Today, it's all about the bottom line.
Sometimes it backfires like when Vioxx was withdrawn.
-- Reader to complete...
-- Please reply to this ng as my email adress is fake:
-- Regards
-- CC
It is a shame to live life with such cynicism (not that I have been
untouched by cynicism in my own life).
But, do try to put things in perspective. I have not, for instance, met
many researchers who were not most concerned with finding the cure for a
cancer or a medication for absolute relief of pain without side effect.
Nor, does the race to high stock prices seem to be adversely effecting the
potential for a prostate cancer cure.
A sergeant grieves for a man whereas a general grieves for a Division if he
happens to lose one, but is otherwise worried only about ground. A cop's
over-riding desire is to help, yet when he becomes chief, it's all about
statistics and budget. A nurse, when she is in a room, cares about nothing
but the patient, but her director is worried about whether he has too many
nurses and the president is worried about the financial viability of the
hospital.
I'm sure that is the case in all occupational systems.
> >hi folks - i ran across this article and thought to myself - here we
> >are......our lives get shattered by cancer, or our loved ones develop a
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> -- CC
Alan Meyer - 25 Apr 2005 21:54 GMT
It is a shame to live with such cynicism. And I agree that
there are many dedicated people working in medical research.
But unfortunately, I fear that cynicism is justified.
A lot of money that we spend on health care goes into research.
But a lot of it also goes into sinkholes that benefit no one.
I'm thinking in particular of the behavior of the big
pharmaceutical companies. They spend billions on marketing and
advertising drugs. They bribe doctors with junkets and gifts.
They convince people in terrible need that some nearly worthless
drug is a lifesaver (ask any Alzheimer's caregiver, for example,
if his parent was really helped by Aricept.) They show happy,
healthy, smiling arthritis, Alzheimer's, and cancer patients in
TV ads that cost a fortune and leave the patients with absurdly
raised expectations of relief that doesn't materialize.
On the other side of the coin, cheap solutions to health
problems are often ignored because no one can make money on
them. There are drugs that are no longer patentable that may be
valuable in the treatment of various diseases. But no drug
company will fund clinical trials because they can't make super
profits selling the drugs, and very few other sources of funds
for clinical trials are available.
People who become successful scientists almost always do it
because they have a love of science. Very often they have a lot
of concern about the application of that science too.
But business is, has been, and always will be, about making
money. I'm not condemning that. I'm not saying there are no
benefits to society from that. But that's what it is. If a
drug company can make more money by plowing two dollars into
advertising and one dollar into research, than by putting three
dollars into research, then that's what they will do. They're
in a dog eat dog competition with other drug companies and, even
if they want to be altruistic, they'll be eaten alive if the
try.
In my view we've got to take advantage of what competition and
free enterprise can give us, but regulate it in a way that keeps
it from going off into socially unproductive or deleterious
directions. I think we should, for example, ban drug
advertising. No drug company will suffer because their
competitors are banned from doing it too.
That's a start on what we need to do.
Alan
> It is a shame to live life with such cynicism (not that I have
> been untouched by cynicism in my own life).
>
> But, do try to put things in perspective.
...
> > >.. and yet, there are those
> > >who see all of this as a marketplace and treat it as a meal
> > >ticket to make a profit off of our misfortunes.
> > >...
> > Today, it's all about the bottom line.
...