Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / February 2005
Diagnosed and scared to death
|
|
Thread rating:  |
8 8 - 07 Feb 2005 22:55 GMT Hi.
I am 56 and live in Chicago.
In Nov. I was diagnosed with diabetes and was terrified.
Routine office visit urine test and it had been about 4 years since my last check-up.
I've been a caretaker for parents and my 100 year old aunt which is no excuse for the neglect in my doctr visits but it is what it is.
In passing, the doc said...my first ever PSA was 7.2 but the internist said make an appoint. with a uro when you can but let's treat the diabetes first.
I did this and had a biopsy scheduled for Jan. 31.
Ever since the high PSA I have been looking in on this group and you folks are great.
Such strong fighters.
I was so scared waiting for the results and just got them.
I was told that it was T1c with a Gleason of 7 (3+4)
That was 15 minutes ago and I will see him and talk about options tomorrow at 11am.
Northwestern Hosp. in Chicago.
I have read so much from the guys here that I know what's coming.
I am very frightened.
I am far more afraid than anything that I have seen written here.
I am so amazed by you folks.
I'm just a big baby but I have to tell the truth.
The diabetes is the least of my concerns at this time.
I am single (divorced) but still am concerned about all of the things that I've read. (ED, incontinence)
I wanted to tell my story and ask what I should talk about at tomorrow's meeting.
The only positive thing that the doc said is that your glass is half full and not half empty (I guess due to the T1c)
It hasn't hit me yet and if I'm this scared now...I wonder about later.
Thanks so much and I'm sorry to whine so,
I know I'll need tape and sweats and a bag to carry my bag.
(I read about you guys :-)
Thanks for any advice. E-mail is OK.
You guys seem so brave...I can't help but be embarrassed.
Ron
James A. Honeychuck - 07 Feb 2005 23:40 GMT Welcome Ron.
You should calm down, because like Ray who just joined us, you have a dangerous case but it has probably been caught in time.
Next thing is to decide on treatment. I recommend the book, Dr. Walsh's Guide to Surviving Prostate Cancer, but others here will recommend some web sites.
You're young enough to qualify for radical prostatectomy, but diabetes is a complication on which you need the doctor's advice.
You could probably get the same cure with radiation.
You are young enough that permanent impotence is unlikely. Permanent incontinence is very very unlikely.
So be optimistic. It helps.
jimhoney standard RRP age 52, cured, no significant aftereffects
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron Rob Constable - 07 Feb 2005 23:59 GMT Hey, I was petrified when I found out too, even though my father died of it and my younger brother (40 at the time) had an RRP. So, knew that it wasn't likely that I would escape. After finding out the rest was just going at it one step at a time, which involved finding out as much as possible about options, getting second opinions, choosing an option scheduling the surgery, and then trying to live my life as normally as possible while I waited for the surgery date. There was nothing brave about it as I was scared the whole time.... Then I had the surgery and things were really tough for a couple of weeks, but gradually they started getting better, until at 6 weeks when I would resume normal activities I really started feeling better about life then I did before I was diagnosed. Continence returned about then too. Right now I feel that this was a bump in the road so to speak. I have ED issues, which before the surgery, was something that I had no idea how I could live w/o full function in that area. But now, it really doesn't matter to me. I want it all back, but it just doesn't seem to be an important part of what makes me happy now....
The bottom line is, no special courage required, just take it one step at a time and focus on the things that you need to do to beat it. With that approach a few months from now you will wonder why you were ever so freaked out about it....
8 8 - 08 Feb 2005 00:26 GMT Thanks so much to all who responded.
I am still numb in my first hour.
The incontinence is a great fear though you've all been so supportive.
ED has become less of an issue as I've been reading the group for a while and realize the possibilities.
Thanks so much.
You have some very great and tough guys here.
Ron
Steve Kramer - 08 Feb 2005 11:08 GMT Your fear of incontinence puts you right there with aout 80% of men who find incontinence the single most depressing factor.
 Signature Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3bN0M0 Seminal Vesicle involvement, Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron (1 mo) 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .07 .05 .06 Lupron (4 mo) 8/03 (48), 12/03, 4/04 (49), 09/04 (50) non Illegitimi carborundum
> Thanks so much to all who responded. > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > Ron keith340@webtv.net - 08 Feb 2005 12:17 GMT Welcome Ron...it is ok to have fear of the unknown...I was dx'd with type II diabetes first in 02(scared to death) at age 57...then PCA a few months later(more scared) with a 6.4 psa, gl(3+4), 2 of 12 tumors confined to one gland...current psa=0.8(new life)...I was never incontinent, few side effects, and continue to have erections but the ejaculation has slowed to a trickle...do your research and make a well informed decision...good luck!!!
THE PROTON GUY
Keith Lundy/So. California 40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments Loma Linda Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
I.P. Freely - 08 Feb 2005 17:52 GMT > Welcome Ron...it is ok to have fear of the unknown...I was dx'd with > type II diabetes first in 02 Keith, have your docs briefed you on -- or have you read about -- the many ways to mitigate or even reverse Type II? It often takes only a small loss of excess weight, for example.
I.P.
I.P. Freely - 08 Feb 2005 17:49 GMT I vote for constant, numbing, fatigue, except maybe for bowel incontinence. I figure/hope that if the bladder business continues ad dribblium, I'll come to the realization that wet pants are everybody's else's problem, not mine, like B.O.
Just call me Spongepants.
I.P.
> Your fear of incontinence puts you right there with aout 80% of men who find > incontinence the single most depressing factor. Leonard Evens - 08 Feb 2005 00:03 GMT > Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 31 lines] > > I am very frightened. I know what you feel like. For what it is worth, your diagnosis is not too different from mine at age 67, four and one half years ago. I had a radical prostatectomy, and my PSAs have been undetectable since then. Also, I am continent. I was impotent for something like 18 months, but that didn't stop my wife and me from having an active sex life. Erections started to return at 18 months and today I can manage without any aids but I do better with a bit of Viagra. Of course, your case may be different, but it should reassure you to know that many men in your situation do just as well or better than I did.
Northwestern Memorial has some really excellent urologists. One of the world's leading urologists, William Catalona is there.
Feel free to write to me privately if you feel it will help.
> I am far more afraid than anything that I have seen written here. > [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > > Ron Unquestionably Confused - 08 Feb 2005 02:32 GMT >> Hi. >> [quoted text clipped - 26 lines] > Northwestern Memorial has some really excellent urologists. One of the > world's leading urologists, William Catalona is there. I second what Leonard Evens says. You are fortunate in that you're at Northwestern. I was fortunate enough to have a urologist who had no problem referring me to Dr. Catalona five years ago when the good doctor was at Washington University/Barnes Jewish Hospital in St. Louis.
While time is short, read up on Dr. Catalona and, if you feel like it, ask for a referral to him. If nothing else see if one of his proteges is available. Dr. Catalona is right up there at the top of the heap with Dr. Patrick Walsh in Baltimore.
I'm five years out from my RRP and no sign of recurrance, fully continent, potent and happier than a clam. I would not hesitate to recommend Dr. Catalona to anyone.
Don't know what his surgical schedule is like since coming to Chicago but when he was down in St. Louis he was doing four cases a week or so. At that time, he had over 2,500 nerve sparing RRP's under his belt.
Bob
Bob Anthony - 08 Feb 2005 00:12 GMT Everyone here must have been scared at one time or another by this. Believe me, so was I, and I still am to some manageable extent. Although I cannot compare myself to these brave and extremely well informed people here, but I will offer some very simple advice. First, get several opinions from different doctors. (I went with robotic laparoscopic surgery last December, I am 52 and in otherwise good health). Second, read as much as you can on the subject. There are several books out there that are extremely informative. The people on this ng are extremely knowledgeable on the topic too. Read their replies. The earlier you catch this disease the better. Third, make a decision on treatment. Fourth, act on it. It will be over faster than you think and you will get your life back. I wish you the best!
Bob Anthony
MH - 08 Feb 2005 00:39 GMT I can still remember how stunned I was when I got the news... by telephone.... from the doctor's nurse. It was Friday the 13th of September, 2002. In retrospect, how fitting a date!!
I had never had any kind of surgery. At age 51, I opted to have laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. I went into the hospital on the morning of November 21.... and went home on November 22. The procedure and the stay in the hospital were much easier than I had imagined. Really!!! As the date of the surgery approached, I had done my homework. I had read and read and read about this disease. I had made my choice for treatment. A sense of calm seemed to envelope me as the time got nearer.
You are not alone in this. Everyone here understands the fear... and the apprehension. But you can do it! Believe me..... if *I* can, *anyone* can!!
Please keep us posted..... and feel free to email if you like!
Take care! MikeH :)
Stephen Jordan - 08 Feb 2005 00:18 GMT On February 7, 8 8 (a pianist,perhaps?) wrote of his concerns because of a finding of a T1c Gleason 7 tumor, with a PSA reading of 7.2.
First, slow down. He's not a "dead man walking." I do not believe that the findings are a death sentence.
He has time to study the biology of his tumor and select the treatment most likely to help him.
In addition to the Walsh book, which will lead him toward radical prostatectomy, 8 8 should read _A Primer on Prostate Cancer_ by Stephen B. Strum, a medical oncologist who specializes in prostate cancer (PCa).
He should first and foremost visit the following two websites:
Prostate Cancer Research Institute http://prostate-cancer.org/index.html and the support group Us Too! International http://ustoo.com/
There is far more to learn than is possible to do before tomorrow's appointment.
I have seen recommendations that patients bring with them a trusted friend and/or a tape recorder. It is unlikely that the patient will be able to remember everything, and these two measures will help, well, immeasurably. No medic worth his Mercedes Benz or Rolls Royce would object.
I am not a medic, but I suspect that 8 8's diabetes will be a factor in the decision re: what to do.
I recommend that 8 8 take a deep breath, maybe have a drink, and decide that he's going to approach this life-changing event (and that's what it is) with calm resolve. It will not help to go running off in all directions. As I have said (probably too often): Study, learn, take charge!
Please do let us know how it goes. The men and women here care.
Regards,
Steve J __ "Never give in--never, never, never, never, in nothing great or small, large or petty, never give in except to convictions of honour and good sense. Never yield to force; never yield to the apparently overwhelming might of the enemy." --Sir Winston L. S. Churchill
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron I.P. Freely - 08 Feb 2005 00:45 GMT I haven't time for a well-thought-out essay, but here's its outline off my cuff.
We're all gonna die from some darn thing or another. Some ends are more tolerable than others. PC is one of the others, but . . . it's also one of the slower ways to go. It often takes 15 years even if we do nothing. Your T1c is "easy" to nail, but your 7 borderlines on being aggressive, thus more likely to return some day. You've got so FREAKING much to learn that you don't have TIME to get scared. You need to study half a dozen books and quite a few websites, and do a lot of thinking. Then you need to choose a treatment, schedule it, catch up on the stuff you let slide during all that research. None of the treatments except HT is a big deal, and that's not a common first treatment. You should recover potency, given your T1c and a good radiologist or surgeon, so pick whatever your criteria come up with and feel good about it. By the time you've done all that research, the "right" treatment for you will be obvious. No need to worry at that point. Then get your initial treatment and kill the bastard. Once you're done that it's time to feel GOOD, because you've gotten smart, made the right treatment decision for YOU, GOTTEN your treatment, killed the cancer, and are home free for now. No NEED to worry now. Then you get tested much more frequently, so you KNOW what's going on. No need to worry about THAT, because no news is great news. Then, maybe, one day many years out, one of those tests may be bad news. Or you might get hit by a truck. Or get a heart attack. SOMETHING's gonna get you, but there's no reason to WORRY about it. You just eat right, stay fit, watch who the hell you sleep with, keep getting those PC tests and annual physicals, and buckle your seat belts. If you're LUCKY, your next threat will warn you, with a climbing PSA, some angina, a foot infection, etc., so you can hope for the best, fight like hell, and get your affairs in order for the worst. You STILL got too much to do to waste time worrying. If not, you need more hobbies. Then some day your PC, or your diabetes (there are LOTS of ways to manage or cure THAT), whether Type I or Type II. But fight it you must, for it can tie PC as a crappy way to go), or some other gremlin will rear up and bite you with no solution. If that alligator gives you warning, you'll be too busy getting all your relatives taken care of to worry. If it gives you no warning, it denies you the privilege of worrying. Now let's assume you do get terminally ill 10 or 20 years from now, and those last few weeks or months look absolutely awful for one reason or another. You STILL have research to do and decisions to make, because there are solutions to ANY medical problem at EVERY stage. You see, there's no productive point or time for worry. If you have a problem, your time is best spent solving the problem. If all your problems are solved, what's there to worry about?
I.P.
"8 8" <Gimel@webtv.net> wrote >
> In Nov. I was diagnosed with diabetes and was terrified. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > It hasn't hit me yet and if I'm this scared now...I wonder about later. Stephen Jordan - 08 Feb 2005 01:00 GMT Pretty much the same as I did, but at much greater length.
Hee hee, couldn't help myself.
Seriously, IP wrote good practical advice. And he's certainly been through the mill and then some.
Regards,
Steve J
Ron B - 08 Feb 2005 01:58 GMT Thanks to you all of you guys.
I.P. is sure a 'Howard Cossell' 'tell it like it is' guy but it's true.
I appreciate it.
Ron
smu53@aol.com - 08 Feb 2005 02:15 GMT Ron/88, The waiting was the worst part for me. Learn all you can about your options. Involve your wife/significant other. If you pick RP, you might want to consider learning how to do the shots pre-op, so you will already know how to do them in case you need them. I'm very glad I did that. Also, start doing Kegel exercises. I hope you do well. Steve U
jhhtexas@ieee.org - 08 Feb 2005 06:56 GMT I also have diabetes (diet and oral medications only) as well as being diagnosed with Pca (3+4 Gleason). I had my RRP last summer at UCLA and am doing fine so far. Last PSA reading 0.03. Pca was contained and my Partin tables show 98% chance of beating it. I'm 100% continent and, with the help of Cialis, my erections are not what they were, but still capable of penetration. Get your ducks in a row and get treated.
Danny McCarty - 08 Feb 2005 22:28 GMT >Subject: Re: Diagnosed and scared to death >From: "I.P. Freely" fuhgeddaboutit@noway.not >Date: 2/7/2005 6:45 PM Central Standard Time >Message-id: <PYTNd.211$EQ4.162@fe02.lga> Now, I.P., what did you go and do that for? Excellent advice and attitude.
>I haven't time for a well-thought-out essay, but here's its outline off my >cuff. [quoted text clipped - 55 lines] >> >> It hasn't hit me yet and if I'm this scared now...I wonder about later. Ron B - 08 Feb 2005 22:41 GMT Hi Danny.
Thanks for the response.
Were you in the service? (This goes to many folks here too.)
You're right about type II diabetes.
Took me a month or so to figure out that it was easy to control.
This is different to me. No control but we MUST act...true.
The reason I asked about the military...many of the guys that I call 'brave' seem to have been in the service.
They have, or were willing to put their lives on the line.
They were afraid but they faced it.
Different for someone who thought that "crossing the street on the red light" was daring.
hahaha
Ron
Danny McCarty - 08 Feb 2005 23:56 GMT >Subject: Re: Diagnosed and scared (Danny) >From: Gimel@webtv.net (Ron B) >Date: 2/8/2005 4:41 PM Central Standard Time >Message-id: <4334-42093FFF-342@storefull-3312.bay.webtv.net> First Aerospace Carteographic and Geodesic Squadron, USAF, sometimes sent to Nam to plot bombing runs. Stationed at SAC headquarters in Topeka.
>Hi Danny. > [quoted text clipped - 21 lines] > >Ron I.P. Freely - 09 Feb 2005 02:00 GMT I TRY alla time, but ya can't win 'em all.
I.P.
> >Subject: Re: Diagnosed and scared to death > >From: "I.P. Freely" fuhgeddaboutit@noway.not [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >I haven't time for a well-thought-out essay, but here's its outline off my > >cuff. keith340@webtv.net - 09 Feb 2005 11:53 GMT My type II is under control with diet, exercise and no medication.
Keith Lundy/So. California 40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments Loma Linda Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
I.P. Freely - 09 Feb 2005 16:59 GMT That's great! So many people either do nothing, or take meds to cover up the underlying causes such as Big Macs and TV. Bet you FEEL better this way, too.
I.P.
> My type II is under control with diet, exercise and no medication. keith340@webtv.net - 09 Feb 2005 20:54 GMT IP.....if my HMO had not sent me to a four day diabetes education class, i would not have even known what reading the labels meant or how to calculate the carbohydrate content of foods which in turn helps me to reach my meal plan goals every day thus helping to keep my A1C 6-7 and bs(80-180) in normal range....i don't want to get started in a discussion about diabetes in this wonderful pca group....thanks for your response......
Keith Lundy/So. California 40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments Loma Linda Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
JerryW - 08 Feb 2005 02:14 GMT Ron,
You've already received a lot of good advice from some of our members, here. We've just about all "been there...done that...got the T-shirt." That first 24 hours or so after having your worst fear confirmed is pretty scarey. My own Urologist, after my DRE and even before the biopsy, suggested I get and read Dr. Walsh's book, "Guide to surviving Prostate Cancer." (I could pretty well guess what his guess was!) I think Jim Honeychuck already suggested this to you. I want to reinforce his suggestion, and those of others like Rob, Leonard, Bob, Mike, I.P., etc. You need now to do a crash course in PCa-101 to determine which of the many treatment options may be right for you.
And you can be sure, we're all here pulling for you. We can offer support; we can relate our own experiences; some of us are qualified to provide substantive information. But, after all is said and done, you will be making this decision in consult with your physician(s). It's a decision you'll want to be comfortable with, and once made, not second-guessed..
Please keep coming back here, and keep us up to date on your situation. Good luck and good health.
 Signature JerryW jweindel at flash dot net
2/11/04 PSA 2.6, Suspicious DRE (age 62) 2/23/04 Biopsy: Gleason 3+4=7, T2a, left lobe 5/18/04 RRP, Path: Gleason 4+3=7, T2c, both lobes 7/13/04 PSA <0.1 10/12/04 PSA <0.1 1/18/05 PSA <0.1
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron No Spam - 08 Feb 2005 02:38 GMT > Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron Good evening Ron,
After my diagnosis, I was too busy to be scared. I was a little numb but I wasn't "scared".
I was in serious information gathering mode.
Here's the good news, with a PSA 7.2, T1c (they don't really know) and a Gleason 7 (3+4) at 56, you've got an advantage over me.
I clocked a PSA 10+, the uro-doc called it a T1 but the rad-doc said I might be a T3. Gleason 7 (4+3, but only part of one needle). I was 57 at the diagnosis.
Your choices are surgery or rad. Those are the only options that make sense. Your docs will explain but you might as well start mulling it over now.
I went the rad route. It's easy, no pain, very mild discomfort, less than a tooth filling.
There are side effects, these include having to pee every 2 or 3 hours for about two months. Many people do that anyway, so big whoop.
The cost is a knee-buckler. My insurance covered most of the procedures, tests, and some of the meds. I slammed over $3,000 on my credit card for co-pays, un-covereds, non-perscription stuff.
Two Lupron shots left me impotent but I've managed a couple partials without vitamin-V, so that's coming back. The worse of the hot flashes were in the late fall and winter, not a problem in cold weather.
What was a problem was feeling exhausted. Rad and Lupron have that as a side-effect. I've been sleeping 9+ hours a night and taking naps on weekends.
I've had one PSA post seeding, At about 2.5 months I clocked a < 0.1 which is real good. The docs are pleased. I am cautiously optimistic.
My uro-doc pitched surgery, "at your age and staging, surgery will very likely result in a full cure." I believe that this is true.
The rad-doc said the same thing but promised minimal life interruptions, no hospital stay, swing by on my way to work 25 times for 15 minutes of IMRT, external beam radiation. Do the seeding one morning and I'll back at work in a couple days.
I took 4 days off, just because.
For external beam radiation followed by seeding, there is approximately the same 10 year survival rate as surgery, over 93%. They say 10 years because that's how long they have the data.
The other 7% are mostly guys who were treated too late. Their cancer was more advanced and already spread to the lymph nodes, bones, etc.
No guarentees though. We have no guarentees from anyone.
Incontenance is unlikely with rad. BUT. No guarentees here either. My primary care doc told me that a guy who went the rad route about the same time that I did (and I'm guessing at the same facilty) is catheterized months after the seeding. He can't pee.
I'm at the point where I can almost write my name in wet concrete. No guarentees.
Here's the good news summary,
Most of the stuff you'll read in books is already out of date.
If you look at surgery, you have the nerve-sparing, the laproscopic, robotic, all kinds of techniques that make it better, easier, safer.
Rad? The standard is the IMRT, where robot driven lead shutters shape the beam to deliver the maximum radiation to the tumor and protect your colon and bladder.
With Palladium seeding, they can precisely position the seeds in three dimensions, minimal collateral damage, maximum energy delivered to the cancer.
There are risks of radiation injury but the rad-team gave me medication and instructions to minimize those odds.
ED? Consider this, a large percentage of guys our age are already having trouble getting going.
I'm in recovery and have started exercising again. It's getting better.
I.P. Freely - 08 Feb 2005 05:34 GMT "No Spam " <No Spam@Nospama.net> wrote >
> Most of the stuff you'll read in books is already out of date. Consdering that it takes 15 years to prove that a new procedure works, that's a pretty bold statement, one most of the authors would dispute because . . . it takes 15 years to prove that a new procedure works.
I.P.
No Spam - 08 Feb 2005 12:46 GMT > "No Spam " <No Spam@Nospama.net> wrote > > > Most of the stuff you'll read in books is already out of date. > > Consdering that it takes 15 years to prove that a new procedure works, > that's a pretty bold statement, one most of the authors would dispute > because . . . it takes 15 years to prove that a new procedure works. Prove? As in a guarentee from life? Nah.
What I'm talking about is the fact that the books I got last summer, don't mention robot assisted surgery or what an IMRT radiation treatment is like.
It's not just that you don't feel anything. I had no side effects other than a gradual, mild fatigue toward the end of the 5 week.
It's that the techs aligned and calibrated the lasers on Inova Linear Accelerator #2 every day. They did quality assurance X-ray images every week just before Leon-the-tech took my vitals and the rad-nurse and the rad-doc quized me on side effects.
They were watching for any changes, any problems. I'm sure that most patients were indifferent to the process. Figuring, "Oh, the doc sure likes to talk. He meets with me every week."
Well, no, he's not just talking, he and the rad-nurse are watching for things going out of spec. They interview separately to make sure that they get every detail.
It's not mentioned in the books I've read.
If the books don't cover the newer or current techniques, what are they telling you?
I don't know about surgery, I went the IMRT, external beam radiation, and image guided Palladium seed implant route. The degree of control in computer guided radiation is much better than a few years ago.
Given the increased precision and rapid changes in the technology, the information in books (and unfortunately in 'published studies') is obsolete by the time the study is done.
Of course the proof is in the results. I remain hopeful but I'm not forgetting that some percentage of rad and surgical patients have recurrances of the cancer. The odds are pretty good in general and for 88 are darn-good.
If it is *his* choice to go rad, then I'd bet he has an easy time. Similar to mine, walk out of the hospital, cook a steak, I had a filet mignon, and wait about 6 hours for the pee'ing to settle down.
If he goes surgical, then odds are he'll have a harder first 6 weeks, have to deal with a few months of pads but will bounce back just fine.
Either way, his odds of beating the cancer are better than 93%, according to the numbers I've seen.
He's got a lot going for him.
I.P. Freely - 08 Feb 2005 19:00 GMT The radiation/surgery dilemma is a classic Hobb's choice between two distasteful options: A. Take the easy route up front with SEs that increase over time and whose 15-year prognosis is hypothetical, vs B. Take the rougher initial treatment with SEs that diminish over time and whose 15-year prognosis is yet unmatched and highly documented. Each has its advantages in different cases, and is subject to personal criteria.
Most books I've read address IMRT, and the very fact that it's not a whole chapter, and is omitted in whatever books you found, raises a caution flag for me. I consider new, unproven treatments to be a gamble I'm not yet willing to accept as first-line treatment, especially when even its heritage -- EBRT -- is not as proven as surgery. I'm sure both are legitimate options, but 88 needs to do much more research on both of them.
I.P.
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 05:34:27 UTC, "I.P. Freely" wrote: > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > weeks, have to deal with a few months of pads but will bounce back > just fine. No Spam - 09 Feb 2005 01:45 GMT > The radiation/surgery dilemma is a classic Hobb's choice between two > distasteful options: [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > heritage -- EBRT -- is not as proven as surgery. I'm sure both are > legitimate options, but 88 needs to do much more research on both of them. Absolutely. 88's options are not great and there are no guarentees.
However, either choice offers a good chance of a full cure. Real good with a high probability that he'll be fully functional, that is, contenant and potent.
One thing though, the "increasing" SE's from rad are not a guarentee either. "Prostate Cancer for Dummies" mentions rad side effects at low levels of probability.
My books mention IMRT as a "new technology", better than 3D-CRT, better than the previous generation non-conformal beam machines.
This suggests that the side-effect profile for new Rad patients will be even better.
Last fall, Inova was de-installing Linear Accellerator #1, which is not an IMRT but a 3D-CRT machine. They treated me on Linear Accelerator #2 which was an IMRT.
I think we're saying the same thing. 88 should study his options, discuss them with both a surgeon and a radiation oncologist and make his own best decision.
Either way, he has a great chance for a full cure. We've been through it.
Danny McCarty - 09 Feb 2005 00:10 GMT >Subject: Re: Diagnosed and scared to death >From: "No Spam " NoSpam@Nospama.net [quoted text clipped - 148 lines] >shape the beam to deliver the maximum radiation to the tumor and >protect your colon and bladder. That's what I had for salvage radiation. The machine is called a "peacock" for some reason.
>With Palladium seeding, they can precisely position the seeds in >three dimensions, minimal collateral damage, maximum energy [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] >I'm in recovery and have started exercising again. It's getting >better. jhlms - 08 Feb 2005 02:50 GMT Bud, we've all been there. I think we'll all agree, however, that you should relax, take a deep breath (maybe a shot o' Jack Daniels if you're inclined), and really THINK about your next steps. You are going to be hit with a lot of information, but you have time....time, your best friend. Read, study, ask questions, become informed.....then you will make your best informed descision...the one that is best for YOU. ...........and because the decision is YOURS, we will be here to suppport you. Hey, bud.....we all know you've been kicked in the nuts. Now, you just gotta rise to the occasion and jump into the frey. We're here for ya, buddy.......we really are.
jh
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron Ron B - 08 Feb 2005 03:37 GMT Thanks again to all of you.
You've been really great.
The 2 books mentioned are on the way and with a double hernia (I forgot if I mentioned that), rgeular RP as opposed to robotic might be a choice.
They can do a lot at once I've been told but like you've told me...I have to do a lot of studying and decide what's best for me.
I appreciate your info more than you know.
Ron
I.P. Freely - 08 Feb 2005 05:39 GMT > with a double hernia (I forgot > if I mentioned that), rgeular RP as opposed to robotic might be a [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > but like you've told me...I have to do a lot of studying and decide > what's best for me. Start working that idea up right now. The surgeons need to evaluate. coordinate, plan, and schedule that. Bin dere, dunn dat! The first pair of surgeons passed, but a dual university/VA hospital jumped at it. Dual surgery is THEIR call, not yours, if you want it. I had already decided on RP even before we knew I had colon cancer; it was a solid gold tie-breaker, if I needed one.
I.P.
John Loomis - 08 Feb 2005 03:24 GMT Knowlege is power. You have gained much knowledge, and now need to move ahead. Treatment. Diagnosis, 7.2 Psa high.... Get a digital recal exam, and biopsy. Find out the truth of your numbers..... Decide to go with RP, or Radiation. RP seems a good answer to you problems. You may have incontinence, and such, and also ed disfunction/ Time will give you back al of the above. My best wishes, sorry you have joined this club/ John Loomis
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron RAYMOND KING - 08 Feb 2005 10:31 GMT I'm the new guy Ray. If you want technical stuff listen to these guys, because like you I'm learning and thus would not dream of giving advice in that area. However on the emotions - don't fear PC because as in all wars frightening the enemy gives it fertile ground to conquer.. don't give PC more ground than it as now.
Steve Kramer - 08 Feb 2005 10:56 GMT Ah, how many times have we seen this subject? Welcome, 88, to the club not one of us wanted to join.
The bad news, you already know. You have cancer and it is often fatal. The treatment has side effects that will change your life and not for the better.
However, there is some good news. Neither your PSA, Stage or Gleason score is outlandish. Much better than mine, in fact. Your age allows you all options for treatment.
Do not be hard on yourself. Read my first sentence again. Almost everyone in the club introduced himself in exactly the same manner. Look back at the archives if you need confirmation. We were all scared. To some degree we all still are. If indeed we are brave, remember that fear is a requirement for bravery. If you were not scared, you would be neither brave nor sane.
Questions? There are so many it would be impossible for you to remember them all. And, then, if you are like me, you won't remember very many answers. My only recommendation would be to not make a decision today in his office. You have plenty of time to research this dreaded disease and make an intelligent decision as to treatment. You should begin today by hearing his opinion of the various treatments and asking for a second opinion on the Gleason score -- very important decision-making criterion.
 Signature Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 G7 (3+4), T3bN0M0 Seminal Vesicle involvement, Neg margins PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Lupron (1 mo) 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .07 .05 .06 Lupron (4 mo) 8/03 (48), 12/03, 4/04 (49), 09/04 (50) non Illegitimi carborundum
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron Stephen Jordan - 08 Feb 2005 15:40 GMT On February 8, Steve Kramer wrote wisely on the subject of fear and bravery. It reminded me of the words of Sam (Mark Twain) Clemens on the same subject:
"Courage is resistance to fear, mastery of fear -- not absence of fear. Except a creature be part coward, it is not a compliment to say it is brave."
Regards,
Steve J
David S. - 08 Feb 2005 12:59 GMT My RRP was 8-1-2003 and I am still incontinent to a degree and totally impotent. My suggestion to you is to trash the fear. First, if you have been caring for elderly relatives, which I have first hand experience in that department, you are surely tough enough to handle this little bump in your life. Two, you need to make some important decisions in the near future, so educate yourself as best you can so you can make the most informed decision that you can. No room for emotion. You need facts and to be in control as you make your decision. Three, the T1c, same as me, sounds good. The Gleason at 7 is not so good. Mine was 6, but after surgery the path report dropped it to a 5. The T1c would indicate a good chance for a cure. Again, get the facts and talk to your doctor. Do not get paralyzed by fear or the number of options available. Do not wait months to make a decision on treatment. Four, I live just fine with incontinence, 2 pads a day average now, 5-6 when the catheter first came out. BTW I was 55 at the time of surgery, and now 57. I had ED problems going in, so the impotence was not entirely due to the RRP. I use Trimix injections to assist in achieving the erection. It does not hurt, so do not be afraid of the needle. Bottom line is that life goes on. There is nothing to be afraid of. Your situation is better than others here for sure. Be positive. Once you make the treatment decision put it behind you and move forward. No looking back. Good luck to you. You have found a great place for support. A lot of very good people here, and tons of direct experience. Thank you. David S.
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron RAYMOND KING - 08 Feb 2005 19:32 GMT Fear not apprehension. Certainly initial fear helps us to have courage to face the challenge. But in the time scale we have living in fear only advances PC to the brain, do we really want to help it spread. So what do we fear?
Fear of death, what is to fear in dying? PC or not one day we will all do it - that's another club like or not we're all in. And PC or not we could die the very next second, thus PC does not add to that. So perhaps them we fear for our your loved ones' coping, being concerned is only natural. However living the time remaining in fear for them, which they will see, will not help them, thus have no fear.
I know easy words from someone with faith, but please don't add fear to PC, isn't PC enough for you to cope with.
Ray
Danny McCarty - 08 Feb 2005 22:21 GMT >Subject: Diagnosed and scared to death >From: Gimel@webtv.net (8 8) >Date: 2/7/2005 4:55 PM Central Standard Time >Message-id: <11988-4207F1E4-202@storefull-3317.bay.webtv.net> "Hi" back to ya! ;-} Boy, have you stirred up a hornet's nest- more than 30 responses already! Diabetes can kill you fast if not treated. But it is easily treated. A bother- measuring blood sugar regularly, diet, and insulin injections- but no big thing. PCa caught early is similar. Don't worry, just get with the program. Brave? nah, it's something like sitting in the waiting room on the ground just before your first parachute jump. I don't think many of us have gotten into the scary part yet. Best wishes.
>Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > >Ron Bob C - 20 Feb 2005 14:45 GMT Ron, it may be easy for me to say, but "settle down." You have a ton of really good replies to your plea, so I'll be brief. I began my trip on this road at age 55 with a psa discovered to be 55, gleason 3+4, large volume, two tumors in seminals, on the bladder surface, and so on. That was 4+ years ago. I had the surgery (even though the cancer was known to have escaped the prostate), had external beam radiation to the pelvic cavity, and went a year on Lupron. Then two years off Lupron were a nice breather but a rising psa has me back on it again, this time for two years and I am almost mid-point now. At this point in time, I am happy to still have a weapon to ply against the cancer, and I'm not too unhappy about the side effects. I have made my choices and will be as aggesssive as I can be in this fight.
Do your research, decide how aggessive you want to be, and let the fight begin. You will see how your prioroties in life change, and how you look at most things in a different light than you once did. There is no sense in letting what may happen sometime way off in the future, ruin what you have today. I have had four good years since diagnosis and hope for at least than many more. Advancements are being made all the time. My short reply to you is getting long, so I'll leave you for now. Lots of luck to you, and may you come to grips with this quickly.
> Hi. > [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] > > Ron
|
|
|