 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / May 2008RCMP and Government of Canada are killing us! Documentary - Hemp Oil Cures Cancer
Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and media. The government is literally killing people by denying them their medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted. (youtube) A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997, Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge - curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of possessing and trafficking marijuana! Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL! IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE! (Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.) Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8 Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ -- > Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and > media. Are you actually able to show that this actually is a cancer cure, and not just another in a long list of frauds, cons and hoaxes aimed at the sick and desperate? > The government is literally killing people by denying them their > medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to > the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist > drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and > their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake > of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted. Frankly, this kind of talk will immediately discredit anyone promoting a genuine medical treatment. Either you have the chemistry or you don't. Either you can prove its effectiveness or you can't. Use the science and lose the politics. Show us the proof that it works, in the form of studies and trials. > (youtube) Why Youtube and not JAMA? Is this just another scheme unable to pass peer review? > A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997, > Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use > of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its > high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers <snippage> Can you please identify the studies and trials that showed that hemp oil cured cancers, and which cancers it cures? I'd like to read them. You are making a very, very significant claim, and you should be ready and able to back it up, assuming that you want to be taken seriously. Either you have proof of your claims or you don't. Shall we wait, or do these studies not exist and the trials not take place? -pk >>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine >>and media. > >Are you actually able to show that this actually is a cancer cure, >and not just another in a long list of frauds, cons and hoaxes aimed >at the sick and desperate? You are asking the wrong question. The question is what does the pharmaceutical industry have to lose from this discovery. What does he have to gain from curing people's cancer with cannabis oil? >>The government is literally killing people by denying them their >>medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights [quoted text clipped - 17 lines] >Why Youtube and not JAMA? Is this just another scheme unable to >pass peer review? just watch the film. >>A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997, >>Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >oil cured cancers, and which cancers it cures? I'd like to read >them. The brain cancer effects have been well documented. I am not responsible for your ignorance. Just watch the film. >You are making a very, very significant claim, and you should be >ready and able to back it up, assuming that you want to be taken [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Shall we wait, or do these studies not exist and the trials not take >place? Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8 Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ -- >>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine >>>and media. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > You are asking the wrong question. I am asking exactly the right question where claims are questionable. If you're making an extraordinary claim, it is entirely reasonable to require proof. You provide *none*. > The question is what does the > pharmaceutical industry have to lose from this discovery. One of the clear answers is that you can't even identify the cancers you claim are cured by this. You clearly don't know this subject at all. > What does he have to gain from curing people's cancer with cannabis > oil? In other words, you *cannot* show that this is actually a cancer cure. You don't even know *what* cancers are claimed to be affected. If you could, you would be eagerly identifying the studies and trials. You claim it's "well documented" but refuse to identify the documentation. You can't do this - you flat out refuse to - and it's clear that the material doesn't exist. You could be honest and just say so. It would be a good start. I have watched your films and they are a collection of unsubstantiated anecdotes, targeting the desperate. There are no studies or trials referenced. I guess you've never seen what health frauds and fake "cures" can do to cancer victims and the survivors, their families and friends. Perhaps you just don't care about those people. -pk <snip anarchore's attempts at avoidance> >>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream >>>>pharma-medicine and media. [quoted text clipped - 42 lines] > ><snip anarchore's attempts at avoidance> Just watch the film and stop being such a shithead. Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8 Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ  SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. >>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream >>>>>pharma-medicine and media. [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > Just watch the film and stop being such a shithead. Instead of being a "shithead" yourself, why do you not or can you not provide even a single shred of evidence of your claims ? You obviously didn't real Patrick's reply as he *did* watch your film and stated quite clearly that it's full of anecdotal claims without a single shred of actual proof that this affects a specific cancer. You are aware, are you not, that there *are* multiple forms of cancer ? You are aware, are you not, that a treatment for one cancer (whether traditional or alternative) is not only not necessarily effective on another type, but may actually be harmful ? What is it with you alternative treatment holy rollers that gets your back up when someone asks you to show _proof_ that it actually does anything, rather than some random guy or girl in a video saying "I'm cured! Wow!" Just to be even clearer, here's the *reason* people ask for and need proof: Let's say I'm selling/pushing an alternative cure of, say, pulped dandilion seeds as a cure for cancer. I happen to sell em and make a profit of, say, $10 a dose. I can, within ten minutes of *right now* get a dozen people to appear in a video, claim they are cancer survivors and were all cured by smearing dandilion seed pulp on their left ear lobe and right big toe. For every ten suckers I get to order my pulped dandilion seeds, that's one hundred bucks in my pocket. Why reference *independant* or *peer reviewed* studies ? After all, a bunch of random schmucks in a video said they were cured! It was on that thar interweb thingie, so it must be true, right ? So you're trying another angle at legalizing marijuhanna - Why must you take the shameful tactic of attempting to use those with a life-altering disease in your attempt to get high legally ? - or - How about we just call shenanigans right now and call a spade a spade: You're not only a spammer, but not a very bright spammer. SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >>>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream >>>>>>pharma-medicine and media. [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] > How about we just call shenanigans right now and call a spade a spade: > You're not only a spammer, but not a very bright spammer. I have to say that the "not very bright" goes with other messages "Anarchore" posts promotiong Holocaust denial and "revisionism". -pk On Apr 28, 10:27 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> wrote: > >>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream > >>>>>pharma-medicine and media. [quoted text clipped - 70 lines] > were all cured by smearing dandilion seed pulp on their left ear lobe and > right big toe. You can stop right there. You clearly know *nothing* about the dandelion cure---it's the *left* big toe, and you have to drink a pint of special pure onion juice just before the rub, and all in the light of a gibbous moon. Ear lobes have nothing to do with it. You also didn't post the video, which would have supported your case no end. Please leave fear-based quackery and fraud to the professionals. --- CSM > On Apr 28, 10:27 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 82 lines] > didn't post the video, which would have supported your case no end. > Please leave fear-based quackery and fraud to the professionals. Ha! Shows what _you_ know: There _is_ a video proving it, but it's, uh, being suppressed by The Man and Big Pharmaceutical because, you know, they're all trying to kill us: After all, everyone knows that once you die, they make _so_ much more money off of us. By the by, light of the gibbous moon will make the cure ineffective - You have to do it in total darkness while smoking marijuhanna and taking 3KG of iron supplements. SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >> On Apr 28, 10:27 pm, Marc Bissonnette >><dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 98 lines] >they're all trying to kill us: After all, everyone knows that once >you die, they make so much more money off of us. No you scumbags make money from sick people, that is the fact. >By the by, light of the gibbous moon will make the cure ineffective - >You have to do it in total darkness while smoking marijuhanna and >taking 3KG of iron supplements. The film is presented for non-a.sholes, the rest of you can FOAD of cancer. Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8 Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. On Apr 29, 11:42 am, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> wrote: > csm7...@hotmail.com fell face-first on the keyboard. This was the > result:news:5786253e-7668-4e29-8514-dcf4a9c8ef2a@24g2000hsh.googlegroups.com: [quoted text clipped - 99 lines] > Looking for a new ISP?http://www.canadianisp.com > Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. LOL. Thought you'd like that. Analcore's response is more of *his* brand of hilarity. Part of his claim is true, as I *do* make money from sick people---my work profits from the sick and the well alike, as does most work. --- CSM > On Apr 29, 11:42 am, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> > wrote: >> csm7...@hotmail.com fell face-first on the keyboard. This was the >> result:news:5786253e-7668-4e29-8514-dcf4a9c8ef2a@24g2000hsh.googlegrou >> ps.com: [much ascii murder happened here] >> >> Just to be even clearer, here's the *reason* people ask for and >> >> need proof: [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] >> You have to do it in total darkness while smoking marijuhanna and >> taking 3KG of iron supplements. > LOL. Thought you'd like that. Analcore's response is more of *his* > brand of hilarity. Part of his claim is true, as I *do* make money > from sick people---my work profits from the sick and the well alike, > as does most work. :) Funny how some people get so offended at the idea of making money - from sick or ill -. At the end of the day, the people who make the medicine/treatment need to pay bills, feed families, recoup costs, etc. That's not to say I don't take issue with some of the prices being charged - My daughter, for example, is a type I diabetic and at nearly $1.00 per strip, which she needs at least 4 a day for testing - They're probably making more money that Big Oil Co. :/ Anyway: Even here in Canada, people are often under the mis-impression that healthcare is "free" - Of course, we're one of the most-taxed nations in the world. Naturally, all that money also has some positives attached to it: I *know* that "big pharma" has been required to "prove" whatever it is I'm supposed to put in my body will affect a cure or a treatment. This moron using cancer as a thinly-veiled attempt for legalization of his cheap high is as short-sighted as he is stupid. I have no doubt in the world that for some, smoking marijuhanna alleviates some of their side-effects of illness or treatment. Personally, as long as they're not operating vehicles or heavy equipment (or more specifically: As long as they're at home and out of the public's way), more power to them. Don't try to tell me, though, that mary-j is going to "cure" anything - We all know that just because one form of a drug is illegal doesn't stop pharmaceutical companies from finding legal uses of it: Take opium poppies as a classic example: Lots of evil, nasty and illegal stuff comes out of them, but so do many life-saving drugs. SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >> On Apr 29, 11:42 am, Marc Bissonnette >><dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 62 lines] >though, that mary-j is going to "cure" anything - We all know that >just because one form of a drug Cannabis is not a drug, it is a gift from God, natures way of saying 'high'. is illegal doesn't stop >pharmaceutical companies from finding legal uses of it: Take opium >poppies as a classic example: Lots of evil, nasty and illegal stuff >comes out of them, but so do many life-saving drugs. Opium doesn't cure cancer, cannabis THC does. How much would your bosses lose if that truth comes out? The cancer industry would collapse overnight. Personally I think that people who make money by discreditting cures so that people die as a result should be executed. By God justice will find you bastards one day. A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997, Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge - curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of possessing and trafficking marijuana! Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL! IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE! (Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.) Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8 Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. >>>>>. >>>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] >traditional or alternative) is not only not necessarily effective on >another type, but may actually be harmful ? Blablabla... march of the pharmaceutical industry shitheads. "The greater the corrupting power, the greater the number of sychophants rallying to defend it" --Anarchore 2008 >What is it with you alternative treatment holy rollers that gets your >back up when someone asks you to show proof that it actually does [quoted text clipped - 23 lines] >How about we just call shenanigans right now and call a spade a >spade: You're not only a spammer, but not a very bright spammer. SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. >>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream >>>>>pharma-medicine and media. [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > Just watch the film and stop being such a shithead. Apparently, you lack the ability to read, in addition to your inability to answer questions. I did watch the clips. They do not answer my questions. They are only collections of unsubstantiated anecdotes, and there are no real references to any identifiable studies or trials. Do you even know what unsubstantiated anecdotes are? Why can you not answer my very simple questions? It's not like they are *remotely* challenging. Perhaps - in fact it appears extremely likely - perhaps your daily experience does not include multiple deaths from the many and varied forms of cancer. Perhaps that is why you don't understand that your inability to even identify the forms of cancer that you claim are cured just doesn't convince me of anything other than your profound ignorance of the topic. Perhaps you don't even know that there are many different forms of cancer and they do not respond the same way. Answer the questions or admit that you can't - though it's clear at this point that you can't because the studies and trials don't exist and didn't take place. Try to be honest for a change. What you are doing now isn't, and that's an extremely polite way of phrasing it. -pk > >>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream > >>>>>pharma-medicine and media. [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] > > -pk Just a quick note to say "Thanks, Patrick". I suspect that I'm only one of many who were somewhat tempted to waste time on his video, but can now avoid it thanks to your posting a synopsis. To Anarchore, the tone and content of your posts has done you no favors. If you'd bothered (and were able) to answer Patrick's questions, you might have convinced *someone* else to click your links. As it is, you just look foolish. --- CSM (pro-MJ-legalization, anti-fraud) >> >>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream >> >>>>>pharma-medicine and media. [quoted text clipped - 92 lines] >CSM >(pro-MJ-legalization, anti-fraud) March of the pharmaceutical sychophants... enjoy your radiation treatment, scumbag. SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. >>> >>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream >>> >>>>>pharma-medicine and media. [quoted text clipped - 95 lines] > March of the pharmaceutical sychophants... enjoy your radiation > treatment, scumbag. Now there is the face of compassion. -pk >>>>>>... >>>> [quoted text clipped - 109 lines] > >-pk FOAD pharmaceutical scumbag. >>>>>. >>>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream [quoted text clipped - 76 lines] >this point that you can't because the studies and trials don't exist >and didn't take place. And they never will sychophant scum, and that is what you want. >Try to be honest for a change. What you are doing now isn't, and >that's an extremely polite way of phrasing it. > >-pk SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. >>>>>>. >>>>>>>Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream [quoted text clipped - 78 lines] > > And they never will Thank you for* finally* admitting that these claims you make aren't based on any studies or trials, and are entirely based on unsubstantiated and undocumented anecdotes. You don't have any proof whatsoever that your claim of cure is true. All you have is third and fourth hand, undocumented stories. And that simply isn't good enough. > sychophant scum, Right. You can't honestly answer a simple question, so you resort to name-calling. That attitude, combined with your ignorance and dishonesty, is sure not going to win you converts. > and that is what you want. You have no idea what I want. You apparently don't even know that there are various forms of cancer, yet you claim to have a cure. There might be some valid clinical use for cannabis oils, but if you're going to misrepresent and lie about it, you will only push away the rational people who might be able to actually conduct or arrange studies and trials. They won't want to be associated with liars and frauds. Your attitude does nothing but further associate the substance with crackpots who have zero understanding of science, and that pushes the possibility of real trials fuirther away. You could have been honest in the first place and simply answered that there weren't any studies or trials. You made a choice to not answer honestly. But what else should we expect from a Holocaust denier or "revisionist"? -pk >>Try to be honest for a change. What you are doing now isn't, and >>that's an extremely polite way of phrasing it. >> >>-pk >>>>>. >>>>>> [quoted text clipped - 90 lines] >You don't have any proof whatsoever that your claim of cure is true. >All you have is third and fourth hand, undocumented stories. It is documented in the film, but I guess you want the guys with the lab coats who work for big pharma to vett it? LOL. >And that simply isn't good enough. > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >That attitude, combined with your ignorance and dishonesty, is sure >not going to win you converts. I don't give a f.ck about converting scumbags. If you watched the film you would know it's true and not be such a useful idiot. >>and that is what you want. > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >You made a choice to not answer honestly. But what else should we >expect from a Holocaust denier or "revisionist"? I presented the information for people that weren't a.sholes... as for you and the big pharma industry you represent, you can FOAD of cancer for all I care. >-pk [snip] >>You have no idea what I want. You apparently don't even know that >>there are various forms of cancer, yet you claim to have a cure. [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] > you and the big pharma industry you represent, you can FOAD of cancer > for all I care. ...Except for the fact that everyone who isn't an "a.shole" certainly knows you are and wouldn't trust anything you posted online if you paid them to. Anarchore: Cheap spammer shill. SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >[snip] > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] >knows you are and wouldn't trust anything you posted online if you >paid them to. Why not? My being an a.shole does not preclude me from being right. And I usually am right. >Anarchore: Cheap spammer shill. That's right I'm a shill for the truth, not a shill for the pharmaceutical/medical death industry like the creep that responded with his cheap accusations. If you have cancer and want to die of it after being burned by the doctors who get paid handsomely in corporate kickbacks for their mutilations, of course you can ignore any documented cures. People that want to live will seek out alternatives and try something that looks credible. And if you watch the film instead of listening to shills you would find it out. Or don't watch it. In your case I don't care, but I am sure there are good people out there who could use the information. That is who it is for. So go ahead, be a scumbag for big pharma. Who cares what you think? Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and media. The government is literally killing people by denying them their medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted. (youtube) A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997, Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge - curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of possessing and trafficking marijuana! Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL! IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE! (Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.) Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8 Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ >>[snip] >> [quoted text clipped - 28 lines] > Why not? My being an a.shole does not preclude me from being right. > And I usually am right. Sigh. I am curious if you are this obtuse in person. Look: This is a relatively anonymous medium - you, especially, are using a pseudonym to shield your identity and thus your credibility. Just because *you* say you are right not only doesn't make you right, but it doesn't tell *anyone* else that you are correct, thus the demand for *proof* other than a biased film who's participants benefit by you claiming you are "right". Show evidence from non-biased sources that your claims have merit (and there are many medical research facilities out there with no attachment to pharmaceutical companies) and maybe someone will take you seriously. Unltil then, you're just another pot-head looking to legalize his daily fix so you won't be harassed by the police. >>Anarchore: Cheap spammer shill. > > That's right I'm a shill for the truth, not a shill for the > pharmaceutical/medical death industry like the creep that responded > with his cheap accusations. Show us the *proof* that you are spouting truth. Your videos *do not do that*. > If you have cancer and want to die of it after being burned by the > doctors who get paid handsomely in corporate kickbacks for their > mutilations, of course you can ignore any documented cures. Ah, but that's the crux: Your "cure" isn't documented by anyone with actual knowledge of cancer or it's treatment. If you think that Canadian doctors are "handsomely paid in corporate kickbacks", you're even more uneducated than your rather poor public-relations skills show. > People that want to live will seek out alternatives and try something > that looks credible. And what we - the people who have a vested interest in something *being* credible are saying is that your claims do not look credible. > And if you watch the film instead of listening to shills you would find > it out. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > > So go ahead, be a scumbag for big pharma. Who cares what you think? Apparantly, more people than those that care what you think. Bet *that* stings, doesn't it ? SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >>>[snip] >>> [quoted text clipped - 36 lines] >other than a biased film who's participants benefit by you claiming >you are "right". How do they benefit? By cops raiding them, and taking peoples medicine away? And what is proof to you? Some study? Twenty years of trials, then they push out inferior tainted Marinol garbage? People are dying now. Show evidence from non-biased sources that your >claims have merit (and there are many medical research facilities out >there with no attachment to pharmaceutical companies) and maybe >someone will take you seriously. Why don't you call all the people in the film and tell them that they are liars or that they did not really get cured. Oh yeah I guess they are biased because they don't have big tumours growing out of them. OK a.shole your study is below(scroll down). >Unltil then, you're just another pot-head looking to legalize his >daily fix so you won't be harassed by the police. LOL. My guess is that you are on the pigs side somehow. >>>Anarchore: Cheap spammer shill. >> [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >Show us the proof that you are spouting truth. Your videos *do not do >that*. Prove that I am not truthfull. >> If you have cancer and want to die of it after being burned by the >> doctors who get paid handsomely in corporate kickbacks for their [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >even more uneducated than your rather poor public-relations skills >show. What, of course they get paid to give out specific products. >> People that want to live will seek out alternatives and try >>something that looks credible. > >And what we - the people who have a vested interest in something >being credible are saying is that your claims do not look credible. Why not? If I was dying of cancer I would be grateful to have the opportunity to learn about different cures. Of course the "vested interests" you speak of are the pharma lobbies led by Zionists like the Monsanto family. >> And if you watch the film instead of listening to shills you would >>find it out. [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >Apparantly, more people than those that care what you think. Bet that >stings, doesn't it ? Not really. How many hits does your blog get? Mine is pushing 50,000 views. What kind of scumbag tries to suppress cures? A big pharma scumbag. No one else has the "vested interest". OH and here's your studies done by men in labcoats, a.shole. http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/cancer/THC_cancer_nov_2003.htm New Study Explains How Pot Kills Cancer Cells Nov 6, 2003, Steve Kubby A new study published in Nature Reviews-Cancer provides an historic and detailed explanation about how THC and natural cannabinoids counteract cancer, but preserve normal cells. The study by Manuel Guzmán of Madrid Spain found that cannabinoids, the active components of marijuana, inhibit tumor growth in laboratory animals. They do so by modulating key cell-signalling pathways, thereby inducing direct growth arrest and death of tumor cells, as well as by inhibiting the growth of blood vessels that supply the tumor. The Guzman study is very important according to Dr. Ethan Russo , a neurologist and world authority on medical cannabis: "Cancer occurs because cells become immortalized; they fail to heed normal signals to turn off growth. A normal function of remodelling in the body requires that cells die on cue. This is called apoptosis, or programmed cell death. That process fails to work in tumors. THC promotes its reappearance so that gliomas, leukemias, melanomas and other cell types will in fact heed the signals, stop dividing, and die." "But, that is not all," explains Dr. Russo: "The other way that tumors grow is by ensuring that they are nourished: they send out signals to promote angiogenesis, the growth of new blood vessels. Cannabinoids turn off these signals as well. It is truly incredible, and elegant." In other words, this article explains several ways in which cannabinoids might be used to fight cancer, and, as the article says, "Cannabinoids are usually well tolerated, and do not produce the generalized toxic effects of conventional chemotherapies. Usually, any story that even suggests the possibility of a new treatment for cancer is greeted with headlines about a "cancer cure" - however remote in the future and improbable in fact it might be. But if marijuana is involved, don't expect any coverage from mainstream media, especially since mainstream editors have been quietly killing this story for the past thirty years. That's right, news about the abilility of pot to shrink tumors first surfaced, way back in 1974. Researchers at the Medical College of Virginia, who had been funded by the National Institutes of Health to find evidence that marijuana damages the immune system, found instead that THC slowed the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice -- lung and breast cancer, and a virus-induced leukemia. The Washington Post reported on the 1974 study -- in the "Local" section -- on Aug. 18, 1974. Under the headline, "Cancer Curb Is Studied," it read in part: "The active chemical agent in marijuana curbs the growth of three kinds of cancer in mice and may also suppress the immunity reaction that causes rejection of organ transplants, a Medical College of Virginia team has discovered." The researchers "found that THC slowed the growth of lung cancers, breast cancers, and a virus-induced leukemia in laboratory mice, and prolonged their lives by as much as 36 percent." "News coverage of the Madrid discovery has been virtually nonexistent in this country. The news broke quietly on Feb. 29, 2000 with a story that ran once on the UPI wire about the Nature Medicine article," complained MarijuanaNews.com editor Richard Cowan, who said he was only able to find the article through a link that appeared briefly on the Drudge Report Web page. "The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times all ignored the story, even though its newsworthiness is indisputable: a benign substance occurring in nature destroys deadly brain tumors," added Cowan. On March 29, 2001, the San Antonio Current printed a carefully researched, bombshell of a story by Raymond Cushing titled, "POT SHRINKS TUMORS; GOVERNMENT KNEW IN '74." Media coverage since then has been nonexistant, except for a copy of the story on Alternet . It is hard to believe that the knowledge that cannabis can be used to fight cancer has been suppressed for almost thirty years , yet it seems likely that it will continue to be suppressed. Why? According to Cowan, the answer is because it is a threat to cannabis prohibition . "If this article and its predecessors from 2000 and 1974 were the only evidence of the suppression of medical cannabis, then one might perhaps be able to rationalize it in some herniated way. However, there really is massive proof that the suppression of medical cannabis represents the greatest failure of the institutions of a free society, medicine, journalism, science, and our fundamental values," Cowan notes. Millions of people have died horrible deaths and in many cases, familes exhausted their savings on dangerous, toxic and expensive drugs. Now we are just beginning to realize that while marijuana has never killed anyone, marijuana prohibition has killed millions. http://www.sierratimes.com/03/11/07/article_kubby.htm SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. >>>>[snip] >>>> [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > How do they benefit? By cops raiding them, and taking peoples > medicine away? At present, there is neither proof nor suggestion that it's a medicine, but an illegal drug. <shrug> I guess that makes it the cops' job to do so. > And what is proof to you? Some study? Twenty years of trials, then > they push out inferior tainted Marinol garbage? People are dying now. Proof is actual scientists, using proven methods and methodologies, knowing what type of cancer is being treated, how the drug works on the cancer and that it is actually cured. Some guy in a newsgroup who is an admitted racist promoting hate to others saying that a fun-drug is a "cure" is not proof. Sorry. > Show evidence from non-biased sources that your >>claims have merit (and there are many medical research facilities out [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > Oh yeah I guess they are biased because they don't have big tumours > growing out of them. You think cancer is all about "big tumours growing out of them ?" Really? You've got some self-education to accomplish. > OK a.shole your study is below(scroll down). > >>Unltil then, you're just another pot-head looking to legalize his >>daily fix so you won't be harassed by the police. > > LOL. My guess is that you are on the pigs side somehow. Indeed I have a great respect for police. As a firefighter, I've seen their work and what they have to put up with first-hand. There are a *lot* of really crappy people out there that seem to think the cops are the bad guys. >>>>Anarchore: Cheap spammer shill. >>> [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > Prove that I am not truthfull. I'm not the one making outrageous claims about an illegal drug: The burden of proof is on you. >>> If you have cancer and want to die of it after being burned by the >>> doctors who get paid handsomely in corporate kickbacks for their [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > What, of course they get paid to give out specific products. Not in Canada they don't. >>> People that want to live will seek out alternatives and try >>>something that looks credible. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Why not? If I was dying of cancer I would be grateful to have the > opportunity to learn about different cures. You are absolutely correct in that: Indeed, *that* is why we are asking you for more than just *your* word that this works or even has an effect. (Hint: People smoking dope who think they might have cancer saying they're "cured" doesn't wash) > Of course the "vested interests" you speak of are the pharma lobbies > led by Zionists like the Monsanto family. Where does racism fit into all of this ? >>> And if you watch the film instead of listening to shills you would >>>find it out. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Not really. How many hits does your blog get? Mine is pushing 50,000 > views. No offense, but big deal. My site is at 7,000 views *a day*. > What kind of scumbag tries to suppress cures? > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > > http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/pg/cancer/THC_cancer_nov_2003.htm Now, here's the irony in all of this: You had a study that alleges to show support for what you were saying all along - I'll let those more educated in this stuff that I to comment on it - So why act like a prick this entire time, reducing your credibility and even your likeability ? You have got a *lot* to learn in public relations, son. > New Study Explains How Pot Kills Cancer Cells > [quoted text clipped - 88 lines] > > http://www.sierratimes.com/03/11/07/article_kubby.htm SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >>>>>[snip] >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 80 lines] >*lot* of really crappy people out there that seem to think the cops >are the bad guys. Yeah I wonder how they get that impression... gee poor cops. LOL. >>>>>Anarchore: Cheap spammer shill. >>>> [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > >Where does racism fit into all of this ? Zionism is an evil racist cult. >>>> And if you watch the film instead of listening to shills you >>>>would find it out. [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > >No offense, but big deal. My site is at 7,000 views *a day*. But I don't have to show my a.s to get views! >> What kind of scumbag tries to suppress cures? >> [quoted text clipped - 9 lines] >prick this entire time, reducing your credibility and even your >likeability ? Pearls before swine. If the pricks were interested in the veracity of claims in the video, they would have watched it before denouncing it. Then they would have found that the video contains reference to the THC studies. >You have got a lot to learn in public relations, son. But it is so much fun watching you shills make fools of yourselves! >> New Study Explains How Pot Kills Cancer Cells >> [quoted text clipped - 88 lines] >> >> http://www.sierratimes.com/03/11/07/article_kubby.htm SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. >>>>>[snip] >>>>> [quoted text clipped - 148 lines] > >No offense, but big deal. My site is at 7,000 views *a day*. http://www.marcbissonnette.com/ LOL. Suuuure it does. >> What kind of scumbag tries to suppress cures? >> [quoted text clipped - 104 lines] >> >> http://www.sierratimes.com/03/11/07/article_kubby.htm SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. >>> Not really. How many hits does your blog get? Mine is pushing >>>50,000 views. [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > > LOL. Suuuure it does. That's not my site. (I shouldn't even have to clue you in to which one I am referring to) SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. the very thought of you as a lawyer! oh my! > >>> Not really. How many hits does your blog get? Mine is pushing > >>>50,000 views. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com > Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. > the very thought of you as a lawyer! oh my! Oh that *would* be funny. Especially in family or divorce court. I'd get disbarred for my opinions of judges :) >> >>> Not really. How many hits does your blog get? Mine is pushing >> >>>50,000 views. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >> That's not my site. (I shouldn't even have to clue you in to which >> one I am referring to) SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >>>> Not really. How many hits does your blog get? Mine is pushing >>>>50,000 views. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >That's not my site. (I shouldn't even have to clue you in to which >one I am referring to) How exciting and what a surprise. You're a firefighter who worships the military and cops. And you spend your spare time attempting to debunk factual information about cancer cures on the 'net. Wow, what a mind! You just might change the world there, hoser! >>>>> Not really. How many hits does your blog get? Mine is pushing >>>>>50,000 views. [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > debunk factual information about cancer cures on the 'net. Wow, what a > mind! You just might change the world there, hoser! More so than you, my hateful little sock-puppet. SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. On May 1, 6:58 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> wrote: > >>>>> Not really. How many hits does your blog get? Mine is pushing > >>>>>50,000 views. [quoted text clipped - 19 lines] > Looking for a new ISP?http://www.canadianisp.com > Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. Now this is just disappointing. All this time I thought he was some half-wit troll who spent his time spouting diatribe and bile, repeating the same tripe in post after post. It appeared he just happened to get into an efight with you. Now you say he's your sock puppet. I really would expect you to do better than this. If you're going to produce a sock puppet, can't you be more creative? Imbue it with intelligence, grace, and humor? For what it's worth, I found myself with nothing better to do, and watched the videos. To all you non-believers, I can confirm that following the practices shown, you can indeed keep yourself from dying of cancer (call that "cure" if you like), or from even getting it. Although there are warnings, it is their proposed method to produce the hemp oil, so unless someone else does it for you, this is what you need to do. To make a long story short, it involves boiling some highly flammable solvents. I just hope the adherents do this in very sparsely populated areas. I wonder why they feel the need to concentrate the drug. Why not brownies? --- CSM >On May 1, 6:58 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> >wrote: [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] >going to produce a sock puppet, can't you be more creative? Imbue it >with intelligence, grace, and humor? Speaking of sock puppies, lol... >For what it's worth, I found myself with nothing better to do, and >watched the videos. Good for you! To all you non-believers, I can confirm that >following the practices shown, you can indeed keep yourself from dying >of cancer (call that "cure" if you like), or from even getting it. [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >I wonder why they feel the need to concentrate the drug. Why not >brownies? I wondered that myself. I guess they want to control the dosage. >--- >CSM SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. > On May 1, 6:58 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 18 lines] >> >> More so than you, my hateful little sock-puppet. > Now this is just disappointing. All this time I thought he was some > half-wit troll who spent his time spouting diatribe and bile, [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > going to produce a sock puppet, can't you be more creative? Imbue it > with intelligence, grace, and humor? You think he's *my* sock puppet ? Umm. No. I've posted under my real name and only my real name for more years than I can remember on Usenet, now. SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >> On May 1, 6:58 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> >> wrote: [quoted text clipped - 45 lines] >I've posted under my real name and only my real name for more years >than I can remember on Usenet, now. Quit talking to yourself you Goddamn weirdo. > Quit talking to yourself you Goddamn weirdo. well, why should he? he gets a more adult and intelligent response than from you Paul T. Holland <pholland@bellatlantic.net> wrote: > > Quit talking to yourself you Goddamn weirdo. > > well, why should he? he gets a more adult and intelligent response than > from you Don't you love it when the only recourse of wackos is to call those they are debating with "wackos" (or weirdos in this case)? It's not far off that nut case who posts in can.politics and many right wing groups named Ross John Lambourn. He says that all Americans should knuckle under and give the government DNA samples and fingerprints, claiming that only the leftists would disagree; then uses Jonah Goldberg's book to claim that liberals are fascists! Needless to say, the ensuing Usenet riot resulted in both Republicans and Democrats agreeing that he was an a.shole! >Paul T. Holland <pholland@bellatlantic.net> wrote: >> [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] >Needless to say, the ensuing Usenet riot resulted in both Republicans >and Democrats agreeing that he was an a.shole! http://phoenixtears.ca/ THC in action killing cancer cells on the "Featured Experiment" "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." Margaret Mead "The more money you spend on cancer, the more cancer you get," says Dr. Sam Epstein, cancer expert and author of The Politics of Cancer "The more drugs are bought, the higher the profit. The more disease there is, the greater the profit." "Cancer is a massive industry," says Diana Ward, a cancer information advocate in London with the UK Working Group on the Primary Prevention of Breast Cancer. "We're being taught to think about cancer as you do about diabetes, as you do about asthma, and prepare for a time when if you have it, you will just be on a lifelong drug regime." The Canadian Cancer Society says; "The ultimate goal of basic cancer research is twofold: "coming up with the rare, "breakthrough" discovery that will help prevent, control or even cure cancer... contributing a small but significant bit of knowledge that will help other scientists as they work on their own piece of the cancer puzzle." but, even though 8 Canadians die every hour from various cancers, they reply; "The Society does not endorse or support medical products or dietary supplements...thanks for the information. We wish you luck in your work." Signature"The greater the corrupting power, the greater the number of sycophants, quislings and agents rallying to defend it"--Anarchore 2008 http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/ > > On May 1, 6:58 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 33 lines] > I've posted under my real name and only my real name for more years than > I can remember on Usenet, now. Not really. You referred to him as "my...", so I took liberties with that. Maybe it wasn't as funny as I thought---it wouldn't be the first time. Maybe I should have used an emoticon, but I'm too confident of my humor for that. As for using real names, I consider that a mistake. With some of the vitriol you've encountered, I'm sure you know why, but of course you're free to be less careful. Since about '95, I've used three different handles, the other two including part of my real name. It's still possible for some lunatic to track me down and harass me, but they'd have to be a little more intelligent, resourceful, and diligent than if I posted with my full real name. --- CSM >> > On May 1, 6:58 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> >> > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 39 lines] > first time. Maybe I should have used an emoticon, but I'm too > confident of my humor for that. No worries - No harm, no foul :) > As for using real names, I consider that a mistake. With some of the > vitriol you've encountered, I'm sure you know why, but of course [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > they'd have to be a little more intelligent, resourceful, and diligent > than if I posted with my full real name. Yeah, believe me, I know what you mean. I've been considering a change to a pseudonym for a while, simply because the ko0ks out there just aren't worth the stress. Ironically, nearly all of them use pseudos themselves - They don't, of course, want to take what they dish out. SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. marc! think wry parody > > On May 1, 6:58 pm, Marc Bissonnette <dragnet\_@_/internalysis.com> > > wrote: [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com > Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. lol > > More so than you, my hateful little sock-puppet. > > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > going to produce a sock puppet, can't you be more creative? Imbue it > with intelligence, grace, and humor? you may have been a bit too 'dry' for some to get it - but i thought it funny! > For what it's worth, I found myself with nothing better to do, and > watched the videos. enjoy the nap? >To all you non-believers, I can confirm that > following the practices shown, you can indeed keep yourself from dying > of cancer (call that "cure" if you like), or from even getting it. of course you can! > Although there are warnings, it is their proposed method to produce > the hemp oil, so unless someone else does it for you, this is what you > need to do. let us not forget a salient issue of quality controls on the basic 'source' product...with no lab, there aren't any. >To make a long story short, it involves boiling some > highly flammable solvents. and what about the by product residues! >I just hope the adherents do this in very > sparsely populated areas. i was thinking tunnels - isn't that the natural habitat for trolls? > I wonder why they feel the need to concentrate the drug. Why not > brownies? not members of the bakers union? > --- > CSM Paul T. Holland <pholland@bellatlantic.net> wrote: > lol > [quoted text clipped - 12 lines] > > going to produce a sock puppet, can't you be more creative? Imbue it > > with intelligence, grace, and humor? I had a drink with Ted Rogers the other day and he said that he was thinking about switching his notebook wireless over to http://www.canadianisp.com so that nobody would know about his Peer to Peer file sharing habit! > lol > [quoted text clipped - 15 lines] > you may have been a bit too 'dry' for some to get it - but i thought it > funny! Good, it wasn't a total failure. > > For what it's worth, I found myself with nothing better to do, and > > watched the videos. > > enjoy the nap? Some of it really was interesting. Whey they claim pot helps with pain, nausea, stress, etc., I can buy that. Even for those, a serious study that compared it with other available drugs is needed. However, when it starts to be the wonder drug that cures everything including cancer, it becomes comic. > >To all you non-believers, I can confirm that > > following the practices shown, you can indeed keep yourself from dying > > of cancer (call that "cure" if you like), or from even getting it. > > of course you can! A shotgun in the mouth works as well, without quite the risk to innocent bystanders. Imagine the threads they could start with that! > > Although there are warnings, it is their proposed method to produce > > the hemp oil, so unless someone else does it for you, this is what you [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > and what about the by product residues! You'd die in the explosion long before the residues are a problem. > >I just hope the adherents do this in very > > sparsely populated areas. > > i was thinking tunnels - isn't that the natural habitat for trolls? Maybe, but the natural habitat for kooks is Usenet. > > I wonder why they feel the need to concentrate the drug. Why not > > brownies? > > not members of the bakers union? One of the chief reasons to concentrate an illegal drug is for safe transport. It's much easier to hide $1K worth of hemp oil (how is this different from hash?) than $1K worth of fresh bud. Even if you're just keeping it at home, this is a consideration. --- CSM hey marc - our widdle troll doesn't even know the 'current' literature - makes him even funnier! > >>>>[snip] > >>>> [quoted text clipped - 257 lines] > Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com > Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. > hey marc - our widdle troll doesn't even know the 'current' literature - > makes him even funnier! That is usually the case with not only conspiracy nuts, but revisionists and haters, too - Using data and examples that are not only years, but decades out of date. It used to work when the only way to refute it meant trekking down to the library for a couple of hours or research, but nowadays, Google slaps their credibility in a couple of seconds. SignatureMarc Bissonnette Looking for a new ISP? http://www.canadianisp.com Largest ISP comparison site across Canada. >> hey marc - our widdle troll doesn't even know the 'current' >>literature - makes him even funnier! [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >the library for a couple of hours or research, but nowadays, Google >slaps their credibility in a couple of seconds. Suck it, scumbag. You asked for studies... I should have known better than to feed the pigs. Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and media. The government is literally killing people by denying them their medicine. This cannot stand, let us demand our Gods given rights to the plants of the earth, and give a fat middle finger to the fascist drug czars and slimey crimey neocon "ambassadors" from the US, and their mirror-image counterparts in Canada that have thrived in the wake of Bus-style war-on-terror BS that is now discreditted. (youtube) A Film By Christian Laurette - After a serious head injury in 1997, Rick Simpson sought relief from his medical condition through the use of medicinal hemp oil. When Rick discovered that the hemp oil (with its high concentration of T.H.C.) cured cancers and other illnesses, he tried to share it with as many people as he could free of charge - curing and controlling literally hundreds of people's illnesses... but when the story went public, the long arm of the law snatched the medicine - leaving potentially thousands of people without their cancer treatments - and leaving Rick with unconsitutional charges of possessing and trafficking marijuana! Canada is in the middle of a CANCER EPIDEMIC! Meet the people who were not allowed to testify on Rick's behalf at the Supreme Court of Canada's Infamous Rick Simpson Trial on September 10, 2007... INCLUDING A MAN WHO WAS CURED OF TERMINAL CANCER USING HEMP OIL! IF YOU SEE ONLY ONE DOCUMENTARY THIS YEAR... MAKE IT THIS ONE! (Parental Guidance Suggested - Mature subject matter.) Part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjhT9282-Tw Part 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysdaDhM9rfA Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGhpVzN0ik8 Part 4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9NN98CuFGA Part 5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zn6XIG_oxUM Part 6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G4Lqug_vaqo Part 7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fa2iCx3ZLgQ SignatureIf you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the f.ck would I want to have anything to do with you. Consider me a Jew. Consider me a fag. Consider me an immigrant. lololol > Suck it, scumbag. You asked for studies... I should have known better > than to feed the pigs. actually wannabe, you were be told that you 'had' to provide factual information, not just anecdotal reference hint: your 'old' information is already known should you have know better than to do what you did? of course - your 'once over lightly' doesn't begin to rise to the level of adult discussion turns out those 'pigs' know more than you thought and certainly more than you 'do'... when faced with an actual discussion about active compounds, you remained silent when shown actual current information, you remain silent yet, you then state: > Another cancer cure is being ignored by mainstream pharma-medicine and studies are being conducted, including human trials, by the very pharma-medicine corporate entities that you claim 'aren't' doing so...part one of your rant proved false - by both the [older] studies you cite, and the more current ones already discusssed. but don't let mere facts stop your foam-spittle diatribe. > media. also here, you cite news articles, we cite articles, there are multitudes of other sources... your second conspiracy count proved false by the very articles you quote... so - is it that you are a disingenuous sophist, magnificently ignorant, or are you simply a kook? >lololol > [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > >hint: your 'old' information is already known Gee I guess we don't know that the earth revolves around the sun, because that is "old information", right genius? >should you have know better than to do what you did? of course - your >'once over lightly' doesn't begin to rise to the level of adult >discussion I sure made you sit up and beg! >turns out those 'pigs' know more than you thought and certainly more >than you 'do'... Uhhh huh... do demonstrate that you are a clever pig... we are waiting. >when faced with an actual discussion about active compounds, you >remained silent > >when shown actual current information, you remain silent You didn't show anything, liar. >yet, you then state: > [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >pharma-medicine corporate entities that you claim 'aren't' doing >so...part one of your rant proved false They are doing studies using THC to treat cancer? Do tell. >- by both the [older] studies you cite, and the more current ones >already discusssed. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] >also here, you cite news articles, we cite articles, there are >multitudes of other sources... I cite articles, you make a lot of noise and kick up dust in a bid for attention or some sick desire to keep cancer cures from the people. >your second conspiracy count proved false by the very articles you >quote... You don't see much followup though do you scumbag? Without the internet the studies would have simply gone down the memory hole. And the cancer industry continues to press us to shovel money down the hole to them, in the quest for "the cure" that would bankrupt them. LOLOLLOLOOLOOLOOLLOLLLOOOOOLLOLLLLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOL!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!! >so - is it that you are a disingenuous sophist, magnificently >ignorant, or are you simply a kook? Go tell astronomers that they are kooks, because they are using Galileo's "old information". Either that or step up and debunk it. Put it up or shut it up, you scumsucker shitball. -- having comprehension issues again i see - yawn > >lololol > > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > > Gee I guess we don't know that the earth revolves around the sun, gosh! you didn't? well do try to catch up won't you? > because that is "old information", right genius? not even a good attempt at misdirection - yawn > >should you have know better than to do what you did? of course - your > >'once over lightly' doesn't begin to rise to the level of adult > >discussion > > I sure made you sit up and beg! now, now puppy - mostly the replies are aimed for folks who are interested in facts - unlike your polemical treatise now, had 'you' actually read my posts for 'content' - you would have noticed one small yet important fact: they gave 'current' information as to the studies being done - you apparently missed that - not that anyone really cares given your presentational manner. > >turns out those 'pigs' know more than you thought and certainly more > >than you 'do'... > > Uhhh huh... do demonstrate that you are a clever pig... we are waiting. tsk, tsk , already did - you weren't able to read for content - lololol > >when faced with an actual discussion about active compounds, you > >remained silent > > > >when shown actual current information, you remain silent > > You didn't show anything, liar. that you didn't bother to read it, or, perhaps weren't able to comprehend it, isn't our problem youngster. that you label someone a liar when the facts are in the archives for anyone to see is simply droll > >yet, you then state: > > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > > They are doing studies using THC to treat cancer? Do tell. i did - there's that comprehension problem of yours...or is it simply laziness on your part? > >- by both the [older] studies you cite, and the more current ones > >already discusssed. [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > I cite articles, you make a lot of noise and kick up dust in a bid for > attention or some sick desire to keep cancer cures from the people. gosh! and i even included one done by the same researcher you quoted...lololol but it's noise? from the same individual? lolololol > >your second conspiracy count proved false by the very articles you > >quote... > > You don't see much followup though do you scumbag? ah! changing the requirements aren't you? you said there wasn't any - all the while actually having some to quote - we posted others, 'now' you claim it's about 'follow-ups'? lolololololo noise! indeed youngster i guess researchers like anju preet, Kenneth M. Hargreaves, Straiker, Kunos, Di Marzo, Mackie, and others would be surprised that you haven't read their [more current] work on the over 100,000 individual web hits any cursory search gives any given month like on qmul.ac.uk, biomedcentral.com, cancercouncil.com.au, newscientist, bizjournals, associatedcontnet, and literally hundreds of other contemporary - mainstream - sites. > Without the > internet the studies would have simply gone down the memory hole. i guess you didn't bother to check mainstream outlets like forbes, sciencedaily, innovations-report, nytimes, at least 5 newpapers that i have read within the last year... > And the cancer industry continues to press us to shovel money down the > hole to them, in the quest for "the cure" that would bankrupt them. so - the money being spent on hemp/thc/[and those other pesky compounds that i mentioned and you didn't know] isn't really happening? lololol > LOLOLLOLOOLOOLOOLLOLLLOOOOOLLOLLLLOLOLOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLLOLOL!!!!!!!! > !!!!!!!! [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] > Go tell astronomers that they are kooks, because they are using > Galileo's "old information". very humorous, and totally irrelevant - you simply aren't in that class you might actually be able to conduct a reasonable conversation if you were able to discuss contemporary work being done - but you don't, so you can't > Either that or step up and debunk it. you are so on a rant that you haven't actually read what i've written - that just makes you very silly >Put it up or shut it up, you > scumsucker shitball. lolololololololol another failure to read for content - i have shown that there 'is' work being done, and there 'is' some modicum of media attention 0- that is isn't as 'you' want doesn't in any way lessen the truthfulness and factualness of what is really out there. that is just one reason why you are being laughed at - you simply don't know what is real > -- but silly thing - studies are being paid for, are being done - you are several years behind - why are we not surpoirsed.....lololol - gosh i guess all those conspiracy theories are...incorrect? lololol > >>>[snip] > >>> [quoted text clipped - 218 lines] > Consider me a fag. > Consider me an immigrant. >but silly thing - studies are being paid for, are being done - you are >several years behind - why are we not surpoirsed.....lololol - gosh i >guess all those conspiracy theories are...incorrect? lololol LOL now the retard contradicts himself and says that I was right! AHAHAHAHAA! >> >"Anarchore" <e@t.me> fell face-first on the keyboard. This was the >> >result: [quoted text clipped - 221 lines] >> >> -- |
Enable EMail Alerts
Start New Thread
Reply to this Message