Roy,
Your PSA was lower than mine, your Gleason higher and your post-op about the
same. I too was told to wait for my salvage radiation and did. But, when
my PSA went down to .1, we put off EBRT. Then when it started going, I got
EBRT. Then, within a short time (relative) it started going up again, so
I'm now on HT.
The point of this is, you'll probably follow a similar line and you'll
probably still be kicking 4 years from now with sub .1 PSAs like I am. By
then, we should be really close to something resembling a cure.

Signature
Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
non illegitimi carborundum
> I had LRP on Aug 20 and finally got the Pathology report and it does
> not look good. I will meet with the surgeon for a six weeks checkup
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Size 66 Grams
> Roy
Roy,
Sorry to hear about the marginal path report. It does sound like radiation,
but the chances getting rid of the cancer cells at this stage are still very
good. The 3+5=8 is surely better than a 5+3, but it is an 8 all the same.
It's a bummer having to go through the radiation, I'm sure, but we're all
pulling for a complete cure for you at the other end.

Signature
JerryW
jweindel at flash dot net
2/11/04 PSA 2.6, Suspicious DRE (age 62)
2/23/04 Biopsy: Gleason 3+4=7, T2a, left lobe
5/18/04 RRP, Path: Gleason 4+3=7, T2c, both lobes
Tumor organ-contained; lymph nodes clear, seminal vesicles clear
Both nerve bundles spared
7/13/04 PSA <0.1
> I had LRP on Aug 20 and finally got the Pathology report and it does
> not look good. I will meet with the surgeon for a six weeks checkup
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Size 66 Grams
> Roy