Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / June 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

HIFU {Albatherm vs Sonablate} ?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Canada Bob - 31 May 2004 00:04 GMT
Hi,

I see that there have been a couple of threads on HIFU {High Intensity
Focused Ultrasound} in here over the last couple of years, but nothing
that I can find in the last 6 months or so.

At age 56 I have recently been diagnosed with PCa, PSA 4.6 Gleason 3+4
{thought to be contained in the prostate}, so I am keen to learn a bit
more about HIFU before making my judgement call.

I've looked at the technology, and I can see that the logic makes
sense and that the statistics over the years seem to be comparable
{better in some important respects} to other treatments on offer.

I'd appreciate any comments that anyone might have, especially from
those that have either considered HIFU or had the treatment.

I'm not sure how much difference there is between the efficacy of the
Albatherm vs Sonablate 500 ? maybe marginal ?

Canada Bob.
Heather - 31 May 2004 01:52 GMT
Hi Canada.......

Where are you living?  My husband had HDR brachytherapy done last summer in
Toronto.......at Sunnybrook.  Have you considered that?  His stats were Psa
10, Gleason 4+3, age 71.

Sunnybrook's Regional Cancer Centre has been doing it for 3 years now and 4
other hospitals in Canada are slated to start doing this as well.

Just a thought.......Heather (Ron's better half)

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Canada Bob.
Steve Kramer - 31 May 2004 02:02 GMT
The guru of prostate cancer, Dr. Patrick Walsh, in his book on the subject
Surviving Prostate Cancer, says on Page 283, "although promising, and
effective in treating benign prostate enlargement, in an effort to preserve
the urethra, the central core of the prostate must be colled.  But sparing
even soem prostate tisssue means that some cancer cells may be spared as
well..... None of these procedures has been tested widely, or evaluated with
long-term PSA follow-up."

Of course, that was written almost 4 years ago.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04

> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Canada Bob.
John Loomis - 31 May 2004 02:09 GMT
Hey Bob,
   What are the statistics?
   Does HIFU have a track record? (10 years)
   I would want to see stats, and such concerning the treatment.
   You seem to be a great candidate for Surgery.
   You are young, not a bad diagnosis, and move on.
My idea is to go with tried and tested.
Your choice.
You can try HIFU, and be part of the statistic.
I am past that, and would love to know how you do with that treatment!
Good wishes, keep us posted.
John Loomis
> Hi,
>
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Canada Bob.
ron - 31 May 2004 15:18 GMT
Hi Bob...Here is an abstract on HIFU from the recent AUA meeting.  The
5-year disease-free results presented here seem significantly below
the published results attainable with more conventional surgical and
RT approaches...Best wishes and good health, Ron

American Urological Association Annual Meeting
May 8-13, 2004
San Francisco, California, USA  

Program#/Poster#: 830
Presentation Title: PROSTATE CANCER CONTROL WITH TRANSRECTAL HIFU IN
242 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: 5-YEAR RESULTS
Presentation Time: 5/10/2004 8:00:00 AM
Author Block: Albert Gelet, Jean Yves Chapelon, Laura Poissonnier,
Raymonde Bouvier, Olivier Rouviere, Ibrahim Bah-Clozel, Denis Lyonnet,
Jean Michel Dubernard. Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France, INSERM
Unit 556, Lyon, France, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France

Introduction and Objective: To evaluate the 5-year results after HIFU
treatment for localized prostate cancer according to the
disease-related prognostic factors.

Methods: All our patients treated with HIFU as primary care for
localized prostate cancer, with a baseline PSA level ≤ 30 ng/ml,
and with at least 1 year of follow-up were included in this analysis.
They were treated using the Ablatherm® HIFU device (EDAP S.A.,
France). Patients follow-up included sextant biopsies and PSA level
measurements. Any positive biopsy or 3 consecutive increases in the
PSA level was considered as a failure for the disease free rates (DFR)
calculation.

Results: 242 patients fulfilled these criteria and were all considered
for analysis. The mean patients follow-up was 28 ± 21 months (range:
12 to 108 months). The population description before HIFU was: mean
age 71 ± 5.4 years, mean prostate volume 32.4 ± 16.6 cc, mean PSA
level 9.2 ± 5.8 ng/ml, and all had positive biopsies. The clinical
stage was T1 for 118 patients, T2 for 115 patients and T3 for 9
patients. Neoadjuvant hormones were administered to 33 patients. The
DFR were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
For the overall population, the mean nadir PSA was 0.63 ± 1.30 ng/ml,
and further follow-up evidenced a 81% negative biopsy rate, and a 63%
actuarial DFR at 60 months. These results were stratified according to
the disease-related risk, the initial PSA level and the baseline
Gleason score:

Prognostic Factors      n       DFR     p
Low-risk                62      78%   
Intermediate-risk       108     61%     p<0.01
High-risk               72      47%    

PSA (ng/ml)
0-7                     97      78%
7-15                    106     61%     p<0.0001
15-30                   39      44%

Gleason score
2-6                     144     70%
7                       67      60%     p=0.005
8-10                    31      37%    

Adjuvant treatments were administered to 40 patients (17%) presenting
with rising PSA level with or without residual positive biopsies. For
17 patients with positive biopsies (10.2%), watchful waiting is still
justified due to the low (mean: 1.02 ng/ml) and slowly rising PSA
level (mean velocity: 0.31ng/ml/year).

Conclusions: Transrectal HIFU is a minimally invasive therapy with
5-year results similar to those observed for the other non surgical
options. The DFR is influenced by the usual disease-related prognostic
factors.
Canada Bob - 02 Jun 2004 00:11 GMT
Hi John, Heather & Steve, Ron & Curtis,

Thanks for all the comments and good wishes, I can sure use those
right now, the emotional turmoil has my head spinning.

First of all Heather, I have lived in Canada since 1982, Thorold near
St Catharines Ontario, then Sorel PQ for a couple of years,then the
last 13 years or so in Nova Scotia, Bedford right now, but I spend
some time each year in Wigan, NW England, 12 miles West of Manchester,
we are over here right now looking at the HIFU option offered at
Stepping Hills Hospital in Stockport, just a few miles South of
Manchester.

I may have an option of treatment there {seeing as there isn't any
HIFU option in Canada}, but I'm also looking at Munich or Lyon as fall
backs if needed.

I have looked at all the regular treatments, including Brachytherapy,
but one way and another given a choice I'd {personally} avoid all of
them, for one reason and another. I know they are the confident
choices of many folks, but I think this HIFU treatment might {just
might} be the right one for me.

It's a hell of a game this aint it, I don't mind having a bet at
Woodbine, or on the Maple Leafs, but this bet is winner takes all, not
just your wallet, your life can be {let me rephrase that} your life is
at stake in this gamble.

Maybe like Hockey teams there are folks who think their team is the
best, nothing like having confidence in "something" for that read,
maybe anything!

That and time isn't exactly on your side when your told "you have
cancer", what a roller coaster this is, to bring yourself up to speed
ASAP {weeks to become an expert on saving your life}, and then finding
out who the best butcher in town may be, sigh {I say this as a more
sardonic comment than a critical one agaisnt surgeons, et-al}.

Looking at the Stats, and I don't know if this is worse for me, having
spent the last 30 years as a QA/Statistical Control Engineer, I am
well able to read them, but almost overwhelmed at the differing
results reported.

From what I see {in general} none of the treatments offer a life free
of PCa
{no matter what you do} and reading the stats even watchful waiting
finds its way into the winners enclosure for a good number of folks.

The thing is, how do you place this bet ? I could have major surgery
for a cancer that may well never get much worse than it is now, boy
don't I wish I was 76 rather than 56, sigh.

Watchful worrying doesn't have a lot of appeal to me, I'd go broke
buying devotive candles.

RP doesn't exactly appeal to me either, not that concerned about the
loss of sex life etc, at 56 if there's one thing I could pass up on
that would be it.
But I really don't fancy being incontinent for the next 20 year, and
the odds say I could finish up that way. Let me clarify that, the odds
say I "could" but probably wouldn't, but this is THE one thing that
I'd like to avoid, OK add to that popping my clogs in the the near
future outranks that, but I guess we can take that as a gimme.

So losing my life and control of my bladder rank high for me.

On the losing of the life thing {this is where having worked with
Stats for a long time puts the frighteners to you}...

Stats tell me that anyone having major surgery {surgery that lasts for
over 60 minutes} has a 1 in 300 chance of not coming round from the
anesthesia !
For me a 1 in 300 chance of losing my life aint odds that I'm
comfortable with.

Add to that strokes and heart attacks {Oh ! I've had 2 already} as a
result of surgery add to the already unattractive odds. Did I mention
blood clots forming in the legs and migrating to the lungs and
finishing you off, or the risk involved due to any blood transfusion
you may need.

The above all sponsor me to look what other options I might have, as
mentioned all in all no option carries a guarantee of a cancer free
life {none yet anyway}, so in my way of seeing things maybe the thing
to look at is the impact of the treatment itself ?

Already I'm shying away from RP, and none too keen on Radiation
treatments, some folks have done quite well, but there seem to be some
horror stories also, although the odds do favour a decent outcome.

On to Brachytherapy, looked at this as a favoured option for a few
days, I guess you all know what I've been through 'cause most of you
have been down the same path... Up all night trying to Google your
life back into safe hands.

I think at my age {56} Brachy would be good, and less disruptional /
less traumatic than RP or Beam Radiation, but when weighing up the
odds of me coughing something up that glowed in the night, it started
to lose its appeal.

I know there are some Brachy's that use only temp isotopes, but again
Heather this is a hell of a time {when you are emotionally staggered}
to be looking not only at what options there are, but where in your
locale or for that matter anywhere in the World yo might get the
treatment, while that little ticking time bomb is making you sweat,
sigh.

How long does it give you to make your mind up ? hours, days, a few
weeks or years, no one can safely say, but for me I'd say once you
know the foot race is on, and your should get one form of treatment or
another within 4/10 weeks, why wait any longer ?

I think that a group like this is incredibly important to folks who
are shell shocked by the bad news, maybe we can have some pre packaged
thinking available to them, so that they can get a flying start
towards a treatment they feel comfortable and confident with.

I guess we can all play our part in that, and roll the clock back in
favour of other folks diagnosed with PCa.

IF I had 6 months to think about it, and measure every option, and
with a coooler mind that I have had in many a night the last 3 weeks,
then maybe I'd have / find something better than HIFU ?

I think the new vaccine treatments offer a lot of promise, to deliver
us not just from PCa, but also from the {sometimes} brutal and
{almost} barbaric treatments offered to the innocent.

Although these vaccines are spoken of, I don't have time to evaluate
them or track them down, or see their track record, so like thousands,
nay 10's of thousands of other blokes I'm stuck with what's on the
shelf right now.

One thing I feel comfortable with is, they haven't killed anyone yet
with HIFU, well not directly {sigh}, so that's a plus, and the
reported levels of incontinence are lower than many other standard
treatments, so that's the other can of beans I was looking for.

Not to mention that they don't need to anesthetise you, another plus,
no need for blood transfusions, and no scar to show to the lads in the
pub.

Maybe reading the above you can see why this horse appeals to me...

Over to you John...

Thanks for your comments, HIFU has been practised for well over 10
years, and they have {as you would expect} go better over the years,
but even in the early years HIFU showed a lot of promise.

I understand your comment on the tried and tested {aka the Gold
Standard}, but the thing is John what many accept as the Gold Standard
now was also untried and untested when it first came out, God knows
what options {or lack of them} were available to the poor beggars with
PCa 40 to 50 years or more ago ?

Maybe the goal posts are about to be moved by HIFU ? maybe this will
soon become the new Gold Standard {which in itself John went the way
of the Dodo, it's the Plastic Standard now, for better or for worse}.

All of us are liable to become "statistics" but THANKFULLY the
majority of us will fall into the group of Favourable Statistics, and
that's the way it is with most treatment options.

Again I value your comments and support John, with a common enemy
maybe we can all work towards it's demise rather than our own.

Now for Ron... Thanks for the recent Stats, they don't exactly fill me
with confidence, but Stats are indicative and worthy of reveiw.

If the Stats indicate my outcome then I think that I'm still on this
horse, for the reasons outlined above. I feel that it is still early
days, and maybe IF we could collate ALL the HIFU treatments done for
PCa {from China through Dominican Republic through to Germany, Russia
and the UK et-al} the picture may be a little better ?

From what I've read on HIFU the lower youR PSA the better the DR rate
you might expect, and being at 4.6 as my worst ever, then this appeals
to me.

I would like to Thank ALL of you for your time, considerations,
suggestions and best wishes, it is very much appreciated.

Canada Bob, presently in Wigan, England.
Steve Kramer - 02 Jun 2004 01:14 GMT
> Hi John, Heather & Steve, Ron & Curtis,

> It's a hell of a game this aint it, I don't mind having a bet at
> Woodbine, or on the Maple Leafs, but this bet is winner takes all, not
> just your wallet, your life can be {let me rephrase that} your life is
> at stake in this gamble.

Well, it's a damned seriouse game, alright, but to lessen the stress a
little, you are not likely to fare much worse regardless of which mainstream
option you select.  All three surgeries and the several radiations all seem
to have comparable results in the short to mid-term.  Long-term is a crap
shoot and pretty much out of your control.

> Looking at the Stats, and I don't know if this is worse for me, having
> spent the last 30 years as a QA/Statistical Control Engineer, I am
> well able to read them, but almost overwhelmed at the differing
> results reported.

Statistics are fun, but of very little use when deciding on which treatment
will do what to which parts of your body on any particular day or in the
hands of any partiular treating physician.  You'd be better off deciding
which side effects you prefer.

> So losing my life and control of my bladder rank high for me.

I know that most men count incontinence as their worst worry, then their
worst side effect and biggest cause for depression.  I wonder, however,
after three years, if impotence takes over.  I think I could get used to
pads.  But, in reality, I have to get used to impotence, not pads, so I'm
not a good judge.

> Add to that strokes and heart attacks {Oh ! I've had 2 already} as a
> result of surgery add to the already unattractive odds.

Oh, that's different.  You probably have to think twice about surgery.

> I think the new vaccine treatments offer a lot of promise, to deliver
> us not just from PCa, but also from the {sometimes} brutal and
> {almost} barbaric treatments offered to the innocent.

I dont' think you are a good candidate.  That is still being tested and, as
I understand it, somewhat toxic.  If you are already having cardio-vascular
problems, then I wouldn't introduce new toxicity.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04

Canada Bob - 02 Jun 2004 23:03 GMT
Hi Steve...

> > I don't mind having a bet at Woodbine, or on the Maple Leafs, but this bet > > is winner takes all,

> Well, it's a damned seriouse game, alright, but to lessen the stress a
> little, you are not likely to fare much worse regardless of which mainstream
> option you select.  All three surgeries and the several radiations all seem
> to have comparable results in the short to mid-term.  Long-term is a crap
> shoot and pretty much out of your control.

Looks as though that's the way it is Steve...

> > Looking at the Stats, and I don't know if this is worse for me, having
> > spent the last 30 years as a QA/Statistical Control Engineer,

> Statistics are fun,

Aren't they just, sigh... {at least they helped me back Ireland to
beat Jamaica in the soccer match tonight, grin}, anyway... I
digress...

> but of very little use when deciding on which treatment
> will do what to which parts of your body on any particular day or in the
> hands of any partiular treating physician.  You'd be better off deciding
> which side effects you prefer.

I tend to agree with your opener above Steve, sort of, but I think
your EXACTLY right on the end run, decide on what you can live with
{was that a pun} if the worst comes to the worst, and go with that.

I can't imagine less attractive options than castration AND growing
breasts at 56 {or for any man at any age}, add to that glowing in the
dark and this is a lousy place to find yourself in. I hope that
everyone can see the sardonic humour I'm trying to "inject" but you
just HAVE TO try to find the lighter side to all this...

Having said that, some days are hellish from the moment I get up, and
realise where I'm at, sometimes I've got as far as the shaving mirror
{forgetting my recent DX} and then the man in the mirror seems to look
back at me with saddened eyes, and that can REALLY put the damper on
your day.

For folks who are passing through this same trauma, I've found that a
comedy tape/cd/video is one way of getting out of that bad groove, get
yourself laughing and the veil of sadness satrts to lift pretty
quickly.

Anyway, back to the plot...

> > So losing my life and control of my bladder rank high for me.

> I know that most men count incontinence as their worst worry, then their
> worst side effect and biggest cause for depression.  I wonder, however,
> after three years, if impotence takes over.  I think I could get used to
> pads.  But, in reality, I have to get used to impotence, not pads, so I'm
> not a good judge.

Hmmm, what can I say Steve, man to man, I'm sorry to hear your
situation, and if it helps then let yourself know that a few thousand
miles away, some bloke {maybe in a pub} in England, wishes you well,
and at least peace of mind Steve.

Did you ever look into those "mechanical devices" that help control
incontinence ? if not then I know I guy in Scotland that has 20 odd
years of knowledge of them, he works for a company that makes this
device, I'm not eve sure how it works, but if you'd like further and
betters just e-mail me directly.

> > Add to that strokes and heart attacks {Oh ! I've had 2 already} as a
> > result of surgery add to the already unattractive odds.

> Oh, that's different.  You probably have to think twice about surgery.

Yea, aint it, pressure of the job, "Airworthyness Flight Inspector"
for a good number of years, do a Google for "Norburn Fleet" and see
what comes up, then you'll see why my BP was way up for years, and how
the old pumping engine was feeling the strain... The heart attacks
weren't the worst kind, or I wouldn't be here, but on a scale of 1-10
they were 4's, but I shy away from anything now that could stress me
out {mind you, I'm still married, grin}...

> > I think the new vaccine treatments offer a lot of promise, to deliver
> > us not just from PCa, but also from the {sometimes} brutal and
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> I understand it, somewhat toxic.  If you are already having cardio-vascular
> problems, then I wouldn't introduce new toxicity.

Yep, I think you're right...

I went to speak with the HIFU Dr's {again} at Stepping Hill Hospital
in Stockport today, and I have to say this... Dr Brown and Dr Campbell
are are the most considerate folks that you could ever expect to meet.
Dr Campbell spent 1hr 15 mins today going over everything he wanted me
to know about HIFU and answered {in depth} every question I had for
him.

Both these guys as Surgeons, and the older one Dr Brown has a
reputation in Urology second to none, so my level of
comfort/confidence in them is as high as it could be.

They {at Stepping Hills} have only done 8 {wow !!! grin} HIFU
procedures, whereas the Dr's in France and Germany have done hundreds
if not thousands.

I did have some concerns about which to favour, someone who has done
hundreds vs someone who has done just a few, in human nature there's
arguements to be made on both sides of that, but the thing that has
edged me towards the Stepping Hill guys is the attitude of care,
concern and compassion, and I've not blended in their professional
skills into the mix yet.

At least the choice ISN'T "Hobson's Choice" it's a bit like picking
the best {on the day} between Manchester United, Arsenal & Chelsea,
even on a bad day these guys are good.

Stepping Hills say they can treat me around the end of June to maybe
early July, so... in the meantime...

I'll have to sign off for a couple of weeks, me and the wife have
decided to chill out and take a vacation, in an attempt to take our
minds off all this, so if you guys don't hear from me until after the
20th June, you'll know why.

Other than that I wish you ALL the very best, hang on in there, it's a
Hell of a ride, but YOU aren't on your own, there's a few thousand
more of us "screaming" at the same time, with a bit of help from each
other the journey will be easier for us all.

Canada Bob, presently in Wigan,{home of Rugby League}, England.
Steve Kramer - 03 Jun 2004 17:09 GMT
> I can't imagine less attractive options than castration AND growing
> breasts at 56 {or for any man at any age}, add to that glowing in the
> dark and this is a lousy place to find yourself in. I hope that
> everyone can see the sardonic humour I'm trying to "inject" but you
> just HAVE TO try to find the lighter side to all this...

That was one of the funniest paragraphs I've seen in a long time.  I hope
the "glow in the dark", "find yourself", and "lighter side" were
intentional.

> Did you ever look into those "mechanical devices" that help control
> incontinence ?

Mechanical devices are available for incontinence and impotence.  They are
the epitome of giving up.  I haven't given up just yet.

> I'll have to sign off for a couple of weeks, me and the wife have
> decided to chill out and take a vacation, in an attempt to take our
> minds off all this, so if you guys don't hear from me until after the
> 20th June, you'll know why.

My wife and I went on a cruise between dx and RRP.  Perfectly
understandable.

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04

Canada Bob - 22 Jun 2004 01:55 GMT
Hello Steve...

> That was one of the funniest paragraphs I've seen in a long time.  I hope
> the "glow in the dark", "find yourself", and "lighter side" were
> intentional.

Glad to hear the above Steve, I was trying to inject a bit of humour,
one thing that seems to help me cope each and every day {since my
diagnosis} is to make sure I start the day with a laugh or at least a
smile. I find that a comedy tape/cd/video helps break the grip of fear
that can grab a hold of me, and I'd suggest that to everyone who finds
themselves in this rotten situation.

> > I'll have to sign off for a couple of weeks, me and the wife have
> > decided to chill out and take a vacation, in an attempt to take our
> > minds off all this, so if you guys don't hear from me until after the
> > 20th June, you'll know why.

Back again now, and I expect to be going in to Stepping Hills Hospital
{Stockport, near Manchester, England} on the 6th July for the HIFU
treatment.

> My wife and I went on a cruise between dx and RRP.  Perfectly
> understandable.

Well it worked for us Steve, gave us a "time out" and rolled over a
couple of waiting weeks that can't go fast enough for me.

Having said that, and in the full knowledge that HIFU {High Intensity
Focused Ultrasound} is non invasive, {no knives, saws, cat gut or
staples, or even the need for a general anesthetic}, I'm still anxious
about it, having never been in Hospital since the day {56 years ago}
when I was born...

Anyway, a bit on the HIFU "option" for anyone who would like to
consider it...

Although it is "approved" in Europe {France, Germany, UK, etc} and in
Japan, South Korea, China {even}, plus Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and
Canada etc, it hasn't yet gone beyond the trial stages in the US.

HIFU has been around for over 10 years, and has shown a lot of
promise, thousands of men have been treated in Europe alone, and the
results rival the {so called} gold standards of surgery, without many
of the problems associated with surgery.

Having said that HIFU isn't yet available in the US {other than the
trials being done to get approvals} a Dr Suarez of Miami FL, has been
treating people in a clinic he runs in the Dominican Republic, at what
I hear is a well respected Hospital in the Dominican Republic.

Dr Suarez uses the Sonablate "machine" and charges in the region of
$20,000 US $'s that is for the treatment, not cheap but neither is a
funeral, sigh.

Other than that there are several top class Dr's based in top class
Hospitals in France and Germany {at least} with considerable expertise
on HIFU, and the average price of treatment in Europe is around $6,000
to $10,000 US.

Quite a difference in prices, but little difference in "cure" rates.

If ANYONE needs ANY "further and betters" on getting access to HIFU in
the UK or elsewhere in Europe I will do my best to help them out, no
matter where you are from. By chance I live less than 20 miles away
from Stepping Hills Hospital, near Manchester, so I could/would help
advise you how to get here, where to stay, and as far as I can
anything else that might help you, feel free to contact me anytime.

If you want to e-mail me directly then drop me a line to...

robert01942@hotmail.com

The 01942 in the address above is the local phone code for Wigan, my
home town.

I'll keep you guys posted on how I go on, at least HIFU is {now}
another available option for us to consider.

All the Best to everyone.

Bob.
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.