Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Prostate Cancer / May 2004

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

supportive info

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
t.rex - 18 May 2004 04:04 GMT
Thanks to everyone who replied to my inquiries last week. The answers were
extremely helpful in deciding how to respond to the fact that my PSA was at
4.25 and my doctor was recommending a biopsy, which *was* scheduled for
next Wednesday.

After it was mentioned here that sex prior to a blood draw can result in an
elevated PSA, I scheduled a second test. As the nurse was preparing the
draw, I asked if they could also count free PSA -- which I also learned
about here. She replied that the in-house lab didn't do that and sent me
across town to the hospital lab where it could be done.

I spoke with my doctor today who said his recommendation for a biopsy was
withdrawn, based on the reduced PSA of 3.3. I'll return in six months for
another test, and again be mindful of potentially elevating activities
prior to the test. No sex, water-skiing, or strenuous dumps, to be sure.

Thanks again!

t
Beverley - 18 May 2004 04:36 GMT
A 3.3 is still not low but let's see how the fPSA returns. If it is above
25% then you are probably fine. But if it comes in at 8, 10 or 13% you've
got to get that biopsy!
Bev

> Thanks to everyone who replied to my inquiries last week. The answers were
> extremely helpful in deciding how to respond to the fact that my PSA was at
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> t
t.rex - 18 May 2004 04:48 GMT
> A 3.3 is still not low but let's see how the fPSA returns. If it is
> above 25% then you are probably fine. But if it comes in at 8, 10 or
> 13% you've got to get that biopsy!

I'll try to get a copy of the lab report tomorrow and tell you exactly what
it says. However, what the doctor said to me on the phone was that with a
PSA below 4, the fPSA doesn't have any significance and is only calculated
by the lab if the total PSA is above 4. What he said, I believe, was that
research doesn't support giving any weight to fPSA if the total is below 4.

I didn't ask for references.

With 3.3, he said he was no longer recommending the biopsy and I should
come back in six months.
Steve Kramer - 19 May 2004 00:52 GMT
Concur.  Get the report!

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04

> > A 3.3 is still not low but let's see how the fPSA returns. If it is
> > above 25% then you are probably fine. But if it comes in at 8, 10 or
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> With 3.3, he said he was no longer recommending the biopsy and I should
> come back in six months.
MH - 19 May 2004 03:27 GMT
> > A 3.3 is still not low but let's see how the fPSA returns. If it is
> > above 25% then you are probably fine. But if it comes in at 8, 10 or
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> With 3.3, he said he was no longer recommending the biopsy and I should
> come back in six months.

If I remember correctly, there have been a few guys here over the past 18
months who had a lower PSA but were positive.  I hope that you *DON'T* have
PCa, of course.... but *do* keep an eye on it!  Doctors have been known to
be wrong... and one thing I've learned from this list is that you have to be
your own advocate!
If they didn't do a fPSA.... I'd have blood drawn again and be sure they
*did* one.

Hope it all turns out as well as it seems at the moment, guy!

Take care..
MikeH
t.rex - 20 May 2004 01:17 GMT
> If I remember correctly, there have been a few guys here over the past
> 18 months who had a lower PSA but were positive.  I hope that you
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> If they didn't do a fPSA.... I'd have blood drawn again and be sure
> they *did* one.

Thanks. I will. For the last couple of days I've been unusually busy at
work and haven't yet found time to stop by the urology office to pick up a
copy of the lab report. I did ask for fPSA to be run and I believe that it
was. However, in reviewing the results with me on the phone my urologist
said to me that with a PSA below 4 the fPSA isn't a useful measure. There
seems to be disagreement on that point here.

When I do pick up the report, I'll post the fPSA result here for the
informed advice of group members.
Claude - 19 May 2004 14:07 GMT
> > A 3.3 is still not low but let's see how the fPSA returns. If it is
> > above 25% then you are probably fine. But if it comes in at 8, 10 or
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
> With 3.3, he said he was no longer recommending the biopsy and I should
> come back in six months.

Hi t.  When you refer to your doctor, is he an internist or a urologist?  If
the former, go to a urologist.  My *former* internist kept telling me my PSA
was "normal" for someone my age with bph.  He apparently was ignoring the
velocity.  He used to refer to some chart he kept in the office.  When I
demanded a free PSA test, he ordered it.  Called me up over the phone and
told me it was completely "normal".  When I asked him for the percent, he
said no per cent was given.  I went in for another PSA test 4 months later,
happened to glance at the free PSA report, and saw that it was 15%.  Since I
knew anything below 25% was bad, I almost yelped when I saw the score.  I
pointed it out to him, and he said "Don't worry.  Look how *low* it is."  I
went to a urologist.  He ordered a biopsy.  It came back 3+3.  Had an RP on
5/2/02.  Post op biopsy was 3+4, and the margins were not clear.  So far I
have been "undetectable", and I'm now sweating out results of the latest
draw taken yesterday.  Had my internist understood the importance of the
"slowly" rising PSA; had my internist understood the free PSA test results,
might I have been operated on earlier, had clear margins and a better
surgical result?  I'll never know.  Our local Man to Man group recommends
all PSA testing be done by a urologist.
t.rex - 20 May 2004 01:12 GMT
* * *
> Hi t.  When you refer to your doctor, is he an internist or a
> urologist?  
* * *

A urologist. I also discussed the results with an internist friend who was
dismissive of the earlier 4.51 PSA result. Despite the friendship, with
regard to prostate issues I put more confidence in my urologis.
Steve Kramer - 19 May 2004 00:51 GMT
So, what was your free PSA?

Signature

Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA  .1  .1  .1  .27  .37  .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA  .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA  .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04

> Thanks to everyone who replied to my inquiries last week. The answers were
> extremely helpful in deciding how to respond to the fact that my PSA was at
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> t
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.