Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / March 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

For anyone still looking at their options

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
makingprogress - 29 Mar 2005 16:21 GMT
http://www.catholicmedicalcenter.org/whatsnew/details.php?id=122
Happy with this doc.  He was up front with his stats, gave us the info,
then let us make the decision.  
PeteBos - 29 Mar 2005 19:29 GMT
> http://www.catholicmedicalcenter.org/whatsnew/details.php?id=122
> Happy with this doc.  He was up front with his stats, gave us the info,
> then let us make the decision.

Glad to hear you are happy with your choice and the operation. I
haven't had surgery yet but was initially in favor of robotic RP
because of the 10x display and that the robot filters out any of the
surgeon's hand tremors making for more accurate cuts. The laporoscopic
technique is also a plus. However, I changed my mind during my research
when several seasoned surgeons explained that RRP is best because they
need to feel the tissues to know exactly where the cancer is located,
allowing them to cut in the right place. This provides the best
possible opportunity for nerve sparing. The choice is not easy, but
I've decided to have RRP.
makingprogress - 29 Mar 2005 20:03 GMT
Good luck with your surgery.  It's a difficult choice to make, and an
important one.  Half of the battle is making the initial decisions.  
James A Honeychuck - 29 Mar 2005 20:11 GMT
I followed the same logic as PeteBos.  The large incision caused a lot
of pain and left a big scar, but it doesn't matter because I was focused
on the outcome.  Which was pretty much perfect.

jimhoney
standard RRP age 52, cured, no significant aftereffects

>>http://www.catholicmedicalcenter.org/whatsnew/details.php?id=122
>>Happy with this doc.  He was up front with his stats, gave us the
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> possible opportunity for nerve sparing. The choice is not easy, but
> I've decided to have RRP.
smu53@aol.com - 30 Mar 2005 00:19 GMT
PeteBos,
You should do what feels best to you on tactile vs visual. As to the
comment on seasoned surgeons recommending RRP, my take is that if you
go to a hammer, you will be a nail. All doctors believe in what they
do. I think the open RP guys have perfected a method that will
eventually be abandoned. Only time will tell. If you get good results,
and I hope you do, you won't care how you got them. If you go to a top
experienced robotic guy, they will tell you it is at least as good as
the open procedure with less misery up front. My urology group includes
a top RRP guy and a leading robot guy. I picked robot guy because I
felt better going to a surgeon who could see better what he was doing.
Results are excellent for me, so I'm very pro robot. Plus, I like the
doc!  Good luck.
Steve U

Rate this thread:






 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.