Hi there all. On September 2006 I was diagnosed colon-cancer
positive after a colonoscopy.
Also on that month, I had a CEA test reading of 0.4.
In December of 2006 another CEA test reading was 0.7.
And last November (2007) another CEA test reading, at a different lab,
was 0.7.
Also in December (2007) I underwent an MRI test, which indicated that
the cancer tumor was, externally, about the same size it was in
September of 2006, or about 4 centimeters.
But the MRI test also indicated that the tumor has
"disrupted" (penetrated) the intestine wall.
My question: does the CEA test reflect colon tumor growth towards the
inside, such as the "wall disruption" indicated by the MRI test?
If the answer is yes, given the fact that the CEA reading has shown
almost no change since September 2006 to last month, could this be
interpreted to mean that the penetration revealed by the MRI test was
already present in September of 2006, when the initial CEA was taken?
Thank you all..!
MZB - 19 Dec 2007 01:22 GMT
I don't understand. Wouldn't you have had the tumor surgically removed?
Mel
> Hi there all. On September 2006 I was diagnosed colon-cancer
> positive after a colonoscopy.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Thank you all..!
J - 19 Dec 2007 01:58 GMT
> Hi there all. On September 2006 I was diagnosed colon-cancer
> positive after a colonoscopy.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Thank you all..!
I think you should read this, then talk to an oncologist.
The test should alreays be done at the same lab.
http://www.medicinenet.com/carcinoembryonic_antigen/article.htm
Steph may have a comment, so watch for it.
Keep in touch and let us know what an oncologist says.
He or she will want to see the operative report and pathology report.
J
Steph - 19 Dec 2007 07:15 GMT
> Hi there all. On September 2006 I was diagnosed colon-cancer
> positive after a colonoscopy.
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
>
> Thank you all..!
No, CEA is a very blunt test. It shows general growth trends in some
tumours, that's all.
Why on earth didn't you have the cancer removed in 2006?
J - 19 Dec 2007 11:11 GMT
> "altek3000" <altek3000@lycos.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 16 lines]
>
> Why on earth didn't you have the cancer removed in 2006?
I missed the fact that he had not had the surgery.
He was here Dec/06 but never mentioned he had cancer.
J
altek3000 - 19 Dec 2007 15:55 GMT
> No, CEA is a very blunt test. It shows general growth trends in some
> tumours, that's all.
> Why on earth didn't you have the cancer removed in 2006?
Thanks Steph but I am not sure I follow.
Let me restate it: If in December of 2006 CEA reading was 0.7 and in
November of 2007 it was still 0.7, could that be interpreted as to
mean that the "disruption" or penetration of the intestine wall
identified in an MRI test a couple of weeks back (December of 2007)
did NOT occur this year, but was already present last December 2006?
Because, if CEA, as you say, shows growth trends, then it seems to me
that it "should" have showed the penetration, if it had occurred after
December of 2006.
In fact, "one" of the doctors I have consulted (a gastroenterologist)
agrees, but another one (radiologist) does not. Hence my present
confusion.
Greetings to all, AT.
J - 20 Dec 2007 10:12 GMT
> > No, CEA is a very blunt test. It shows general growth trends in some
> > tumours, that's all.
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
>
> Greetings to all, AT.
Maybe you missed some important words in what Steph wrote?
"CEA is a very blunt test. It shows general growth trends in some
tumours, that's all.
Why on earth didn't you have the cancer removed in 2006? "
J
J - 19 Dec 2007 11:09 GMT
> Hi there all. On September 2006 I was diagnosed colon-cancer
> positive after a colonoscopy.
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
> interpreted to mean that the penetration revealed by the MRI test was
> already present in September of 2006, when the initial CEA was taken?
Let's talk, before you rush off to an oncologist.
What's the size of the tumor, the location in the colon and what surgery
was recommended, please?
J