>> http://www.nofreelunch.org/usersguide.htm
>>
[quoted text clipped - 13 lines]
> exchanges with him) !
> J
Despite Zee's rather offensive attitude towards me, I agree with what she
posted in this thread about assessing the evidence objectively
zwalanga@yahoo.com - 08 Feb 2005 03:35 GMT
I will reply to you once.
YOURS is the offensive attitude, accompanied as it was by abusive
comments to me following my post to you.
Interesting that your view *blames* the cancer patient for the bad
diagnosis.
Interesting that you think you can come to usenet and brutalize cancer
patients who aren't "your" patient.
"First do no harm".
Zee
Steph - 08 Feb 2005 06:46 GMT
>I will reply to you once.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Zee
You, madam, are seriously deranged.
In what way did I blame any cancer patient for the diagnosis?
What evidence do you have that I am in the pay of the "pharmas"?
Do you understand the term "libel"?
J - 09 Feb 2005 09:38 GMT
> I will reply to you once.
>
[quoted text clipped - 10 lines]
>
> Zee
http://tinyurl.com/586py
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.support.cancer/msg/bc217a3d55eac961
http://businesscontent.telus.com/webcontent/content/Products/legal/acceptableUse
Policy.jsp
J - 09 Feb 2005 09:21 GMT
> "J" <agnalawz@privacy.net> wrote in message
>
[quoted text clipped - 18 lines]
> Despite Zee's rather offensive attitude towards me, I agree with what she
> posted in this thread about assessing the evidence objectively
I was agreeing too, including advertisements disguised as "newspaper items"
And the deranged part too.
J