Well, Steve, I try not to get too confident... I understand from you guys
that passing the 18 month test is the real exciting one... Right? I'll
save my money for a BIG PARTY when I pass that one... lol
Thanks for the support, folks...
Paul
Age: 63
10/04: PSA = 10.4, T1C, Gleason 7 (“in a few samples”)
11/04: RP “looks like we got it” - sparing one and a half bundles of nerves
05/05: PSA = less than 0.1
05/13/05: Good bladder control - no erections (yet) - soreness “inside”
belly
finally subsided for the most part - but, still sore to the touch along the
incision
Interesting topic, maybe.
Yes, I'd say that based on what I've seen here, 1½ years seems very
important. Then 4-5 seems significant. Then 9. I don't know if that's
accurate. Just a perception of my observations.

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05
PSA .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum
> Well, Steve, I try not to get too confident... I understand from you guys
> that passing the 18 month test is the real exciting one... Right? I'll
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> 10/04: PSA = 10.4, T1C, Gleason 7 ("in a few samples")
> 11/04: RP "looks like we got it" - sparing one and a half bundles of
nerves
> 05/05: PSA = less than 0.1
> 05/13/05: Good bladder control - no erections (yet) - soreness "inside"
> belly
> finally subsided for the most part - but, still sore to the touch along the
> incision