Dear All,
First I would like to thank you guys for the knowledge and the help
you unknowingly provided me with, during a very long and lonely
weekend - when I already knew the biopsy results but had no doctor
to talk to.
Here is the full story
I am an Israeli - normal healthy life with yearly routine check ups.
The PSA started to climb and the Uro started to watch me more closely
for the past 2 years. Last check up Nov. 2004 the PSA reached 5,62
and I was sent to get a biopsy. Here PSA 4 is the max.
It took me a while to get to the biopsy - I thought it is all
precaution and can wait.
On 10th of February 2005 I finally went for the biopsy (8) and on the
15th, my 65th birthday I got the positive results Gleason 3+3. I was
shocked.
The following week I saw 3 Urologists and made up my mind for RP.
We have good medicine here and I was well covered with medical
insurance.
18 March operation - 4 days (3 nights) in the hospital and went home.
28th March stitches and cath came out.
3 and some weeks from the operation my PSA is down to LESS than 0.1
I am still dripping - but it is manageable - I am optimistic that it
will stop eventually.
Erection - - I did not go to that test yet - still something to look
forward to.
I will have to check PSA every 3 months or so - I can live with that.
One observation - PSA is not that accurate. Biopsy is closer to the
truth.
In my case the biopsy of the prostate - after taken out - revealed a
worse situation than the biopsy taken before the operation.
Best of luck to all
Reuben
Ron B - 18 Apr 2005 13:17 GMT
Hi Reuben, thanks for your story.
Great about the low PSA.
A question...
did you mean a post surgery PATHOLOGY report instead of biopsy?
If the prostate is gone...how do they do a post-op biopsy?
Thanks and good health,
Ron B.
Chicago
I. P. Freely - 18 Apr 2005 17:50 GMT
The sooner we exercise that "muscle", the sooner and more likely its
recovery. Go do your homework, Reuben!!
PSA is quite useful after treatment, including its level, its DT, and its
velocity. It's one of the best and far earliest indicators of post-treatment
PC recurrence, far earlier than symptoms or scans.
Yeah, most pathologies look a bit worse than the biopsy. I was fortunate in
that my path looked a little better -- a little less 4, more 3 than
expected.
I.P.
> Erection - - I did not go to that test yet - still something to look
> forward to.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> Best of luck to all
> Reuben
re - 18 Apr 2005 18:53 GMT
Hello There:
Would he eventually stop dripping?
I ask the question because someone has a
similar situation.
Regards,
Re
-==================================
> The sooner we exercise that "muscle", the sooner and more likely its
> recovery. Go do your homework, Reuben!!
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> > Best of luck to all
> > Reuben
I. P. Freely - 19 Apr 2005 02:23 GMT
"re" <nnn@msn.net> wrote in >
> Would he eventually stop dripping?
> I ask the question because someone has a
> similar situation.
Most likely. He'll know in a couple of years if not sooner.
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 19 Apr 2005 02:08 GMT
Great review, Reuben. What was your post-op biopsy? Gleason 7? T2c?

Signature
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05
PSA .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum
> Dear All,
>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> Best of luck to all
> Reuben
JK@work - 19 Apr 2005 18:43 GMT
So the moral kiddies out there in lurker land is early detection, and
biopsy sooner than later is the way to go. No reason to wait wait wait....
it's not going away.

Signature
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
http://www.sinrodstudios.com/
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories/