 |
 | Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us |
 | Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network |
Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / March 2008Hoxsey
http://whale.to/cancer/hoxsey.html > http://whale.to/cancer/hoxsey.html The usual. What happened to the English patient who felt better after taking Hoxsey tonic for three months for his liver cancer, John? That was in 2000. Can we have an update? In the Hoxsey clinic's own results no patient with poor prognosis active cancer was shown to be rid of cancer by the use of the Hoxsey treatment alone. Ignore the promotional material and conspiracy theorizing, folks. It is time you demanded to see all the supposedly cured patients. PM > >http://whale.to/cancer/hoxsey.html > [quoted text clipped - 10 lines] > > PM Another utterance by Petey the Moron that resembles another demonic defender of the AMA's protection of its power and the medical monopoly. Consider this quote: "Still, Hoxsey's Dallas clinic grew to the point where it was handling as many as 12,000 patients, with affiliate clinics being established in Illinois, Pennsylvania and other states. In a legal action against Fishbein and the AMA in 1949, Hoxsey won. Fishbein' attorney admitted that Hoxsey' treatment did cure cancer. Judge W. L. Thorton ruled: "I am of the firm opinion and belief that Hoxsey has cured these people of cancer. Hoxsey has been done a great injustice and . . . articles and utterances by defendant Morris Fishbein were false, slanderous, and libelous." Let us use some common sense. No cancer treatment could have possibly have grown to be as large and successful as Hoxsey's unless it had some merit. I am not saying 100% effective, but it surely had merit. In the same way that Fishbein's motives were those of greed and power, using false, slanderous, and even libelous methods so also are the motives of Petey the Moron. Petey may suffer from more arrogance and pompousity than the medically incompetent Fishbein but he is just as incompetent and pretentious. DrCee You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons. >> In the Hoxsey clinic's own results no patient with poor prognosis active >> cancer was shown to be rid of cancer by the use of the Hoxsey treatment [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > defender of the AMA's protection of its power and the medical > monopoly. Wow -- asking to actually see real results is "demonic." Well, in your religion I suppose so. > Let us use some common sense. No cancer treatment could have possibly > have grown to be as large and successful as Hoxsey's unless it had > some merit. I am not saying 100% effective, but it surely had merit. So let's see the results. It should be easy. (I do note that Chuckles' "vox populi" is a delightful example of special pleading, since he would never remotely accept any similar argument for something like vaccination or chemotherapy.) | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ "Peter Moran" =Allopath http://whale.to/a/allopathy_h.html go figure >> http://whale.to/cancer/hoxsey.html > > The usual. What happened to the English patient who felt better after > taking Hoxsey tonic for three months for his liver cancer, John? That was > in 2000. Can we have an update? Lets look at one of your therapies http://whale.to/drugs/taxol_h.html Update on that, last bI heard it was a failure on its main claim re breast cancer no matter that it has killed thousands trying to do that >>> http://whale.to/cancer/hoxsey.html >> [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > no matter that it has killed thousands trying to do that John, the subject (see "Subject:") was Hoxsey. You picked it, and Peter responded on-topic. Suddenly you don't want to discuss Hoxsey. Why is that? | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" | | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" | +---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+ > http://whale.to/cancer/hoxsey.html Corect spelling: HOAXsey. On Mar 22, 6:48 pm, "JOHN" <j...@nospam.com> wrote: >> http://whale.to/cancer/hoxsey.html >Corect spelling: >HOAXsey. Wrong, harrasser and proven liar. HOXSEY. Mark S Probert, gutless wimp who said not one word when he was disbarred. Here is his spelling: Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative From: "M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-September 7, 2004" <M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t 09-07...@lambercartel.com> Newsgroups: misc.health.alternative From: "M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-July 10, 2004" <M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t 07-10...@lymbercartel.com> From: M.a.r.k P.r.o.b.e.r.t-April 30, 2004 (M.a.r.k_P.r.o.b.e.r.t_04-30...@limbercartel.com) On Mar 22, 6:48 pm, "JOHN" <j...@nospam.com> wrote: > http://whale.to/cancer/hoxsey.html >Corect spelling: HOAXsey. Go with the chemo mate ;0) Alt med is too good for the likes of you. |
Reply to this Message |
 Sign In
 Join
 My Latest Posts My Monitored Threads My Blog My Photo Gallery My Profile My Homepage Start New Thread Enable EMail Alerts Rate this Thread
|
©2008 Advenet LLC Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.