Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / January 2008

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Mets. in liver from breast cancer, female 43 yrs - treatment?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Roland Astrand - 15 Oct 2007 14:18 GMT
She is 43 years and has a tumour with the size of a fist in her right
breast and was just going to start chemo for 20 weeks in order to
reduce the tumour to an oprationable size (80% in size less than now),
when her doctor discovered spread to her liver!

What is the best treatment she can get from this standpoint? What
about transplatation? We've heard about tests with patients whos have
spread to liver from colon cancer, but what about mets from breast
cancer?

Other treatments?

Appreciate your help out there!

Roland
Norway
Steph - 15 Oct 2007 16:04 GMT
> She is 43 years and has a tumour with the size of a fist in her right
> breast and was just going to start chemo for 20 weeks in order to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Roland
> Norway

Metastatic disease to the liver is always a sign of widespread mets in
breast cancer. Surgery is not an option. The situation with colon cancer is
rather special
Treatment will certainly be chemotherapy, but will be palliative.
J - 15 Oct 2007 23:51 GMT
> > She is 43 years and has a tumour with the size of a fist in her right
> > breast and was just going to start chemo for 20 weeks in order to
[quoted text clipped - 17 lines]
> rather special
> Treatment will certainly be chemotherapy, but will be palliative.

No surgery for the breast, then, Steph?

Would the picture be better if she was her2neu+ ?
J
Steph - 16 Oct 2007 02:54 GMT
>> > She is 43 years and has a tumour with the size of a fist in her right
>> > breast and was just going to start chemo for 20 weeks in order to
[quoted text clipped - 23 lines]
> Would the picture be better if she was her2neu+ ?
> J

Surgery might be appropriate for issues of local control, but not cure
her2neu doesn't matter
Roland Astrand - 25 Jan 2008 22:17 GMT
Hello J,

J

I hope this e-mail get to you. It is regarding her stage4 inoperable
Metatstatic Breast Cancer. By now she has had her 5th cemo (separated
by 3 weeks) She gets "Cyclophosphamide - Epirubicin - Flourouracil"
each time. After the last chemo, she got a bad reaction in the sence
of water in her right lung, embolus in the artery from the lungs (poor
O2 uptake) and some trouble with the liver.

Her doctor says that all this was because of the chemo and they will
now replace the Epuribicin with Taxotere.

The tomour is now reduced to half of what it was in October and the
spots on the liver have not developed (good) but there are mets to her
right lung, that they hope wil be stopped by the new "cocktail".

Now to my questions:

1) I read somewhere once about approx 260 patients with stage-4 mets
breast cancer of what some 50 patients survived 3 years and 16 were
still living after 15 years (I think in that order). Do you have ref.
such statistics and where I can find it?

2) In Dec 2006 I read a long posting "Surviving Cancer" posted by
Eli_S and signed by Mrs "TQ". She had survived cancer for almost 50
years and gave us her own story. Have you heard of this and do you
know if she is living today?

Roland

old posting---------------------------------------------------------
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:52:35 -0400, you wrote:

|> > She is 43 years and has a tumour with the size of a fist in her right
|> > breast and was just going to start chemo for 20 weeks in order to
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
|Would the picture be better if she was her2neu+ ?
|J

|> > She is 43 years and has a tumour with the size of a fist in her right
|> > breast and was just going to start chemo for 20 weeks in order to
[quoted text clipped - 22 lines]
|Would the picture be better if she was her2neu+ ?
|J
J - 26 Jan 2008 01:29 GMT
> Hello J,
>
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Roland

Hello Roland,
TQ asked Eli to post this if he didn't hear from her by Dec 12th.
http://www.health-forums.com/alt-support-cancer/tq-surviving-cancer-5934.html
She had multiple cancer diagnoses over almost 5 decades and was battling one again
so maybe she didn't make it.
Some of her cancers might have been early stage and cured with surgery, like skin
cancers.
No, I've not heard from her again and there's nothing more on her webpage.

Metastatic disease (Stage IV) is incurable. The five-year survival rate is about 5
to 10%.
I think the ones with metastatic cancer (Stage IV) who survive the longest have
only low-volume amounts of cancer in the bone.  If it's found at the stage where
it's spread throughout the body, it's less optimistic.

So remember that chemo is palliative to reduce the size of the tumor and make the
person feel better if the tumor's causing symptoms and in so doing may result in
some prolongation of life.  In the common cancers, like your wife's, chemo does
not reduce tumors to nothing; just too small to be seen on scans, for a while.

When they say "stopped", they mean stopped from growing for a while.

So please make sure your wife has breaks so she is able to the things she loves to
do, visit old friends, family, travel or whatever pleases her. You too !

Let us know how you're doing - you're important as well.
Best,
J
Alex - 16 Oct 2007 00:12 GMT
> She is 43 years and has a tumour with the size of a fist in her right
> breast and was just going to start chemo for 20 weeks in order to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Roland
> Norway

Treatment for metstatic cancer is systemic....more chemo. Some opt for
pallative care treatment of symptoms only, Bone Marrow transplant was
shown not  to be effective for breast cancer.
http://www.webmd.com/breast-cancer/guide/bone-marrow-transplantation

I am assuming if she was HER2 positive she would be getting it
preoperatively. Here is a link to a email group for breast mets

http://www.bcmets.org/
Steph - 16 Oct 2007 02:54 GMT
> I am assuming if she was HER2 positive she would be getting it
> preoperatively.

Why?
Alex - 16 Oct 2007 03:42 GMT
> > I am assuming if she was HER2 positive she would be getting it
> > preoperatively.
>
> Why?

Neo adjunctive chemo is targeted for the tumor, if the tumor tested
positive for HER/2 that would be the treatment choice, It seems to be
accepted treatment worldwide
http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v94/n2/full/6602930a.html

That is why I made that conclusion but with the limited information
given it was just a guess.
Steph - 16 Oct 2007 06:56 GMT
>> > I am assuming if she was HER2 positive she would be getting it
>> > preoperatively.
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> That is why I made that conclusion but with the limited information
> given it was just a guess.

"neoadjunctive treatment"?
We're talking metastatic disease here, not localised and potentially curable
disease.
The patient he posted about is stage 4, your irrelevant trial was for
patients with stage 2 and 3 disease who were being treated for cure.

Why on earth do you post ill-informed nonsense after ill-informed nonsense?
Alex - 16 Oct 2007 22:55 GMT
> >> "Alex" <usenetg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> The patient he posted about is stage 4, your irrelevant trial was for
> patients with stage 2 and 3 disease who were being treated for cure.

I didn't post any trial but an consumer article about Bone Marrow
Transplant and how it is NOT effective for stage IV breast cancer, it
is NOT an option.

> Why on earth do you post ill-informed nonsense after ill-informed nonsense?

I think if you read the post the patient was diagnosed with a large
tumor, with the goal of reducing the tumor to save the breast.....the
standard of care is to test the tumor for hormone status and her/2.
Yes the initial goal was to cure the cancer and have surgery which is
stage 2 o3 3.J asked about Herceptin which I added that would have
been tested and treated during the initial curative treatment.

I said palliative care is an option for stage IV, while some elect to
have chemo. Chemo has been shown to prolong life in Stage IV Breast
Cancer.   It is a whole new ball game when diagnosis stage IV.

Do you not give herceptin to patients for neoadjuctive therapy prior
to surgery? It is give in the US to for breast sparing surgery.
Steph - 17 Oct 2007 04:13 GMT
>> >> "Alex" <usenetg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
[quoted text clipped - 40 lines]
> Do you not give herceptin to patients for neoadjuctive therapy prior
> to surgery? It is give in the US to for breast sparing surgery.

For patients who already have metastatic disease in the liver?
J - 17 Oct 2007 23:46 GMT
> >> >> "Alex" <usenetg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
>
> For patients who already have metastatic disease in the liver?

There's a her2neu forum http://her2support.org/ if Alex wants to check it.
herceptin.com does not mention neoadjuvant nor does cancer care ontario
that I could see
http://www.cancercare.on.ca/pdf/pebc1-15s.pdf
nor wikipedia, that I could see , if someone wants to check
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herceptin
It sounds like it potentiates the effect of other chemotherapies in certain
people?
J
xela56 - 18 Oct 2007 03:36 GMT
> For patients who already have metastatic disease in the liver?

Yes NCCN guidelines suggest the use.
Steph - 18 Oct 2007 06:34 GMT
>> For patients who already have metastatic disease in the liver?
>
> Yes NCCN guidelines suggest the use.

They certainly DO NOT suggest the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for
patients with liver metastases, so either you misunderstood them, or you're
telling porkies. Would you like to post the citation?
starfleet - 20 Oct 2007 06:58 GMT
Steph schreef:
>  
>>> For patients who already have metastatic disease in the liver?
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
>
>  
She misunderstood the neoadjuvant  part.

Anne
Steph - 20 Oct 2007 08:20 GMT
> Steph schreef:
>>
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
>
> Anne

A little knowledge is a dangerous thing
Alex - 21 Oct 2007 00:27 GMT
> Steph schreef:> "xela56" <noacco...@nw.nl> wrote in message
> >news:aPidndQwP6ofW4vanZ2dnUVZ_gudnZ2d@comcast.com...
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Anne

I didn't misunderstand the tern neoadjuctive , according to the post,
the woman was newly diagnosed with breast cancer getting neo adjuc
chemo then diagnosed with liver mets.
J - 17 Oct 2007 20:16 GMT
> > "Alex" <usenetg...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> Transplant and how it is NOT effective for stage IV breast cancer, it
> is NOT an option.

The OP was asking about a liver transplant, not a bone marrow transplant.
J

> > Why on earth do you post ill-informed nonsense after ill-informed nonsense?
Roland Astrand - 17 Oct 2007 21:06 GMT
> I didn't post any trial but an consumer article about Bone Marrow
> Transplant and how it is NOT effective for stage IV breast cancer, it
> is NOT an option.

The OP was asking about a liver transplant, not a bone marrow
transplant.
J

> > Why on earth do you post ill-informed nonsense after ill-informed nonsense?

I appreciate yourpostings and follow with interest. Now the chemo has
started and the 3 weeks to come will be very "exciting". Guess the
reaction to the first chemo will indicate the result of the following
8 treatments on to the end of December?!

Regards
Roland
Steph - 18 Oct 2007 06:32 GMT
>> I didn't post any trial but an consumer article about Bone Marrow
>> Transplant and how it is NOT effective for stage IV breast cancer, it
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
> Regards
> Roland

Response to chemo in breast cancer, especially inflammatory, is sometimes
dramatic, but often more slow. I don't think you'll be able to draw any
conclusions necessarily from one cycle.
Roland Astrand - 29 Oct 2007 16:50 GMT
Tried to reach you on e-mail but nil.

After my posting here I got some info from a Finish friend, who has
been treated for oral cancer for +20 years. He sent me some info
regarding treatments and diets etc. Now my question:

Would it be ok for you, if I send his comments to you via e-mail for
you to have a look at? I have sorted the info into three categories
(treatments, cototoxic agents and diet/health foods, so it should be
easy to get a quick overview.

Roland

|>> I didn't post any trial but an consumer article about Bone Marrow
|>> Transplant and how it is NOT effective for stage IV breast cancer, it
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
|dramatic, but often more slow. I don't think you'll be able to draw any
|conclusions necessarily from one cycle.
J - 30 Oct 2007 00:51 GMT
> Tried to reach you on e-mail but nil.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Roland

Sounds like questions for her oncologist.
Steph does not email.
Alternatively, run it by alt.support.cancer.breast please.
J
Alex - 30 Oct 2007 02:04 GMT
> > Tried to reach you on e-mail but nil.
>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> Alternatively, run it by alt.support.cancer.breast please.
> J

Oral cancer on the breast cancer support group. It does not make sense.
J - 30 Oct 2007 20:56 GMT
> > > Tried to reach you on e-mail but nil.
> >
[quoted text clipped - 15 lines]
>
> Oral cancer on the breast cancer support group. It does not make sense.

He did not write "got some info for". He wrote "got some info from".
We're not in an oral cancer thread. Look at the topic/subject line.
That's how I drew my conclusion.
J
Steph - 30 Oct 2007 02:32 GMT
> Tried to reach you on e-mail but nil.
>
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>
> Roland

You really should be discussing these with your wife's oncologist.
My email isn't my email, if you know what I mean
Roland Astrand - 30 Oct 2007 09:49 GMT
Steph,

Yes I'm going to discuss it with ther oncologist, but he is on holiday
for another week. This is a small country with few oncologist
available! So just wanted a (2nd) evaluation :-)

But ok, I get the point - thank you
Roland
Norway

|> Tried to reach you on e-mail but nil.
|>
[quoted text clipped - 11 lines]
|You really should be discussing these with your wife's oncologist.
|My email isn't my email, if you know what I mean
Roland Astrand - 31 Oct 2007 22:30 GMT
Today I had a short conversation with her oncologist on phone. This is
the brief information I got:

Diagnose codes: C48.7 - C50.9 - C79.5.

The chemo therapy consist of the following drugs in combination for 8
cycles: Cyclophosphamide - Epirubicin - Flourouracil, intravnniously
injected.

Any comments?

Regards
Roland

|Steph,
|
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
||You really should be discussing these with your wife's oncologist.
||My email isn't my email, if you know what I mean
Steph - 01 Nov 2007 02:38 GMT
> Today I had a short conversation with her oncologist on phone. This is
> the brief information I got:
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Regards
> Roland

Pretty standard palliative chemotherapy in the circumstances.
cancerblog@hotmail.com - 17 Oct 2007 21:25 GMT
> She is 43 years and has a tumour with the size of a fist in her right
> breast and was just going to start chemo for 20 weeks in order to
[quoted text clipped - 12 lines]
> Roland
> Norway

Try to

treat cancer with flavonoids!!!
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.