Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Diapers or Catheter - Which Is Least Hassle For Air Travel?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
DLKR - 23 May 2005 00:57 GMT
I hope I'm not asking too many questions here. It seems that, as I work my way
through this process, there's always something new cropping up.

Next month I'll be flying out of state for prostate surgery. I have a couple of
post-op travel options:
- stay near the hospital for a week or so (until the catheter is removed)
or
- fly home a  couple of days after the surgery (still wearing a catheter)..

My initial thought was to stay until the catheter was removed; partly because
I'd be close to the hospital where the surgery was done in case of any
post-operation complications, but mostly because I thought that flying with a
catheter would be a  huge PITA (not to speak of airport security's reaction upon
discovering a bottle of suspicious fluid strapped to my leg).
In making that choice, I assumed that leakage after catheter removal would be
minimal (maybe zero).. Some of your responses to one of my previous posts has me
rethinking that issue and I'm adjusting to the likely hood that I will probably
have some leakage for a while after the catheter is removed.
Now I'm not sure which "travel mode" would involve the least hassle; :catheter
travel" or "diaper travel"?
I can envision a number of unpleasant scenarios in either case.
I'd appreciate some comments, suggestions or first hand experiences as to the
pros/cons involved with  either choice.
Thanks again for any help.


Steve Kramer - 23 May 2005 01:55 GMT
If it were me, I'd go home and get my cath pulled there.  To me, I felt 100%
better in my chair and my bed with my family and my friends.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum

> I hope I'm not asking too many questions here. It seems that, as I work my way
> through this process, there's always something new cropping up.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> pros/cons involved with  either choice.
> Thanks again for any help.
OCL - 23 May 2005 03:18 GMT
>I hope I'm not asking too many questions here. It seems that, as I work my
>way through this process, there's always something new cropping up.
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> the pros/cons involved with  either choice.
> Thanks again for any help.

Wow.  For me that is a tough question.  I had my
robotic three weeks ago.  I would not have wanted
to fly anywhere two days after surgery!  I felt a lot
more pain and a lot more tired than I had thought that
I would.  I stayed in the hospital an extra night and I
am in pretty good shape, not overweight, no other
health problems, and expected to go home the day
after my robotic.  But, I felt like crap and appreciated
the morphine.  So, if it had been me, I would not have
wanted to fly two days after my robotic.

However, you are getting your surgery from someone
who has done hundreds and my surgeon has only
done about 50.  I was under anesthesia longer than
expected because the set of lights for the robot
went out and they had to sterilize their second set
while I was out.  Plus the surgeon hit a big vein in
my belly and got blood on the camera and he had
to take it out and clean it and fix the vein and that
slowed him down.  So my anesthesia wasn't four
or five hours but six or so.  You will be under for
far less time at Henry Ford.  So it wouldn't be at
all right to compare my experience with what you
can reasonably expect.

If your only options are two days and fly or wait
a week to have the catheter out, that's a tough
choice to make before the surgery.  You might
have the surgery and then want to stay put for a
week or you might feel pretty good and want to
fly home.  I don't think you can predict with any
reasonable accuracy how you're going to feel.

I would have found it fairly uncomfortable after
two days to walk up the aisle of an airplane to
empty my catheter bag.  It took me four or five
days to really get comfortable with that thing.
And if you wear the smaller leg bag then you may
have to dump the thing.  If you use the large bag
then you're going to have it exposed and carrying
it is going to be interesting in public.

So, this is a difficult choice, I think.

OCL
jack in phoenix - 23 May 2005 03:36 GMT
I've twice gone through LAX with a catheter.  Once was during an
"Orange Alert" with extra security. There were no problems.  My
recollection is that there were no metal clips or anything else that
would set off the scanner, and I was prepared to drop my pants in front
of God and everybody to prove I was not a terrorist.

I did get a pre-board pass for each flight by advising the agent that I
had a catheter and needed to be close to one of the lavatories, and I
did have to empty the bag once on one of the flights.  Other than that,
it was no big deal.

> I hope I'm not asking too many questions here. It seems that, as I work my way
> through this process, there's always something new cropping up.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> pros/cons involved with  either choice.
> Thanks again for any help.
Ron B - 23 May 2005 12:46 GMT
Just another opinion DLKR.

The guys have given you great thoughts depending on circumstances.

Friends, family, home, etc.

I had open surgery and had to stay a few extra days in the hospital,
which was unusual...so that colors my opinion.

If you can do it...I'd stay near the hospital.

If you have family or friends WITH you...all the better.

This way...you'll be getting stronger each day and if anything strange
happens or help is needed...you're there.

You won't have to worry about "what if?"

Then...if you DO need the Depends...my guess is that it would be easier
to fly with THOSE.

Whatever way you choose to do it...we wish you all the best.

Ron B.

Chicago  
Steve U - 23 May 2005 23:23 GMT
DLKR,
Your question is a hard one!
My experience with RLRP (2/11/04)was there was very little pain. I felt
like I had done about a 100 sit-ups. There was no nausea. I asked my
doctor if I could go home the same evening. He convinced me to stay
just in case there were problems with bleeding.  I didn't need or get
any pain medicine.  I was a little sore on the trip home every time we
went over a pothole. I was walking outside day 2. My wife and I went
out for breakfast day 3. I was driving day 4, able to walk 5 miles day
5, and went back to work day 6. (My job has no physical demands).
Catheter out day 7.  I was totally incontiment after the catheter was
out day 7, but that got better by the day. I liked sleeping in my own
bed A LOT. Travel was more convenient with the catheter than immediatly
after when I was totally incontinent. Still, you will probably feel
safer staying close to the surgeon who did your operation. You can
decide this intelligently either way. Good luck.
Steve U

> I hope I'm not asking too many questions here. It seems that, as I work my way
> through this process, there's always something new cropping up.
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> pros/cons involved with  either choice.
> Thanks again for any help.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.