Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / April 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Radiation for Prostate Boosts Rectal Cancer Risk

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Charlie - 03 Apr 2005 05:44 GMT
In this morning's local newspaper there was an article titled, "Radiation
for Prostate Boosts Rectal Cancer Risk", that I found both surprising and
even more satisfied that I had selected surgery.

For some strange reason, I'm having a brain cramp and can't seem to copy and
paste this article into the body of this posting.

Apparently the source article appears in today's issue of the journal
Gastroenterology. I have no idea if this journal is available online or not.
If there are any of you who would like me to email them with a scanned copy
of the article as an attachment I will be glad to do so inbetween rounds of
golf and lawn cutting (not to shabby after having surgery on January 28, if
I do say so myself).

Charles McQuarrie
camcq@shaw.ca
Tom Cular - 03 Apr 2005 13:06 GMT
Here's a copy of the article from WebMD.
Tom

Prostate Radiation Linked to Rectal Cancer

Radiation Treatment for Prostate Cancer May Double Rectal Cancer Risk

     By Jennifer Warner
     WebMD Medical News  Reviewed By Michael  Smith, MD
     on Friday, April 01, 2005

April 1, 2005 - Men who receive radiation treatment for prostate cancer are
more likely to develop rectal cancer, a new study suggests.

Researchers found that men with prostate cancer who were treated with
radiation had a 70% higher risk of developing rectal cancer than those who
were treated with surgery only.

"Men who have had prostate radiation should be aggressively monitored for
rectal cancer starting five years after treatment," says researcher Nancy
Baxter, MD, PhD, of the University of Minnesota Cancer Center, in a news
release. "This is the first time rectal cancer risk associated with prostate
radiation has been quantified, and these findings may also have implications
for patients treated with radiation for other pelvic cancers."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Prostate Cancer: Latest Treatments, Tips for Coping

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Prostate cancerProstate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in the
U.S. with about 230,000 men diagnosed with the disease each year. Although
prostate cancer is highly treatable when caught in the early stages,
researchers say men who survive prostate cancer may face higher risks of
other types of cancer due to the effects of their treatment.

About 17% of men with prostate cancer are treated with radiation,treated
with radiation, usually because they choose radiation over surgery,surgery,
are older, or have other medical problems.

Prostate Cancer Treatment May Raise Other Risks

In the study, which appears in the April issue of Gastroenterology,
researchers looked at more than 85,000 men treated for prostate cancer from
1973 to 1994.

More than 30,000 of the men received radiation treatment for prostate cancer
and about 55,000 had surgery only.

The results showed that radiation treatment was linked to a higher risk of
cancer in areas that were irradiated, such as the rectum, but not in the
remainder of the colon. The risk of developing rectal cancerrectal cancer
among men who received radiation was 70% higher than those who underwent
surgery alone.

Researchers say that increase in risk is roughly equivalent to the
colorectal cancer riskcolorectal cancer risk associated with having a family
history of the disease.

Improvements With Current Technology

However, researchers say current technology allows for more targeted
radiation treatment to the affected area than was available up to 1995. Even
so, researchers say some portions of the rectum may still receive a high
dose of radiation, which raises the risk of rectal cancer.

In an editorial that accompanies the study, William M. Grady of the Fred
Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and Ken Russell of the
University of Washington Medical School say that the results highlight the
need to monitor the long-term health of prostate cancer survivors.

"In light of the increasing number of men surviving prostate cancer, these
findings have substantial implications not only regarding our understanding
of radiation-induced cancers but also for our management of men who have
undergone prostate irradiation," write the editorialists.

"As more men are successfully treated for their prostate cancer, the
prevention of long-term complications from prostate cancer treatment can be
predicted to become a major medical issue."

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

SOURCES: Baxter, N. Gastroenterology, April 2005; vol 128: pp 819-824. News
release, American Gastroenterological Association.

> In this morning's local newspaper there was an article titled, "Radiation
> for Prostate Boosts Rectal Cancer Risk", that I found both surprising and
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Charles McQuarrie
> camcq@shaw.ca
Stephen Jordan - 03 Apr 2005 20:41 GMT
> Here's a copy of the article from WebMD. Tom

> Prostate Radiation Linked to Rectal Cancer

(snip)

> In the study, which appears in the April issue of Gastroenterology,
> researchers looked at more than 85,000 men treated for prostate cancer
> from 1973 to 1994.

> More than 30,000 of the men received radiation treatment for prostate
> cancer and about 55,000 had surgery only.

(snip)

> However, researchers say current technology allows for more targeted
> radiation treatment to the affected area than was available up to 1995.
> Even so, researchers say some portions of the rectum may still receive a
> high dose of radiation, which raises the risk of rectal cancer.

(snip)

So the most recent tx for the cohort of 30,000 was eleven years ago. Too many maybes for my taste.

My tx, which was IMRT, was last October. I examined the planning and isodose dosage lines. Some radiation necessarily was applied to the rectal wall, simply because of anatomy. The amount, however, was quite small. So I'll keep this in mind, but think that there are more vital matters to think about.

Those who were in the cohort should, I think, be a bit more concerned.

Regards,

Steve J
__
"Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy.''
--Sir Winston L. S. Churchill
keith340@webtv.net - 03 Apr 2005 21:37 GMT
I'm in total agreement with you Stephen, the cohorts have some
worry...with proton treatment...low entrance dose,maximal at target, no
exit dose...the rectum is moved away from line of the beam to the
prostate by the use of a pediatric condom filled with water before each
treatment...the beam goes through the hip which is alternated each
day...the dose goes direct to the site and does not exit...the ten year
study at Loma Linda (published 2004-Science Direct) on 1255 patients
between 1991 and 1997 reported that gastrointestinal toxicity which
includes bleeding and bowel problems were less than 1%....

Keith Lundy/So. California
40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments
Loma Linda  Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
ron - 03 Apr 2005 22:34 GMT
Stephen Jordan wrote:...snip...

> So the most recent tx for the cohort of 30,000 was eleven years ago. Too many maybes for my taste.

Cancers are often slow to develop, like PCa for example.  The PCa being
treated today probably started 10-15 years ago.  Radiation induced
cancers seem to peak in the 10-20 year post-treatment timeframe, so men
treated from '73-'94 are what you'd need to look at in order to examine
this effect.  I haven't seen this paper yet, but in others that examine
secondary radiation induced cancers from PCa RT, they inevitably
address the question about how will "today's treatments" compare.  The
answer seems to be something like, "the beam today is better focused,
consequently the doasge has been increased (in fact they are still
stepping up dosages) and radiation to the surrounding areas remains
pretty much at the same levels.  Still alot of maybes, but with PCa
isn't that the norm :-) ?..Best wishes and good health, Ron
Steve Kramer - 03 Apr 2005 23:30 GMT
> Cancers are often slow to develop, like PCa for example.  The PCa being
> treated today probably started 10-15 years ago.

Yes, we may not always realize it, but when it comes to cancer, we are
extremely lucky.  My brother's sister in law a month or so ago was having
sight problems.  Her optometrist told her he thought it was a mass, possibly
cancerous and sent her for tests.  Her first tests showed brain cancer.
Subsequent tests and biopsies showed breast, lung and liver cancer.  Today
we were told of her bone scan report:  "Every bone is affected except the
one at the very top of her skull...but still not the primary sight."

We are lucky to have prostate cancer.

Signature

PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3cN0M0 Neg margins
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05
PSA  .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum

 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.