Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Lupron & cholesterol

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
chuck.mcclellan - 28 Apr 2005 00:24 GMT
I am sure this topic has been discussed before bo please bear with me.
My last shot of Lupron was supposed to have worn off in November but it
seemed to take longer than that to recover some of the things I lost
such a muscle mass, chest hair and energy.  I just had my annual
physical with my G.P. apparently not aware of what Lupron is much less
what its side effects are.  My cholesterol, which is usually in the 170
range is now 230+.  Is this due in part to the lethargy, empathy and
lack of exercise during treatment or does Lupron have a tendency to
raise the cholesterol or is it both?  I am just now being able to get
back into exercising.  Geez!  Why don't they discuss this aspect of it
with you before sticking you with the needle?  "You'll be a little more
tired...maybe...perhaps... kina' sorta'."  Just like them saying the
biopsy wouldn't hurt except for a 'slight discomfort'.  Sorry for the
ranting but I don't think they (the medical folks)fully know.

Have a good day,
Chuck McClellan
ron - 28 Apr 2005 01:30 GMT
Chuck...The following abstract indicates that ADT drives cholesterol
levels up significantly.  Unfortunately, the abstract doesn't say
exactly how much...Best wishes and good health, Ron

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Feb;90(2):657-60. Epub 2004 Nov 23.
Related Articles, Links

The influence of androgen deprivation therapy on metabolism in patients
with prostate cancer.

Nishiyama T, Ishizaki F, Anraku T, Shimura H, Takahashi K.

Division of Urology, Department of Regenerative and Transplant
Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental
Sciences, Asahimachi 1-757, Niigata 951-8510, Japan.
nisiyama@med.niigata-u.ac.jp

The effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) include not only
suppression of tumor growth, but also adverse effects on various bodily
functions. The aim of this study was to determine the metabolic effects
of ADT in patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Forty-nine men
with prostate cancer were treated with ADT before beginning radical
therapy for 6 months. Body weight, peripheral red blood cell counts,
hemoglobin, hematocrit, fasting blood sugar, serum total cholesterol,
blood urea nitrogen, uric acid, compensated calcium, inorganic
phosphorus, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, urinary
deoxypyridinoline, and radial bone density determined using dual energy
x-ray absorptiometry were examined before and 6 months after ADT
treatment. Body weight (P = 0.037) and the levels of fasting blood
sugar (P = 0.014), serum total cholesterol (P = 0.017), blood urea
nitrogen (P = 0.030), compensated calcium (P < 0.001), inorganic
phosphorus (P < 0.001), bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.001),
and compensated urinary deoxypyridinoline (P < 0.001) increased
significantly. Peripheral red blood cell counts (P < 0.001), hemoglobin
level (P < 0.001), hematocrit (P < 0.001), uric acid (P < 0.001), and
radial bone density (P = 0.023) decreased significantly. These effects
of ADT on various bodily functions warrant systematic study in clinical
trials. We should be aware of the far-reaching consequences of ADT and
incorporate strategies for preventing and managing adverse effects into
routine practice.
kh - 28 Apr 2005 10:54 GMT
> The effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) include not only
> suppression of tumor growth, but also adverse effects on various bodily
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> and compensated urinary deoxypyridinoline (P < 0.001) increased
> significantly.

"the levels of fasting blood sugar (P = 0.014) ... increased
significantly. "

What does (P = 0.014) mean?

I had 2 four month Lupron shots and went from a fasting blood sugar
of 130 (big whoop at 197 pounds, 5'7", and driving a desk) to a
fasting 300 and I had lost 10 pounds!

I'm 3 months past the day I was supposed to get the 3rd Lupron shot.

I have a little more weight off.  I'm maaaaybe at 180 and I just
clocked a morning, not fasting, blood sugar of 138.

So the sugar is trending right.  I used to see 180 in the morning,
then 160's, then 150's.  I have more energy. I don't have the
"diabetic buzz" and can write code again.  

I'd really like to find an authoritative report on Lupron or any ADT
and blood sugar.  

My primary care doc doesn't think it's the Lupron.  Neither does the
Rad-doc.
ron - 28 Apr 2005 15:42 GMT
kh wrote...snip...
> "the levels of fasting blood sugar (P = 0.014) ... increased
> significantly. "
>
> What does (P = 0.014) mean?

KH...It means that, statistically speaking, the result was significant
at the (1.00 - 0.014 = 0.986) 98.6% confidence level.  Said a bit
differently, there is a 98.6% chance that the conclusion that ADT
increased fasting blood sugar levels is correct (not caused by random
chance) and a corresponding 1.4% chance that the conclusion is
incorrect (the observation was caused by mere chance)...Best wishes and
good health, Ron
kh - 29 Apr 2005 11:29 GMT
> kh wrote...snip...
> > "the levels of fasting blood sugar (P = 0.014) ... increased
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> incorrect (the observation was caused by mere chance)...Best wishes and
> good health, Ron

Thanks,  That's a BIG help to me.

I clocked a morning blood sugar of 138 yesterday.  That's not great
but the lowest I've seen in months.   Six weeks ago, it was up
around 180, then 160, week by week, it's been falling.  This is on
two glucophage's a day.

I've also been feeling "clearer" and stronger.  Did I mention that I
managed a 75% firm erection with no Vitamin-V?   This last week I
did some lotusscript programming and patched some JSP's too.  

As the Lupron flushes out, I've been feeling better.

Levels of fasting blood sugar (98.6% confidence level) increased
significantly.

I blame the Lupron.... reminds me, I got a piece of spam today that
included the phrase Lupron-Depot in the subject line.   What are the
odds of that?  

But, hey thanks again for the stats-talk lesson.  If Lupron does
jack around with blood sugar, then they really should publicize it.

I was in bad shape for about a half year, confused, thirsty, had the
shakes, no energy, all classic diabetes symptoms.  

I really hope that my experience and misery will help someone avoid
it.  If you have to take Lupron, so be it but get your blood sugar
monitored.
kh - 28 Apr 2005 10:54 GMT
> The effects of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) include not only
> suppression of tumor growth, but also adverse effects on various bodily
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> and compensated urinary deoxypyridinoline (P < 0.001) increased
> significantly.

"the levels of fasting blood sugar (P = 0.014) ... increased
significantly. "

What does (P = 0.014) mean?  I know it's some kind of statistical
mumbo-jumbo but what?

I had 2 four month Lupron shots and went from a fasting blood sugar
of 130 (big whoop at 197 pounds, 5'7", and driving a desk) to a
fasting 300 and I had lost 10 pounds!

I'm 3 months past the day I was supposed to get the 3rd Lupron shot.

I have a little more weight off.  I'm maaaaybe at 180 and I just
clocked a morning, not fasting, blood sugar of 138.

So the sugar is trending right.  I used to see 180 in the morning,
then 160's, then 150's.  I have more energy. I don't have the
"diabetic buzz" and can write code again.  

I'd really like to find an authoritative report on Lupron or any ADT
and blood sugar.  

My primary care doc doesn't think it's the Lupron.  Neither does the
Rad-doc.
Stephen Jordan - 28 Apr 2005 01:38 GMT
> I am sure this topic has been discussed before bo please bear with me.
> My last shot of Lupron was supposed to have worn off in November but it
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> biopsy wouldn't hurt except for a 'slight discomfort'.  Sorry for the
> ranting but I don't think they (the medical folks)fully know.

Yes, Lupron and the other LHRH agonists tend to increase cholesterol levels.

The reason that patients are often not informed about SE's is that the
medics often are ignorant of them.

One such is osteoporosis. Chuck should get himself a bone density test
-- the QCT (Quantitative Computerized Tomography) test, *not* the DXA
test.

See: Prostate Cancer Research Institute at
http://prostate-cancer.org/index.html

Regards,

Steve J
__
"Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small,
large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good
sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming
might of the enemy.''
--Sir Winston L. S. Churchill
I. P. Freely - 28 Apr 2005 06:38 GMT
Yup. T deprivation => increased lipids (including cholesterol) => increased
cardiovascular risk.
And it takes some people many months to recover their T after stopping HT .
. . not to mention the ones who never get their T back.
This is one of the reasons I harp about SEs, and why I can't understand why
some people whine when I harp about SEs.

OTOH, I also tell folks biopsies don't hurt, because they normally don't.
They're supposed to use a needle, not a sharp spoon, and our colons can't
feel cuts, only pressure like with excess gas.

I.P.

> My last shot of Lupron was supposed to have worn off in November but it
> seemed to take longer than that to recover some of the things I lost
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> biopsy wouldn't hurt except for a 'slight discomfort'.  Sorry for the
> ranting but I don't think they (the medical folks)fully know.

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.