Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / March 2005
Hot flashes: nuisance or real threat?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
I. P. Freely - 02 Mar 2005 18:38 GMT Those of you who have hot flashes . . . say you get one just as the sun has come up to beat down on you while zipped into a hefty sleeping bag. Or you get a flash while hunting Christmas (that was a holiday we used to enjoy before that OTHER PC went refractory) trees in the forest zipped into a full snowmobile suit with integral hood. Or you're out in the ocean in a cozy neoprene diving suit when a hot flash hits.
And, oh yes . . . the zipper is stuck.
Or you're just sleeping in a hot bedroom (like that 74-degree sauna one person recently mentioned here) or in a comparably overheated office, and you're hit by a hot flash.
How bad would that be? Do you just quietly tell yourself, "It's not serious, it's just uncomfortable as hell and will pass" and ignore it? Or do you do ANYTHING to relieve it because no mantra is going to overcome its demands? What if there IS no way to get out of that zipper besides prolonged struggling or hiking or swimming, or the only relief from that hot room is out the door IF it's cooler outdoors? What if it's 110 degrees outside?
And to top it off, you hate heat anyway . . . always have, always will.
Silly hypothetical conditions? No, reality, paraphrased.
Hot flashes: nuisance, or real threat to one's mental well-being?
I.P.
Stephen Jordan - 02 Mar 2005 18:58 GMT > Those of you who have hot flashes . . . (ka-snip imaginary horrors)
> Hot flashes: nuisance, or real threat to one's mental well-being? Depends (no pun) upon the individual. For me, they're a minor nuisance. Insufficient for tx. I had the opportunity, declined.
However, I'll soon be on Zoloft for a different reason and will report on whether it's one of the antidepressants that as a SE reduce/stop hot flashes.
Regards,
Steve J
I. P. Freely - 02 Mar 2005 22:01 GMT I wish they were imaginary. Only the "stuck zipper" part is hypothetical, and even that is a simplstic way of representing a very real scenario I deliberately pursue as often as possible (e.g., unzipping my dry suit out in the ocean would be suicidal). And is a hot flash in a confining scenario -- e.g., a jury box, a warm aircraft, a board meeting -- a sweaty nuisance or an intolerable nightmare? Inescapable heat *** PISSES ME OFF *** to the point I've passed on free vacations to tropical islands including Maui, and that's withOUT hot flashes. One prostate surgeon said he'd rather die than continue endure the SEs of his ADT, notably hot flashes.
So my question is very, very practical, not academic.
I.P.
"Stephen Jordan" <mycroftscj@earthlink.net> wrote...
>> Those of you who have hot flashes . . . > (ka-snip imaginary horrors) Stephen Jordan - 02 Mar 2005 23:07 GMT On March 2, I. P. Freely replied to me:
> I wish they were imaginary. (ka-snip) Since we're not posting in-line, anyone who cares will have to look upthread to understand what I'm referring to.
> So my question is very, very practical, not academic. Oh, for heaven's sake.
I dunno about others who maybe are unable to tolerate a nuisance. My hot flashes last about two (2) minutes, cause a bit of perspiration, disappear. Ask a ~60+ woman. I've never heard of a woman dying from hot flashes. Has IP?
I'm not gonna die of hot flashes, and I reckon no one else will either, even if he's a "prostate surgeon" who speaks in hyperbole, which I suppose means excitable urologist.
Good lord, why all the handwringing? There are enough genuinely-life-threatening matters for us to deal with.
Regards,
Steve J __ "Do not compute the totality of your poultry population until all the manifestations of incubation have been entirely completed." --William Jennings Bryan (1860-1925) - American lawyer and politician.
I. P. Freely - 03 Mar 2005 02:33 GMT Stephen Jordan" <mycroftscj@earthlink.net> wrote ...> On March 2, I. P. Freely replied to me:
>> I wish they were imaginary. >> So my question is very, very practical, not academic. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Good lord, why all the handwringing? There are enough > genuinely-life-threatening matters for us to deal with. That's why I'm asking, dammit!
Some peoples say they're a nuisance, others, including a renowned urologist and some people here, say they're horrible and get worse with time; 10% of ADT pts can't shed them even after ADT is stopped. Just because yours aren't bad doesn't mean others are so fortunate. And just because you don't spend hundreds of hours annually in extreme exertion in a confining, insulating wet- or dry-suit in situations where you can't just shed the suit doesn't mean we all sit on our a.ses in an air conditioned room all day.
"Warm" flashes -- toss back the covers and lose a couple of hours of sleep until I cool down -- have already cost me enough sleep to completely change my entire eating regimen 25 years ago. The several-times-a-day/night, 2-minute to one-hour, bed- and clothes-drenching hot flashes some people get w/ADT ARE worth being concerned with, in some couch-potato scenarios and sure as hell in a dry suit in 10-foot ocean waves and 40 mph wind.
Sorry, but as far as I'm concerned, anyone willing to subject himself to tens of thousands of searing, soaking blasts of extreme heat just to MAYBE add a few months of more misery to the end of his life has a dramatically different set of QOL criteria than I do. I'm just trying to get a handle on the severity distribution and how disabling these things are.
Sounds like your vote is for "Not much". Thanks. The rest of your crap you can keep to yourself.
I wouldn't have sent this blast months, even weeks, ago. But this PC has already robbed me of more time than anything else in my life, I'm fed up with it, and I think my Zoladex is thinking about to kick in. If you don't like others' earnest questions, shut up and let those of us who think PC treatment choices ARE life-threatening ask some questions about an issue -- PC treatment SEs -- both the medical community and hundreds of thousands of patients agree is under-discussed.
For example, I just today read yet again that radiation treatment SEs can continue to increase in number and severity more than six years after treatment. You can hide SEs from people all you want, but you're not going to make me stop questioning SEs or objecting when newbies are told that SEs aren't major treatment decision factors.
Go tell that renowned physican his choice to quit ADT due to SEs, especially excruciating hot flashes, is "hand-wringing", then get back to us. Tell those here who made the same decision with their wives' concurrence that their decision isn't life-threatening. Tell it to the PC panel physician whose father's ADT has reduced him from law-professor/serious runner to a confused couch potato (but who at least doesn't have severe hot flashes.)
I.P.
Olfart - 03 Mar 2005 09:51 GMT > Stephen Jordan" <mycroftscj@earthlink.net> wrote ...> > On March 2, I. P. Freely replied to me: [quoted text clipped - 49 lines] > > I.P. Like the rest of us in this group, you were unfortunate enough to get Cancer. In your case, Cancer in 2 areas of the body. We have the choice to select from the available treatments, all of which come with side effects or to ignore the treatment options and the associated side effects. Cancer changes our lives and our lifestyles-FOREVER. There is not magic bullet or Barney band-aid that will make PCa go away. Generally, there is no "Cure" for Cancer. The available treatments can extend our life expectancy, but cannot restore our health and lifestyle to what it was before diagnosis. Hopefully sometime in the future, medical science will have advanced to a point where we can have our "cake and eat it too" with respect to quality of life before, during and after treatment. Presently this is not the case. I still have SEs from Rad and 13 months of ADT and at times they are a pain in the a.s, but I chose to go that route to add a few years to my time on earth. Quitcherbitchin - make your choice based on what you have learned about the treatments available today and get on with your life. Good luck with what ever choices you make. George Age - 69 8/12/02 - PSA 3.7 10/13/03 - PSA 4.69 11/11/03 - PSA 4.8 11/18/03 - Biopsy - 10 cores one core-25% of core-Gleason 4+4=8 all other cores benign tissue 12/10/03 - Consult - Oncologist MD 12/16/03 - Consult - Radiation Oncologist Treatment Plan - Northeast Ga Cancer Center HT - started 12/17/03 - Eulixen & Lupron (2nd 4 mo Lupron-4/26) 2/10/04 - Started - Flowmax and Megastrol Radiation - IMRT to begin 3/30/04 - 42 treatments - Completed 6/8/04 No seeds due to Prostate problems 8/30/04 - 1 yr Viadur Implant instead of 4mo Lupron 1/14/05 - Removed implant - trying intermittant HT for a while.
Tom Cular - 03 Mar 2005 10:16 GMT The hot flashed are a nuisance to be sure, certainly not life threatining. All treatment protocols have side effects of some kind. As for the Dr. who would rather die than put up with ADT side effects, I'm glad he's not my Dr. with that attitude towards life.
Tom
> > Stephen Jordan" <mycroftscj@earthlink.net> wrote ...> > > On March 2, I. P. Freely replied to me: [quoted text clipped - 93 lines] > 8/30/04 - 1 yr Viadur Implant instead of 4mo Lupron > 1/14/05 - Removed implant - trying intermittant HT for a while. Pops - 03 Mar 2005 15:00 GMT Have hot flashes at night. They began back a few years ago but seemed to dissappear after I lost alot of weight (I also stopped snoring!). They're back again, perhaps twice a week, since I had LRP. Sure does soak up the bedcloths! I have no problems during waking hours
I. P. Freely - 03 Mar 2005 16:56 GMT At last . . . an actual, useful, non-judgemental . . . and encouraging . . . answer! Thanks, Pops.
I.P.
> Have hot flashes at night. They began back a few years ago but seemed > to dissappear after I lost alot of weight (I also stopped snoring!). > They're back again, perhaps twice a week, since I had LRP. Sure does > soak up the bedcloths! I have no problems during waking hours I. P. Freely - 03 Mar 2005 16:45 GMT > The hot flashed are a nuisance to be sure, certainly not life threatining. > All treatment protocols have side effects of some kind. As for the Dr. who > would rather die than put up with ADT side effects, I'm glad he's not my > Dr. > with that attitude towards life. Realize that he's saying the same thing many others have said, that the handful of extra months of heartbeat ADT MAY provide are not worth the many years of highly degraded QOL many patients DO face. IMO, and that of several others here, refusing to be a total victim is a valid attitude in this and every other aspect of life. I don't think it's fair or respectful for the two people with the lightest SEs in my SE poll to keep telling those with FAR worse SEs that their opinions and choices are invalid. I believe it's important for newbies making choices to see the whole spectrum of outcomes on the table, not just the lucky few, and to realize they don't have to give up their lifestyles to PC if they so choose. Why so many of you are so upset that some of us care so strongly about a decade of high QOL compared to a few months shorter lifespan is beyond my comprehension, but it's your choice. Now let the rest of us make ours.
I.P.
Tom Cular - 03 Mar 2005 19:19 GMT IP, I respect your opinion, your choices and your stated intent to inform "newbies" of the possible SEs of ADT, however, if you are going to advise of SEs, it does seem rational that you would also mention the SEs of other treatment protocols [ except watchful waiting, it has no side effects; only a direct effect] and please remember, opinions are like noses [or any other part you wish to reference] , everybody has one!
I chose to have Lupron before and after seeds, maybe that was the right choice in my instance, maybe not, everyone is different.
I experienced the expected SEs of both the ADT and those of brachytherapy, not fun, but I'm none the worse from them. I may be seeing it all wrong, but you seem to be on a crusade against any form of ADT.
Those of us who have chosen radiology and/or ADT have not, to the best of my knowledge, expressed looking forward to spring, as you did, so you could trade in your wet sweat pants for shorts and just leave puddles behind you like a puppy. I'd bet that most men with an incontinence problem see that as a SE of surgery and don't see it as you do.
OK, the hot flash has passed, the rant is over.
Tom
> > The hot flashed are a nuisance to be sure, certainly not life threatining. > > All treatment protocols have side effects of some kind. As for the Dr. who [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > I.P. I. P. Freely - 03 Mar 2005 20:09 GMT Let's look at it this way: Think Steve Fossett, who just landed in Kansas, is gonna ground his lifestyle with debilitating SEs just to stretch his heartbeat by a few months?
I.P.
Steve Kramer - 03 Mar 2005 22:52 GMT > Let's look at it this way: Think Steve Fossett, who just landed in Kansas, > is gonna ground his lifestyle with debilitating SEs just to stretch his > heartbeat by a few months? Is this the same Steve Fossett who just stretched his fuel to near fumes just for another 5 minutes of fame? Yeah, he's someone I want to model all my decisions after.
Not really a commentary on ADT, SEs, etc. Just a thought.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3bN0M0 Seminal Vesicle involvement, Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05 PSA .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum
I. P. Freely - 04 Mar 2005 00:59 GMT Those 5 minutes meant the difference between success and failure. Are people who aspire to set records such as Lindbergh's and Fossett's and Armstrong's and Yeager's (Fossett has dozens of them, according to today's news) are just out for the glory? I don't think so; I think many of them enjoy the effort and event for its own sake. I know hundreds of people who live their lives that way, who wouldn't consider giving up their vitality one day earlier than their bodies dictate it.
I.P.
>> Let's look at it this way: Think Steve Fossett, who just landed in >> Kansas, [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > all > my decisions after. Steve Kramer - 04 Mar 2005 01:45 GMT I'm not so enamored by Lindbergh either. I think more of Jimmy Stewart that Lindbergh.
Yeager and Armstrong usually had more contribution than fanfare to their feats.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3bN0M0 Seminal Vesicle involvement, Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05 PSA .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum
> Those 5 minutes meant the difference between success and failure. > Are people who aspire to set records such as Lindbergh's and Fossett's and [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > > all > > my decisions after. I. P. Freely - 03 Mar 2005 20:53 GMT No, my crusade, because I'm still in the midst of finalizing that decision, is that people become aware of the whole spectrum of treatments and choices and SEs. Too many people, here and in doctors' offices, are being told fairy tales, according to me and according to reports, clinical trials, and large panels of experts around the world. I HAVE mentioned the SEs of RT, for example, in particular the FACTS that they tend to increase with time for many years and threaten urological and bowel problems more than the other options, yet STILL see uninformed people right here denying those facts to newbies. I happen to discuss ADT SEs more because I know more about them than I do the other options, am actively trying to decide whether to accept ADT, have spent several hundred hours researching it to that end, and still see newbies being told here and across the world that adjuvant ADT adds years of bliss to our lives. Sorry, guys . . . it ain't bliss and it ain't years. We don't have to let PC run or ruin our lives until it gives us no choice, and even then we STILL have choices . . . TBD.
Don't worry, folks . . . as soon as my decision is final, I hope to put all this PC crap behind me, get on with what's left of my life, let these cancers do what the hell they want on autopilot while I measure their status quarterly, and divert my time from this soapbox to pursuits put on back burners since last summer. At that time some of you are free to tell newbies anything you wish without my reality checks based on Strum, Walsh, Harvard, Mayo, ACS, NIH, Lange, etc. And only INFORMED opinions are truly valid, whether it's PC treatment or an election. Uninformed or misinformed opinions are just knee-jerks, and in the case of PC, can be disastrous.
Sure, puddles can be an SE of surgery. I've never said surgery is "preferable" to other treatments; I try to deal in facts, not judgements. It's all about informed choices based on knowledge and personal criteria. (But IMO yellow puddles beat the hell out of bloody, brown, lumpy, painful, stinky puddles any day.) You've been very fortunate to have minimal SEs, with just mild hot flashes and some anemia corrected by B-12, plus fatigue which must be pretty minimal as it wasn't even mentioned until months after our initial SE description. If your experience were the norm, my decisions and my objections to the Fairy Tale would be very different. If you HAD "experienced the expected SEs of both the ADT and those of brachytherapy", you'd have a slew of serious SEs that would change most people's tune significantly, according to Strum's analyses of the ADT Syndrome and the many who agree with him.
I.P.
> IP, > I respect your opinion, your choices and your stated intent to inform [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > like a puppy. I'd bet that most men with an incontinence problem see that > as a SE of surgery and don't see it as you do. Stephen Jordan - 03 Mar 2005 21:43 GMT On March 3, I. P. Freely wrote to Tom Cular, in pertinent part:
> > .....If you HAD "experienced the expected SEs of both the ADT and those of > brachytherapy", you'd have a slew of serious SEs that would change most > people's tune significantly, according to Strum's analyses of the ADT Syndrome > and the many who agree with him. Dr.Strum's article on ADS (Androgen Deprivation Syndrome) can be found at: www.prostate-cancer.org/education/sidefx/Strum_ADS.html
Caution: this article is six years old. There may be later information available, I haven't checked.
Sorry, I just don't find anywhere that Dr. Strum posits that all these serious SE's *would* (imperatively) occur. In fact, it appears that the older the patient, the less likely he is to experience, frex, hot flashes/flushes.
There's a 2001 Power Point presentation at: www.prostate-cancer.org/powerpoint/online/ADS_Strum.htm
Regards,
Steve J
I. P. Freely - 04 Mar 2005 00:49 GMT By definition, if the rates of SE occurrence run 50-70-90%, the AVERAGE pt will experience several of them. And I doubt the SEs of T deprivation have changed a whole lot in the last 6 years, considering how long T has been around.
I.P.
> On March 3, I. P. Freely wrote to Tom Cular, in pertinent part: >> .....If you HAD "experienced the expected SEs of both the ADT and those [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > older the patient, the less likely he is to experience, frex, hot > flashes/flushes. Stavros Moschos - 04 Mar 2005 19:26 GMT You wrote: "it appears that the older the patient, the less likely he is to experience, frex, hot flashes/flushes.".
This has been my experience and it is what I have suspected. Now 76, I started ADT at 75, seven months ago. Yes, I have flashes (and fatigue), but they are manageable. Their frequency come and go, Unpleasant, sure, but no gross perspiring. As for fatigue, I have been using a gym lately and that helps a lot (as long as I don't do too much). But the fatigue, too, varies.
> On March 3, I. P. Freely wrote to Tom Cular, in pertinent part: >> .....If you HAD "experienced the expected SEs of both the ADT and those [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > Steve J I. P. Freely - 04 Mar 2005 19:55 GMT From Strum's 2003 100+ page update to The Primer:, at http://www.lef.org/protocols/prtcls-txt/t-prtcl-138.html :
"Chronic ADS symptoms are much more prevalent in PC patients treated with ADT than are currently recognized, and some are nearly inevitable in patients treated for longer than 1 year. For such patients, specific treatment strategies must be implemented to minimize or prevent the development of chronic ADS. Left untreated, chronic ADS is progressive with ongoing ADT and often leads to other medical complications. Useful preventive or active strategies against acute ADS-related symptoms are shown in Table 20, and chronic ADS-related symptoms in Table 21"
I.P.
> "Stephen Jordan" <mycroftscj@earthlink.net> wrote... >> On March 3, I. P. Freely wrote to Tom Cular, in pertinent part: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] >> Sorry, I just don't find anywhere that Dr. Strum posits that all these >> serious SE's *would* (imperatively) occur. Stephen Jordan - 04 Mar 2005 23:26 GMT On March 4, I. P. Freely replied to me:
> From Strum's 2003 100+ page update to The Primer:, at > http://www.lef.org/protocols/prtcls-txt/t-prtcl-138.html : [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > preventive or active strategies against acute ADS-related symptoms are shown > in Table 20, and chronic ADS-related symptoms in Table 21" To which I respond:
OK, so what has been proven? Maybe that it's a good idea to be aware of possible SE's and to take steps to alleviate them?
I don't consider that to be particularly startling or worrisome news.
What Dr. Strum also said is this: "...(T)he spectrum of symptoms relating to (ADT) was highly variable from patient to patient. Some patients seemed hardly bothered by castrate testosterone levels while others were overtly affected."
Just what I wrote, but in more elegant language.
Regards,
Steve J __ "Everyone is in favor of free speech. Hardly a day passes without its being extolled, but some people's idea of it is that they are free to say what they like, but if anyone says anything back, that is an outrage." --Sir Winston L. S. Churchill
I. P. Freely - 05 Mar 2005 03:06 GMT You said the data is six years old, that you aren't aware of any newer data, and that you "just don't find anywhere that Dr. Strum posits that all these serious SE's *would* (imperatively) occur".
I merely updated the data and offered Strum's quote, as I thought you wanted. I wasn't aware you wanted to be startled or worried; I'll have to dig deeper for that.
I.P.
> On March 4, I. P. Freely replied to me: > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > I don't consider that to be particularly startling or worrisome news. Stephen Jordan - 05 Mar 2005 16:01 GMT On March 4, I. P. Freely replied to me, in pertinent part:
> > I wasn't aware you wanted to be startled or worried; I'll have to > dig deeper for that. Easy there, IP.
Regards,
Steve J
ckh - 04 Mar 2005 15:42 GMT > I respect your opinion, your choices and your stated intent to inform > "newbies" of the possible SEs of ADT, however, if you are going to advise of [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > part you wish to reference] , everybody has one! > ....
> Those of us who have chosen radiology and/or ADT have not, to the best of my > knowledge, expressed looking forward to spring, as you did, so you could > trade in your wet sweat pants for shorts and just leave puddles behind you > like a puppy. I'd bet that most men with an incontinence problem see that > as a SE of surgery and don't see it as you do. I'll be a little more direct. I did 8 months of Lupron, 25 days of IMRT, and Palladium-103 Seeds last year. The side effects were extremely mild.
I experienced occasional hot flashes and sweats. I was tired and dragging during the day after the 3rd week of IMRT. After the seeding, I was peeing about every 2 hours and getting up 2 and 3 times a night to go. I was exhausted for the first 3 months post seeding. It was a strain to go to the grocery store.
I have a desk job so the fatigue did not impact my work. I was irritable and argumentative but as I have a self-effacing and eccentric programmer personality, no one noticed. I asked and people uniformly said they hadn't noticed anything.
At seeding+4 months, my stamina was coming back.
I'm at seeding+5 months now and I get up once a night. I can run up 3 flights of stairs without feeling like collapsing.
My primary complaint is the 300 fasting blood sugar. I suspect that the Lupron is responsible for it but I am taking those numbers seriously. My primary care doc started me on glucophage.
Pre-Lupron, my worse fasting blood sugar was 130 but at 5'7", 197 pounds and 57 years old, a 130 is a big whoop, just a message to lose some weight.
300, after losing 12 pounds, is a serious number.
My bloodwork shows high triglycerides and a blood count at the low end of normal. I am taking B-12 and a multi-vitamin. I'm also gradually taking the weight off. I'm down to 185 now, having lost about a pound a month for the last year.
I'm hopeful that the rad and lupron has beaten back the cancer.
I come here and read I.P. and other folk's stuff about surgery, catheters, Kegels, groin pain for weeks, and incontinence as the way to go.
And, oh, the side effects from Rad, well, they'll show up eventually.
Well, I flat don't see it.
If surgery works for you, great.
Great. But don't imagineer that the side effects from rad or lupron are worse than they are or that a year or two or permanent incontinence from surgery is not a big deal. It is a big deal.
Both my rad doc and urologist said that rad, specifically seeding, was replacing radical prostectomy as the treatment of choice.
My rad doc said that rad's survival numbers are "good", "as good as surgery". My uro said that his patients are choosing rad because there are "mild side effects" and the "recovery is easy".
I walked out of the outpatient center 3 hours after checking in for the seeding. I had a bandaid on my arm and on my back but they didn't think I needed one between my legs.
I could tell that something had happened but there was no pain. My driver pulled up, I said good bye to the recovery nurse who was standing with me. I got in the car and we drove off.
It was that easy.
I had read on the Internet, maybe at seedpods, about a guy who was up in a tree the day after his seeding. He was cutting off limbs with a chainsaw. I could-a done that.
I'm also realistic about this. There are no guarentees in life. None. Well, except we'll all die some day.
While I am optimistic and hopeful that my PSA will stay < 0.1, I know that it could start rising.
As the Lupron wears off, my ability to function as a man might not return. Hey, I'm 58 now. I don't compete in keep-it-up-all-night contests. At 58, balding, with a Lupron belly, 5 year old car, and the shabby clothes of an aging computer programmer, I don't have Angelina Jollie look-alikes chasing me.
I'm hopeful here too but if I need to take Vitamin-V, oh well.
I was "lucky". My primary doc has a seed-patient who has real trouble with his uretha. They're going to roto-rooter him when he gets stronger. It happens. Things can go wrong.
My rad doc said that in the last 10 years and thousands of rad-patients, they had ONE guy where they think the radiation burned his colon. No problems since they instituted the diet and post-rad directives.
The rad-nurse put the fear of a colon bypass in us, I stuck to the diet and took the colace as directed. Roast turkey, mashed potatoes and gravy, well cooked green beans, pumpkin pie with whipped cream, what hard duty, cry me a river. It's like Martha "mad dog" Stewart doing home detention at her 40 million dollar estate. Yeah, that'll show her.
After the rad doc explained the risks and the odds, I made my decision, "hey, I drive on the beltway every day, I know what life threatening means."
Again, I'm not saying that rad is perfect or without risk. Nothing in life is without risk.
I'm not saying that surgery is horrible, I have no direct experience with it.
I am glad I decided to skip the groin pain and the incontinence that surgical patients discuss here. That was my decision after having done my research.
It is disingenuous for surgical patients to hint that, "just wait, the rad side effects will eventually prove to be far worse than a year or two of incontinence and the surgical pain." or speculate that surgery is more certain than rad. The Gaussian field of the high energy photons might kill cancer that the surgery will miss. You take your chances either way.
My doc just called. PSA at 5 months, 2 weeks post seeding is again undetectable. < 0.1 on the printout.
Time to celebrate.
I. P. Freely - 04 Mar 2005 17:54 GMT That's great, but get back to us in 5-6 years when your radiation SEs may still be developing. We hope you escape them altogether, but . . . don't hold your breath. And realize that 8 months of ADT has been explicitly shown to be inadequate; the only proven ADT duration is 28 months, with which SEs more often become permanent. Besides, I haven't noticed anyone describing surgery and its SEs as "the way to go", merely as *A* way to go, maybe THE way to go in certain combinations of pre-treatment numbers. RT is definitely not recommended in some common scenarios, including LUTS score
>20, bowel problems, mets, etc.You've already described fatigue that lasted 10 weeks longer than mine did, and your SEs should increase while mine should decrease.
There is STILL no free lunch.
I.P.
> I did 8 months of Lupron, 25 days of > IMRT, and Palladium-103 Seeds last year. The side effects were [quoted text clipped - 124 lines] > > Time to celebrate. ckh - 08 Mar 2005 02:33 GMT > That's great, but get back to us in 5-6 years when your radiation SEs may > still be developing. We hope you escape them altogether, but . . . don't [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > > I.P. Here's the problem, neither you nor I know how our fatigue compares to the other's fatigue or what the source was.
During the worse of my fatigue, my blood sugar was outa control. I was waking up several times a night to "go". Normally an 8-10 cup a day coffee drinker, I had cut back to zero in anticipation of the seeding, "be gentle to your bladder and urethra."
5 months, 2 weeks post seeding, I'm feeling pretty good. Is it the rad fading, the glucophage, the fact that I drink 2 cups of coffee now. (I'll never let myself get to the state where I'm drinking 8-10 cups again.) I drink a lot but it's mostly water with a little coffee or tea in it.
I doubt that my side effects will increase. Every week, I've been able to do more, sleep longer, think clearer.
I've compared my situation against my notes from the rad-class at Inova and the information in my three books, "Prostate Cancer for Dummies", Walsh's book, "... and those who love them", and "The Prostate Cancer Treatment Book" by Grimm, Blasko, and Sylvester which includes a chapter by the "name" at the Inova Cancer Center, Dr. Daniel Clarke.
I'm tracking on the mild end of the side effects. Mostly I'll notice something, "hey, I feel hot", it'll be 78 in the office and everyone else is griping. It's hot and I'm having a hot flash.
I'll get stuck in traffic and take an hour to get home, dang, I gotta run up two flights of stairs. By the time I get Mr. Zip down, a drop or two is sneaking out. I'll let fly and notice that there's some urethal burning. Exactly as described in the books.
Why am I tracking at the mild end? Well, I was 57 when treated. I have a desk job but I do a couple 1 hour powerwalks a week. I was still strong enough to do pushups with one arm.
The other contributing factor is Inova and my primary care doc.
The primary doc - Turns out that he's famous around here as the consummate nitpicker, doesn't let any symptoms slide, keeps after you, watches your vitals. Let something get even slightly outa spec and he's on it and on you.
You know how most guys are. They could be in pain and near death but they won't get it checked out. They'll change the oil in their car on schedule but they won't get a DRE.
My primary doc would not let the 10+ PSA slide, "you are beyond my expertise, go see this guy, he's a top Urologist." It was only in the 2nd biopsy that they found it.
So. I figure, two consummate pro's persisted and found it early.
The next factor was Inova. I got hollared at for going to a "no-name community hospital" and not Walsh's Johns Hopkins which is only 50 miles away.
Well, Inova ain't a community hospital, it's the powerhouse in Northern Virginia and Dr. Daniel Clarke has his name in foot high letters in the lobby.
Back of the lobby is a lead lined room gridded with lasers and the 10 million dollar Inova Linear Accellerator #2 IMRT. They have their own CAT scan and are upgrading Linear Accellerator #1. 100 feet away, the Nuclear Medicine Center has an MRI and Bone Scan.
I got lucky there. My rad-doc was the right guy, young enough to be into the latest technologies, old enough to have a ton of experience, smart, into research, confident in his abilities, and studied with Clarke, a seeding pioneer.
While they were beaming me with Linear Accelerator #2 IMRT, workmen were de-installing Linear Accelerator #1, an older 3D-CRT model.
I got the benefit of newer than new technology. Treatment from the best of the best. So, yeah, maybe that explains why my side effects are milder than textbook.
Long term, who knows? I hope my luck holds.
IMRT 25 sessions Seeding +3 months PSA < 0.1 Seeding +5 months, 2 weeks PSA < 0.1
As for the free lunch, I figure it was a combination of the top docs, the absolutely best technology, relatively early diagnosis, my age and health, and the three phased approach, hit the cancer with the Lupron, then the IMRT, then the Palladium-103 seeds.
One, two, three. Five thousand, three hundred dollars of Lupron. 25 IMRT treatments, a couple week break, and then the seeding.
The followup from the seeding included a half dozen pills, Decadron, Pyridium, Flomax, Aleve, Colace, Zantac, Septra DS, and so on, on a rigid schedule. Two here, half of something else 4 hours later, the anti-radiation diet. Each step was carefully programmed and specified.
I believe that most of my side effects are from the Lupron. Don't know though. My current complaint is my blood sugar. I'll get another 10 pounds off and maybe as the Lupron flushes out, I'll get that back under control.
....
> > It is disingenuous for surgical patients to hint that, "just wait, > > the rad side effects will eventually prove to be far worse [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > > > Time to celebrate. I. P. Freely - 08 Mar 2005 03:17 GMT "ckh" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote >
> It is disingenuous for surgical patients to hint that, "just wait, > the rad side effects will eventually prove to be far worse > than a year or two of incontinence and the surgical pain." I haven't seen anyone say or imply that, and "worse" is in the eye of the beholder anyway. But now that you bring it up, I'd probably -- don't know yet -- prefer a year of urinary incontinence to the more likely onset years after RT of the suite of bowel problems that hit 10-20% of RT patients, often beginning years later and requiring medical correction 85% of the times it occurs. Heck, 47% of RT pts have rectal bleeding at the two-year point, it's often very tough to stop, and that's among the LEAST of the rectal problems one in six RT pts gets years later. Source: Johns-Hopkins' 2005 PC White Paper.
> or speculate that surgery is more certain than rad. Nor that. The key words are "state" and "proven", not "speculate" and "certain", and that comes from all the books, not from me.
Let's hope the newest RT techniques bring those numbers down.
I.P.
ckh - 08 Mar 2005 11:55 GMT > "ckh" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote > > > It is disingenuous for surgical patients to hint that, "just wait, [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > rectal problems one in six RT pts gets years later. Source: Johns-Hopkins' > 2005 PC White Paper. I can read; I can parse; I can write and I craft prose with the best of them.
Taking one of your statements:
"But now that you bring it up, I'd probably -- don't know yet -- prefer a year of urinary incontinence to the more likely onset years after RT of the suite of bowel problems that hit 10-20% of RT patients, often beginning years later and requiring medical correction 85% of the times it occurs."
and striking out the "spin words" gives:
" ........ I'd probably -- don't know yet -- prefer a year of urinary incontinence to the ... suite of bowel problems that hit 10-20% of RT patients, ... later and requiring medical correction ... ."
So what do we have? 10-20% of rad patients have some bowel problems, the vast majority of which can be treated.
Stipulating that's the historic reality, it still doesn't bother me much.
The historic treatment includes high dosage, 45 day broad external beam rad, that is pre-3D-CRT. It has to be older technology to produce results "years later".
In my books, conformal radiation is "new" and IMRT is mentioned as a future technology, similar to flying cars and space ships. Except advanced facilities have IMRT linear accelerators today. Tomorrowland, today.
The whole point of 3D-CRT and the newer IMRT is to shape the beam. To target the tumor and prostate and to avoid collateral damage to the colon and nearby tissues.
Inova has a CAT scanner in their Cancer Center. They use the CAT scanner to locate the tumor, prostate, organs, and align the linear accelerator.
Here's how it works.
On day 0, you walk into the CAT scan room, drop your pants and lie down on the platform with a little towel over Mr. Winkie.
They move the platform into position in a big donut. As you slide in, you can see laser beams criss-crossing.
The techs mark your hips and just above Mr. Winkie with a dye and prick your skin to make it permanent, the "gang tattoo" of the IMRT-homeboys.
The CAT scan, aligned by the lasers to the "gang tattoo" images your prostate. They showed me the tomographic images. As a computer programmer, I found it fascinating.
On day 1, and on the other IMRT treatment days. you walk into the linear accelerator room. This is past the "command center", a wall of computer displays that show the IMRT leaf positions, your records in their server, etc.
You drop your pants and with a little towel over Mr. Winkie, lie down on the IMRT platform.
The techs raise the platform and position it below the IMRT beamhead. Then they shift your position, an inch back, a quarter inch to the left, until your "gang tattoos" align with the lasers.
Now the computer driving the IMRT knows where the tumor is, where your colon is, and how to form the beam of photons.
Computer controlled, precise, far better than anything before. Essentially, the CAT-scan is driving the IMRT.
The techs leave the room; for a couple minutes, you're there with the Linear Accelerator. It orbits and beams you from 4 or 6 different directions. You can hear the shutters moving to shape the beam. The photons punch holes in the cancer's DNA and interfer with its ability to reproduce.
The precisely focussed beam hits the cancer hard, much harder than it hits your colon or other organs.
The rad-nurse had given you tips, come in with a full bladder if possible, eat a diet that doesn't irritate your intestines.
If 10 or 20 percent of the "old technology" patients experienced problems, a much smaller percentage of "new technology" patients will. What is much smaller? 1% 5% 0%?
Pretty good odds to me.
Inova has not had a single case requiring surgical repair in 10 years.
Each week of the IMRT, the rad-nurse and the rad-doc grilled me on side-effects, anything going on, bleeding, gut-cramps, anything. Well, I didn't have a single side effect except for having to pee at night and feeling tired toward the end.
They are watching for it. It almost never happens with the new technology.
> > or speculate that surgery is more certain than rad. > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > I.P. I'm clocking a < 0.1 PSA. The peeing is getting better. I go 5 hours now without having to "go".
Yesterday I managed a 1 hour powerwalk. First time in 6 months. This is up and down hills. It was hard but felt good, darn good.
I built up to it by climbing the stairs at the jobsite. At the worse of the fatigue, 1 month post-Palladium-103 seeding, I could barely climb to the 3rd floor.
Of course. No guarentees in life. I'm taking this a day at a time.
Steve Kramer - 08 Mar 2005 12:50 GMT IP, I have been reading with interest almost all of your posts. I have come to the conclusion that you are probably not a good psychological fit for asymptomatic prostate cancer treatment of any kind.
While I sometimes feel forced into an antagonistic role wherein some of your posts are concerned, I say this with absolutely altruistic intentions. Consider the following:
1. While I am an ardent proponent of research, I feel yours has scared the crap out of you. 2. Add to that your engineering background. 3. Add to that your lust for life for the sake of life. 4. Add to that your other cancer that is potentially much more dangerous -- or quicker in it's work. 5. Add to that your Gleason is higher than 84% of us here. (Maybe) 6. Add to that your conviction that one or the other or both cancers is going to be terminal in the near future regardless (I'm not sure if that is your conviction.).
It all comes up to a sum equal to "maybe you should wait for a symptom before taking a chance."
There will be SEs regardless of the treatment(s) you accept. You have seen them with RRP. You have read about those that are possible with RT and HT. It takes a significant amount of psychological stamina to work through some of the SEs. No man who has not decided on a path for treatment or who has not been forced into a certain treatment can easily acquire the stamina. Especially in lieu for Numbers 3 and 4 (and maybe 5) above.
So, in your case, I support your decision to not treat your prostate cancer until it rears its ugly head somewhere.
 Signature PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3bN0M0 Seminal Vesicle involvement, Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron 07/03 (1 mo) 8/03 (4 mo), 12/03, 4/04, 09/04, 01/05 PSA .07 .05 .06 .05
non Illegitimi carborundum
> "ckh" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote > > > It is disingenuous for surgical patients to hint that, "just wait, [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > > I.P. I. P. Freely - 09 Mar 2005 20:18 GMT > IP, I have been reading with interest almost all of your posts. I wouldn't wish than on anyone.
> I have come > to the conclusion that you are probably not a good psychological fit for > asymptomatic prostate cancer treatment of any kind. I don't know about that. I had and still have zero doubts about my surgery, based primarily on PSA followed by biopsy. I didn't even know I had symptoms every other 60-something man doesn't have. But if you're addressing my NEXT/adjuvant treatment, I'd say it's more like a poor analytical fit, as my analysis tells me no adjuvant treatment has a sufficient therapeutic index IN MY CASE and WITH MY PRIORITIES to warrant it. The operative word is "priorities", and I emphasize again to those still making big decisions that it's all about priorities. I would dread/resent chronic fatigue far more than impotence, for example.
> 1. While I am an ardent proponent of research, I feel yours has scared > the > crap out of you. I feel empowered, not scared. Mine is a technical decision, not an emotional reaction, and data is vital to it.
> 2. Add to that your engineering background. I get accused of being an engineer almost weekly, wth a few "accountant" votes now and then. That's a GOOD thing, to me. I don't see how people who make decisions base primarily on emotion -- whether it's PC or a natonal election -- cope with life's tough challenges. Analysis help reduce gut-wrenching emotional decisions to mere academic exercises; I have yet to lose even a moment's sleep to the "OHMYGODIHAVECANCER" syndrome. I don't so much have "cancer" as I have a research project; it doesn't emotionally become "cancer" until it gains an intractable physical impact on my life, which I hope is many years away. Diapers are an occasional and diminishing nuisance; chronic fatigue would be devastating to me.
> 3. Add to that your lust for life for the sake of life. Yup. For better or worse, I've always valued today more highly than tomorrow. I'm process-oriented more than goal-oriented. It certainly biases many of my choices, especially this one, which has to balance a few thousand high-QOL "todays" with a couple of hundred downright shitty "tomorrows" at the end no matter what I do.
> 4. Add to that your other cancer that is potentially much more > dangerous -- > or quicker in it's work. One helluva decision tiebreaker, alright.
> 5. Add to that your Gleason is higher than 84% of us here. Oh, yes . . . THAT little incentive for ADT. Nothing cranks up the nomograms' doom and gloom prognoses like that 8-10 Gleason. Unfortunately, it also diminishes the advantages of adjuvant treatments.
> 6. Add to that your conviction that one or the other or both > cancers is going to be terminal in the near future regardless (I'm not > sure > if that is your conviction.). Conviction? Nah . . . just statistics. I'm either gonna skate past 'em or get hit head-on by 'em, ADT doesn't make a huge statistical difference in the path of the truck, and I'll start WORRYING about them when I see (with lab tests) it coming and feel (with symptoms) its bow wave.
> It all comes up to a sum equal to "maybe you should wait for a symptom > before taking a chance." Whether I act on symptoms or just PSA parameters remaos to be seen. There's a significant chance more trials may address that issue by the time I must choose.
> There will be SEs regardless of the treatment(s) you accept. You have > seen [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > cancer > until it rears its ugly head somewhere. You've been reading, understanding, and cogitating my tomes thoroughly, haven't you? I appreciate that on all three counts. I hope my tomes and your excellent summary have been and will be of use to others making similar decisions -- not so much my CONCLUSIONS, because they're highly personal, but the PROCESS, which helps many people cope, choose, act, and get on with their lives. PC may kill me someday, but beyond my initial treatment I can't do a lot to change the odds or the timing significantly so I'm not going to let it ruin my life until that day draws a lot closer. If this had hit me in the summer rather than the winter, I'd have spent FAR less time on it, having to work it around windy days like everything else in life the warmer eight months of each year. I did, in fact, time my surgery with the onset of winter.
Thanks for the attention and the reassurance. You're in good company, as the U.W. urology and oncology staff, including Lange, concurred with my analysis and rationale as you did.
I.P.
I. P. Freely - 03 Mar 2005 16:54 GMT > Cancer > changes our lives and our lifestyles-FOREVER. > The available treatments can extend our life expectancy, but > cannot restore our health and lifestyle to what it was before diagnosis. That's just it: my lifestyle hasn't been changed significantly yet, especially if I can ever shed the diapers, but any of several common ADT SEs WILL destroy it. I don't understand why several of you think it's so unreasonable to analyze the risks.
> I still have SEs from Rad and 13 months of ADT and at times they are a > pain > in the a.s, but I chose to go that route to add a few years to my time on > earth. If you find an ADT that will do that, please inform the medical profession. It's news to them.
> Quitcherbitchin - make your choice based on what you have learned about > the > treatments available today and get on with your life. You're telling me and others who CARE about making QOL CHOICES that our concerns and questions don't belong here?
I.P.
Stephen Jordan - 03 Mar 2005 18:42 GMT Well, maybe there is something that can be done about it. Another damn pill.
This was discussed here at some length a few months ago.
Anyhoo, there are medications that can be helpful. See: http://www.psa-rising.com/med/hormonal/hotflash_SSRI_mayo1004.htm
I'll soon be starting Zoloft for a different reason. We'll see what it does for the hot flashes.
Regards,
Steve J
Stephen Jordan - 03 Mar 2005 15:20 GMT A rather intense reply to my earlier post.
He had a point, in that my post was too combative, the source being the grouchy mood I was in at the time. An SE of ADT, maybe? Or just the overall situation?
Dunno. In any case, I regret having punched the "send" button and apologize to IP.
Regards,
Steve J
I. P. Freely - 03 Mar 2005 17:02 GMT Thanks, Steve. I thought your comments sounded out of character, as was mine, but then . . . aren't our characters DEFINED by our actions? Sobering thought, isn't it?
I used to wait overnight before editing and SENDing my vitriolic responses, but got walked on too much that way and wait far less time now. You were simply in my headlights. I won't hold yours against you if you return the courtesy, which you have done already. Thanks.
I.P.
> A rather intense reply to my earlier post. > [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Steve J Howie and Hope - 02 Mar 2005 19:02 GMT Hot Flash ? I get something like that, sometimes while waiting in a checkout line..I begin to feel warm all over..then get the prickly itches center chest, back and arms??? At night I wake up and seem to be in a cold sweat with no sweating..kinda clammy feeling..room is cool..male MEN o pause ? Howie
I. P. Freely - 02 Mar 2005 21:33 GMT Male hot flashes demand analysis, as some causes can be very serious. Andropause, whether due to aging past mid-40s (male menopause) or to ADT, are predictable and generally manageable causes. Carcinoid syndrome is a whole 'nuther ball of worms, far more life threatening than a little old Gleason 8 T3c prostate cancer.
I.P.
> Hot Flash ? I get something like that, sometimes while waiting in a > checkout line..I begin to feel warm all over..then get the prickly > itches center chest, back and arms??? At night I wake up and seem to be > in a cold sweat with no sweating..kinda clammy feeling..room is > cool..male MEN o pause ? Howie Dave LaCourse - 02 Mar 2005 19:13 GMT >Silly hypothetical conditions? No, reality, paraphrased. > >Hot flashes: nuisance, or real threat to one's mental well-being? > >I.P. When I was diagnosed with PCa, my doc put me on estrogen and casodex to knock down the testosterone. The pharmacy made an error and gave me three times what I was supposed to have.
A week before I was to have surgery, my doc called and said I should probably lay down as my cholesterol was 1043 -- no error -- one thousand forty-three, while my triglycerides were in the 5000 range. I immediately stopped taking the estrogen and casodex and a couple of days later I was cleaning my wife's car when I noticed my heart beat was very elevated for what little exercise I was doing. I went into the house, took a warm shower, and immediately started to sweat. Our first thought was heart attack, so off to the ER. They admitted me and while I lay in bed I was so very uncomfortable. The room felt like it was 100 degrees. Joanne turned the AC to full and got two fans to blow the air over my body. I laid there barechested with just a bit of the sheet over my midsection for modesty's sake. The poor man in the next bed was freezing. He had his blanket and mine and was still cold. It was not very funny at the time, but I look back at it and have to chuckle.
I told my wife that when her "change" comes that I will be very understanding.
Two days after surgery and a day before my release from the hospital, the doc came in and said my cholesterol was normal.
Dave
Clarence Crow - 02 Mar 2005 20:26 GMT <snip>
>Hot flashes: nuisance, or real threat to one's mental well-being? > >I.P. Oddly enough I don't get them, but I DO get increased Peripheral Neuropathy (a Diabetes spin-off) in my both feet.
Steve Jordan would say I don't get the Flushes 'cos I'm hanging upside down like a Bat from D/Under ;)
-- Reader to complete... -- Please reply to this ng as my email adress is fake:
-- Regards
-- CC
Ken - 03 Mar 2005 16:00 GMT My hot flashes began the day after my Lupron shot, and the first of my daily Casodex tabs. They were just two or three a day. I could live with that. A few days later, they were every 8 to 10 minutes, 24 hours a day! After a month of that, I quit the Casodex, and by the following month, they had dropped down to every 20 to 25 minutes.
Being unable to get even one full hour of sleep, waking up soaking wet, every night for months, is very debilitating to say the least. Then, during the day, having to towel-off and change your clothing a dozen times throughout your work day, can affect your income. Social life? No comment. If you've never had intense hot flashes, you can't imagine what it's like. It's NOT "just get a little warm," as two doctors had told me.
I saved these two interesting reports. Anyone here know the results?: ....................................... ROCHESTER, Minn., Oct. 12, 2004 (AScribe Newswire) -- A new antidepressant medication is an effective treatment for diminishing hot flashes in men who are receiving hormone therapy for prostate cancer, Mayo Clinic researchers report in the October issue of Mayo Clinic Proceedings.
The five-week study followed 18 men who completed the therapy, illustrating that their hot flashes decreased from 6.2 per day to 2.5 per day. Hot flash scores, the frequency multiplied by the severity, decreased in the same period from 10.6 per day to 3 per day.
"Newer antidepressants have been proven effective in reducing hot flashes in women but have not been studied in men," says Charles Loprinzi, M.D., Mayo Clinic Division of Medical Oncology and the lead author of the study. "Although hot flashes in men with prostate cancer are well documented, their treatment has not received as much attention." Hormonal treatments for male hot flashes have been studied, but there is a concern that they may affect prostate cancer growth and/or cause significant side effects.
The study looked at men receiving androgen ablation therapy, also known as hormonal deprivation therapy, which is a well-established treatment for various stages of prostate cancer. The antidepressant used, paroxetine, has been used to treat mental depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder and social anxiety disorder, among others. A placebo-controlled trial had previously demonstrated that paroxetine reduced hot flashes in women.
The study was conducted between August 2001 and October 2003. Men eligible for the study had to have a history of prostate cancer for which they were receiving androgen ablation therapy.
Others who worked with Dr. Loprinzi on this study are: Debra Barton, R.N., Ph.D.; Lisa Carpenter; Jeff Sloan, Ph.D.; Paul Novotny; Matthew Gettman, M.D.; and Bradley Christensen, all from Mayo Clinic. .................................
... March, 2004:
OHSU School of Medicine and OHSU Cancer Institute researchers are conducting the first American study to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture in diminishing hot flashes in men receiving hormonal deprivation therapy.
"Acupuncture carries few side effects, has shown promising results in preliminary studies, and is associated with a feeling of relaxation and well-being in the majority of patients," Beer said. A Swedish pilot study of seven men treated with acupuncture for hot flashes due to hormonal deprivation therapy for prostate cancer shows promising results. Six of seven men completed a 10-week course of acupuncture. Frequency of hot flashes was reduced between 50% and 70% at various times during the study. No adverse effects were reported.
In a follow-up to this pilot study, Beer currently is enrolling 25 patients in a phase II clinical trial of acupuncture (IRB No. 7235). Study participants must be diagnosed with prostate cancer, older than 18, receiving hormonal therapy for the duration of the study and experiencing significant hot flashes. The men will receive 14 acupuncture treatments over 10 weeks - twice weekly for 4 weeks, then once weekly for 6 additional weeks. Each treatment lasts about 30 minutes and involves the placement of 14 needles in the arms, legs, back and head.
Beer and his team will evaluate the impact of acupuncture on the frequency and intensity of hot flashes, and on the insomnia and loss of vitality they often cause. Researchers also will take blood and urine samples before, during and after acupuncture to evaluate its impact on neurotransmitters in the blood and central nervous system.
"We'd like to come away from this study with a better understanding of the biological changes associated with hot flashes and with acupuncture," Beer said. "For example, reduced levels of a particular neurotransmitter, serotonin, and its metabolites have been associated with hot flashes. Preliminary findings suggest that acupuncture can increase serotonin levels. We'd like to determine if the extent to which acupuncture provides relief for these men is associated with changes in their serotonin levels." ..........................................
I. P. Freely - 03 Mar 2005 18:31 GMT My docs say your experience, although worse than average, isn't unusual. They emphasize that they're not talking about just heat waves, but floods of burning sweat that necessitate changing your clothes and bedding several times every day and night. The hot flashes I've had with nicotinic acid for tinnitus and more recently for unknown causes were nuisance-level stuff -- red face and neck, BAD sunburn level of discomfort, once every few days, for a couple of minutes. IOW, who cares, as long as the cause is understood and harmless? But yours must also dehydrate you, with all the attendant harmful effects that incurs, in addition to the obvious effects. I can't imagine the frustration, the consternation bordering on fear, and the helpless feeling one of your hot flashes might generate if you were in any of several inescapable situations from a hot hotel room to a 3-piece suit in the boardroom to being bundled up on the ski slopes.
I've fought for > 40 years with condo and office and hotel and recovery ward and classroom managers about the heat in their facilities, and that's WITHOUT hot flashes. I quit going to movies and restaurants altogether during the year or so they paid any attention to Jimmy Carter's 80-degree edict. Hot flashes anywhere NEAR your level would be infinitely worse to me than a little thing like diapers or an impaired sex life. And to think that 10% of people who abandon ADT never lose their hot flashes!
Thanks for your comments. They help define the realistic high bounds (I hope) of the hot flash spectrum.
I.P.
> My hot flashes began the day after my Lupron shot, and the first of my > daily Casodex tabs. They were just two or three a day. I could live [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] > what it's like. It's NOT "just get a little warm," as two doctors had > told me.
|
|
|