http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080229105838.htm
When Couples Face The Diagnosis Of Cancer, Women Carry A Larger Emotional
Burden Than MenScienceDaily (Feb. 29, 2008) In a couple where one of the
partners is diagnosed with cancer, women are more consistently and
severely distressed than men, regardless of whether they are the person
with the disease or the healthy partner. The results of a research paper
appearing in the Psychological Bulletin report that when a couple is faced
with coping with a diagnosis of cancer, gender plays a greater role than
who the patient is.
For more than twenty-years, researchers have accumulated anecdotal and
statistical evidence that has been inconclusive and even contradictory as
to who carries the greater psychological burden in a couple struggling
with the diagnosis of cancer, the patient or the spouse" The researchers
from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and the University
Medical Center Groningen, in the Netherlands, conducted the exhaustive
study that analyzed the findings of 43 studies from around the world that
assessed distress in couples coping with cancer.
"It is the gender that maters," said James C. Coyne MD, Professor of
Psychology in Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania School of
Medicine, a co-author of the published study. "Past studies focused on who
has the cancer, not gender, and that explains the inconsistency in the
findings,"
"In practical terms, breast cancer patients are going to be, on average,
more distressed than their husbands; but the wives of prostate cancer
patients are going to be, on average, more distressed than their
husbands," said lead study author, Mariët Hagedoorn, Professor of health
Psychology at the University Medical Center Groningen.
Surprisingly, when researchers looked at anxiety in the general population
or in patients recruited from waiting rooms of primary care practices,
they found that the level of distress in couples facing the diagnosis of
cancer was only "moderate" in comparison.
"Only a minority of cancer patients suffer clinically significant
distress," said Professor Hagedoorn. "The myth that all cancer patients
are distressed gets in the way of getting the proper attention to those
patients who do become significantly distressed and who could benefit from
a clinical intervention."
ironjustice@aol.com - 17 Mar 2008 21:57 GMT
On Mar 15, 5:38 pm, J <nswex@nalid;no> wrote: Women Carry A Larger
Emotional
Burden Than Men <<
They should ..
They do the cooking ..
If they didn't do the cooking then one couldn't blame them ..
But .. they do do the cooking and since eating meat uncooked is very
uncommon .. one can assume they cook the meat ..
No denying it ..
On average ..
Who loves ya.
Tom
Jesus Was A Vegetarian!
http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com
Man Is A Herbivore!
http://tinyurl.com/a3cc3
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING
http://tinyurl.com/zk9fk
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080229105838.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> patients who do become significantly distressed and who could benefit from
> a clinical intervention."
Mary_Gordon@tvo.org - 18 Mar 2008 16:02 GMT
I would say its no big surprise women are more distressed about a
diagnosis of cancer, since the burden of caregiving tends to fall on
women, and they are socialized to feel emotionally responsible for the
caregiving.
If their husband is sick, they are faced with having to look after him
on top of everything else (kids, house, job, parents, etc.) plus
potentially - and very seriously - the loss of income due to his
illness, disability or death (given that men are most often the
primary bread winners).
If they are sick, disabled or dying, women are worried about how
everything will get done (i.e. who will look after THEM, the children,
aging parents, the home, hubbie etc.).
My mother died of breast cancer at 47 (with kids still in the house -
the youngest was 11), and like in many homes, she was the one who was
the main parent, the emotional center of the home, in charge of
everything on the domestic/medical front, keeping everything organized
and running, all the shopping etc. etc. She was most upset about all
that stuff - knowing that my father was both inexperienced on the
domestic front and not really emotionally capable or inclined to
shoulder the "mom" load.
Mary G.
anon - 21 Mar 2008 04:26 GMT
I'm sure it is often true that women do shoulder the larger emotional
burden. But it can go in so many directions.
Shortly after my diagnosis my wife decided to leave. It was all just too
much. She said she could not watch me be sick.
She is not in any sense a bad person. And I am sure that this happens, in
one form or another with both men and women. And to be "fair", I was having
other health problems before as a result of my work at the World Trade
Center on 9-11-01. It was all a strain.
As it turns out, my prognosis is a pretty good one. I have a form of
thyroid cancer that responds well to treatment, and no identified mets.
But it is very hard to be sick alone. If you have one, be thankful to your
spouse...
Anon
csm7532@hotmail.com - 21 Mar 2008 14:33 GMT
> I'm sure it is often true that women do shoulder the larger emotional
> burden. But it can go in so many directions.
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Anon
Amen. Those of us with supportive spouses (or others) need to be very
aware of, and thankful for, their help and support. I've told my wife
many times, through words and actions, how much I appreciate her.
Anon, you're not entirely alone in this, as long as you have this
group, though we're a poor substitute for someone physically present.
---
CSM
anon - 24 Mar 2008 04:23 GMT
>> But it is very hard to be sick alone. If you have one, be thankful to
>> your
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Anon, you're not entirely alone in this, as long as you have this
> group, though we're a poor substitute for someone physically present.
Hi CSM,
Thank you for your note, and for offering the support of the group.
Sometimes I do feel very alone, and it can be overwhelming.
I made some terrible choices a long time ago; 20 years ago I pushed away
someone who truly did love me. Now the consequences are upon me, for I
wound up marrying someone who left when the going got difficult.
I guess there are times many of us wish we might have a time machine: a way
to go back and take a different path somewhere. We never know what that
other path might have meant. But we wish we'd taken the other gamble. I
was a fool. Now I am a damned fool.
Anon
csm7532@hotmail.com - 24 Mar 2008 14:23 GMT
> >> But it is very hard to be sick alone. If you have one, be thankful to
> >> your
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
>
> Anon
I wouldn't be so sure. We make our decisions and live with the
consequences, but we seldom truly know what the result would have been
had we chosen otherwise, and only for the most trivial choices. The
paths *do* diverge in the wood, and you can only walk one. Even if
you trip on a root, the other path may have had tigers.
---
CSM
Scott W - 21 Mar 2008 05:40 GMT
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/02/080229105838.htm
>
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
> patients who do become significantly distressed and who could benefit from
> a clinical intervention."
I have to say being distressed when you are diagnosed with cancer is a
waste of what might turn out to be not much time. Rather then trying
to get men more distressed we need to get women to lighten up a bit.
When I was diagnosed with cancer it was not at all clear how bad it
might be, still don't know for sure. But I managed to have a really
good time even facing the unknown. I did not tell many people since
the news of cancer tends to bring people down.
I don't know about other men, but I did not want to talk at length
about my feeling of having cancer.
My wife was great through all of this, she was pretty upset about the
whole thing but tried hard not to bring me down.
If you think you might not have much time left, it is time to party
hard IMO.
Scott