Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2004
Saddam's Prostate Problems
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Heather - 30 Jul 2004 19:46 GMT This was in the Toronto Star this morning.....seems he could have BPH or prostate cancer....but is refusing a biopsy.
Heather
http://makeashorterlink.com/?M4BC23FE8
c palmer - 30 Jul 2004 21:38 GMT This was in the Toronto Star this morning.....seems he could have BPH or prostate cancer....but is refusing a biopsy. Heather
=============== hi heather - seems to me that in light of everything he has done of other men in his lifetime, that he might have a phobia about getting a DRE and finding out in the middle of it that the person has a hand on each of his shoulders.
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
Al - 31 Jul 2004 02:01 GMT *This was in the Toronto Star this morning.....seems he could have BPH or *prostate cancer....but is refusing a biopsy.
I couldn't feel more happy if it was PCa and consumed him in the most horrible manner. He is but a few people I would actually wish this disease on right now.
Al
Please be quiet if replying via email, flames will be deleted promptly. I won't even read the whole message...
ehcorp1@lycos.com - 31 Jul 2004 21:59 GMT Al <al1096@loud.bellsouth.net> wrote in
> I couldn't feel more happy if it was PCa and consumed him in the most > horrible manner. He is but a few people I would actually wish this > disease on right now. > > Al Perhaps your hatred is misplaced since it is George Warmonger Bush that is responsible for placing your sons and grandsons at risk of being drafted to fight wars for made-up arbitrary-make-it-up-as-we-go reasons.
Most all the 9-11 hijackers were Saudis, none were from Iraq. But then George Bush Sr has his fingers deep in the pockets of the Saudis and in turn the Saudis are granted unlimited access to power & influence within our government.
Saddam Hussein is a foul man but he never posed any threat to you or yours.
Heather - 31 Jul 2004 23:37 GMT OK......I am sorry I even mentioned it.....this is not alt.politics!!
We all have our own personal views on Iraq and they are best kept to private email.
Heather
> Al <al1096@loud.bellsouth.net> wrote in Al - 01 Aug 2004 00:00 GMT *OK......I am sorry I even mentioned it.....this is not alt.politics!! * *We all have our own personal views on Iraq and they are best kept to private *email.
No, it's not your comment that needs apology for. Saddam having prostate problems is news worthy in that it's irony that he refuses to get a biopsy, perhaps because he knows he's going to face capital punishment, hopefully from the same Iraqis he tortured... I respectfully submit that this isn't political, just one veteran's opinion on Saddam and him having prostate problems.
Al Please be quiet if replying via email, flames will be deleted promptly. I won't even read the whole message...
Al - 31 Jul 2004 23:55 GMT *Perhaps your hatred is misplaced since it is George Warmonger Bush *that is responsible for placing your sons and grandsons at risk of *being drafted to fight wars for made-up arbitrary-make-it-up-as-we-go *reasons. * *Most all the 9-11 hijackers were Saudis, none were from Iraq. But *then George Bush Sr has his fingers deep in the pockets of the Saudis *and in turn the Saudis are granted unlimited access to power & *influence within our government. * *Saddam Hussein is a foul man but he never posed any threat to you or *yours.
With all due respect, I've seen documentaries about Saddam, and personally know an Iraqi scientist. He -deserves- to die horrible deaths! I'd be happy to discuss chimp via email, if you desire, but this group is for us PCa survivors and soon to be survivors. I won't spam it with political commentary.
Al
Please be quiet if replying via email, flames will be deleted promptly. I won't even read the whole message...
Neil Simpson - 01 Aug 2004 03:59 GMT > Al <al1096@loud.bellsouth.net> wrote in > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > Saddam Hussein is a foul man but he never posed any threat to you or > yours. It must be sad to be so consumed with hatred and angst.
ehcorp1@lycos.com - 02 Aug 2004 19:51 GMT > > Al <al1096@loud.bellsouth.net> wrote in > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > > Saddam Hussein is a foul man but he never posed any threat to you or > > yours.
> It must be sad to be so consumed with hatred and angst. Consumed? ... no, just concerned about my sons. What happens to Saddam is of no interest to me. I'm also concerned (not consumed) how so many Americans lack the critical thinking skills to recognize what a fraud George W Nepotism Bush is.
Bush is Cheney's lackie AND Cheney is the bought & paid for lackie of Halliburton Corp. If you strip back all the fluff you get Halliburton earning $$BILLIONS$$ from the war that Cheney pushed Bush into fighting. Bush is no fighter on his own as his "hide me daddy" Viet Nam charade illustrates. Bush is a coward of the first order.
I don't like Kerry but ABB (anybody but bush).
Finally, if politics offends you and you can't stand up for your own thinking then with that weak girly-man attitude how the hell do you expect to beat cancer? Just wondering ...
Steve Kramer - 03 Aug 2004 03:13 GMT > Finally, if politics offends you and you can't stand up for your own > thinking then with that weak girly-man attitude how the hell do you > expect to beat cancer? Just wondering ... It's not your politics that offends me, nor is it likely what offended him. I suspect it was your dishonesty, interloping, and cowardly anonymity.
Me? I've had a lifetime of dishonest, ignorant people who think their opinion is more valuable than the 2 cents most of us subscribe to here. With such experience, I know that I do not have to fight you, therefore I will not. I do not have win, therefore I do not have to chance losing.
I will merely DWIB you and your voice will become as a tree falling in a forest.
I invite others to do the same.
case - 03 Aug 2004 16:48 GMT "Steve Kramer" <skramer@cinci.rr.com> wrote in
> I will merely DWIB you and your voice will become as a tree falling in a > forest. > > I invite others to do the same. Steve, I'm sorry but this head-in-the-sand attitude is exactly what allowed Hitler to take over Germany. When national leaders misappropriate power then citizens cry out. When folks ignore their leaders misdeeds then the cancer spreads.
Cancer can invade the body but it can also invade nations. Brave folks fight back in both cases while the weak masses turn a deaf ear. The weak masses shoulder heavy responsibility for German Death Camps for it was they who ignored information about Hitler's deeds and goals.
So my dear Steve Kramer, be careful what you censure.
Steve Kramer - 03 Aug 2004 21:53 GMT > Steve, I'm sorry but this head-in-the-sand attitude is exactly what allowed > Hitler to take over Germany. When national leaders misappropriate power [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > So my dear Steve Kramer, be careful what you censure. Case,
I do not have my head in the sand. As much as time allows, I keep myself up on history, politics, science, education, the 'social condition', religion, etc. When I can, if I am an expert or more expert and where it is appropriate, I do what I can to educate or edify others. In every other case, I keep my mouth shut (or my hands off the keyboard). Discussion of anything other than prostate cancer in a prostate cancer support group, by definition, qualifies for the "inappropriate" standard.
I am also careful as to whom I personally censure. He lied. There is no harm in censuring a liar for you cannot rely on their subsequent messages regardless of their actual veracity.
Other than that, Hitler and his death camps have not modern analogy, the weak masses are those who will not do what is necessary and hide behind a failed ideology, and you have not the basis to determine or make reference to my bravery.
So, do you really hate spam, or do you have a prostate cancer issue you'd like to discuss?
Al - 03 Aug 2004 04:00 GMT *Finally, if politics offends you and you can't stand up for your own *thinking then with that weak girly-man attitude how the hell do you *expect to beat cancer? Just wondering ...
I'm not sure if it offends many here, but this NG isn't the place to argue politics. Personal email will work better. I respectfully say to you to use it!
Al Please be quiet if replying via email, flames will be deleted promptly. I won't even read the whole message...
c palmer - 02 Aug 2004 21:49 GMT From: ehcorp1@lycos.com
Saddam Hussein is a foul man but he never posed any threat to you or yours. ------------------------ i normally stay out of the political side and will try to do so here, but i wanted to reflect what makes up this side of the coin.
the root of evil is jealously. that is the bottom building block. if you let it fester, then jealously will turn into envy. and if you let it grow, then it will turn into hatred. and then it will grow more - into hatred with acts against another. but the final stage of jealously is hatred with involving acts of violence, whether it was hitler killing the jews or people blowing up other people.
none of these people (the victims) deserve what happen to them. it was the violent act of hatred that did this, and responding with acts of hatred is not going to be the answer either. it just shows who has the biggest military wins, that's all.
what the bottom line is.........did the problem get solved or was there a bandaid put on it?
on for what's worth, i remember bill clinton around 1995 called a press conference and told the public that the national debt was going to be reduced to zero and had a big check with a goose egg on it. said it was going to be down to zero around 2004, but as we all know the debt is now the highest it has ever been and kerry was in congress then and was involved with clinton's game plan.
no president can do anything for the first two years of office because it takes that long for the effects of the previous president to get out of the system. the same is true if kerry got into office this election. you won't see the effects of what he could do until 2005 or 2006.
but then again, i remember a president who lied to a congressional panel and got by with it. ran the debt up higher than it ever has been. did things that was so bad, that he was tried in impeachment, and everybody thinks he's a real nice guy. in fact, he's making money off of the book bragging about it.
what really makes me THINK and go hummmm.......is when kerry is on tv and tells the public that he has a plan in place for medicines for seniors, a financial plan to get the u.s. back on track. a plan to reduce the national debt, a plan to strengthen the military - all the while he has been a senator for how many years.......and could have at least done something to show what he can do. remember this or anybody else who wants to lead the pack.
can anybody remember something that kerry has done in congress that he has been credit for for the past 20 years? just curious.
BTW - i'm not in bush's corner either.
just my 02 cents.
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
MisterSkippy - 31 Jul 2004 14:27 GMT >This was in the Toronto Star this morning.....seems he could have BPH or >prostate cancer....but is refusing a biopsy. > >Heather > >http://makeashorterlink.com/?M4BC23FE8 He may be very realistic about the issue. In the not too distant future he will be placed in the physical custody of a new Iraqi government. After the trial he will have to figure out how to get his feet to touch the ground before the rope around his neck breaks his fall.
For email remove "_no_spam_"
Heather - 31 Jul 2004 21:28 GMT LOL......good point. And why bother with a biopsy if your days are obviously numbered anyway!!
Heather
> >This was in the Toronto Star this morning.....seems he could have BPH or > >prostate cancer....but is refusing a biopsy. [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > For email remove "_no_spam_" Bill Denton - 02 Aug 2004 15:24 GMT "seems he could have BPH or prostate cancer....but is refusing a biopsy."
Maybe he doesn't want anyone poking around in there because that's where the WMD are!
Bill Denton RP 2/12/02 Memphis
Heather - 02 Aug 2004 19:16 GMT ROFL!! Now *that* is funny!!
Cheers....Heather
> "seems he could have BPH or prostate cancer....but is refusing a > biopsy." [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > RP 2/12/02 > Memphis c palmer - 02 Aug 2004 21:18 GMT (Bill Denton) writes.... "seems he could have BPH or prostate cancer....but is refusing a biopsy." Maybe he doesn't want anyone poking around in there because that's where the WMD are! ---------------- hi bill - or maybe he thinks what he's got in the front of his pants is a WMD, ha, ha.
~ curtis
knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional "Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
|
|
|