Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / July 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

My Concoction Seems to be Working!

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Ken - 14 Jun 2005 06:20 GMT
Over the past few months, I've posted one thing or another here
relating to my post-op rising PSA. Here's some interesting news...
On April 14th my PSA was 9.5. Today, exactly two months later, it's
5.6! My doctor was very surprised, and almost as delighted as I. He
asked me what have I been doing...

On May 5th (about five weeks ago), I started taking the following:

Acetyl L-Carnitine 250mg
Alpha Lipoic Acid 250mg
B complex timed release
Beta-carotene 15mg
Calcium Citrate+D (630mg calcium citrate + 400iu vitamin D3)
Celebrex (prescription) 200mg
Centrum-like multivitamin
Coenzyme Q10 400mg
Green Tea extract capsules 800mg
Pomegranate extract capsules 500mg
Selenium 200mg
Tocotrienols 100mg
Vitamin C 1000mg timed-release
Vitamin E d-alpha tocopherol 400mg
Vytorin 10/20 (prescription)

Plus, I drink about a cup of green tea and a cup of pomegranate juice
three or four times a week. I eat tomato sauce at least once a week. No
red meat. No animal fats, except fish at least twice a week, and
chicken about twice a month... and a scoop of ice cream every couple of
months.

I don't doubt that many, if not most, of the things I'm taking have no
effect whatsoever on PSA, but SOMEthing is doing the deed, so it's
steady-on 'til my next blood draw.

Just thought I'd mention it in case any of my brothers here are in my
predicament, i.e., willing to try anything to avoid that ****ing HT.

I.P., what do you think?

Ken
I. P. Freely - 14 Jun 2005 08:06 GMT
"Ken" <wrote
> Over the past few months, I've posted one thing or another here
> relating to my post-op rising PSA. Here's some interesting news...
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
>
> I.P., what do you think?

Not that my opinion is important compared to many of the more knowledgeable
folks here or the literature, but since you ask . . .
a) I agree that avoiding HT is a valid goal for some people, at least until
symptoms or scans establish recurrence.
b) I'd want to make sure I was not doing anything to lower PSA without
actually diminishing my CANCER, because it's the cancer, not the PSA, that
kills, and PSA history is important in assessing disease progress.
c) You've obviously studied PC supplementation more than I have.
d) I'd evaluate everything on that list for threats, such as the
ever-increasing evidence that Vit E harms our cardiovascular system.
Selenium is easy to overdo, long-term Celebrex is not risk-free, and Vit D
can be overdone, for example, and I'm sure you know Vytorin can lead to
liver or muscle problems in some people. Also make sure you're getting
enough protein on that low-meat diet.

I.P.
OCL - 14 Jun 2005 16:41 GMT
> b) I'd want to make sure I was not doing anything to lower PSA without
> actually diminishing my CANCER, because it's the cancer, not the PSA, that
> kills, and PSA history is important in assessing disease progress.

I would echo this cautionary note.  I think that I have done a
good job of researching and analyzing supplements and
non-FDA or off-label uses of prescriptions - like taking
Celebrex or a statin for prostate cancer.  And I have a lot
of confidence in some of those supplements and in the
off-label uses of things like Celebrex and Vytorin.

But, lowering PSA and killing cancer cells are two
different things.  They are related!  Most certainly!
But, if supplements are lowering PCa cell PSA production
without killing the PCa cells then growth of the PCa
could be masked o at least the continued presence of
PCa could be hidden.

So I would be sure to seek additional diagnostic tests. I
would want a Bone Scan and at least an abdominal CT
and while I'm not well versed on Free PSA testing and
don't know it's role in post-surgical PSA testing, I would
want the best PSA testing available.

After saying all of that I would add, Bravo!  Good for you!
It is always good news when a member of this club has
some positive news to share!  So I will continue to wish
and pray for you a complete victory over your PCa and
a long and happy life!

OCL
Ken - 14 Jun 2005 19:23 GMT
Good points, I.P.!

I forgot to mention that my scans and X-rays are negative, and I have
no symptoms. If, as you said, recurrance were identifiable, I wouldn't
have the "luxury" of trial and error.

I've always been suspicious of relying on PSA as the sole determinant
of recurrance in a situation like mine. Apparently, after all these
years and millions of dollars, that's still the be-all and end-all. I
hate the idea of all the stress involved in chasing PSA numbers, if I
don't have cancer. However, the one thing ALL of the doctors I've
consulted agree on... PSA is a reliable marker, especially for
recurrance.

Apparently, there are recent reports about problems with alpha
tocopherol vitamin E. (By the way, that should be 400 IU, not "400mg" I
had posted.) That's why I started the rice bran oil-based tocotrienols
vitamin E as a substitute as I switch from d-alpha tocopheral. Also,
with the additional E I get in nuts and wheat germ, I think it'll be
okay. There are lots of good studies showing a definite relationship
between PCa and vitamin E, and I think the vitamin itself is not the
suspected culprit.

Selenium can be over-dosed, but 200mg is safe, according to what I've
read. Apparently, selenium and E could be the key to turning off the
"stay alive" switch in cancer cells. Two months ago, Fox Chase Cancer
Center presented their research paper at the American Association for
Cancer Research. An outstanding quote from the release is: "Selenium
and vitamin E are the most promising dietary supplements considered for
use in the reduction of prostate cancer risk," Kolenko said. "This
enthusiasm is reflected in the initiation of the large National Cancer
Institute sponsored trial - SELECT (Selenium and Vitamin E
Chemoprevention Trial).

The vitamin D in the calcium citrate compound is just enough quantity
as a catalyst to help make the calcium more available. At this moment,
studies are escaping dairy industry filtering that indicate major
problems with relying on milk products for calcium. Some studies
suggest fish and their bones, such as herring, sardines, etc., in
addition to compounds.

You're right about protein! I forgot to mention that I consume quite a
bit of soy protein... in soy milk, soy powder protein shakes with
blueberries and almonds (how can anything so good-tasting be good for
you?), tofu, soy "meat" patties and "hot dogs."

As far as I know, EVERY prescription drug has at least the potential
for serious side effects. Celebrex and Vytorin are at the top of the
list. Supposedly, 200mg of Celebrex is the best combination of lowered
risk without eliminating effectiveness. Vytorin's caveats appear to
affect a minority of users, but they would know within only a few
doses, by mild muscle cramps. With both meds, all side effects are
reversible by reducing or stopping dosage after the first sign of a
problem.

Ken
Ken - 14 Jun 2005 20:20 GMT
Here are excerpts from a couple of the articles that grabbed my
attention:

About statins like Vytorin...
   April 18, 2005 - "Cholesterol is the building block of the male
hormone testosterone," said Dr. William J. Catalona, director of the
Clinical Prostate Cancer Program of Northwestern University's Robert H.
Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center. Since statins lower blood levels of
this fatty substance, there may be less of it available to synthesize
testosterone and dihydrotestostrone, he explained. And that may reduce
male hormones that stimulate prostate cancer.
   The findings deserve further investigation, said Catalona, who
pioneered use of the PSA -- prostate-specific antigen -- test to screen
for the disease. This study isn't the first to show the potential
cancer-fighting properties of statins. Prior population-based studies
suggest those who take statin drugs are at a lower risk of breast,
colon and prostate cancers. In addition, laboratory research suggests
statins induce cancer cell death, inhibit the spread of cancer
throughout the body and suppress inflammation within cells.

About Celebrex...
   In studies published in the March 1 [2005] issue of the journal
Clinical Cancer Research, scientists at the Weill Medical College of
Cornell University revealed that celecoxib, marketed under the name
Celebrex, not only targets COX-2, but also reduces levels of a key
protein, cyclin D1, that's critical for cell replication.
   "It is well established that COX-2 is a significant and rational
target for anti-cancer therapy," said Andrew Dannenberg, M.D., director
of cancer prevention at the Weill Medical College of Cornell University
and senior author of the paper. "These studies suggest that celecoxib
exerts a second mode of action independent of its known
anti-inflammatory mechanism that imposes further restrictions on the
proliferation of prostate cancer cells."

Ken
Ken - 16 Jun 2005 19:27 GMT
Below are some quotes from the article that got my attention about
CoQ10. The whole report is here:
http://www.med.miami.edu/news/view.asp?id=403

"4/25/05          Researchers from the University of Miami Leonard M.
Miller School of Medicine have presented dramatic findings at a
national cancer meeting that show a link between a very potent
antioxidant that occurs naturally in the body, and the ability to kill
breast and prostate cancer cells. The antioxidant they have studied is
Ubiquinone, more commonly referred to as Coenzyme Q10 or CoQ10, and
delivery of the therapy could soon be as simple as applying an ointment
to the tumor site."

"The scientists made two presentations at the annual meeting of the
American Association for Cancer Research in Anaheim, Ca.The first
presentation involved the most common prostate cancer cell line, PC3.
The researchers showed that after adding CoQ10 to the cells in vitro,
or in the laboratory, there was a 70 percent inhibition of cell growth
over 48 hours and a reversal in the expression of a key anti-apoptotic
protein, bcl-2.  "We saw evidence that the remarkable reduction in cell
growth was due to apoptosis, showing that CoQ10 restored the ability of
the cancer cells to kill themselves," said
Narain."

"S.L. Hsia, Ph.D., director of the Transdermal Delivery/Cutaneous
Biology Laboratory and principal investigator of the research, said,
"It is amazing that a benign compound, CoQ10, can cause the cancer
cells to selectively kill themselves without harm to normal cells."

Ken
I. P. Freely - 14 Jun 2005 21:19 GMT
As I suspected from your food & supplement list, asking me for cancer
dietary advice is like Lance Armstrong asking Michael Moore for dietary (and
grooming) advice. You're far more informed on it than I, and I'll use your
comments as a starting point for my own expansion in that direction. Let's
see . . . QOL-devastating ADT SEs or food . . . QOL-devastating ADT SEs or
food . . . I KNOW . . . I think I'll try FOOD first. Thanks for the extra
motivation.

Now, dangit, I read just yesterday that some common pertinent supplement is
inhibited by soy. When I find that article again I'll bring it up if it's
relevant.

I.P.

> Good points, I.P.!
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>
> Ken
David S. - 14 Jun 2005 12:36 GMT
Ken:

   Why are you intent on avoiding conventional treatment?  If it is because
of the risk of side effects I think you have to weigh the risks that you are
taking by pursuing the path that you are on.  As I.P. pointed out, there are
risks with some of the drugs that you are taking, not to mention the
cumulative effect of mixing all those things together.  Is there any
documentation on possible side effects of combining some of these
drugs/vitamins/supplements?  I do not mean to knock what you are doing.  You
may know that what you are doing is tame compared to what one of our former,
now deceased, members did.  I respect your right to choose, but just want to
point out that your chances may be better following the conventional course.

   Good luck to you.

   Thank you.
David S.

> Over the past few months, I've posted one thing or another here
> relating to my post-op rising PSA. Here's some interesting news...
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> Ken
Ken - 14 Jun 2005 21:00 GMT
David, the only conventional treatment, in my case, is anti-androgen or
hormone therapy. The last time I had a Lupron shot and Casodex
medication, I wasn't told about ANY side effects other than a sore butt
at the injection site. If you've never had a severe hot flash, you
really can't appreciate a description. It's totally debilitating. My
skin felt like a bad sunburn, and was cherry red. All layers of my
clothing soaked with sweat. My mind was feverish and standing was
difficult because of dizzyness. At its worst, the duration was about
four minutes, every seven to 10 minutes, 24 hours a day. Sleep was
possible only after total exhaustion. That was the easy part. Here's
part of a list of other side effects, both non-reversible and
temporary, called "ADS" (Androgen Deprivation Syndrome) and compiled by
Stephen B. Strum, MD:

Muscle atrophy in chest, arms & legs
Impotence & loss of libido
Atrophy of testicles
Aches & pains in joints
Decreased muscle strength & endurance
Loss of energy & "feeling weak"
Weight gain due to increased body fat
Gynecomastia (breast enlargement and pain)
Mood "swings"
Osteoporosis
Chronic fatigue-like syndrome
Anemia
Difficulty controlling blood pressure
Alzheimer's-like symptoms (severe short-term memory difficulties,
inability to concentrate, etc.)
Increase in urinary symptoms (uncontrolled urination or difficulty
starting the urinary stream)
Increased serum cholesterol (LDL, or "bad" cholesterol) and/or &
triglyceride levels

I had most of the list, and will do just about anything to avoid a
repeat... until the cancer shows up in a scan. With any luck, by then
there might be an alternative.
gourd_dancer - 14 Jun 2005 22:55 GMT
Ken have you tried Eligard instead of Lupron. Does the same thing except for
the past 11 months not one hot flash. With the Lupron I would have 10-12 a
day.......

> David, the only conventional treatment, in my case, is anti-androgen or
> hormone therapy. The last time I had a Lupron shot and Casodex
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> repeat... until the cancer shows up in a scan. With any luck, by then
> there might be an alternative.
Ken - 16 Jun 2005 19:42 GMT
This is the first I've heard of Eligard. It might have come onto the
market withing the past three years. It's good to know there's an
alternative to Lupron... and even better to know that you haven't had a
hot flash.

Below is the side effects info. from the eligard.com site. I realize
they're supposed to include all possible side effects, even if there
were few incidences, and they were mild.

"ELIGARD, like other drugs in its class, causes a temporary increase in
testosterone during the first week of treatment. Patients may
experience worsening of symptoms or new symptoms during the first weeks
of treatment, including bone pain, nerve damage, blood in the urine, or
difficulty urinating. The most common side effects are hot flashes,
injection site pain (including burning and stinging), fatigue, and
testicular atrophy."
gourd_dancer - 17 Jun 2005 00:23 GMT
I am in a research facility and get access to a lot of up to date
information as opposed to an approved practice. With the mulyiple flashes on
Lupron the Meidcal Oncologist switched me because he had very good success
with Eligard. The Oncologist R.N. told me that very few experience hot
flashes with it and after a year, they both are correct.

After 14 months of HT and 6 months of chemo, I still can get it up. I do get
fatigued, gained weight, lost muscle tone, and sport a new set of
mini-breasts.

I bring it up only as an alternative to try if Lupron induced hot flashes
are really bothersome. BTW, the injection site is typically the back of the
arm and stings like hell. For my money, it is a lot better than the hip.

> This is the first I've heard of Eligard. It might have come onto the
> market withing the past three years. It's good to know there's an
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> injection site pain (including burning and stinging), fatigue, and
> testicular atrophy."
Ken - 23 Jun 2005 01:12 GMT
>... and sport a new set of mini-breasts."

Last year I had a chat with a radiologist about gynecomastia. He said
he could eliminate or greatly reduce it, probably in one but possibly
two quick office visits. He said that it was a fairly common procedure.
I had anti-androgen meds twice before, on the opposite coast, and no
one even told me about gynecomastia, let alone that it was easily
controlled with low-dose radiation. Maybe you could ask about it if you
have to take the meds again.
Allan Matthews - 17 Jun 2005 18:49 GMT
>This is the first I've heard of Eligard. It might have come onto the
>market withing the past three years. It's good to know there's an
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
>injection site pain (including burning and stinging), fatigue, and
>testicular atrophy."
As a person who was on Lupron for 25 months I can state that the hot
flashes can be controlled by Megastrol (Megace) very quickly.  Your
initial post sounds very much like the posts of the English gentleman
who resisted conventional treatment by drinking and bathing in urine.
May he rest in peace.
Lorelei - 18 Jun 2005 09:22 GMT
Curt takes Effexor for hot flashes and he would tell you that for him
they are very debilitating. He's been on Lupron for 18 months and will
be til the day he dies. He hates Lupron. I wonder why he hasn't gotten
any Eligard... I wonder if I can find out if there is a conflict of
interest with our clinic and TAP Pharmaceuticals. The doc knows how
much Curt hates the Lupron. Curt even delayed his last shot because he
hates it so much. I'll have to ask at the next appt why not try
Eligard.

PS. just because your symptoms were helped by Megace doesn't mean
everyone's will be relieved.
as they say: your body, your science experiment.

Lori
Lori
Allan Matthews - 19 Jun 2005 17:53 GMT
>Curt takes Effexor for hot flashes and he would tell you that for him
>they are very debilitating. He's been on Lupron for 18 months and will
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Lori
>Lori
I too hated Lupron..so much that when my treatments of radiation had
failed and I had the choice of going back on Lupron or having surgical
castration, I chose the castration, knowing that Lupron had made me
suicidal.  I only stated that the Megestrol can control the hot
flashes..it is used widely for this because it is so effective.  
I. P. Freely - 19 Jun 2005 19:12 GMT
The SEs should be about the same whether the castration is accomplished by
knife or needle, because the cause of the SEs is generally considered to be
due to the zero T. Did you find the effects different between needle and
knife?

And Megace has its own suite of SEs.

I.P.

> I too hated Lupron..so much that when my treatments of radiation had
> failed and I had the choice of going back on Lupron or having surgical
> castration, I chose the castration, knowing that Lupron had made me
> suicidal.  I only stated that the Megestrol can control the hot
> flashes..it is used widely for this because it is so effective.
Allan Matthews - 22 Jun 2005 01:01 GMT
>The SEs should be about the same whether the castration is accomplished by
>knife or needle, because the cause of the SEs is generally considered to be
>due to the zero T. Did you find the effects different between needle and
>knife?

Yes, The side effects of surgical castration were no where near as bad
as the Lupron.  On Lupron, when I started, I had 30-40 hot flashes a
day.  After one Megace tablet they stopped entirely but I had severe
depression and came very close to suicide.  I have had very few side
effects from the surgery.  A few mild bouts of depression and feeling
sorry for myself once in awhile.  What the Hell...I'm only 70 years
old!!!! (G)

>And Megace has its own suite of SEs.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> suicidal.  I only stated that the Megestrol can control the hot
>> flashes..it is used widely for this because it is so effective.
I. P. Freely - 24 Jun 2005 00:28 GMT
This implies the SEs are compounded by the drug itself, not due just to the
resulting T depletion. That's no surprise, but it's the first indication
I've seen of that. One more tidbit of info in my personal decision tree, to
be acted on when my PSA starts climbing some day.

I.P.

>>The SEs should be about the same whether the castration is accomplished by
>>knife or needle, because the cause of the SEs is generally considered to
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>>> suicidal.  I only stated that the Megestrol can control the hot
>>> flashes..it is used widely for this because it is so effective.
Ken - 16 Jul 2005 03:23 GMT
For what it's worth... Wednesday's (July 13) PSA was 5.8. Previously:
June 22,  5.9.
June 20,  2.5.
June 13,  5.6
May 5,    7.6
April 14,  9.5
Mar 15,   9.6
Feb 3,     8.2
Dec 14,   9.2

Obviously, the lab screwed up on June 20. Otherwise, there has been a
definite decline in the numbers. I started Celebrex April 12. Vytorin
was added to the mix May 5.

A nice side benefit... Despite my "no red meat" and mostly vegetarian
diet for the past decade, and being fanatical about low and no-fat
foods, daily exercise and being on the low side of normal weight for my
height, my cholesterol has always been high. When I started Vytorin,
two months ago, my total cholesterol was 220. Wednesday it was 134.

As I mentioned in previous posts, I haven't a clue as to what effect
the supplements I've been taking have had on these results. Maybe it's
just the Celebrex and Vytorin... or maybe it's a little of everything,
and I just happened to have lucked out with the right combination.
Thankfully, nothing I'm taking is harmful... at least as far as today's
latest newsbites tell us.

The only thing I feel secure in saying is that cholesterol and prostate
cancer seem to have stronger links than previously thought.

Although I'm happy with the results, if this proves helpful to just one
other man on this group (or anywhere else in the world for that
matter), I'll be ecstatic!!

Ken
Steve Kramer - 16 Jul 2005 12:07 GMT
Sure seems to be reducing PSA.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1    .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum

> For what it's worth... Wednesday's (July 13) PSA was 5.8. Previously:
> June 22,  5.9.
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> Ken
Bob r - 16 Jul 2005 15:53 GMT
Ken,
 Celebrex lowered my psa gradually as did my first protocol, PC-SPES.
The FDA put the kabosh on it and now the VA has outlawed Celebrex.
 My PSA is climbing back up now so perhaps I'll buy my own Celrbrex.
             thanks for your info,
                       bob r
Ken - 21 Jun 2005 02:33 GMT
Allen - I had moments of feeling like "throwing-in the towel" during
the worst of the Lupron saga, too. One of the meds on the list that
supposedly controled hot flashes was Effexor, which was supposed to
also help with depression. It had no effect on the hot flashes, but I
think it helped me feel a little better between bouts. Megace didn't do
anthing for me on any level. Did it work for you?
Allan Matthews - 22 Jun 2005 01:03 GMT
>Allen - I had moments of feeling like "throwing-in the towel" during
>the worst of the Lupron saga, too. One of the meds on the list that
>supposedly controled hot flashes was Effexor, which was supposed to
>also help with depression. It had no effect on the hot flashes, but I
>think it helped me feel a little better between bouts. Megace didn't do
>anthing for me on any level. Did it work for you?

The Megace (Megatrol) ended my hot flashes, but did not for the
horrible bouts of depression.
Lorelei - 18 Jun 2005 09:23 GMT
oh and Curt would want me to add that he can still get it up too. <G>
Lori
Allan Matthews - 22 Jun 2005 01:10 GMT
>oh and Curt would want me to add that he can still get it up too. <G>
>Lori
Unfortunately for me, 41 radiation treatments, several months on
Casodex and 25 months on Lupron ended in what the doctors called a
(Biomedical Failure) when my PSA started rising again.
Ken - 23 Jun 2005 00:51 GMT
"Unfortunately for me, 41 radiation treatments, several months on
Casodex and 25 months on Lupron ended in what the doctors called a
(Biomedical Failure) when my PSA started rising again."

Damn! You've been through hell, Allen. It's horribly frustrating to do
"all the right things," and endure their side effects, just to wind up
where you started.

I had another round of blood tests this afternoon (third in two weeks)
to see what's happening to me with all the stuff I'm taking... and to
confirm again-again, if my PSA really has plummeted. Apparently,
several  hemotologists and oncologists will be analyzing today's
results. If they conclude that I'm not killing myself, and my PSA is
indeed rapidly heading south, would you consider asking your docs about
it for yourself, Allen?

Also today, I received my first shipment of US-grown and packaged
pomegranate concentrate. It's very palatable, and a fraction of the
cost of juice, even with shipping.
Allan Matthews - 23 Jun 2005 01:33 GMT
>"Unfortunately for me, 41 radiation treatments, several months on
>Casodex and 25 months on Lupron ended in what the doctors called a
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>pomegranate concentrate. It's very palatable, and a fraction of the
>cost of juice, even with shipping.
I really have no one to blame but myself.  I did not get regular
exams even when my wife urged me to.  My PSA at time of diagnosis was
39.6.  I knew better but did not get tests.  However right now I am
feeling great, do some physical work every day, and my PSA in March of
this year was .15 so the surgery must have helped some.  It was 7.6 at
the time of surgical castration. I had excellent care by two doctors I
had a lot of faith in.  At the outset, before any treatment they told
me the odds of beating it were about 50/50.  Started treatment March
29, 2000.
Allan Matthews - 23 Jun 2005 01:37 GMT
>>"Unfortunately for me, 41 radiation treatments, several months on
>>Casodex and 25 months on Lupron ended in what the doctors called a
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
>me the odds of beating it were about 50/50.  Started treatment March
>29, 2000.
Ken, I missed your final question..sorry.  I will be glad to discuss
your treatment with my urologist when I seen him again...Sept.  I sure
hope you have good luck with it.
Allan
David S. - 15 Jun 2005 13:04 GMT
Ken:
   After reading this I get the point!  Not sure what to say except I hope
the dietary supplements, etc., work for you.  Good luck.
David S.

> David, the only conventional treatment, in my case, is anti-androgen or
> hormone therapy. The last time I had a Lupron shot and Casodex
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
> repeat... until the cancer shows up in a scan. With any luck, by then
> there might be an alternative.
Ken - 21 Jun 2005 03:20 GMT
I just got back from another doctor's visit... and another blood test,
to help confirm last week's test that showed a PSA drop from 9.5 to 5.6
in less than two months. First message on my machine was from my
doctor, with some "great news, and some strange news." The great news
is today's PSA was 2.5. I don't know what's happening, but something is
causing it to fall dramatically. The strange news is the liver function
test is a bit elevated. That could be related to the Vytorin.

He wants me to get another blood test, this week, to confirm the liver
function test. Maybe the Vytorin dosage will have to be modified.

Bottom line for my PSA is that on April 14th, it was 9.5, and on June
20th it's 2.5. If anyone reading this is thinking about following a
similar regimen, you might consider getting a full blood panel as a
starting point from which to monitor... and/or discuss it with your
doctor if your liver function is elevated.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.