Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / July 2006

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Blood test may find early lung cancer

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
J - 16 Jul 2006 21:10 GMT
<http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/Blood-test-may-find-early-lung-cancer/2006/0
7/16/1152988411924.html
>

Blood test may find early lung cancer

July 16, 2006 - 9:11PM

A blood test that looks for the body's own immune response to tumours may
provide an easy way to find lung cancer in patients long before an X-ray
or CT scan could, US researchers report.

The test correctly predicted non-small-cell lung cancer in blood samples
taken from patients years before they were actually diagnosed with lung
cancer, the researchers reported.

If the test's reliability can be confirmed, it might become the first new
blood screen for any cancer since the prostate specific antigen or PSA
test. The test is licensed to privately held company 20/20 GeneSystems
Inc.

"These data suggest antibody profiling could be a powerful tool for early
detection when incorporated into a comprehensive screening strategy," the
researchers wrote in their report, published in the Journal of Thoracic
Oncology.

Non-small-cell lung cancer is the most common type of lung cancer, and has
an average five-year survival rate of only 40 per cent.

Lung cancer is by far the biggest cancer killer globally. Each year 10
million people are diagnosed with it, according to the Global Lung Cancer
Coalition, and half of all patients die within a year of diagnosis.

Special X-rays known as computed tomography or CT scans can find lung
cancer tumours, but they have a high rate of false positives - meaning
many people have to undergo a painful biopsy to get a piece of a
suspicious lump out of the lung, only to find out it was not cancerous
after all.

By the time people have symptoms of lung cancer, it is usually too late to
save them.

Li Zhong and colleagues at the University of Kentucky developed a test
that looks for certain proteins the body makes in response to very early
lung tumours.

When they tested it in people who were being treated for lung cancer, it
correctly identified 90 per cent of cases, and with very few false
positives in samples taken from people who did not have lung cancer.

They went back and tested blood samples taken from some of the lung cancer
patients years before they were diagnosed. The test found cancer in four
out of seven samples taken a year before diagnoses, and in all 18 samples
taken two, three and four years earlier.

"Based on doubling times, a lung cancer can be present three to five years
before reaching the conventional size limits of radiographic detection,"
Zhong's team wrote.
Pen - 17 Jul 2006 18:51 GMT
> <http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/Blood-test-may-find-early-lung-cancer/2006/0
7/16/1152988411924.html
>
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> before reaching the conventional size limits of radiographic detection,"
> Zhong's team wrote.

Could be good news hey J? :-)
Hope something comes of it.
Hugs
Penny
J - 17 Jul 2006 21:53 GMT
> > <http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/Blood-test-may-find-early-lung-cancer/2006/0
7/16/1152988411924.html
>
> >
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
> Could be good news hey J? :-)
> Hope something comes of it.

See my other reply, Penny.
Must be the heat spell here. Gosh is it hot down here and more to come this week.
So I developed a plan to shower outdoors with the garden hose. :p
(saves on water, saves on gas for hot water; saves on scrubbing the tub/shower)
Gosh, does that feel good.
Don't ask me for details; a shed is involved for part of it and I hope no neighbours have binoculars. :p
How's it your way? I missed the news and weather past few days.

and tomorrow you get the scan news, yes?
Hugs
J - hoser :p
MZB - 17 Jul 2006 21:02 GMT
> <http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/Blood-test-may-find-early-lung-cancer/2006/0
7/16/1152988411924.html
>
>
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
> before reaching the conventional size limits of radiographic detection,"
> Zhong's team wrote.

That is great news. Hope it pans out!!

Mel
J - 17 Jul 2006 21:48 GMT
> "J" <macyinno@nospam.inv> wrote in message
> > <http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/Blood-test-may-find-early-lung-cancer/2006/0
7/16/1152988411924.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 32 lines]
>
> That is great news. Hope it pans out!!

I'm sorry, Mel and Penny and others reading.
I'm not sure this is helpful at all because of false positives and because they wouldn't know which lung, if at
all. So it could send millions asking for the bloodwork and then serial scans for nothing...

(unless they could find a way to target the proteins with chemo) but again, the false positives would be a
problem - people taking medicines for nothing?

Maybe it'll lead somewhere, maybe not. At least, they're working on it. :)
J
Figgertoes - 18 Jul 2006 05:12 GMT
>> "J" <macyinno@nospam.inv> wrote in message
>> > <http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/Blood-test-may-find-early-lung-
[quoted text clipped - 46 lines]
> Maybe it'll lead somewhere, maybe not. At least, they're working on
> it. :) J

When I was talking to the group of researchers at the recent luncheon
following the passage of Colorado's non-smoking law, I was asking about
early detection for lung cancer & the reply was something to the effect
that there was no treatment in the earlier stages - something about not
being able to locate it.  So where does that leave us?  You want to find
it neither too early nor too late?

I have always wondered when Socks first 'came down' with cancer.  He'd
had an, "I'm so tired" mantra for some time before diagnosis.  Well,, he
had a heavy-duty job, a long highway commute, lots of volunteer work,
then he'd be on the computer till all hours - who wouldn't be tired?  He
sure didn't seem ill, but I wonder if that was the genesis.

Fig
MZB - 18 Jul 2006 06:09 GMT
>> "J" <macyinno@nospam.inv> wrote in message
>> > <http://www.theage.com.au/news/World/Blood-test-may-find-early-lung-cancer/2006/0
7/16/1152988411924.html
>
[quoted text clipped - 55 lines]
> Maybe it'll lead somewhere, maybe not. At least, they're working on it. :)
> J

J:

True, but that's the same situation with the PSA test. If it gets high then
one takes a Free PSA Test and then possibly a biopsy. Most of those will
turn out okay. So, lots of "unecessary" tests. But, overall, the PSA has
resulted (arguably) in many lives saved. It can end up being the same here.

Still, this is the first I've heard of this. Shouldn't this be big news??

Mel
Steph - 18 Jul 2006 08:03 GMT
> True, but that's the same situation with the PSA test. If it gets high
> then one takes a Free PSA Test and then possibly a biopsy. Most of those
> will turn out okay. So, lots of "unecessary" tests. But, overall, the PSA
> has resulted (arguably) in many lives saved. It can end up being the same
> here.

That is extremely difficult to prove.

> Still, this is the first I've heard of this. Shouldn't this be big news??
>
> Mel
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.