They'll see that SS and her husband had to sell a property to afford it.
I think I also mentioned on one or the other newsgroup, that there's
specialists (or 2) out in her area who give dire prognosis, without
apparently knowing how wonderful Gemzar is.
Clifto seemed interested. I wonder if he tried it. We'll see what he says.

Reminding folks that nobody can say there's no cancer in her husband, based
on scans because scans can only see a 1 cm tumor, which contains (approx)
1,000,000,000 cancer cells.  I was tempted to mention the product here
myself..she's so convincing but it would have been unethical for me to do
so, since one person (and/or small carefully selected person/trials) does
not a trial make and it's still early anyway.

Overall, liver cancer in adults has a poor outlook because it tends to be
diagnosed late.  By the time someone has symptoms and goes to their doctor,
the disease is very often in the advanced stages. Only about 3 out of 10
people (30%) are diagnosed in the early stages of this disease when surgery
can help.  This means that 5 year survival rates are not very reliable for
liver cancer.

Across the world, 7 out of every 100 people diagnosed with liver cancer
(7%) will be alive 5 years later.  But 8 out of 10 liver cancer cases (80%)
are found in developing countries, where it can be difficult to get
treatment.  The outlook may be better for the UK.   The figures do also
vary widely depending on the type of treatment that you have. <this blurb
has been on http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk long before Gemzar).

7 out of every 100 people diagnosed with liver cancer is still a lot of
people, folks.
Suggest to you that she's crowing too early...though I'm plaesed to read
that he's doing well.

centrewatch.com has industry sponsored clinical trials. Unfortunately, does
not list them by product or the "manufacturer" .  This particular
manufacturer /inventor has offices/web pages in US and Canada, so I
searched on Canada. (combined with 4 sections on cancer (pediatric,
treatment, pain, chemotherapy and only 3 came up for Canada).  The other
two don't seem close to Montreal.
If you're near Montreal, you might inquire what this clinical trial is
about
(doesn't state which "drug" and I think the one she mentions is classified
as a food supplement).
http://www.centerwatch.com/patient/studies/stu92387.html
The contact there has a mcGill email address , which if I recall correctly
is the University where the "proponents" of the product have claimed trials
were run, so if you're nearby, contact her to ask if that's the product in
the trial listed.  If they won't put it in Phase II or III clinical trials,
my conclusion is they won't do the work and/or would much rather not spend
the money on providing the product for trials; preferring word of mouth to
spread and line their pockets.

Up to you folks.  I'm a cynic.  Too many people have come here, with their
claims about one product or another and we've yet to hear Phase III trial
results proving better (than what's currentlly available through your
regular treatment centre) on many, if not all of the products.
J

Are you aware that you are the fourth or fifth fraud here to pander the same
letter?  It's too bad that you lack the imagination to even rewrite the
trash to make it look original.  Go somewhere else.  GOOD DAY!