Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / December 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

NSCLC changing to SCLC

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Mark - 25 Dec 2006 12:15 GMT
Anybody ever hear of this?

Mark
auntiesuz - 25 Dec 2006 15:25 GMT
> Anybody ever hear of this?
>
> Mark

A possible explanation is a change in the pathologic classification of
SCLC, in which some tumors which would have been called SCLC in the
past are now identified as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with
neuroendocrine features.
Steph - 25 Dec 2006 19:39 GMT
> Anybody ever hear of this?
>
> Mark

Mixed cancers are not that uncommon.
J - 26 Dec 2006 11:50 GMT
> "Mark" <cirone@comcast.net> wrote in message
> > Anybody ever hear of this?
> >
> > Mark
>
> Mixed cancers are not that uncommon.

Steph,
Can being on treatments _longterm_ cause another cancer OR a new cancer
and/or more aggressive cancer to start or an existing cancer to become
more aggressive ? (re: dna damage to cells)
J
Steph - 26 Dec 2006 18:00 GMT
>> "Mark" <cirone@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> > Anybody ever hear of this?
[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
> more aggressive ? (re: dna damage to cells)
> J

Not really
Mark - 26 Dec 2006 12:25 GMT
Steph,

Her Dr.'s are telling her it's morphed into SCLC.  Not a new cancer.  Have
you seen this behavior before and if you have what treatments have been most
successful?

Mark

>> Anybody ever hear of this?
>>
>> Mark
>
> Mixed cancers are not that uncommon.
Steph - 26 Dec 2006 18:00 GMT
> Steph,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>
> Mark

Nobody can be dogmatic about "morphing"
Likely it was a mixed cancer. The prognosis depends on the most aggressive
elements - the scslc - and should be treated as such
Mark - 28 Dec 2006 11:43 GMT
Steph,

They biopsied her lung in Oct 2005 and found it to be NSCLC.  Are you
suggesting that the primary could be this and the mets back then SCLC?  She
had a small lesion in her brain they took care of with SRS.  After intitial
chemo, she disn't have disease progression for eight months.  Her brain RI
remains clean.  Are these findings consistant with SCLC?

Also,  she's having an MRI of her hip and femur this week to confirm PET
results of mets to those areas.  If this is SCLC and it's in those places,
what should we expect and is RT the only treatment?

Mark

>> Steph,
>>
[quoted text clipped - 7 lines]
> Likely it was a mixed cancer. The prognosis depends on the most aggressive
> elements - the scslc - and should be treated as such
Steph - 28 Dec 2006 16:15 GMT
> Steph,
>
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> intitial chemo, she disn't have disease progression for eight months.  Her
> brain RI remains clean.  Are these findings consistant with SCLC?

All biopsies are subject to potential sampling error. It could have been a
mixed tumour all along, it could be a new lung cancer. In terms of
management, it's really academic.

> Also,  she's having an MRI of her hip and femur this week to confirm PET
> results of mets to those areas.  If this is SCLC and it's in those places,
> what should we expect and is RT the only treatment?
>
> Mark

sclc or non-sclc, radiotherapy is the correct treatment
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.