Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Do It Yourself PSA ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Tom Cular - 26 Apr 2005 12:19 GMT
Prostate Specific Antigen as a Clinical Biomarker for Prostate Cancer:
What's the Take Home Message?

Leach FS, Koh MS, Chan YW, Bark S, Ray R, Morton RA, Remaley AT.

Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) continues to be challenged as a legitimate
clinical biomarker in early detection of prostate cancer due to lack of
specificity for malignant transformation. Skepticism surrounding the utility
of serum PSA as a clinical marker is not new and many questioned its initial
use in widespread prostate cancer screening due to non-specific expression
and low predictive value for cancer detection. Despite these initial
concerns, serum PSA measurement along with digital rectal examination (DRE)
is currently the accepted practice for prostate cancer screening in the
United States with hundreds of thousands of men undergoing serum PSA
measurement each year. In contrast to its role for early detection, serum
PSA measurement as a surrogate for prostate cancer recurrence (biochemical
failure) following curative intent therapy has consummate clinical utility
in post-treatment surveillance. As thousands of men each year are
aggressively treated for potentially curable prostate cancer, development of
simple and effective diagnostic tools for detecting treatment failures
should be an important area of biomedical and clinical investigation.

We have constructed and tested a home-based prostate cancer surveillance
device for use by patients to detect PSA from blood obtained by finger
stick. Our initial results suggest that home based PSA testing is feasible
and may have clinical utility in management of men treated for prostate
cancer.

PMID: 15846084 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
Alan Meyer - 27 Apr 2005 02:11 GMT
> ...
> We have constructed and tested a home-based prostate cancer surveillance
> device for use by patients to detect PSA from blood obtained by finger
> stick.
> ...

If you search on Google for "psa test" you'll see
lots of hits on the advertising side bar for home
testing kits.

There's one from "BioSafe" that a lot of vendors
advertise.  I've seen it for as little as $30.

I have no idea how accurate they are.

   Alan
Twig - 27 Apr 2005 22:02 GMT
> > ...
> > We have constructed and tested a home-based prostate cancer
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
>     Alan

I have been using Bio-Safe for about a year. It uses a dried blood
sample from a finger prick. They do not recomend using it to track psa
post treatment as they are not accurate at very low numbers. However,
for higher psa's they claim accuracy within .6 ng/ml when compared to
serum tests. They use the Hybritech assay.

Twig
Stephen Jordan - 29 Apr 2005 21:13 GMT
> I have been using Bio-Safe for about a year. It uses a dried blood
> sample from a finger prick. They do not recomend using it to track psa
> post treatment as they are not accurate at very low numbers. However,
> for higher psa's they claim accuracy within .6 ng/ml when compared to
> serum tests. They use the Hybritech assay.

Plus/minus .6 is poor accuracy, IMO. I would not use it.

Frex, my last PSA, once the lab's screwup had been corrected, was 0.01.
The self-test could have shown it as much as 0.61 or as little as
0.0059. Not good enough when my life is at stake.

Regards,

Steve J
__
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our
inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the
state of facts and evidence."
--John Adams
Beverley - 29 Apr 2005 21:22 GMT
That's a very good point but my question is just what is the accuracy of the
labs doing the testing now? Hmm, interesting.
Bev

> > I have been using Bio-Safe for about a year. It uses a dried blood
> > sample from a finger prick. They do not recomend using it to track psa
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> state of facts and evidence."
>  --John Adams
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.