Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / June 2004
HIFU {Albatherm vs Sonablate} ?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Canada Bob - 31 May 2004 00:04 GMT Hi,
I see that there have been a couple of threads on HIFU {High Intensity Focused Ultrasound} in here over the last couple of years, but nothing that I can find in the last 6 months or so.
At age 56 I have recently been diagnosed with PCa, PSA 4.6 Gleason 3+4 {thought to be contained in the prostate}, so I am keen to learn a bit more about HIFU before making my judgement call.
I've looked at the technology, and I can see that the logic makes sense and that the statistics over the years seem to be comparable {better in some important respects} to other treatments on offer.
I'd appreciate any comments that anyone might have, especially from those that have either considered HIFU or had the treatment.
I'm not sure how much difference there is between the efficacy of the Albatherm vs Sonablate 500 ? maybe marginal ?
Canada Bob.
Heather - 31 May 2004 01:52 GMT Hi Canada.......
Where are you living? My husband had HDR brachytherapy done last summer in Toronto.......at Sunnybrook. Have you considered that? His stats were Psa 10, Gleason 4+3, age 71.
Sunnybrook's Regional Cancer Centre has been doing it for 3 years now and 4 other hospitals in Canada are slated to start doing this as well.
Just a thought.......Heather (Ron's better half)
> Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Canada Bob. Steve Kramer - 31 May 2004 02:02 GMT The guru of prostate cancer, Dr. Patrick Walsh, in his book on the subject Surviving Prostate Cancer, says on Page 283, "although promising, and effective in treating benign prostate enlargement, in an effort to preserve the urethra, the central core of the prostate must be colled. But sparing even soem prostate tisssue means that some cancer cells may be spared as well..... None of these procedures has been tested widely, or evaluated with long-term PSA follow-up."
Of course, that was written almost 4 years ago.
 Signature Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48 HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .07 .05 Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
> Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Canada Bob. John Loomis - 31 May 2004 02:09 GMT Hey Bob, What are the statistics? Does HIFU have a track record? (10 years) I would want to see stats, and such concerning the treatment. You seem to be a great candidate for Surgery. You are young, not a bad diagnosis, and move on. My idea is to go with tried and tested. Your choice. You can try HIFU, and be part of the statistic. I am past that, and would love to know how you do with that treatment! Good wishes, keep us posted. John Loomis
> Hi, > [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] > > Canada Bob. ron - 31 May 2004 15:18 GMT Hi Bob...Here is an abstract on HIFU from the recent AUA meeting. The 5-year disease-free results presented here seem significantly below the published results attainable with more conventional surgical and RT approaches...Best wishes and good health, Ron
American Urological Association Annual Meeting May 8-13, 2004 San Francisco, California, USA
Program#/Poster#: 830 Presentation Title: PROSTATE CANCER CONTROL WITH TRANSRECTAL HIFU IN 242 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: 5-YEAR RESULTS Presentation Time: 5/10/2004 8:00:00 AM Author Block: Albert Gelet, Jean Yves Chapelon, Laura Poissonnier, Raymonde Bouvier, Olivier Rouviere, Ibrahim Bah-Clozel, Denis Lyonnet, Jean Michel Dubernard. Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France, INSERM Unit 556, Lyon, France, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, France Introduction and Objective: To evaluate the 5-year results after HIFU treatment for localized prostate cancer according to the disease-related prognostic factors.
Methods: All our patients treated with HIFU as primary care for localized prostate cancer, with a baseline PSA level ≤ 30 ng/ml, and with at least 1 year of follow-up were included in this analysis. They were treated using the Ablatherm® HIFU device (EDAP S.A., France). Patients follow-up included sextant biopsies and PSA level measurements. Any positive biopsy or 3 consecutive increases in the PSA level was considered as a failure for the disease free rates (DFR) calculation.
Results: 242 patients fulfilled these criteria and were all considered for analysis. The mean patients follow-up was 28 ± 21 months (range: 12 to 108 months). The population description before HIFU was: mean age 71 ± 5.4 years, mean prostate volume 32.4 ± 16.6 cc, mean PSA level 9.2 ± 5.8 ng/ml, and all had positive biopsies. The clinical stage was T1 for 118 patients, T2 for 115 patients and T3 for 9 patients. Neoadjuvant hormones were administered to 33 patients. The DFR were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. For the overall population, the mean nadir PSA was 0.63 ± 1.30 ng/ml, and further follow-up evidenced a 81% negative biopsy rate, and a 63% actuarial DFR at 60 months. These results were stratified according to the disease-related risk, the initial PSA level and the baseline Gleason score:
Prognostic Factors n DFR p Low-risk 62 78% Intermediate-risk 108 61% p<0.01 High-risk 72 47%
PSA (ng/ml) 0-7 97 78% 7-15 106 61% p<0.0001 15-30 39 44%
Gleason score 2-6 144 70% 7 67 60% p=0.005 8-10 31 37% Adjuvant treatments were administered to 40 patients (17%) presenting with rising PSA level with or without residual positive biopsies. For 17 patients with positive biopsies (10.2%), watchful waiting is still justified due to the low (mean: 1.02 ng/ml) and slowly rising PSA level (mean velocity: 0.31ng/ml/year).
Conclusions: Transrectal HIFU is a minimally invasive therapy with 5-year results similar to those observed for the other non surgical options. The DFR is influenced by the usual disease-related prognostic factors.
Canada Bob - 02 Jun 2004 00:11 GMT Hi John, Heather & Steve, Ron & Curtis,
Thanks for all the comments and good wishes, I can sure use those right now, the emotional turmoil has my head spinning.
First of all Heather, I have lived in Canada since 1982, Thorold near St Catharines Ontario, then Sorel PQ for a couple of years,then the last 13 years or so in Nova Scotia, Bedford right now, but I spend some time each year in Wigan, NW England, 12 miles West of Manchester, we are over here right now looking at the HIFU option offered at Stepping Hills Hospital in Stockport, just a few miles South of Manchester.
I may have an option of treatment there {seeing as there isn't any HIFU option in Canada}, but I'm also looking at Munich or Lyon as fall backs if needed.
I have looked at all the regular treatments, including Brachytherapy, but one way and another given a choice I'd {personally} avoid all of them, for one reason and another. I know they are the confident choices of many folks, but I think this HIFU treatment might {just might} be the right one for me.
It's a hell of a game this aint it, I don't mind having a bet at Woodbine, or on the Maple Leafs, but this bet is winner takes all, not just your wallet, your life can be {let me rephrase that} your life is at stake in this gamble.
Maybe like Hockey teams there are folks who think their team is the best, nothing like having confidence in "something" for that read, maybe anything!
That and time isn't exactly on your side when your told "you have cancer", what a roller coaster this is, to bring yourself up to speed ASAP {weeks to become an expert on saving your life}, and then finding out who the best butcher in town may be, sigh {I say this as a more sardonic comment than a critical one agaisnt surgeons, et-al}.
Looking at the Stats, and I don't know if this is worse for me, having spent the last 30 years as a QA/Statistical Control Engineer, I am well able to read them, but almost overwhelmed at the differing results reported.
From what I see {in general} none of the treatments offer a life free of PCa {no matter what you do} and reading the stats even watchful waiting finds its way into the winners enclosure for a good number of folks.
The thing is, how do you place this bet ? I could have major surgery for a cancer that may well never get much worse than it is now, boy don't I wish I was 76 rather than 56, sigh.
Watchful worrying doesn't have a lot of appeal to me, I'd go broke buying devotive candles.
RP doesn't exactly appeal to me either, not that concerned about the loss of sex life etc, at 56 if there's one thing I could pass up on that would be it. But I really don't fancy being incontinent for the next 20 year, and the odds say I could finish up that way. Let me clarify that, the odds say I "could" but probably wouldn't, but this is THE one thing that I'd like to avoid, OK add to that popping my clogs in the the near future outranks that, but I guess we can take that as a gimme.
So losing my life and control of my bladder rank high for me.
On the losing of the life thing {this is where having worked with Stats for a long time puts the frighteners to you}...
Stats tell me that anyone having major surgery {surgery that lasts for over 60 minutes} has a 1 in 300 chance of not coming round from the anesthesia ! For me a 1 in 300 chance of losing my life aint odds that I'm comfortable with.
Add to that strokes and heart attacks {Oh ! I've had 2 already} as a result of surgery add to the already unattractive odds. Did I mention blood clots forming in the legs and migrating to the lungs and finishing you off, or the risk involved due to any blood transfusion you may need.
The above all sponsor me to look what other options I might have, as mentioned all in all no option carries a guarantee of a cancer free life {none yet anyway}, so in my way of seeing things maybe the thing to look at is the impact of the treatment itself ?
Already I'm shying away from RP, and none too keen on Radiation treatments, some folks have done quite well, but there seem to be some horror stories also, although the odds do favour a decent outcome.
On to Brachytherapy, looked at this as a favoured option for a few days, I guess you all know what I've been through 'cause most of you have been down the same path... Up all night trying to Google your life back into safe hands.
I think at my age {56} Brachy would be good, and less disruptional / less traumatic than RP or Beam Radiation, but when weighing up the odds of me coughing something up that glowed in the night, it started to lose its appeal.
I know there are some Brachy's that use only temp isotopes, but again Heather this is a hell of a time {when you are emotionally staggered} to be looking not only at what options there are, but where in your locale or for that matter anywhere in the World yo might get the treatment, while that little ticking time bomb is making you sweat, sigh.
How long does it give you to make your mind up ? hours, days, a few weeks or years, no one can safely say, but for me I'd say once you know the foot race is on, and your should get one form of treatment or another within 4/10 weeks, why wait any longer ?
I think that a group like this is incredibly important to folks who are shell shocked by the bad news, maybe we can have some pre packaged thinking available to them, so that they can get a flying start towards a treatment they feel comfortable and confident with.
I guess we can all play our part in that, and roll the clock back in favour of other folks diagnosed with PCa.
IF I had 6 months to think about it, and measure every option, and with a coooler mind that I have had in many a night the last 3 weeks, then maybe I'd have / find something better than HIFU ?
I think the new vaccine treatments offer a lot of promise, to deliver us not just from PCa, but also from the {sometimes} brutal and {almost} barbaric treatments offered to the innocent.
Although these vaccines are spoken of, I don't have time to evaluate them or track them down, or see their track record, so like thousands, nay 10's of thousands of other blokes I'm stuck with what's on the shelf right now.
One thing I feel comfortable with is, they haven't killed anyone yet with HIFU, well not directly {sigh}, so that's a plus, and the reported levels of incontinence are lower than many other standard treatments, so that's the other can of beans I was looking for.
Not to mention that they don't need to anesthetise you, another plus, no need for blood transfusions, and no scar to show to the lads in the pub.
Maybe reading the above you can see why this horse appeals to me...
Over to you John...
Thanks for your comments, HIFU has been practised for well over 10 years, and they have {as you would expect} go better over the years, but even in the early years HIFU showed a lot of promise.
I understand your comment on the tried and tested {aka the Gold Standard}, but the thing is John what many accept as the Gold Standard now was also untried and untested when it first came out, God knows what options {or lack of them} were available to the poor beggars with PCa 40 to 50 years or more ago ?
Maybe the goal posts are about to be moved by HIFU ? maybe this will soon become the new Gold Standard {which in itself John went the way of the Dodo, it's the Plastic Standard now, for better or for worse}.
All of us are liable to become "statistics" but THANKFULLY the majority of us will fall into the group of Favourable Statistics, and that's the way it is with most treatment options.
Again I value your comments and support John, with a common enemy maybe we can all work towards it's demise rather than our own.
Now for Ron... Thanks for the recent Stats, they don't exactly fill me with confidence, but Stats are indicative and worthy of reveiw.
If the Stats indicate my outcome then I think that I'm still on this horse, for the reasons outlined above. I feel that it is still early days, and maybe IF we could collate ALL the HIFU treatments done for PCa {from China through Dominican Republic through to Germany, Russia and the UK et-al} the picture may be a little better ?
From what I've read on HIFU the lower youR PSA the better the DR rate you might expect, and being at 4.6 as my worst ever, then this appeals to me.
I would like to Thank ALL of you for your time, considerations, suggestions and best wishes, it is very much appreciated.
Canada Bob, presently in Wigan, England.
Steve Kramer - 02 Jun 2004 01:14 GMT > Hi John, Heather & Steve, Ron & Curtis,
> It's a hell of a game this aint it, I don't mind having a bet at > Woodbine, or on the Maple Leafs, but this bet is winner takes all, not > just your wallet, your life can be {let me rephrase that} your life is > at stake in this gamble. Well, it's a damned seriouse game, alright, but to lessen the stress a little, you are not likely to fare much worse regardless of which mainstream option you select. All three surgeries and the several radiations all seem to have comparable results in the short to mid-term. Long-term is a crap shoot and pretty much out of your control.
> Looking at the Stats, and I don't know if this is worse for me, having > spent the last 30 years as a QA/Statistical Control Engineer, I am > well able to read them, but almost overwhelmed at the differing > results reported. Statistics are fun, but of very little use when deciding on which treatment will do what to which parts of your body on any particular day or in the hands of any partiular treating physician. You'd be better off deciding which side effects you prefer.
> So losing my life and control of my bladder rank high for me. I know that most men count incontinence as their worst worry, then their worst side effect and biggest cause for depression. I wonder, however, after three years, if impotence takes over. I think I could get used to pads. But, in reality, I have to get used to impotence, not pads, so I'm not a good judge.
> Add to that strokes and heart attacks {Oh ! I've had 2 already} as a > result of surgery add to the already unattractive odds. Oh, that's different. You probably have to think twice about surgery.
> I think the new vaccine treatments offer a lot of promise, to deliver > us not just from PCa, but also from the {sometimes} brutal and > {almost} barbaric treatments offered to the innocent. I dont' think you are a good candidate. That is still being tested and, as I understand it, somewhat toxic. If you are already having cardio-vascular problems, then I wouldn't introduce new toxicity.
 Signature Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48 HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .07 .05 Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
Canada Bob - 02 Jun 2004 23:03 GMT Hi Steve...
> > I don't mind having a bet at Woodbine, or on the Maple Leafs, but this bet > > is winner takes all,
> Well, it's a damned seriouse game, alright, but to lessen the stress a > little, you are not likely to fare much worse regardless of which mainstream > option you select. All three surgeries and the several radiations all seem > to have comparable results in the short to mid-term. Long-term is a crap > shoot and pretty much out of your control. Looks as though that's the way it is Steve...
> > Looking at the Stats, and I don't know if this is worse for me, having > > spent the last 30 years as a QA/Statistical Control Engineer,
> Statistics are fun, Aren't they just, sigh... {at least they helped me back Ireland to beat Jamaica in the soccer match tonight, grin}, anyway... I digress...
> but of very little use when deciding on which treatment > will do what to which parts of your body on any particular day or in the > hands of any partiular treating physician. You'd be better off deciding > which side effects you prefer. I tend to agree with your opener above Steve, sort of, but I think your EXACTLY right on the end run, decide on what you can live with {was that a pun} if the worst comes to the worst, and go with that.
I can't imagine less attractive options than castration AND growing breasts at 56 {or for any man at any age}, add to that glowing in the dark and this is a lousy place to find yourself in. I hope that everyone can see the sardonic humour I'm trying to "inject" but you just HAVE TO try to find the lighter side to all this...
Having said that, some days are hellish from the moment I get up, and realise where I'm at, sometimes I've got as far as the shaving mirror {forgetting my recent DX} and then the man in the mirror seems to look back at me with saddened eyes, and that can REALLY put the damper on your day.
For folks who are passing through this same trauma, I've found that a comedy tape/cd/video is one way of getting out of that bad groove, get yourself laughing and the veil of sadness satrts to lift pretty quickly.
Anyway, back to the plot...
> > So losing my life and control of my bladder rank high for me.
> I know that most men count incontinence as their worst worry, then their > worst side effect and biggest cause for depression. I wonder, however, > after three years, if impotence takes over. I think I could get used to > pads. But, in reality, I have to get used to impotence, not pads, so I'm > not a good judge. Hmmm, what can I say Steve, man to man, I'm sorry to hear your situation, and if it helps then let yourself know that a few thousand miles away, some bloke {maybe in a pub} in England, wishes you well, and at least peace of mind Steve.
Did you ever look into those "mechanical devices" that help control incontinence ? if not then I know I guy in Scotland that has 20 odd years of knowledge of them, he works for a company that makes this device, I'm not eve sure how it works, but if you'd like further and betters just e-mail me directly.
> > Add to that strokes and heart attacks {Oh ! I've had 2 already} as a > > result of surgery add to the already unattractive odds.
> Oh, that's different. You probably have to think twice about surgery. Yea, aint it, pressure of the job, "Airworthyness Flight Inspector" for a good number of years, do a Google for "Norburn Fleet" and see what comes up, then you'll see why my BP was way up for years, and how the old pumping engine was feeling the strain... The heart attacks weren't the worst kind, or I wouldn't be here, but on a scale of 1-10 they were 4's, but I shy away from anything now that could stress me out {mind you, I'm still married, grin}...
> > I think the new vaccine treatments offer a lot of promise, to deliver > > us not just from PCa, but also from the {sometimes} brutal and [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > I understand it, somewhat toxic. If you are already having cardio-vascular > problems, then I wouldn't introduce new toxicity. Yep, I think you're right...
I went to speak with the HIFU Dr's {again} at Stepping Hill Hospital in Stockport today, and I have to say this... Dr Brown and Dr Campbell are are the most considerate folks that you could ever expect to meet. Dr Campbell spent 1hr 15 mins today going over everything he wanted me to know about HIFU and answered {in depth} every question I had for him.
Both these guys as Surgeons, and the older one Dr Brown has a reputation in Urology second to none, so my level of comfort/confidence in them is as high as it could be.
They {at Stepping Hills} have only done 8 {wow !!! grin} HIFU procedures, whereas the Dr's in France and Germany have done hundreds if not thousands.
I did have some concerns about which to favour, someone who has done hundreds vs someone who has done just a few, in human nature there's arguements to be made on both sides of that, but the thing that has edged me towards the Stepping Hill guys is the attitude of care, concern and compassion, and I've not blended in their professional skills into the mix yet.
At least the choice ISN'T "Hobson's Choice" it's a bit like picking the best {on the day} between Manchester United, Arsenal & Chelsea, even on a bad day these guys are good.
Stepping Hills say they can treat me around the end of June to maybe early July, so... in the meantime...
I'll have to sign off for a couple of weeks, me and the wife have decided to chill out and take a vacation, in an attempt to take our minds off all this, so if you guys don't hear from me until after the 20th June, you'll know why.
Other than that I wish you ALL the very best, hang on in there, it's a Hell of a ride, but YOU aren't on your own, there's a few thousand more of us "screaming" at the same time, with a bit of help from each other the journey will be easier for us all.
Canada Bob, presently in Wigan,{home of Rugby League}, England.
Steve Kramer - 03 Jun 2004 17:09 GMT > I can't imagine less attractive options than castration AND growing > breasts at 56 {or for any man at any age}, add to that glowing in the > dark and this is a lousy place to find yourself in. I hope that > everyone can see the sardonic humour I'm trying to "inject" but you > just HAVE TO try to find the lighter side to all this... That was one of the funniest paragraphs I've seen in a long time. I hope the "glow in the dark", "find yourself", and "lighter side" were intentional.
> Did you ever look into those "mechanical devices" that help control > incontinence ? Mechanical devices are available for incontinence and impotence. They are the epitome of giving up. I haven't given up just yet.
> I'll have to sign off for a couple of weeks, me and the wife have > decided to chill out and take a vacation, in an attempt to take our > minds off all this, so if you guys don't hear from me until after the > 20th June, you'll know why. My wife and I went on a cruise between dx and RRP. Perfectly understandable.
 Signature Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46 Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c RRP 12/15/2000 PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75 EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47 PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32 Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48 HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48 PSA .07 .05 Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
Canada Bob - 22 Jun 2004 01:55 GMT Hello Steve...
> That was one of the funniest paragraphs I've seen in a long time. I hope > the "glow in the dark", "find yourself", and "lighter side" were > intentional. Glad to hear the above Steve, I was trying to inject a bit of humour, one thing that seems to help me cope each and every day {since my diagnosis} is to make sure I start the day with a laugh or at least a smile. I find that a comedy tape/cd/video helps break the grip of fear that can grab a hold of me, and I'd suggest that to everyone who finds themselves in this rotten situation.
> > I'll have to sign off for a couple of weeks, me and the wife have > > decided to chill out and take a vacation, in an attempt to take our > > minds off all this, so if you guys don't hear from me until after the > > 20th June, you'll know why. Back again now, and I expect to be going in to Stepping Hills Hospital {Stockport, near Manchester, England} on the 6th July for the HIFU treatment.
> My wife and I went on a cruise between dx and RRP. Perfectly > understandable. Well it worked for us Steve, gave us a "time out" and rolled over a couple of waiting weeks that can't go fast enough for me.
Having said that, and in the full knowledge that HIFU {High Intensity Focused Ultrasound} is non invasive, {no knives, saws, cat gut or staples, or even the need for a general anesthetic}, I'm still anxious about it, having never been in Hospital since the day {56 years ago} when I was born...
Anyway, a bit on the HIFU "option" for anyone who would like to consider it...
Although it is "approved" in Europe {France, Germany, UK, etc} and in Japan, South Korea, China {even}, plus Lebanon, Saudi Arabia and Canada etc, it hasn't yet gone beyond the trial stages in the US.
HIFU has been around for over 10 years, and has shown a lot of promise, thousands of men have been treated in Europe alone, and the results rival the {so called} gold standards of surgery, without many of the problems associated with surgery.
Having said that HIFU isn't yet available in the US {other than the trials being done to get approvals} a Dr Suarez of Miami FL, has been treating people in a clinic he runs in the Dominican Republic, at what I hear is a well respected Hospital in the Dominican Republic.
Dr Suarez uses the Sonablate "machine" and charges in the region of $20,000 US $'s that is for the treatment, not cheap but neither is a funeral, sigh.
Other than that there are several top class Dr's based in top class Hospitals in France and Germany {at least} with considerable expertise on HIFU, and the average price of treatment in Europe is around $6,000 to $10,000 US.
Quite a difference in prices, but little difference in "cure" rates.
If ANYONE needs ANY "further and betters" on getting access to HIFU in the UK or elsewhere in Europe I will do my best to help them out, no matter where you are from. By chance I live less than 20 miles away from Stepping Hills Hospital, near Manchester, so I could/would help advise you how to get here, where to stay, and as far as I can anything else that might help you, feel free to contact me anytime.
If you want to e-mail me directly then drop me a line to...
robert01942@hotmail.com
The 01942 in the address above is the local phone code for Wigan, my home town.
I'll keep you guys posted on how I go on, at least HIFU is {now} another available option for us to consider.
All the Best to everyone.
Bob.
|
|
|