may influence
health behavior, such as whether patients get regular screenings and
undergo treatment.
Led by Ted Gansler, M.D., M.B.A of the American Cancer Society,
researchers conducted a national telephone survey of 957 adults with no
history of cancer to assess Americans' understanding of the disease and
its management, and identify any demographic characteristics associated
with misconceptions.
Participants were asked if five misconceptions were true or false.
The authors found only one in four (25 percent) of participants
correctly identified all five misconceptions as false. Four in ten (41
percent) of the respondents believed that surgical treatment actually
spread cancer in the body and 13 percent said they were unsure whether
this was true. Twenty-seven percent believed that there is a cure for
cancer available being withheld by the healthcare industry and an
additional 14 percent were uncertain. Nineteen percent believed that
pain medications were ineffective in treating cancer pain with another
13 percent saying they did not know. Nine in ten (89 percent) correctly
disagreed with the statement that "all you need to beat cancer is a
positive attitude," but more than one in ten (11 percent) either thought
is was true or did not know. A similar percentage (87 percent) correctly
disagreed that "cancer is something that cannot be effectively treated,"
but again, about one in eight (13 percent) either agreed or did not
know.
People who were over 65 years, of non-White race, residents of the
South, or self-identified as without much or any understanding of cancer
were likely to hold more misconceptions. The survey found little
relation between people's self-assessment of cancer knowledge and the
accuracy of their answers. For four of the five questions, there was no
significant difference in prevalence of endorsement of the inaccuracies
between the groups who called themselves "very informed," "somewhat
informed," or "not very informed." However, those who called themselves
"not at all informed" were generally quite accurate when rating their
own health literacy.
"These results indicate that public and patient education interventions
are most urgently needed in cancer centers, medical practices, and other
community organizations that serve large numbers of patients with these
'at risk' demographic characteristics," conclude the authors.
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Alan Meyer - 27 Jun 2005 19:49 GMT
> An American Cancer Society survey finds up to half of Americans
> mistakenly believe surgery can spread cancer, and more than one
> in four thinks a cure for cancer already exists but is being
> held back by a profit-driven industry.
...
There's a remarkable number of people in our society who refuse
to allow themselves to be confused by facts. Whatever opinion
accords with their inner feelings plenty good enough for them.
Some of us just don't know much about cancer. I didn't until I
got it myself and still don't dare call myself knowledgeable.
But there are also a frightening number for whom science,
religion, and superstition all seem to be equally valid
approaches to the world - with science being the last and least
trusted approach.
Alan
urillan - 27 Jun 2005 21:34 GMT
However, the problem with the cancer "myths" is that they aren't all
"improbables"... The cure thing is pretty improbable because you'd
have too much subject to information leaks.
Cancer, however, is strongly transplantable. If you take cancer cells
from one kidney, and put them into another kidney, they will
practically always thrive. It's the same with skin cancers and so on.
Why would spreading as a result of surgical operative process be
far-fetched?
Can cancer spread via the blood-stream? Countless abstracts say YES.
Cells "broken" from malignant solid-tumors have been documented as
finding harbor in lymph-nodes, where they will often lead to advanced
and hard to treat stages of cancer.
Saying that surgery causing the spread of cancer is a myth is like
saying surgery doesn't "cause" disease. Heck, it's got it's own word
iatrogenic.
There have even been cases where biopsies and excisions have caused
cancer in the surgeons (by transplant).
What makes the concept mythological? If it happens rarely, then is it
a myth? How rare must it be for it to be mythological? Is the cut-off
higher or lower than something like transmission of AIDs from
non-sexual contact (rare, but we surely CAN find some), OR keeping your
eyes open when you sneeze?
Peter Headland - 27 Jun 2005 23:08 GMT
I also question their implied claim about pain relief always working
for all cancer patients. That's not what I have heard...
I'd like to hear the actual script used. These surveys often twist the
words around one way when asking the questions and a completely
different way in the subsequent press release.
Oh, wait a minute, it's our old friends the ACS, those paragons of good
information and prudent financial management. No doubt the follow-up is
another round of begging for money to "support cancer awareness
education" (= to buy some more real estate and give more bonuses to
their executives).

Signature
Peter Headland