Male, 52, quit smoking cigarettes 18 years ago (after 18 years of
smoking), quit cigars two years ago (after four years). Been around a
lot of
passive smoke, until recent years. Took a Lung Cat scan a year ago
because my
doctor and I figured I was borderline and this would be a good
risk/cost/reward tool. Scans showd one small "spot" on upper right
lobe - 5 mm.
90 days later another scan -- high contrast: no change in size.
Another 90 days later a third scan with no contrast: no change and
radiologist description now calls it fiber-something, which my GP
says
means scar tissue, rather than a spot. The GP says let's do it again
in six months. Ok, we do it and once again -- no growth and it is now
called scar tissue on the radiologist report. My GP now says we
probably don't even need to scan it again. Prudent? I thought two
years of scans was the norm?
Mark Jones - 21 Dec 2007 15:56 GMT
> Prudent? I thought two years of scans was the norm?
I had to have CT scans every 3 months for 2 years when my
oncology doctor saw a spot on my lung when a new digital
x-ray machine was used. It turned out to be some old scar
tissue from when I had Hodgkin's Lymphoma at age 15 to 16
and I give high dose radiation therapy. I had never had a
scan made with one of the new technologies such as CT,
so this initially set off the alarm bells for the doctor.
This didn't turn out to be a problem, but they did find
several chronic problems during the course of the two
years and now these are being taken care of. At least
that means that the CT scans were not a waste of time
and money.
garagecapital - 23 Dec 2007 16:57 GMT
> > Prudent? I thought two years of scans was the norm?
>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
> that means that the CT scans were not a waste of time
> and money.
How big was the spot? And how long until they diagnosed it as scar
tissue?