My surgery was in Oct. 2000. The PSA readings for the first 2+ years
were <.01. When my PSA went from .03 in April '03 to to .05 on
October '03, my internist suggested I contact my urologist. The
urologist's PA responded by saying that there was nothing to worry
about. My PSA this month was .06 and my internists is suggesting
again I call the urologist. I know that the magic treshold is .1, but
still ... Any opinions on this? Thanks.
jimhoney - 26 Mar 2004 00:06 GMT
> My surgery was in Oct. 2000. The PSA readings for the first 2+ years
> were <.01. When my PSA went from .03 in April '03 to to .05 on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> again I call the urologist. I know that the magic treshold is .1, but
> still ... Any opinions on this? Thanks.
You might ask if the same test procedure was used in all cases, and if that
version of the test is even capable of descriminating among readings which
are that low.
This sounds like another case in which the patient should probably be told
"less than 0.1," and not the exact number.
jimhoney
Larry Sabo - 26 Mar 2004 01:54 GMT
>My surgery was in Oct. 2000. The PSA readings for the first 2+ years
>were <.01. When my PSA went from .03 in April '03 to to .05 on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>again I call the urologist. I know that the magic treshold is .1, but
>still ... Any opinions on this? Thanks.
I understand that three consecutive increases in PSA after RP indicate
that some prostate cancer remains. If it's in the prostate bed, EBRT
may take care of that and you're home-free. My uro says he usually
doesn't refer patients for EBRT after RP until/unless their PSA gets
above .2, but in my case, he felt the three consecutive increases were
enough to proceed now. My post-RP PSAs were miniscule, like yours, but
the doubling time was much higher. Your last two PSAs were not
significantly different from each other, so it's hard to say you have
a trend underway. One more significant increase though, and I think
I'd be pressing for EBRT. It's a painless procedure with very few
adverse side/after-effects.
In the tables at http://www.phoenix5.org/Basics/psaPostSurgery.html
the doubling time, time to PSA growth recurrence and Gleason score all
figure into the likelihood that the cancer has metastisized. It's a
scary table but your (and my) numbers are so low, I don't think I'd
get too worried about it. Easier said than done.
Best wishes for good health.
Larry
---
larry sabo (one word) at istop dot com
Dave P - 26 Mar 2004 20:43 GMT
Sy,
1. I have read that psa tests can fluctuate from <0.01 - 0.08 for years and
it doesn't mean there is a recurrence of the PCa. I know that a few people
on this newsgroup within the past two years reported that their psa tests
have fluctuated up and down on the newer sensative PSA tests but still
stayed <.1
2. From just looking at your results and doing the math - it looks like
your psa doubled in one year. Which means your PCa is growing very, very
slowly and is probably a local recurrence that can be taken care of with
salvage radiation. PCa that has metastasized is more aggressive and the
doubling time is weeks to <6 months
3. You will know in another 6 months - 1 year. If your psa continues to rise
and your Dr's believe it may be a recurrence - then you can make a decision
on how to proceed.
4. I would absolutely be positive at this time and not worry about it - it
went from .05 to .06 in six months - which means to me that it really
stayed the same. I would worry if it jumped to .1 or higher since October
but it didn't. It basically stayed the same. It very well could have come
back at .05 or .04
5. I agree with your Doctor to not worry about it. You are <.1
Dave P.
> My surgery was in Oct. 2000. The PSA readings for the first 2+ years
> were <.01. When my PSA went from .03 in April '03 to to .05 on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> again I call the urologist. I know that the magic treshold is .1, but
> still ... Any opinions on this? Thanks.
Gordan Calma - 26 Mar 2004 21:45 GMT
SY,
my father had his surgery in May of 2000 (Gleason score was 7).
His first two post-RP PSAs were <0.02 and his PSA nine months after the
surgery was 0.08. He received his latest PSA result yesterday (almost 4
years after the RP) and it was 0.04. It means that his PSA has been
fluctuating between 0.08 and 0.02 all these years. Until it reaches >0.1 we
are not worrying.
I think that any score <0.1 should be considered undetectable for the sake
of people's mental health. Really, it seems that the number can change from
0.02 to 0.05 within the same day and it may not mean a thing...As long as it
is not steadily progressing upward (>0.1), there is no reason to worry too
much. The difference between 0.05 and 0.06 in your case is almost
irrelevant. But, as I said, be alert to a continuous upward tendency of your
PSA results...
Gordan
> Sy,
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
> > again I call the urologist. I know that the magic treshold is .1, but
> > still ... Any opinions on this? Thanks.
SY - 27 Mar 2004 00:19 GMT
Okay, guys, thanks. I did leave a message for my current urologist,
whom I've seen only once, 3 years ago. (I had my RRP at a university
Prostate Center in another state.) Just like most of us, I worry
about that damn PSA but, thankfully, only at the time I'm due for the
next one (though I try to drag it out as long as I can stand it), and
then when the result is in. Then the anxiety and that living on the
borrowed time feeling kicks in. Thanks again.
SY
Bill Denton - 27 Mar 2004 03:00 GMT
SY, there are benign sources of PSA that can account for over even .1
so don't jump to conclusions. Also, a healthy immune system can take
care of microscopic PCa cells. Keep a close eye on it but give your
body a chance to work.
Bill Denton
RP 2/12/02
Memphis
Steve Kramer - 27 Mar 2004 02:45 GMT
I agree with your urologist. The "threshhold" is more than 0.1, but
probably now something much less than 1.0. Anything below 0.1 is considered
"undetectable" and variations under 0.1 are probably useless as determining
factors.

Signature
Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA .1 .1 .1 .3 .4 .8
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .3 .2 .2 .2 .3
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA .1
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03
> My surgery was in Oct. 2000. The PSA readings for the first 2+ years
> were <.01. When my PSA went from .03 in April '03 to to .05 on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> again I call the urologist. I know that the magic treshold is .1, but
> still ... Any opinions on this? Thanks.
SY - 30 Mar 2004 03:07 GMT
Well, I spoke with the urologist today. He also emphasized the lack
of clear recommendations as to what to do next in situations like
mine. He did suggest to make an appointment and speak with a
radiologist, but keeping in mind his/her professional bias. He also
suggested I contact my surgeon (in another state) and ask for his
opinion. He recommended to repeat the PSA in three months. Sometimes
it's really apealing to have somebody make the decision for you,
especially an informed one. :(
>My surgery was in Oct. 2000. The PSA readings for the first 2+ years
>were <.01. When my PSA went from .03 in April '03 to to .05 on
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>again I call the urologist. I know that the magic treshold is .1, but
>still ... Any opinions on this? Thanks.
Steve Kramer - 30 Mar 2004 11:44 GMT
Actually, Simon, that's the best part of this disease. It grows so slowly
that you can take your time and make a good, solid decision on your own
treatment.
You are in a great position. If you don't have a recurrence, then your PSA
readings are just as everyone has told you, undetectible. If you do have
PCa again, then you are one of the first to have made that determination at
such a low level of test results. Meaning, there is so very little that it
will take very little to knock it out.
Speak to your references. Read up. Get another PSA. But, by all means,
don't start wringing your hands at 0.06.

Signature
Prostate Cancer Survivor (so far), not a doctor
PSA 16 10/17/2000 @ 46
Biopsy 11/01/2000 G7 (3+4), T2c
RRP 12/15/2000
PSA .1 .1 .1 .3 .4 .8
EBRT 05-07/2002 @ 47
PSA .3 .2 .2 .2 .3
Erection 05/12/2003 @ 48
HTbegins 07/21/2003 @ 48
PSA .1
Lupron 7/03, 8/03, 12/03
> Well, I spoke with the urologist today. He also emphasized the lack
> of clear recommendations as to what to do next in situations like
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> >again I call the urologist. I know that the magic treshold is .1, but
> >still ... Any opinions on this? Thanks.