> > ...
> > We have constructed and tested a home-based prostate cancer
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Alan
> I have been using Bio-Safe for about a year. It uses a dried blood
> sample from a finger prick. They do not recomend using it to track psa
> post treatment as they are not accurate at very low numbers. However,
> for higher psa's they claim accuracy within .6 ng/ml when compared to
> serum tests. They use the Hybritech assay.
Plus/minus .6 is poor accuracy, IMO. I would not use it.
Frex, my last PSA, once the lab's screwup had been corrected, was 0.01.
The self-test could have shown it as much as 0.61 or as little as
0.0059. Not good enough when my life is at stake.
Regards,
Steve J
__
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our
inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the
state of facts and evidence."
--John Adams
Beverley - 29 Apr 2005 21:22 GMT
That's a very good point but my question is just what is the accuracy of the
labs doing the testing now? Hmm, interesting.
Bev
> > I have been using Bio-Safe for about a year. It uses a dried blood
> > sample from a finger prick. They do not recomend using it to track psa
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> state of facts and evidence."
> --John Adams