
Signature
"The greater the corrupting power, the greater the number of sycophants
and agents rallying to defend it"--Anarchore 2008
> The pharmaceutical industry sold hemp-based medicine for decades, they
> know all about hemp's healing power. These companies sold the public
> what I would consider a watered down version of hemp medicine, mostly
> in tinctures and hash resin pain pills. I can't find any evidence that
> these companies ever sold the public real high-grade hemp oil or
> resins. It seems they kept the real medicine from the public
If we follow your reasoning, such as it is, we quickly arrive at the idea
that these industrialists also kept this medicine from themselves and their
families. They would rather die, and let their loved ones die, slow and
painful deaths rather than release this.
Do you really think that this is likely, or the way that people facing
terminal illnesses really act?
> using the
> same reasoning as today; you can't sell the people medicine if you heal
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw
You *were* going to mention that this movie presents entirely anecdotal
material, and doesn't identify any studies or trials, weren't you?
I'm always suspicious when people make claims about science but refuse to
identify specific studies or trials, and instead wave vaguely towards
Google. If there is material, identify it.
So: Can you identify a real study or trial to support your claim that this
"cures cancer", setting aside for the moment that there are many different
forms of cancer and that you can't name which ones it cures?
Can you do that, yet? Or are you still agreeing that this has never been
done?
-pk
<snip references to anecdotal videos>
Anarchore - 03 May 2008 06:23 GMT
>>The pharmaceutical industry sold hemp-based medicine for decades,
>>they know all about hemp's healing power. These companies sold the
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
>Do you really think that this is likely, or the way that people
>facing terminal illnesses really act?
>>using the
>>same reasoning as today; you can't sell the people medicine if you
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>You were going to mention that this movie presents entirely anecdotal
>material, and doesn't identify any studies or trials, weren't you?
It does mention studies on cancer killing brain tumours, which inspired
him to use THC rich oil against cancer.
>I'm always suspicious when people make claims about science but
>refuse to identify specific studies or trials, and instead wave
>vaguely towards Google. If there is material, identify it.
I did.
>So: Can you identify a real study or trial to support your claim that
>this "cures cancer", setting aside for the moment that there are many
>different forms of cancer and that you can't name which ones it cures?
>
>Can you do that, yet? Or are you still agreeing that this has never
>been done?
THC is known to kill cancerous brain cells while normal cells thrive on
it!
I don't think he is lying, and more extensive tests should be done.
In the meantime this non-toxic, most medicinal of plants should not be
denied sick people for whom time may be running out.
*That* is criminal.