Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Vidaza, sooner or later?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fltcpt@yahoo.com - 20 Mar 2008 08:31 GMT
Hello,

A family member has been diagnosed with CMML type
of Myelodisplatic syndrome. We asked about Vidaza
but the doctor said it is not available in this country
(we are in Asia). I am wondering if anybody has
experience with Vidaza:

1. Is Vidaza some kind of suppressant that will eventually
lose is potency (I read it's only good for 1 year)?

2. I understand every individual's situation is different but
generally speaking, (I assume Vidaza would be a kind of
chemo) should we start this kind of chemo as soon as
possible? Since currently the white blood cell count is
still within normal range (while hemoglobin is really low);
or if Vidaza is only good for a year, should we want till
the situation has deteriorated first?

I appreciate any information at all.
J - 20 Mar 2008 08:48 GMT
> A family member has been diagnosed with CMML type
> of Myelodisplatic syndrome. We asked about Vidaza
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> I appreciate any information at all.

Hello,
I would suggest that you ask your questons on the MPD list here
http://www.acor.org/mlists/mlists.html
Click on the (list) name and follow the instructions and they will get
back to you as soon as possible.
Best,
J
QUESTedder - 21 Mar 2008 09:27 GMT
> Hello,
>
> A family member has been diagnosed with CMML type
> of Myelodisplatic syndrome. We asked about Vidaza

Spammer
Brand names are not allowed in the newsgroup
Natural product names are not allowed either
J - 21 Mar 2008 11:28 GMT
> > Hello,
> >
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Brand names are not allowed in the newsgroup
> Natural product names are not allowed either

There's no reason to believe he's a spammer.
However: from the Charter.
"If your post is more about medicine than cancer support, post to
sci.med.diseases.cancer instead.."
He was appropriately dealt with, by me.
J
xela56 - 21 Mar 2008 12:52 GMT
>> > Hello,
>> >
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> He was appropriately dealt with, by me.
> J

This is Usenet  free speech is allowed for better or worse. The Charter is
meaningless, if it had any teeth the spaming that happen in January would
not have happened.
J - 22 Mar 2008 03:46 GMT
> "J" <nswex@nalid;no> wrote in message
> > There's no reason to believe he's a spammer.
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> January would
> not have happened.

What happened from mid- November through January was not spamming.
J
xela56 - 22 Mar 2008 05:10 GMT
>> "J" <nswex@nalid;no> wrote in message
>> > There's no reason to believe he's a spammer.
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> What happened from mid- November through January was not spamming.
> J

I stand correct sporgery, any case it showed the total lack of control on a
usenet group.
J - 22 Mar 2008 14:16 GMT
> "J" <nswex@nalid;no> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> I stand correct sporgery, any case it showed the total lack of control on a
> usenet group.

Floods and sporges: Each person found a way to control the posts; with perhaps
help from the tips by others.
Stop the posts?  Maybe, if the antagonist was lurking and noted that people
were told to not abandon the newsgroup and were finding ways to get around
them.
Did the Chaerter/FAQ help with that? Only insofar as to instruct people to
filter undesirable posts. And if people read it and checked their Help, in
their software.
A link to every type (and version) of newsreader has yet to be found, since
versions are constantly evolving.
J
xela56 - 22 Mar 2008 20:02 GMT
>> "J" <nswex@nalid;no> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 29 lines]
> versions are constantly evolving.
> J

I think Usenet is a dying breed, people are connecting using facebook,
twitter, linked in, etc. The posts on this group is the lowest ever! People
are getting internet savvy with web 2.0 programs, Usenet is ancient
technology.
Figgertoes - 24 Mar 2008 03:38 GMT
>>> "J" <nswex@nalid;no> wrote in message
>>>
[quoted text clipped - 34 lines]
> People are getting internet savvy with web 2.0 programs, Usenet is
> ancient technology.

Different strokes.  

Wonder why you stay if you think so little of it.

Fig
xela56 - 24 Mar 2008 05:15 GMT
>> I think Usenet is a dying breed, people are connecting using facebook,
>> twitter, linked in, etc. The posts on this group is the lowest ever!
[quoted text clipped - 6 lines]
>
> Fig

I didn't say I though little of  usenet, Why do I stay? Basically it is a
habit since I have been on usenet since the late 80's when  I use to connect
with 2400 bps modem thru a company called Channel 1 in Cambridge. Computers
and Internet is involving and by the stats here you can see that
participation is declining. The reason why I don't leave this group is for
several reasons. One I have met many wonderful people. Second, I am a cancer
survivor and refuse to be bullied out by non cancer survivors who don't like
what I have to say. ( I am stubborn, but cancer has taught me to be a
survivor and not a quitter.).

Hope you had a Happy Easter. We had a glorious day, a wonderful dinner, my
kids came home from medical school and college. It has been a great weekend,
one I will always treasure.
csm7532@hotmail.com - 24 Mar 2008 15:00 GMT
> >> I think Usenet is a dying breed, people are connecting using facebook,
> >> twitter, linked in, etc. The posts on this group is the lowest ever!
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> kids came home from medical school and college. It has been a great weekend,
> one I will always treasure.

In IT terms, Usenet *is* very old tech.  This has both positive and
negative aspects, and I suspect you will find people using it for
years to come.  This group, like many, is small enough that the volume
can change dramatically from the behavior of just a few people
(imagine if two of the three most prolific posters went on vacation w/
o access for two weeks), so short-term trends aren't very useful.  One
of the things I told my students is that prognostication about
technology is easy, but seldom accurate.  Good news on your Easter,
xela---may next year be even better.  I hope you stay stubborn, and
don't bow to bullies.

---
CSM
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.