Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / March 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Converting Salt Water into Fuel

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Gadget Inspector - 05 Mar 2008 09:51 GMT
This amazing invention works by using a generator that emits 14-
megahertz radio waves that bombard a solution of salt and water. No
one knows for certain what happens thereafter but everything indicates
that the sodium chloride may weaken the bonds between the strong
oxygen and hydrogen atoms in water and the radio waves break apart the
bonds and liberate flammable hydrogen gas molecules.
A simple spark is all is needed then to ignite the hydrogen,
generating an intense flame that produces enough heat to power up an
engine:
http://gadgetgreeninspector.blogspot.com/2008/03/converting-salt-water-into-fuel.html

The inventor discovered it by accident when he was working with a
radio frequency generating device aimed at eradicating cancer cells,
which incidentally also happens to work !!!
Curing Cancer with Radio Waves:
http://gadgetmedicalinspector.blogspot.com/2008/03/curing-cancer-with-radio-wave
s.html


And all this, that has left the scientific community completely
astonished, comes from a retired radio and television broadcaster with
no academic qualifications ...
Ray King - 05 Mar 2008 14:26 GMT
You would be further along and more efficient if you forgot about the high
frequency generation to make the 14 mhz and just drive an electric motor
with that energy. Every time ( processing stage ) is introduced the more
energy is wasted.

Ray

> This amazing invention works by using a generator that emits 14-
> megahertz radio waves that bombard a solution of salt and water. No
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> astonished, comes from a retired radio and television broadcaster with
> no academic qualifications ...
Sam Wormley - 05 Mar 2008 15:47 GMT
> This amazing invention works by using a generator that emits 14-
> megahertz radio waves that bombard a solution of salt and water. No
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
> astonished, comes from a retired radio and television broadcaster with
> no academic qualifications ...

  You might want to do some self education on the laws of
  thermodynamics...  How much RF energy is being used?
drceephd@insightbb.com - 05 Mar 2008 16:06 GMT
> > And all this, that has left the scientific community completely
> > astonished, comes from a retired radio and television broadcaster with
> > no academic qualifications ...

And what is the value of academic qualifications?  A paycheck and only
the ability to pass a test?  Maybe?

>    You might want to do some self education on the laws of
>    thermodynamics...  How much RF energy is being used?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The interesting part is that we can now generate hydrogen anywhere
there is salt water and electricity.  This can be a big boon for the
coming hydrogen economy.

DrCee
D. C. Sessions - 05 Mar 2008 16:56 GMT
> The interesting part is that we can now generate hydrogen anywhere
> there is salt water and electricity.

As distinct from 100 years ago, when we could generate hydrogen
anywhere there was electricity and water.

| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
|    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Anthony Matonak - 05 Mar 2008 17:10 GMT
...
> The interesting part is that we can now generate hydrogen anywhere
> there is salt water and electricity.  This can be a big boon for the
> coming hydrogen economy.

We always could generate hydrogen anywhere there is water
and electricity. This RF process is a lot less efficient
than normal electrolysis so it's worthless in any practical
sense.

Anthony
harry k - 06 Mar 2008 16:10 GMT
On Mar 5, 9:10 am, Anthony Matonak
<anthony...@nothing.like.socal.rr.com> wrote:
> drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Anthony

Exactly.  Even direct electrolysis is a losing proposition.  The
inventor of this thing has discovered a way to waste even more energy.

Harry K
Sam Wormley - 05 Mar 2008 22:51 GMT
>>> And all this, that has left the scientific community completely
>>> astonished, comes from a retired radio and television broadcaster with
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> DrCee

  Takes more energy to make the hydrogen than you would
  get back by burning it.... did you miss that important point?
D. C. Sessions - 05 Mar 2008 23:11 GMT
>    Takes more energy to make the hydrogen than you would
>    get back by burning it.... did you miss that important point?

That's just a lie put out by the Illuminati to support their
control of the world through energy sources.

We are reliably informed that the Grand Conspiracy has been
suppressing the physics of free energy since the early 20th
Century.

| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
|    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 06 Mar 2008 13:40 GMT
> >    Takes more energy to make the hydrogen than you would
> >    get back by burning it.... did you miss that important point?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |

> |    The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?"    |
> +---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ----------+

Even if hydrogen became cheap, the natural gas pipelines couldn't
carry it as the gaskets are wrong for this gas. Apparently the
tiny diatomic hydrogen penetrates much more readily than the
larger molecules of natural gas. It would likely be easier to
convert H2 into methane before it is piped anywhere.

"It is easy to propose but harder to dispose.".......Unknown
Mauried - 06 Mar 2008 22:54 GMT
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:40:31 -0800 (PST), "trigonometry1972@gmail.com
|" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> wrote:

>> > =A0 =A0Takes more energy to make the hydrogen than you would
>> > =A0 =A0get back by burning it.... did you miss that important point?
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>"It is easy to propose but harder to dispose.".......Unknown

I dont understand the obsession with hydrogen when the world has
abundant supplies of Natural Gas (methane) and its very cheap.
In Australia Natural Gas costs a mere 1.5 cents per Megajoule.
With one of these devices
http://www.cfcl.com.au/Assets/Files/NetGen_Plus_Brochure_(ENG)_09-07.pdf
you can partially power your house on it as well.

The world is NOT running out of Natural gas.
drceephd@insightbb.com - 07 Mar 2008 00:53 GMT
> The world is NOT running out of Natural gas.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

As long as we continue to raise cows and eat...beans....I probably
could agree.

DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons
HardySpicer - 05 Mar 2008 17:50 GMT
On Mar 5, 10:51 pm, Gadget Inspector <thegadgetinspec...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> This amazing invention works by using a generator that emits 14-
> megahertz radio waves that bombard a solution of salt and water. No
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> astonished, comes from a retired radio and television broadcaster with
> no academic qualifications ...

How fast can it do this? Even though the efficiency isn't too good if
it has the advantage of speed it could have some uses. (don't expect
Physicists to understand this - it is a practical engineering point! -
they only understand energy in energy out)

Hardy
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.