Well, Eric
it may be fun for you and certainly would be helpful if/when other efforts are
not in place.
If Harpoon is redirecting the troll to other newsgroups, or reporting them to
their newsfeed and/or ISP and I'm posting the "filters messages" to ignore/plonk
the troll/loon, you are drawing them back by asking questions/responding to them.

Kind of self-defeating and others get in the mix (patients and other trolls), so
it becomes never-ending problems, just what we're trying to nip in the bud.
there were two trolls in this thread.
john added sci.med.diseases.cancer
If you must reply, take it over there, please.
madiba's reply sufficed in this instance. He fixes the messes the stated "curer"
messes.
(that reminds me, I must remember to save his post, in case he's not around, for
the next tru at that quack on this newsroup)

Since we're way offtopic here.
For those reading this post out of sequence, there is no effective " german new
medicine".
It's some quackstuff that's been posted about here for years now.
J

If you don't look you wont find.  And who can be bothered to tell you?

http://www.whale.to/cancer/testimonies.html
http://www.whale.to/cancer/melanoma1.html

Case histories from the Richardson Clinic
http://credence.org/testimon/testimonrich.htm

"We went through the records and we found over five hundred of his patients
who were alive and well five years after their treatment, with no cancer.
And Dr. Burton didn't selectively give us these. These were "take what you
want. Here are the patients I treated." So there was statistical
improvement -- more so than any cancer institution in the United States
could show."-Gary Null http://www.whale.to/cancer/iat.html

"The survival rate of Dr Burton's patients approximately doubled the maximum
survival rate of conventionally treated patients. Had these findings
pertained to a chemotherapy drug instead of IAT, massive amounts of funding
would have been allocated to investigate the drug. Once again, the politics
of cancer barred a potentially valuable treatment from reaching the
public." --J.Diamond, M.D.

In a study of 370 cancer patients on Dr. Issels' program, 87% (322) were
still alive with their cancers in regression after five years.
http://www.whale.to/c/issels.html

"While paying my respects last Saturday due to Dr. Revici's death, I met a
man who had 50 tumors in his liver. At least, he used to have 50 tumors. Now
he has two little ones left, according to a recent scan performed elsewhere.
Prior to going to the Revici Life Science Center the gentleman was waiting
for a liver transplant. Now he appears to be rather normal. He says he still
has some cirrosis of the liver, so he will continue treatments."--- William
Kelley Eidem. http://www.whale.to/cancer/revici.html

"Professor Friedrich Douwes reported over a dozen (pancreas cancer)   cures
with his biologic therapy, and enzymologist Karl Ransberger had reported on
38 cases of total remission (collected by no less official than Austrian
minister of health) using his world renowned Wobe-Mugos enzyme."---Dr
Atkins. http://www.whale.to/c/douwes.html

In an evaluation of five-year survival rates of 153 melanoma patients. Here,
100% of Gerson therapy patients with Stage 1 & 2 cancers survived, but only
79% survive had conventional therapy. With Stage 3 cancers (regional
metastases), the figures respectively were 70% and 41%; with Stage 4a
(distant metastases), 39% with Gerson and 6% with conventional therapy
survived. How Scientific are Orthodox Cancer Treatments? by Walter Last
http://www.whale.to/cancer/gerson.html

etc

I sometimes wonder if he gets paid by them (for posting the web pages for them)
and that's how he makes his living.

J

I have to agree with you whole heartedly.  However, as I have observed,
besides fighting the big C, all patients do have a severe allergy to
mediocrity and bull droppings.  This is very diffiicult to control.