Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / October 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Prostate Cancer Treatment Impairs Sexual Function

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
c palmer - 06 Oct 2004 21:51 GMT
Wed Oct 6, 2004 01:15 PM ET

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Over a 5-year period, men with localized
prostate cancer showed a much sharper decline in sexual function and
urinary control than did similar men without the disease, researchers
report in the medical journal Cancer.
"Men facing decisions about treating early stage prostate cancer should
recognize that treatment-related declines in sexual and urinary function
may significantly exceed changes from normal aging," lead investigator
Dr. Richard M. Hoffman told Reuters Health.
Hoffman, with the New Mexico Veterans Affairs Health Care System in
Albuquerque, and colleagues note that previous findings in this area
have often been difficult to interpret because of problems
distinguishing the effects of treatment from the effects of aging.
To investigate further, the team studied 293 men with localized prostate
cancer and 618 age- and ethnicity-matched "controls." About 70 percent
of those in both groups were older than 60 years of age.
At the start of the study, the participants completed questionnaires
about prostate health and general health-related quality of life. Five
years later, 210 of the men with cancer (72 percent) and 421 of those in
the comparison group (68 percent) completed a follow-up survey.
At the outset, the men with prostate cancer had better urinary control
and sexual function than did those in the control group. However, at the
five-year mark the proportion of cancer patients reporting total urinary
control fell from 84 percent to 41 percent. Among controls, the
corresponding drop was from 72 percent to 69 percent.
Moreover, the proportion of men reporting no problems with erections
fell from 45 percent to 9 percent among those with prostate cancer, and
from 40 percent to 32 percent among the group without cancer.
Bowel function remained high in both groups, and health-related quality
of life was also "relatively high" in both groups.
Overall, the researchers conclude that the negative effects of the
disease and its treatment on sexual and urinary function "far exceeded
any effects from aging, particularly for men undergoing radical
prostatectomy."
SOURCE: Cancer, November 1, 2004.  
Reuters 2004

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
Wakeley Purple - 07 Oct 2004 03:58 GMT
> Wed Oct 6, 2004 01:15 PM ET
>
> NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Over a 5-year period, men with localized
> prostate cancer showed a much sharper decline in sexual function and
> urinary control than did similar men without the disease, researchers
> report in the medical journal Cancer.

They left out the part about bone mets being a significant inhibitor of
sexual function if you don't do something about the PCa.

Whatever happened to the kind of journalism where the reporter actually
investigated and reported something balanced?

Signature

Wake

PSA 3.8, 11/2003 @58yrs
Biopsy positive 5% in 1 of 10 cores
T1c Gleason 3+3
RRP 1/12/04
Pathology agreed with biopsy + Negative margins
PSA - 4/29/04: <0.1
Mostly Dry - July '04
PSA - 10/5/04: <0.1

Steve Kramer - 07 Oct 2004 15:25 GMT
Journalism seems to be a lost art, or perhaps it's just underfunded.  Those
claiming to be reporters have merely become transcribers and those claiming
to be journalist have become advocates.  There are, of course, exceptions,
but these should be the exceptions.

It's almost getting to be that you have to read the original documents
yourself before you can garner the truth from them.  You can't trust
lawyers, judges or justices to tell you the truth about the Constitution.
You can't trust clerics to tell you about what's in the Bible.  You can't
trust medical 'experts' to tell you what's in scientific study report.  And
you don't have time to research them all yourself.  It's a quandry.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Lupron (1 mo) 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05 .06
Lupron (3 mo) 8/03 (48), 12/03, 4/04 (49), 09/04 (50)
non illegitimi carborundum

> > Wed Oct 6, 2004 01:15 PM ET
> >
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Whatever happened to the kind of journalism where the reporter actually
> investigated and reported something balanced?
Marshall Schuon - 08 Oct 2004 08:05 GMT
>Journalism seems to be a lost art, or perhaps it's just underfunded.  Those
>claiming to be reporters have merely become transcribers and those claiming
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>trust medical 'experts' to tell you what's in scientific study report.  And
>you don't have time to research them all yourself.  It's a quandry.
________

I'm sure you never *could* trust the courthouse crowd to tell you the
truth, and the rest have their special axes to grind.  As to
journalism, so many people now get their news from television, and so
few TV people now cut their teeth in newspapering.  And for as bad as
print journalism sometimes is, it is head and shoulders above
broadcast news.

Marshall
(who is prejudiced but right)
Steve Kramer - 08 Oct 2004 20:29 GMT
> I'm sure you never *could* trust the courthouse crowd to tell you the
> truth, and the rest have their special axes to grind.  As to
> journalism, so many people now get their news from television, and so
> few TV people now cut their teeth in newspapering.  And for as bad as
> print journalism sometimes is, it is head and shoulders above
> broadcast news.

You must be lucky to have good print media in your area.  Our two papers
print directly from local media releases and news services.
Leonard Evens - 07 Oct 2004 05:08 GMT
> Wed Oct 6, 2004 01:15 PM ET
>
[quoted text clipped - 37 lines]
> "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
> invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."

Sometimes one wonders why people bother doing studies like this.  But I
suppose even the obvious should be proved to be true.  When I faced the
prospect of treatment for prostate cancer,  I never imagined that things
would be exactly the same after treatment.  What I was interested in was
 whether the side effects of treatment would be manageable.  What my
doctor told me suggested that they would be, and in fact I've done
somewhat better than could be expected.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.