Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

The Proton Guy Is BACK

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Keith Lundy - 22 Aug 2004 02:51 GMT
Hello everyone!!!! After a few months of delays and politics between my
new home tract builder, County, and City, I moved into my  house August
7th without phone service.  Tent trailer life got old very quick.  I am
now up and running an of course on line.  The 10 year Proton results are
in and looking very promising.  I have not had a chance to do a review.
It seems that the group here continues to grow along with the junk mail.
I will be only lurking for a while until I get other new home matters
completed.

Keith Lundy/So. California
40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments
Loma Linda  Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
c palmer - 22 Aug 2004 04:08 GMT
hi keith - i tried to send you a couple of emails about 4 or 5 months
ago, but it bounced stating that your mailbox was full.

i tried again later and got the same response.  i thought that you might
be using the mailbox as a catch box for the junk mail, but haven't seen
you post for awhile.

glad everything is still going well and you are finally able to move in.

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
Keith Lundy - 22 Aug 2004 12:21 GMT
thanks palmer, i had over 600 e-mails in my box, mostly junk...i will
have my eighteenth month psa test in november and of course will
continue to update the group....proton treatment has been getting a lot
of national news coverage since the release of the 10 year study,,,,,for
early stage pc and my situation, it was the best treatment choice.

Keith Lundy/So. California
40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments
Loma Linda  Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
john brockhouse - 22 Aug 2004 16:52 GMT
Keith,
  I was offline for an extended period and am interested in your psa
results from pre-proton     to the present, also side effects , if any.
Thanks.
                      John
Beverley - 22 Aug 2004 17:03 GMT
Glad to see you are back!

And so nice to hear you are all moved in!! I know living in your new home is
going to feel wonderful especially after the "camping".
Bev

> thanks palmer, i had over 600 e-mails in my box, mostly junk...i will
> have my eighteenth month psa test in november and of course will
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> 40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments
> Loma Linda  Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
ron - 22 Aug 2004 19:48 GMT
> proton treatment has been getting a lot
> of national news coverage since the release of the 10 year study,,,,,for
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> 40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments
> Loma Linda  Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03

Hi Keith...Your comment that proton treatment was the best treatment
choice for early stage PCa caught my attention.  Could you elaborate a
bit and explain the basis for the comment?  I've only seen the
abstract of the Loma linda study (Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004
Jun 1;59(2):348-52), but in it they claim a 10-year biochemical
disease-free survival rate of 90% for men with initial PSA =< 4.0
ng/ml.  In the Hopkins RRP study (J. Urol., Vol. 169, 517–523,
February 2003) a BDFS rate >= 97% is estimated at 10-years for
low-risk men (T1c, PSA =< 4.0 ng/ml, GS<7).  Do you know whether the
LL study used the ASTRO defintion of failure or PSA > 0.2 ng/ml as the
failure point?  If they used the ASTRO defintion, then, from the work
of Critz and Zincke, the LL result should be decremented by at least 5
more points to accurately compare it to the Hopkins results which use
the PSA > 0.2 ng/ml defintion of failure...Best wishes and good
health, Ron
Keith Lundy - 23 Aug 2004 02:10 GMT
RON-what i meant was "proton treatment was the best choice for me in my
early stage and my situation."

Keith Lundy/So. California
40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments
Loma Linda  Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
john brockhouse - 23 Aug 2004 03:45 GMT
Keith,
 Sounds good. Glad your back and doing so well.  Expect November will
be well below 1.0.    Will be rooting for you.  
                               John
Fnocampo - 23 Aug 2004 01:11 GMT
Its good to know that you are still around and in good shape Keith. Keep in
touch.

Fernando
Keith Lundy - 23 Aug 2004 02:03 GMT
JOHN....my 1 year psa result was 1.1 as of may 2004....down from 6.4 in
oct 2002 at time of diagnoses..

RON...the RESULTS state that "the overall biochemical disease-free
survival rate was 73% and in 90% in patients with initial psa 4.0: it
was 87% in patients with postteatment psa nadirs of 0.05..rates dropped
with rises in initial and psa values. long-term survival outcomes were
comparable with those for other modalities intended for
cure.....CONCLUSION..conformal proton radiation therapy at the reported
dose levels yielded disease-free survival rates comparable with other
forms of local therapy and with minimal morbidity. dose-escalation
strategies are being implemented to further improve long-term
reults.".....international journal of radiation onclogy "blology"
physics, vol 59, issue 2, 1 june 2004, pags 348-352. IT WORKS!!!

Keith Lundy/So. California
40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments
Loma Linda  Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.