Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / August 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Can't decide: RRP or DaVinci

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Coleshawn - 03 Aug 2004 00:33 GMT
I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
Thanks
Claude - 03 Aug 2004 00:57 GMT
> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks

   This decision has to be yours, because you are the only one who will
live with the consequences.  A rule of thumb on this forum is that a
surgeon's skill baed on experience is the single most important factor in
the RP surgery.  The more times he has done the surgery, the better he
should get at it.  Now, do as much reading as you can about the advantages
of LRP over RRP.  Then you have to decide whether those advantages outweigh
the advantages of your surgeon's greater experience with the RRP procedure.
   (Why do you have to rush into this surgery?  PCa is a very slow growing
cancer.  This is too important a decision---it involves your future
continence, erectile function, and perhaps your life---to put some sort of
arbitrary "hurry-up" time frame on it.)  All this, of course, is just my
humble non-MD opinion.

Claude
Beverley - 03 Aug 2004 01:54 GMT
I saw a something on the new robotic surgeries. What these guys can see with
this equipment is awesome. It is so weird to watch this as the patient is
lying on the table and the surgeon is over in a corner with his hands in a
machine. I can't tell you what to do but if it was me - I think I'd rather
be using the best technology possible. But I'm not you. Only you can decided
how you feel. Twenty-five is not many but that doesn't mean he's not
skilled. Have you asked what classes/training he attending on the equipment?
Bev

> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks
Andy Kemper - 03 Aug 2004 02:38 GMT
> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks

Why two days. Why not two months. I'd want more than two days to make an
informed decision which would affect the remainder of my life. How long
has it been since you were diagnosed.

Did your urologist describe the benefits and tradeoff between the two
procedures. What was his recommendation. Are there other in his practice
with more Da Vinci experience. Food for thought.

Whichever decision you make, it will be the right one for you. You could
go to the Lord in prayer for guidance.
Cpflanagan3 - 03 Aug 2004 03:36 GMT
<<   My urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  >>

Well, I have to admit to being very biased.  I had robotic RP on July 21st and
came home the following morning.  Catheter out on the 28th and I'm now back
walking 3-4 miles per day and 99.44% continent.  BTW, I haven't had any pain
meds (incl. aspirin) since I left the hospital.  My wife and I have been blown
away by how much easier this has been than we expected.

In doing my research, I found that I wanted: a) someone with experience, and b)
the best practicioner I could find.  The guy I finally picked (Dr. David Lee;
www.uant.com) is fairly young, but teaches robotic surgery around the country
and does about a half-dozen robotic RPs a week.

Don't rush, or get rushed into this decision.   It's too important.

Chuck Flanagan
Leonard Evens - 03 Aug 2004 04:09 GMT
> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks

Do you want to help your surgeon master this new technique, or do you
want him to do what he has been doing for years?  Personally,  I would
opt for the RRP.
Al - 03 Aug 2004 04:10 GMT
*I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.
My
*urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.
He's
*only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's
done
*more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work
out and
*jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2
days.
*Thanks

I have to agree with what the others have said. It's your decision and
no one can make it for you, unless you allow them to. Examine all
possible treatments, talk it over w/your doctor(s), family or loved
ones, then decide which is best -for you-.

Al

Please be quiet if replying via email,
flames will be deleted promptly.
I won't even read the whole message...
jk - 03 Aug 2004 05:18 GMT
> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks

 RRP and that's final!

Signature

JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories

Steve Kramer - 03 Aug 2004 11:28 GMT
You have more time to decide.  If necessary, postpone the surgery a couple
of weeks.

But, if it were me, I'd go with Da Vinci.  I really wish I had that choice
in 2000.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
non illegitimi carborundum

> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks
Claude - 03 Aug 2004 14:03 GMT
> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks

You see from above----you're getting conflicting advice.  Inform yourself,
weigh the pros and cons, and then *you* have to make the decision.
jimhoney - 03 Aug 2004 16:22 GMT
> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks

Sounds like you are in the enviable position of being able to flip a
coin and win either way.

I got perfect results from standard RRP, but for some reason I didn't
respond to pain medication and had a very tough time for a week or two
afterwards.  But I don't think post-op pain is a significant enough
factor to be important in the decision.  The pain fades.  And some
guys don't have any pain anyway.

jimhoney
Radical R P'er - 03 Aug 2004 16:39 GMT
From an earlier Post. I found in my saved box. FYI. only.

Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: AndroGel and PSA

> I have 2nd opinion consult at Moffitt Cancer Center end this
> month.  Still thinking daVinci and looking for a doc with
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
>  TAMPA -- Questions surrounding the death of teacher Al Greenway during
kidney
> removal surgery last month will not go unanswered, a lawyer said Monday.
>
> Steve Yerrid, retained by the Greenway family, said it was time the family
was
> allowed to know why the surgery went wrong.
>
> "We are not willing to settle for less than the whole truth," Yerrid said
at a
> news conference at his Tampa office.
>
> A popular Plant High biology teacher, Greenway, 53, died Oct. 13 at St.
> Joseph's Hospital, two days after a surgeon used the robotic da Vinci
Surgical
> System to remove a cancerous kidney. During the surgery, two blood
vessels,
> including the aorta, were severed. The problem wasn't noticed for about 90
> minutes.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Greenway's family, who was at Monday's news conference but did not
comment,
> has not filed a lawsuit. Yerrid said the case was not about money,
although he
> did not rule out filing a suit.
>
> Yerrid did not want to talk about specifics of the surgery and the
aftermath.
> He said the case went beyond medical malpractice and raised a number of
> questions about when the family was told about what went wrong, and
exactly
> what they were told about the surgery.
>
> As family members of patients, "we expect to know the truth and know the
truth
> when it occurs," he said.
>
> Yerrid added that the surgeon originally scheduled to perform the surgery
the
> day before was not on Greenway's insurance program. The next day, the
> Greenways were "directed" toward Fusia, Yerrid said.
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> small incisions, not one large opening. A long tube with a miniature video
> camera at the tip is inserted into one of the incisions to allow the
surgeon
> to look around.
>
> With the help of long tubes, the surgeon slides rods into the incisions
that
> have scalpels, scissors or other surgical tools at the end. The surgeon
then
> uses handles to manipulate the tools to perform the operation.
>
> An evaluation of the robot that helped assist with Greenway's kidney
removal
> determined that it operated properly. Yerrid said he would be looking into
the
> protocols and training needed for using new technologies in the operating
> room.
>
> A spokeswoman for Intuitive Surgical Inc., which makes the robot, said
last
> week that the robot did not make the cut that led to Greenway's death. The
> surgeon had moved to the patient and was using nonrobotic surgical
techniques
> when the vessels were cut, she said.
>
> Yerrid said the family thought Fusia, who had used the robot about 10
times in
> kidney removal procedures, had more experience with the surgery. They were
> surprised he is still allowed to perform surgeries at the hospital while a
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> TAMPA - A doctor named in a lawsuit over a deadly surgery involving a
robotic
> arm has been found guilty of negligence in a lawsuit stemming from
another,
> unrelated death.
>
> Dr. Tod Fusia, a urologist who works at St. Joseph's Hospital, was on
trial in
> a case involving the death of patient Terry Tapp, said Peter Brudny, an
> attorney for Tapp's family.
>
> On Friday, the jury awarded $765,000 to Tapp's wife and daughter.
>
> "I feel like justice has been very satisfied," said Shirley Tapp, Terry
Tapp's
> widow.
>
> Terry Tapp was operated on twice by Fusia, according to Brudny. In the
first
> procedure to remove a kidney stone, Tapp's urinary tract was perforated
and
> allowed urine to leak into the man's abdomen. Three weeks after a second
> surgery was performed, Tapp died when a blood clot entered his lung,
Brudny
> said.
>
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>
> Fusia was named, but not sued, in a separate lawsuit filed earlier this
month
> alleging he was not adequately trained to perform surgery using a robotic
> device. In that case, Al Greenway died Oct. 13, 2002, after kidney
surgery.

> Greenway's widow is suing St. Joseph's Hospital, saying it is at fault for
her
> husband's death.
>
> Brenda Greenway says hospital administrators allowed Fusia and another
doctor,
> both inexperienced with the $1 million robot, to perform her husband's
> surgery, which was to remove a cancerous kidney.
>
> Attorney Steven Yerrid, who represents Brenda Greenway, said the doctors
were
> not sued after their conduct had been "addressed."
>
> According to Florida Department of Health records, Fusia and the other
surgeon
> paid $1 million in September to settle a claim for an unspecified incident
> that occurred Oct. 11, 2002, the day of Greenway's surgery.
> ................................
>
> During Greenway's surgery, Dr. Tod Fusia sat at a console about 10 feet
from
> the operating table using sophisticated control sticks to manipulate the
da
> Vinci Surgical Systems robot, a machine with three arms that look like
they
> belong to a six-foot-tall insect.
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> The lawsuit alleges that Fusia's experience with the device was limited to
a
> pig, a cadaver, three kidney removals and a complicated prostate surgery
that
> left a man incontinent.
> ......................................
>
>  A postoperative X-ray revealed that an absorbent pad had been left inside
> Greenway's body that forced the surgeons to reopen the site to retrieve
it,
> according to the lawsuit. A needle was also missing and never accounted
for,
> the suit stated.
>
> After the surgery, Greenway began showing signs of distress, according to
the
> suit. A nurse tried to find a surgeon to assist in his treatment, but her
> requests went unfulfilled for more than two hours, the suit stated.
>
> Mrs. Greenway's wife was informed that one of her husband's blood vessels
was
> "nicked," but that he was "fine," according to the lawsuit. She was not
told
> of the severity of the injuries, even as blood seeped from her husband's
nose,
> ears and mouth, the suit stated.
>
> Greenway died the next day.
>
> The lawsuit contends that Fusia and the assistant surgeon were ill-trained
in
> the use of the robot.
>
> Fusia had attended a three-day certification course during which he did
not
> perform a robotic organ removal, the lawsuit stated. After he gained
> certification, Fusia had performed only three robotic organ removals,
> according to the lawsuit.
>
> And during a surgery performed about a week before Greenway's, problems
arose
> that forced Fusia and the other surgeon to abandon the robot for more
> traditional methods.
> ........................
>
> ly
jhlms - 03 Aug 2004 19:57 GMT
I have posted to this group in the past, and praised the DaVinci method to
the heavens....I shan't do so again, so as to not offend those who felt (and
still feel) their RRP was just as successful.
It all boils down to an informative decision, and as you can see from the
previous posts, 2 days AIN'T enuff time to make that decision an informative
one.
I agree...call the surgeon, tell him you need the time to educate yourself.
You'll then feel better about the decision you make...after all it *IS* your
decision.

Best of luck, my friend
jh

> From an earlier Post. I found in my saved box. FYI. only.
>
[quoted text clipped - 213 lines]
> >
> > ly
Steve Kramer - 03 Aug 2004 21:31 GMT
Jeff,

As an RRP patient, I believe you should remember your objectives in deciding
to come to this newsgroup and/or deciding to continue to monitor it.  If you
are like me, and I believe most of us are (were), you came here first to
find help, advice, support or a combination thereof.  Then, you stuck
around.  If you stayed to lend your help, advice and/or support to others
who follow, then you should rethink your stance on praise of daVinci.

This is a newsgroup.  If you think that daVinci is the greatest thing since
sliced bread, then tell Coleshawn you think it's the greatest thing since
sliced bread.  Let HIM decide if it's valuable information or not.  Don't
worry about the guy who chose another path.  Telling Coleshawn that RRP is
the greatest thing since sliced bread is his job.

NOTE:  Before you and I were born, they unslice bread.  Go figure!

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
non illegitimi carborundum

> I have posted to this group in the past, and praised the DaVinci method to
> the heavens....I shan't do so again, so as to not offend those who felt (and
[quoted text clipped - 250 lines]
> > >
> > > ly
MH - 03 Aug 2004 23:15 GMT
Hi, Jeff....
I think *all* opinions are equal here... or should be.
Yes, some people chose RRP..... I chose LRP.... if I had had the opportunity
to choose Da Vinci, I might have chosen that.  I would not have chosen
radiation, as the idea of having the cancer *removed* from my body was
psychologically important to me.  That doesn't mean that I think those guys
who go with EBRT or seeds are wrong.  They have just as good odds as I do,
and I wish them all well. It was just not the best path *for me*.  I'm glad
you were so pleased with your procedure.... and you should be able to share
that pleasure with anyone who asks.  What they choose to do with the
information is up to them, as we all had to decide for ourselves.... but
please feel free to share!!

Take care....
MikeH :)

> I have posted to this group in the past, and praised the DaVinci method to
> the heavens....I shan't do so again, so as to not offend those who felt (and
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> Best of luck, my friend
> jh
Alan Meyer - 04 Aug 2004 22:14 GMT
> I'm scheduled for surgery in ten days. PSA 3.4;Gleason 6; stage Ta2.  My
> urologist will do either the RRP or the Da Vinci LRP, my choice.  He's
> only done 25 prostate removals with the Da Vinci LRP procedure.  He's done
> more than 1,000 RRPs.  I'm 67 years old, lean, in good shape (work out and
> jog regularly).  Please help me decide. Must decide within next 2 days.
> Thanks

I once went to a radiation oncologist who recommended two different
treatments (external beam radiation, or external beam plus implanted
seeds).  Then he told me the long term results appeared to be about
the same and I could choose either treatment, at my option.

I asked him what he would do.  He was reluctant to say.  Then he
said that his father-in-law had cancer and he gave him external beam
plus the seeds.

Maybe you can ask the same question of the surgeon.  Ask him
which procedure he would do for his father if his father got
prostate cancer.  Maybe that will get him to discover and reveal
his own inner thoughts about which treatment he's most comfortable
with.

I don't know this for sure.  I'm not a surgeon.  But I would hope
that the 1000 RRPs that the surgeon performed help to inform
the 25 LRPs.  I would hope that he would do a much better job
than a guy who had done 25 LRPs and no RRPs.  He has, after
all, seen over 1,000 prostates with all different cancers and
conditions.  So the fact that he's done 1,000 of one and only
25 of the other may not be as big a factor as it would otherwise
appear.

   Alan
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.