i was watching ripley's "believe it or not". we've all seen ultra-sound
pictures of unborn babies, but they have a 3rd beam that they can use
and it produces a 3-D imaging and they showed the face of a 27 week old
baby. it was really interesting because it looked just like a regular
baby type picture.
even more interesting was the fact that they are using 3-D imaging to
develop into the field of prostate cancer detection. can you imagine of
the doctor having a 3-D image in front of him and to be able to tell you
where he "sees" the prostate cancer. he could tell if it has a positive
or negative margin and would know in advance, what to expect, when he
got inside the body.
even looking deeper into the crystal ball, can you imagine not only
seeing the prostate in 3-D but in color? this would make it even easier
to detect where the trouble spots are going to be.
right now, they said the cost is about 500 dollars for a photo, but as
the field is developed, i'm sure the price will drop, that is, unless
the medical field has something to do with it.
this comes under the same heading as the same amount of oil is a
constant that is under ground but the price changes daily - right?
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
Alan Meyer - 26 Jan 2005 04:27 GMT
> ... can you imagine of
> the doctor having a 3-D image in front of him and to be able to tell you
> where he "sees" the prostate cancer. he could tell if it has a positive
> or negative margin and would know in advance, what to expect, when he
> got inside the body.
> ...
This would indeed be great. Now if only they could do it without
twisting a baseball bat sized antenna up the rectum ...
Alan
c palmer - 26 Jan 2005 06:42 GMT
..
This would indeed be great. Now if only they could do it without
twisting a baseball bat sized antenna up the rectum ...
Alan
=========ain't that the truth? i told my son that when i got my biopsy, that he
felt like he drove a semi tractor trailer rig inside there and parked
it. then when he moved the probe to the other side, it felt like he
took that semi and made a U-turn without ever backing up.
my son just laughed about it and said, "dad, I was driving that semi!!!"
i looked at him (he's 36) and said, "son, in 20 years from now, when you
have the probe up your butt, just remember - I'll be driving that semi
this time!!!"
we both had a good laugh over it.....
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
James A. Honeychuck - 26 Jan 2005 08:18 GMT
And for the newbees who have not had their needle biopsy yet, could I
just point out that frequent contributors Alan and Curtis are
exaggerating for effect here.
The probe is more like the diameter of a cigar.
jimhoney
> ..
> This would indeed be great. Now if only they could do it without
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
> http://community.webtv.net/PALMER_ENT/doc
I.P. Freely - 27 Jan 2005 01:26 GMT
Fine . . . AS LONG AS THEY EXTINGUISH IT FIRST!
I.P.
> And for the newbees who have not had their needle biopsy yet, could I
> just point out that frequent contributors Alan and Curtis are
> exaggerating for effect here.
>
> The probe is more like the diameter of a cigar.