> > And all this, that has left the scientific community completely
> > astonished, comes from a retired radio and television broadcaster with
> > no academic qualifications ...
And what is the value of academic qualifications? A paycheck and only
the ability to pass a test? Maybe?
> You might want to do some self education on the laws of
> thermodynamics... How much RF energy is being used?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
The interesting part is that we can now generate hydrogen anywhere
there is salt water and electricity. This can be a big boon for the
coming hydrogen economy.
DrCee
D. C. Sessions - 05 Mar 2008 16:56 GMT
> The interesting part is that we can now generate hydrogen anywhere
> there is salt water and electricity.
As distinct from 100 years ago, when we could generate hydrogen
anywhere there was electricity and water.
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
| The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Anthony Matonak - 05 Mar 2008 17:10 GMT
...
> The interesting part is that we can now generate hydrogen anywhere
> there is salt water and electricity. This can be a big boon for the
> coming hydrogen economy.
We always could generate hydrogen anywhere there is water
and electricity. This RF process is a lot less efficient
than normal electrolysis so it's worthless in any practical
sense.
Anthony
harry k - 06 Mar 2008 16:10 GMT
On Mar 5, 9:10 am, Anthony Matonak
<anthony...@nothing.like.socal.rr.com> wrote:
> drcee...@insightbb.com wrote:
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Anthony
Exactly. Even direct electrolysis is a losing proposition. The
inventor of this thing has discovered a way to waste even more energy.
Harry K
Sam Wormley - 05 Mar 2008 22:51 GMT
>>> And all this, that has left the scientific community completely
>>> astonished, comes from a retired radio and television broadcaster with
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
>
> DrCee
Takes more energy to make the hydrogen than you would
get back by burning it.... did you miss that important point?
D. C. Sessions - 05 Mar 2008 23:11 GMT
> Takes more energy to make the hydrogen than you would
> get back by burning it.... did you miss that important point?
That's just a lie put out by the Illuminati to support their
control of the world through energy sources.
We are reliably informed that the Grand Conspiracy has been
suppressing the physics of free energy since the early 20th
Century.
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
| The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" |
+---------- D. C. Sessions <dcs@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
trigonometry1972@gmail.com | - 06 Mar 2008 13:40 GMT
> > Takes more energy to make the hydrogen than you would
> > get back by burning it.... did you miss that important point?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> --
> | The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
> | The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" |
> +---------- D. C. Sessions <d...@lumbercartel.com> ----------+
Even if hydrogen became cheap, the natural gas pipelines couldn't
carry it as the gaskets are wrong for this gas. Apparently the
tiny diatomic hydrogen penetrates much more readily than the
larger molecules of natural gas. It would likely be easier to
convert H2 into methane before it is piped anywhere.
"It is easy to propose but harder to dispose.".......Unknown
Mauried - 06 Mar 2008 22:54 GMT
On Thu, 6 Mar 2008 05:40:31 -0800 (PST), "trigonometry1972@gmail.com
|" <trigonometry1972@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > =A0 =A0Takes more energy to make the hydrogen than you would
>> > =A0 =A0get back by burning it.... did you miss that important point?
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
>
>"It is easy to propose but harder to dispose.".......Unknown
I dont understand the obsession with hydrogen when the world has
abundant supplies of Natural Gas (methane) and its very cheap.
In Australia Natural Gas costs a mere 1.5 cents per Megajoule.
With one of these devices
http://www.cfcl.com.au/Assets/Files/NetGen_Plus_Brochure_(ENG)_09-07.pdf
you can partially power your house on it as well.
The world is NOT running out of Natural gas.
drceephd@insightbb.com - 07 Mar 2008 00:53 GMT
> The world is NOT running out of Natural gas.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
As long as we continue to raise cows and eat...beans....I probably
could agree.
DrCee
You cannot secure nor restore health with pus or poisons