Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / February 2006
Red meat cancer risk
|
|
Thread rating:  |
ironjustice@aol.com - 01 Feb 2006 10:28 GMT Red meat cancer risk clue found
There are health concerns over red meat Eating lots of red meat is linked with DNA damage which raises the risk of bowel cancer, researchers suggest. Scientists at the Dunn Human Nutrition Unit and the Open University compared a red meat diet and a vegetarian diet.
Their study, published in Cancer Research, found the red meat diet was associated with a higher level of DNA damage.
Previous work suggests regular meat eaters are significantly more likely to develop bowel cancer.
Almost 17,000 people die from the disease each year.
Clues
Last year the Dunn team published a study suggesting the chance of developing the disease was a third higher for people who regularly ate more than two portions per day of red meat compared with those who ate less than one portion per week.
These combined discoveries ... may give us some clues about developing a screening test for very early changes related to the disease
Professor David Shuker, Open University
In the latest study the same Dunn team examined cells from the lining of the colon taken from healthy volunteers eating different diets.
They found higher levels of DNA damage in the cells taken from people eating red meat.
Work by the Open University team suggests the reason could be the presence of substances called N-nitrosocompounds, which form in the large bowel after eating red meat.
Their work suggests that these compounds combine with DNA, and alter it so that it is more likely to undergo harmful changes or mutations that increase the likelihood of cancer
Professor David Shuker, head of the Open University team, said: "These combined discoveries have allowed us to link red meat consumption to an increased risk of bowel cancer and may give us some clues about developing a screening test for very early changes related to the disease."
'Moderation is key'
Professor Colin Blakemore, chief executive of the Medical Research Council, which funded the research, said: "Large bowel cancer is the second most common cancer in western countries and nearly one million cases occur each year worldwide.
"This latest study, together with the compelling epidemiological evidence published last year, is an important step towards understanding, and potentially preventing this common disease."
A spokesman for the charity Beating Bowel Cancer said: "The fact is a third of all cancers are linked to what we eat and we must not underestimate the importance of a well-balanced diet in the prevention of bowel cancer.
"This study certainly seems to add further weight to previous evidence about the possible link between bowel cancer and a high consumption of red meat.
"As with all dietary advice, moderation is key as we already know that a diet high in fat and red meat yet low in fibre, fruit and vegetables can increase the risk of developing this disease - currently the second biggest cause of cancer death in the UK."
Professor Annie Anderson, expert advisor to Bowel Cancer UK, said: "The new data not only provides further evidence of risk but also flags the importance of what we eat with our meat - for example, there is further risk with low fibre intakes.
"Current data on eating trends suggests we are eating more fast foods, which we know are high in calories and fat and implicated as a cause of obesity and diabetes, but such cuisine may also be the very type of meals (high in meat - and meat products - and low in vegetables) that also contributes to bowel cancer risk."
But a spokesman for the Meat and Livestock Commission said: "The results of this very small-scale study merely suggest a mechanism by which red and processed meat might possibly increase an individual's risk of developing colorectal cancer.
"The authors themselves acknowledge that larger-scale, prospective studies are needed to identify how important and robust this suggested mechanism could be."
Who loves ya. Tom
Jesus Was A Vegetarian! http://jesuswasavegetarian.7h.com
Man Is A Herbivore! http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/manisaherbivore
DEAD PEOPLE WALKING http://pages.ivillage.com/ironjustice/deadpeoplewalking
vernon - 01 Feb 2006 17:19 GMT > Red meat cancer risk clue found > > There are health concerns over red meat > Eating lots of red meat is linked with DNA damage which raises the risk > of bowel cancer, researchers suggest. SUGGEST?
EVERY real study has proved the opposite.
The next installment will be, the definition of "lots" of red meat will be a pound a day of raw meat.
Roman Bystrianyk - 01 Feb 2006 17:24 GMT FYI
"Red meat 'linked to cancer risk'", BBC News, June 15, 2005, Link: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4088824.stm
A major study has found fresh evidence of a link between red and processed meat and bowel cancer, scientists say.
The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) looked at the dietary habits of over 500,000 people across Europe over 10 years.
Bowel cancer risk was a third higher for those who regularly ate over two 80g portions of red or processed meat a day, compared to less than one a week.
EPIC's study is reported in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
Since it began, 1,330 people have developed bowel cancer.
The study also found a low fibre diet increased the risk of bowel cancer.
Eating poultry had no impact but the risk for people who ate one portion or more of fish every other day was nearly a third lower than those who ate fish less than once a week.
Strong evidence
Lead researcher Professor Sheila Bingham, of the MRC Dunn Human Nutrition Unit in Cambridge, said: "People have suspected for some time that high levels of red and processed meat increase risk of bowel cancer, but this is one of the largest studies worldwide and the first from Europe of this type to show a strong relationship."
Professor Bingham said there were several theories about why red meat should increase the risk of bowel cancer.
She believes the most likely explanation is that compounds called haemoglobin and myoglobin, which are found in red meat, trigger a process called nitrosation in the gut, which leads to the formation of carcinogenic compounds.
Alternatively, the problem might be caused by compounds called heterocyclic amines, carcinogenic compounds created in the cooking process.
However, these compounds are also found in poultry, which has not been linked to an increased cancer risk.
Professor Tim Key, of the charity Cancer Research UK, said: "This study strengthens evidence that bowel cancer risk can be cut by increasing fibre in the diet and reducing consumption of red and processed meat."
The researchers defined red meat as beef, lamb, pork and veal.
Processed meat was mostly pork and beef that were preserved by methods other than freezing. They include ham, bacon, sausages, liver pate, salami, tinned meat, luncheon meat and corned beef.
The Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) said people in Britain ate well below the 160g per day consumption levels that were used to class high intake in the study.
Mike Attenborough, MLC technical director, said: "Once again this points towards the need for moderation and balance in what we eat."
The study was funded by the Medical Research Council, Cancer Research UK and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
vernon - 01 Feb 2006 19:36 GMT > FYI > [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > A major study has found fresh evidence of a link between red and > processed meat and bowel cancer, scientists say. Garbage research. Total 100% garbage with an agenda.
They just hint at the REAL culprit, low fiber.
clifto - 01 Feb 2006 21:01 GMT > The Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) said people in Britain ate well > below the 160g per day consumption levels that were used to class high > intake in the study. !!! 160g? High intake?! I feel like I'm broke any time I can't afford to get more than that in every *meal*.
> Mike Attenborough, MLC technical director, said: "Once again this > points towards the need for moderation and balance in what we eat." Damn. Remind me not to walk too close to the meat counter next time.
 Signature If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.
J - 01 Feb 2006 21:24 GMT > Damn. Remind me not to walk too close to the meat counter next time. oh clifto, oh clifto. ironjustice is a crossposting disease. I spend so much of my time, posting the filters message, trying to convince others, from other newsgroups, not to reply to him or leave the cancer newsgroups out of it, looking up AUP's and threatening some with reporting and then you reply (and crosspost). I just replied and uncrossposted these newsgroups. Of all the people I thought who could help (longterm) here in doing such to discourage crossposts, I would have thought you. How I do it, is sort by poster and see if the poster is a regular here or on sci.med.diseases.cancer. If they are, I post to the cancer newsgroup, where the replier is a regular. If not, I post back to the *other* newsgroups to stop crossposting. vernon is reportable, but how can I threaten him (and instruct him on watching his headers) with reporting him, if you, of all people crosspost? Can't you and I align ourselves on a plan on how to discourage crossposters? And it starts with skipping over (if not plonking) ironjustice or any of the crossposters. Please. J
clifto - 01 Feb 2006 23:33 GMT > oh clifto, oh clifto. > ironjustice is a crossposting disease. I already have him in my killfile. Didn't notice the crosspost on that one. I'll try to be more careful. :)
 Signature If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin.
J - 02 Feb 2006 00:51 GMT > > oh clifto, oh clifto. > > ironjustice is a crossposting disease. > > I already have him in my killfile. Didn't notice the crosspost on that one. > I'll try to be more careful. :) Thank you, clifto. J
TC - 01 Feb 2006 22:00 GMT > > The Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) said people in Britain ate well > > below the 160g per day consumption levels that were used to class high [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > If John McCain gets the 2008 Republican Presidential nomination, > my vote for President will be a write-in for Jiang Zemin. On even the most zealous low carb diet it would be difficult to eat more than 100 to 110 grams per day. That is the high end. That is a lot of meat.
I can see how 160g might cause problems. I challenge anyone to find stats of any group of people that eat that much protein. My guess is that very very few people could sustain or would want to sustain that kind of protein consumption.
TC
Jim Prescott - 02 Feb 2006 00:17 GMT >> > The Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) said people in Britain ate well >> > below the 160g per day consumption levels that were used to class high [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] >more than 100 to 110 grams per day. That is the high end. That is a lot >of meat. Check your math. 80g ~= 3oz ~= 1 serving of meat. Even someone following the food pyramid would be getting 160g of meat a day. Someone on LC, or a typical American not watching what they eat, will probably have more than that.
Perhaps you are thinking of protein. Like most foods, meat is mostly water. A 295g trimmed ribye steak is only about 64g protein (58% water, 27% protein, 15% fat for "Beef, rib eye, small end (ribs 10-12), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled" at: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/cgi-bin/nut_search.pl
 Signature Jim Prescott - Computing and Networking Group jgp@seas.rochester.edu School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Rochester, NY
Daniel Badu-Asmah - 06 Feb 2006 23:20 GMT I am sick and tired of scientists coming out with conflicting theories about the causes of Cancer.
Red meat is a cure to Phalloidins which binds to actin filaments in the body. The only thing is whenever you want to eat red meat, make sure it is well cooked. Probably you might have to boil it for hours before eating it.
Just eat what you want and remember as a man thinks in his heart, so he becomes.
Daniel Badu-Asmah (Cancer Research Student)
vernon - 07 Feb 2006 14:05 GMT >I am sick and tired of scientists coming out with conflicting theories >about the causes of Cancer. [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] > well cooked. Probably you might have to boil it for hours before eating > it. Hours? Have you ever learned the temperature that all life dies.
> Just eat what you want and remember as a man thinks in his heart, so he > becomes. > > Daniel Badu-Asmah > (Cancer Research Student) nospam@aol.com - 01 Feb 2006 20:45 GMT >Red meat cancer risk clue found > [quoted text clipped - 92 lines] >Who loves ya. >Tom Junk results from research. Where is the link?
Ora
|
|
|