Update yesterday:
New PSA 0.8, complex, 0.65
I guess that's good.
Completed week four of five weeks of EBRT's today coupled with Zoladex since
February.
Seeds to follow on June 10.
Larry
Steve Kramer - 08 May 2004 02:18 GMT
Well, it's a damned sight better than 14! I'd say anything than one in less
than a month is a hell of a good sign.

Signature
Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
> Update yesterday:
> New PSA 0.8, complex, 0.65
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Larry
Larry - 08 May 2004 05:19 GMT
Yes, I guess I should be more ecstatic. I just feel a little drained
emotionally, if you know what I mean . . . of course you do . . . you ALL do
. . . and you have the energy to give others support . . . you all are
amazing!
> Well, it's a damned sight better than 14! I'd say anything than one in less
> than a month is a hell of a good sign.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> >
> > Larry
Steve Kramer - 08 May 2004 11:45 GMT
You don't stay drained.... well, I guess I can only speak for myself.... I
don't stay drained. I had the initial WHUMP in 2000 when dx'd. Then
another when my uro told me I still had cancer. Then the other when I
realized again that I still had cancer. But, in between, I went from
punched in the gut, to pessimistic concern, to hope, and then guarded
optimism. I am now approaching, I think, qualified optimism. But, believe
me, when it comes back, it will be WHUMP all over again.

Signature
Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA .1 .1 .1 .27 .37 .75
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .34 .22 .15 .21 .32
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA .07 .05
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03, 4/04
> Yes, I guess I should be more ecstatic. I just feel a little drained
> emotionally, if you know what I mean . . . of course you do . . . you ALL do
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> > >
> > > Larry
John Loomis - 08 May 2004 02:20 GMT
Hello Larry, sounds like you are on the right track....
I wish you the best.
I have been also monitoring my PSA and after 4 years, still have worry?
Great for you, and beat the beast....
John Loomis
> Update yesterday:
> New PSA 0.8, complex, 0.65
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Larry
Beverley - 08 May 2004 02:48 GMT
That's interesting that they did a PSA in the "middle" of treatment.
If you are that low now I wonder where you will fall after the seeds. I'd
say you are doing very well!!
Bev
> Update yesterday:
> New PSA 0.8, complex, 0.65
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Larry
Keith Lundy - 08 May 2004 03:15 GMT
Sounds good, many more low PSA's to you!!
Keith Lundy/So. California
40 Proton Beam Radiation Treatments
Loma Linda Univ.Med Ctr..3/03-5/03
DF - 08 May 2004 05:07 GMT
Alright! Hang in there.
DF
> Update yesterday:
> New PSA 0.8, complex, 0.65
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Larry
dale.j. - 09 May 2004 01:37 GMT
> Update yesterday:
> New PSA 0.8, complex, 0.65
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
>
> Larry
I take it no big problems? Good numbers and here's tipping one for you.
Dale J.

Signature
Email: dalej2@mac..com
Larry - 09 May 2004 05:22 GMT
My problem is failure to get big. <sigh>
I will tip one though. Thanks for the thought.
> > Update yesterday:
> > New PSA 0.8, complex, 0.65
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Dale J.