Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / September 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Another Bad post LRP Lab report

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roy - 08 Sep 2004 00:03 GMT
I had LRP on Aug 20 and finally got the Pathology report and it does
not look good.   I will meet with the surgeon for a six weeks checkup
in about a month to go over what to do next.  Looks like radiation for
sure.  The surgeon's nurse said the doctor would want me to heal for 3
or 4 months and then start radiation.

I wonder if they give hormones prior to the radiation like they would
have if I had skipped the LRP and went strait to radiation?

From where I sit things don't look too good.

Age 61
PSA 9.5
Free PSA 10
Gleason 3+4=7  Local Lab
Gleason 4+3=7  Johns Hopkins Lab
Size 47 Grams
4 cores with 5% PCA each all from one lobe. All 6 other cores no PCA
Bone scan and CT scan negative
Acid phosphatase   1.6  (In normal range)

Pathology Report After LRP

Gleason  3+5=8
Stage T3/N0/M/0 Gleason score 8(stage III)
Not in lympth nodes
In Seminal vesicles
Size 66 Grams
Roy
Steve Kramer - 08 Sep 2004 01:02 GMT
Roy,

Your PSA was lower than mine, your Gleason higher and your post-op about the
same.  I too was told to wait for my salvage radiation and did.  But, when
my PSA went down to .1, we put off EBRT.  Then when it started going, I got
EBRT.  Then, within a short time (relative) it started going up again, so
I'm now on HT.

The point of this is, you'll probably follow a similar line and you'll
probably still be kicking 4 years from now with sub .1 PSAs like I am.  By
then, we should be really close to something resembling a cure.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
non illegitimi carborundum

> I had LRP on Aug 20 and finally got the Pathology report and it does
> not look good.   I will meet with the surgeon for a six weeks checkup
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Size 66 Grams
> Roy
JerryW - 08 Sep 2004 02:28 GMT
Roy,

Sorry to hear about the marginal path report. It does sound like radiation,
but the chances getting rid of the cancer cells at this stage are still very
good. The 3+5=8 is surely better than a 5+3, but it is an 8 all the same.
It's a bummer having to go through the radiation, I'm sure, but we're all
pulling for a complete cure for you at the other end.
Signature

JerryW
jweindel at flash dot net

2/11/04 PSA 2.6, Suspicious DRE (age 62)
2/23/04 Biopsy: Gleason 3+4=7, T2a, left lobe
5/18/04 RRP, Path: Gleason 4+3=7, T2c, both lobes
Tumor organ-contained; lymph nodes clear, seminal vesicles clear
Both nerve bundles spared
7/13/04 PSA <0.1

> I had LRP on Aug 20 and finally got the Pathology report and it does
> not look good.   I will meet with the surgeon for a six weeks checkup
[quoted text clipped - 25 lines]
> Size 66 Grams
> Roy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.