Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
General
GeneralCardiologyVisionDentistryPharmacyLaboratoryNutritionAlternative
Diseases and Disorders
AIDSAlzheimer'sArthritisAsthmaCancerBreast CancerDiabetesEpilepsyGlaucomaHepatitisHerpesLupusProstate BPHProstate CancerProstatitisSinusitisTinnitus

Medical Forum / Diseases and Disorders / Cancer / May 2005

Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

For those who "demand" follow-up (or too many) scans

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
J - 29 May 2005 11:43 GMT
Steph wrote:

> Without any evidence of benefit.
> http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7439/578
D - 29 May 2005 15:28 GMT
This is a well known fact,Steph just pointed it out(with reason,of
course).But,you see,there is also non-ionising scanning,and that is
MRI.Newest scanners can scan the whole body within 10 minutes,as good
as multislice MRI.Should one undergo whole body MRI without good
medical reason?I am convinced not.Sometimes these scans find some
totally meaningless anatomical change which warrants new testing,and
that is,as Steph says,diagnostic spiral of death.Not to mention the
stress one undergoes while awaiting for the results.I am undergoing
regular MRI's to monitor for my newly formed tumors-and each time I
feel like hearing a death sentence.No one should take these scans
without good medical reason,especially not people that are fully
healthy.Thank you for the article,J.And my thanks to Steph as well.

D

> Steph wrote:
>
> > Without any evidence of benefit.
> > http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/328/7439/578
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2008 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.