Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Vacuum pump.

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
gerald rubackin - 21 Jun 2004 12:41 GMT
Hello out there!! Here's a question about the vacuum pumps that i haven't
seen answered. Of course, i've only been a member since May!
There has always been mention of "going too far" re the vacuum damaging
blood vessels, etc. What has not been addressed, (if anyone has been told
"medically", about this),.....If you are just using it post RRP to keep the
system "active", how much vacuum is "enough", and...for how long should you
allow yourself to be in the vacuum, before you would start to worry about
"is this too much, or too long a time?" Is it just for as few seconds,when
it has increased in size, or is 30 seconds OK? 2 minutes? 5 minutes? Nobody
wants to hurt themselves, and add insult to injury. There are those, i
imagine, who do not use it for relations each time, but who use it just to
stay in "potential usable shape", if you will. If anyone has any experience,
or something definitive to mention about the parameters that i've mentioned,
i'd really like to know about them. Lastly...once a day?....twice a
day....??
My very best wishes, and sincere thanks to all.
Jerry R
Leonard Evens - 21 Jun 2004 16:01 GMT
> Hello out there!! Here's a question about the vacuum pumps that i haven't
> seen answered. Of course, i've only been a member since May!
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> day....??
> My very best wishes, and sincere thanks to all.

After a couple of weeks of practicing, I used the pump as intended, and
not for conditioning, but perhaps my experience might be relevant.   It
is important not to stretch the tissues too much.   The usual advice is
that although when pumping you should feel some stretching, it should
never be even close to being painful.   Another bit of advice I was
given was the following.  Make a fist and look at the skin around your
knuckles.  If your penis looks like that after pumping up, you have gone
too far.   I don't see any point in holding the erection in the pump any
significant length of time.  I would think that repeating it several
times a day would be more important.   Stetching muscles may not be the
same, but when you do that, you only hold the stretch a few seconds
after reaching the maximum stretch.   There also, repititions are important.

> Jerry R
Robert Austin - 21 Jun 2004 16:10 GMT
Hi Gerald -

Any time it begins to get uncomfortable is enough.  If it continues to
be uncomfortable after the tissues has had time to fill, I would back
off the vacuum a tad.

The instructions and video that came with my unit gives a 20 minute
maximum when using the restriction ring.  I would assume that until
the restriction ring is in place there is still some circulation and
time is not all that important.

An almost daily workout would probably keep things in good working
condition.  I think if we pay attention to our bodies they will let us
know when we start reaching beyond it's limits.

Bob Austin

>Hello out there!! Here's a question about the vacuum pumps that i haven't
>seen answered. Of course, i've only been a member since May!
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>My very best wishes, and sincere thanks to all.
>Jerry R
c palmer - 21 Jun 2004 19:02 GMT
hi jerry - i would agree with everyone that leonard and bob austin, but
might add a little bit more to this, so one can fully understand what's
going on.

if you are just wanting to pump it up to get circulation going.  i would
recommend getting a cheap sex pump.  these work but using a hand pump
bulb, much like you see when they take your blood pressure, only pulling
a vacuum instead of building pressure.  the base of the cylinder has a
rubber diaphragm that has a hole in it for your penis.  once inside, you
can pump and watch it grow as it fills up with fresh blood, but if you
get carried away and keep pumping, you can't hurt yourself, because air
will come around the seal of the diaphragm and the vacuum can never get
pass this point.  i recommend this type of device if you are unsure and
want to get into the area of exercising the organ.

on the regular VED designed for impotence.  these units fit tight
against the body and form a seal.  pulling a vacuum now is a lot
different because you can pull a strong enough vacuum to cause the
damage you've read about.  what the instructions say when using these
devices, is to pump enough so as the organ will pick itself up from the
floor of the VED.  that seems to be the point they wish to use.  also on
the VED device, there is a system of installing the restriction rings,
that the cheap unit does not have.

so, there you have it.  the two units are quite different, but each
serve their own purpose.

hope this helps.

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
jk - 21 Jun 2004 20:50 GMT
The bigger problem for me was always getting the blood flow to actually stay
in there, without immediately deflating after success.

Signature

JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories

gerald rubackin - 22 Jun 2004 00:05 GMT
My sincere thanks, again!!!....Jerry R
> Hello out there!! Here's a question about the vacuum pumps that i haven't
> seen answered. Of course, i've only been a member since May!
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> My very best wishes, and sincere thanks to all.
> Jerry R
Steve Kramer - 24 Jun 2004 02:27 GMT
I have not heard any limit to the number of times per day.  I'm fairly
certain that the more you practice, the better you will be, including once
every 7 minutes if that's possible.  But, yes, there is a warning with the
instruction and the tape that comes with it.  Do not over suction.  You can
injure yourself.  You can go further after continued practice, but you will
not gain back inches lost in RRP.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04

> Hello out there!! Here's a question about the vacuum pumps that i haven't
> seen answered. Of course, i've only been a member since May!
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> My very best wishes, and sincere thanks to all.
> Jerry R
Leonard Evens - 24 Jun 2004 03:40 GMT
> I have not heard any limit to the number of times per day.  I'm fairly
> certain that the more you practice, the better you will be, including once
> every 7 minutes if that's possible.  But, yes, there is a warning with the
> instruction and the tape that comes with it.  Do not over suction.  You can
> injure yourself.  You can go further after continued practice, but you will
> not gain back inches lost in RRP.

Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon, claims
on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
over a period of months.
Robert Austin - 24 Jun 2004 05:04 GMT
When I mentioned the shortening of the penis to my doctor he said
regardless of the procedure used there was, on average, a shortening
of almost 20% of the penis length. In my case it took several months
but evidently the doctor was correct.  Maybe Dr. Catalona has a better
technique.

As William Bendix used to say on the Life Of Riley, "What A Revolting
Development This Is."

Bob Austin

>Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon, claims
>on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
>over a period of months.
ButtercupsDad@dog.net - 24 Jun 2004 13:15 GMT
When I tried the MUSE and Caverjet one thing I noticed was that the
length was nothing like it used to be.  Maybe that four inches is all
I have left?!

>When I mentioned the shortening of the penis to my doctor he said
>regardless of the procedure used there was, on average, a shortening
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>>on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
>>over a period of months.
Al - 24 Jun 2004 18:00 GMT
I haven't noticed any significant length shortening in my case. Guess
small is all i'll ever have...maybe starting small, I can't lose what
I never had? Unless it'll shrink later?

Al

*
*When I tried the MUSE and Caverjet one thing I noticed was that the
*length was nothing like it used to be.  Maybe that four inches is all
*I have left?!
*
*
*
*On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:04:40 GMT, Robert Austin
*<robertbob.austin@NoSpam.earthlink.net> wrote:
*
*>
*>When I mentioned the shortening of the penis to my doctor he said
*>regardless of the procedure used there was, on average, a shortening
*>of almost 20% of the penis length. In my case it took several months
*>but evidently the doctor was correct.  Maybe Dr. Catalona has a
better
*>technique.
*>
*>As William Bendix used to say on the Life Of Riley, "What A
Revolting
*>Development This Is."
*>
*>Bob Austin
*>
*>>Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon,
claims
*>>on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly
resolves
*>>over a period of months.
*>

Please be quiet if replying via email,
flames will be deleted promptly.
I won't even read the whole message...
Bill Denton - 25 Jun 2004 15:28 GMT
"Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon,
claims on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly
resolves over a period of months."

Dr. C is stretching the truth. :-)

Bill Denton
RP 2/12/02
Memphis
olfart - 25 Jun 2004 16:25 GMT
> "Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon,
> claims on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly
[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
> RP 2/12/02
> Memphis

Especially when you have the facts in hand  {:>)
c palmer - 25 Jun 2004 18:12 GMT
"Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon, claims
on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
over a period of months."
Dr. C is stretching the truth. :-)
Bill Denton

Especially when you have the facts in hand {:>)

--------------> but will it stand up to the evidence at hand?? :)

--------------> is this hard evidence? :)

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
Bill Denton - 26 Jun 2004 14:41 GMT
"Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon, claims
on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
over a period of months.

Dr. C is stretching the truth. :-)

Especially when you have the facts in hand {:>)

but will it stand up to the evidence at hand?? :)

is this hard evidence? :)"

Appears to be a flimsy case.

Bill Denton
RP 2/12/02
Memphis
olfart - 26 Jun 2004 16:30 GMT
> "Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon, claims
> on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Appears to be a flimsy case.

Nothing you can hang your hat on
Steve Kramer - 26 Jun 2004 20:00 GMT
> "Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon, claims
> on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Appears to be a flimsy case.

I think it's all circumcisional.
Danny McCarty - 26 Jun 2004 23:53 GMT
>Subject: Re: RP and length
>From: "Steve Kramer" skramer@cinci.rr.com
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
>I think it's all circumcisional.

I think we should stop circling the issue and get to the point!
Chuck McClellan - 27 Jun 2004 05:20 GMT
> >Subject: Re: RP and length
> >From: "Steve Kramer" skramer@cinci.rr.com
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> >
> I think we should stop circling the issue and get to the point!

It seems to be a 'hands-on' situation...let's see what comes up!
Bill Denton - 27 Jun 2004 14:49 GMT
"Dr. Catalona, who is a highly regarded prostate cancer surgeon, claims
on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
over a period of months.

Dr. C is stretching the truth. :-)

Especially when you have the facts in hand {:>)

but will it stand up to the evidence at hand?? :)

is this hard evidence? :)"

Appears to be a flimsy case.

I think it's all circumcisional.

I think we should stop circling the issue and get to the point!

It seems to be a 'hands-on' situation...let's see what comes up!

Maybe Catalona has better results because he charges a stiffer fee.
Shorty - 25 Jun 2004 18:13 GMT
16 months and still very short.

The thing that really has my attention is my 18 month check up in Sept. I'm
confident yet concerned.
Steve Kramer - 26 Jun 2004 19:58 GMT
> > I have not heard any limit to the number of times per day.  I'm fairly
> > certain that the more you practice, the better you will be, including once
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
> on a web page that the shortening of the penis after RP mostly resolves
> over a period of months.

Wonderful!  I beat the odds again
Edward Chrzan - 26 Jun 2004 17:32 GMT
i would suggest just having a penile implant  go for the gusto
pbh1@comcast.net - 26 Jun 2004 23:18 GMT
An example of "going too far" with the vacuum pump.  (Off topic, but I
couldn't help myself!)

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0624041pump1.html

> Hello out there!! Here's a question about the vacuum pumps that i haven't
> seen answered. Of course, i've only been a member since May!
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> My very best wishes, and sincere thanks to all.
> Jerry R

Signature

"Knowing that one will be hanged in a fortnight wonderfully concentrates
the mind."  Samuel Johnson

c palmer - 26 Jun 2004 23:58 GMT
i think that the judge can "beat" the case.

why?

because the evidence won't stand up in court.

;-P

~ curtis

knowledge is power - growing old is mandatory - growing wise is optional    
"Many more men die with prostate cancer than of it. Growing old is
invariably fatal. Prostate cancer is only sometimes so."
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.